%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : ANA002-4 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 17:15:04 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.03s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8048/ANA/ANA002-4+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 37] [nf = 2] [nu = 2] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 409] [nf = 17] [nu = 24] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 3428] [nf = 130] [nu = 54] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 31816] [nf = 936] [nu = 469] [ut = 7]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 272065] [nf = 7438] [nu = 1145] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 5 secs [nr = 2369107] [nf = 49065] [nu = 10159] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 41 secs [nr = 18767261] [nf = 329477] [nu = 28443] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 57431215] [nf = 753017] [nu = 103265] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 57431602] [nf = 753032] [nu = 103297] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 57434855] [nf = 753160] [nu = 103337] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 57477767] [nf = 754548] [nu = 105132] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 124 secs [nr = 57975123] [nf = 778640] [nu = 107381] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 138 secs [nr = 65220713] [nf = 1102833] [nu = 244441] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 151184225
% 	resolvents: 145565471	factors: 5618754
% Number of unit clauses generated: 382947
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.25
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 4		[2] = 2		[4] = 1		[5] = 1		
% Total = 8
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 382947	[2] = 56798679	[3] = 81697702	[4] = 11351198	[5] = 906211	[6] = 46758	
% [7] = 730	
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] less_than_or_equal_2	(+)8	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)8	(-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 8
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 131182906
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 17349814
% Number of successful unifications: 151184225
% Number of unification failures: 277568545
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 417500114
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 57948770
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 17
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 271130
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 4
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 2
% Number of states in UCFA table: 11
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 20
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.55
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 44
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 428752770
% ConstructUnitClause() = 271134
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.24 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 503947
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------