%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : ANA002-2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v1.0.1.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 17:14:47 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.03s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP11536/ANA/ANA002-2+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 38] [nf = 2] [nu = 2] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 469] [nf = 22] [nu = 50] [ut = 19]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 3580] [nf = 210] [nu = 102] [ut = 19]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 35006] [nf = 1533] [nu = 881] [ut = 23]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 292895] [nf = 11799] [nu = 2173] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 6 secs [nr = 2504364] [nf = 76034] [nu = 19598] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 41 secs [nr = 18543425] [nf = 493597] [nu = 56665] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 55824346] [nf = 1347748] [nu = 229265] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 55824800] [nf = 1347768] [nu = 229325] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 55828270] [nf = 1347982] [nu = 229393] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 55880647] [nf = 1350153] [nu = 232266] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 124 secs [nr = 56488213] [nf = 1387849] [nu = 235997] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 142 secs [nr = 65875057] [nf = 1890144] [nu = 473258] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 151012986
% 	resolvents: 144067299	factors: 6945687
% Number of unit clauses generated: 634969
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.42
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 5		[2] = 14	[4] = 4		[5] = 2		
% Total = 25
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 634969	[2] = 55201638	[3] = 81945895	[4] = 12575085	[5] = 638469	[6] = 16854	
% [7] = 76	
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] less_than_or_equal_2	(+)8	(-)0
% [1] in_interval_3	(+)16	(-)1
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)24	(-)1
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 25
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 189504631
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 20567500
% Number of successful unifications: 151012986
% Number of unification failures: 235861913
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 16
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 510604092
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 46467390
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 359118
% Max entries in substitution set: 17
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 508706
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 6
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 2
% Number of states in UCFA table: 42
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 87
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 104000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.48
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 45
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 386874899
% ConstructUnitClause() = 508726
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.42 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 503377
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------