TSTP Solution File: ANA007-2 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : ANA007-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 04:31:31 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.37s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 13 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 8 ( 5 ~; 3 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f13,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f12,f8]) ).
fof(f8,plain,
! [X0] : c_lessequals(X0,X0,t_b),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f6,f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X2,X1] :
( ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(X1)
| c_lessequals(X2,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Orderings_Oorder__class_Oaxioms__1_0) ).
fof(f6,plain,
class_Orderings_Oorder(t_b),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f2,f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X4] :
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X4)
| class_Orderings_Oorder(X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_44) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',tfree_tcs) ).
fof(f12,plain,
~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(c_1)),t_b),c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(c_1)),t_b),t_b),
inference(superposition,[],[f1,f10]) ).
fof(f10,plain,
! [X0] : c_times(c_1,X0,t_b) = X0,
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f2,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X3,X1] :
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1)
| c_times(c_1,X3,X1) = X3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Ring__and__Field_Omult__cancel__right1_2) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0] : ~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(X0)),t_b),c_times(X0,c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(X0)),t_b),t_b),t_b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : ANA007-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 15:35:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 % (14930)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.14/0.37 % (14937)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (14937)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.37 % (14937)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-14930"
% 0.14/0.37 % (14937)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.37 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.37 % (14937)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37 % (14937)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.14/0.37 % (14937)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 % (14937)Memory used [KB]: 739
% 0.14/0.37 % (14937)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.37 % (14937)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.37 % (14930)Success in time 0.012 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------