TSTP Solution File: ALG434-1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : ALG434-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 18:21:38 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 0.76s
% Output : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 1
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 7 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 5 ( 3 ~; 2 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f453,plain,
$false,
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f383,f374,f375,f367]) ).
fof(f367,axiom,
! [X3,X0,X1,X5] :
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X0)
| c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(X1,c_Polynomial_Osmult(X5,X3,X0),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X0))
| ~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(X1,X3,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_dvd__smult_0) ).
fof(f375,axiom,
~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(v_p,c_Polynomial_Osmult(v_a,v_q,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f374,axiom,
c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(v_p,v_q,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).
fof(f383,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : ALG434-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sat May 18 22:47:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.13/0.35 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/0.75 % (31577)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.55/0.75 % (31570)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.75 % (31573)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.55/0.75 % (31571)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.55/0.75 % (31572)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.55/0.75 % (31575)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.55/0.75 % (31574)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.75 % (31576)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.55/0.75 % (31577)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (31577)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75 % (31577)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.75 % (31577)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.75
% 0.55/0.75 % (31577)Memory used [KB]: 1288
% 0.55/0.75 % (31577)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.55/0.75 % (31577)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.55/0.75 % (31577)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75 % (31577)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76 % (31573)First to succeed.
% 0.55/0.76 % (31573)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-31569"
% 0.55/0.76 % (31578)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/55Mi)
% 0.55/0.76 % (31575)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.55/0.76 % (31573)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.55/0.76 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.76 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.76 % (31573)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76 % (31573)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.76 % (31573)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.55/0.76
% 0.55/0.76 % (31573)Memory used [KB]: 1304
% 0.55/0.76 % (31573)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.55/0.76 % (31573)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.55/0.76 % (31569)Success in time 0.401 s
% 0.55/0.76 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------