TSTP Solution File: ANA013-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : ANA013-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:16:20 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 0.95s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   16 (   0 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Orderings_Oorder__class_Oaxioms__1_0,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(X2,X2,X1)
    | ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IWTIGSlkcH/E---3.1_10901.p',cls_Orderings_Oorder__class_Oaxioms__1_0) ).

cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_44,axiom,
    ( class_Orderings_Oorder(X1)
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IWTIGSlkcH/E---3.1_10901.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_44) ).

cnf(tfree_tcs,negated_conjecture,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IWTIGSlkcH/E---3.1_10901.p',tfree_tcs) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(v_c,t_b),c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(X1)),t_b),t_b),c_times(X1,c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(X1)),t_b),t_b),t_b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IWTIGSlkcH/E---3.1_10901.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(X2,X2,X1)
    | ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(X1) ),
    cls_Orderings_Oorder__class_Oaxioms__1_0 ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    ( class_Orderings_Oorder(X1)
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1) ),
    clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_44 ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(X1,X1,X2)
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b),
    tfree_tcs ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(v_c,t_b),c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(X1)),t_b),t_b),c_times(X1,c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(X1)),t_b),t_b),t_b),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(X1,X1,t_b),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : ANA013-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 15:05:34 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.47/0.70  Running first-order model finding
% 0.47/0.70  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IWTIGSlkcH/E---3.1_10901.p
% 0.55/0.95  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.55/0.95  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.55/0.95  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.55/0.95  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.55/0.95  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.95  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.95  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.95  # new_bool_3 with pid 11147 completed with status 0
% 0.55/0.95  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.55/0.95  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.55/0.95  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.55/0.95  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.55/0.95  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.95  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.55/0.95  # Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.55/0.95  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.55/0.95  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 163s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.95  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with pid 11163 completed with status 0
% 0.55/0.95  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 0.55/0.95  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.55/0.95  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.55/0.95  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.55/0.95  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.95  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.55/0.95  # Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.55/0.95  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.55/0.95  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 163s (1) cores
% 0.55/0.95  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 0.55/0.95  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.55/0.95  
% 0.55/0.95  # Proof found!
% 0.55/0.95  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.55/0.95  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.95  # Parsed axioms                        : 2785
% 0.55/0.95  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1668
% 0.55/0.95  # Initial clauses                      : 1117
% 0.55/0.95  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.55/0.95  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 1117
% 0.55/0.95  # Processed clauses                    : 2158
% 0.55/0.95  # ...of these trivial                  : 5
% 0.55/0.95  # ...subsumed                          : 438
% 0.55/0.95  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1715
% 0.55/0.95  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.55/0.95  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.55/0.95  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.55/0.95  # Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 0.55/0.95  # Generated clauses                    : 1087
% 0.55/0.95  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 861
% 0.55/0.95  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.55/0.95  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.55/0.95  # Paramodulations                      : 1085
% 0.55/0.95  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.55/0.95  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.55/0.95  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.55/0.95  # Total rewrite steps                  : 389
% 0.55/0.95  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.55/0.95  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.55/0.95  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.55/0.95  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.55/0.95  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.55/0.95  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.55/0.95  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.55/0.95  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.55/0.95  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.55/0.95  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.55/0.95  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.55/0.95  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.55/0.95  # Current number of processed clauses  : 646
% 0.55/0.95  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 156
% 0.55/0.95  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.55/0.95  #    Negative unit clauses             : 71
% 0.55/0.95  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 419
% 0.55/0.95  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 882
% 0.55/0.95  # ...number of literals in the above   : 2471
% 0.55/0.95  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.55/0.95  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1069
% 0.55/0.95  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 544654
% 0.55/0.95  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 280377
% 0.55/0.95  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 356
% 0.55/0.95  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 592
% 0.55/0.95  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.55/0.95  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 172
% 0.55/0.95  # BW rewrite match successes           : 6
% 0.55/0.95  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.55/0.95  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.55/0.95  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 58494
% 0.55/0.95  
% 0.55/0.95  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.95  # User time                : 0.175 s
% 0.55/0.95  # System time              : 0.015 s
% 0.55/0.95  # Total time               : 0.190 s
% 0.55/0.95  # Maximum resident set size: 5020 pages
% 0.55/0.95  
% 0.55/0.95  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.95  # User time                : 0.227 s
% 0.55/0.95  # System time              : 0.018 s
% 0.55/0.95  # Total time               : 0.246 s
% 0.55/0.95  # Maximum resident set size: 3508 pages
% 0.55/0.95  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------