TSTP Solution File: ALG432-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : ALG432-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 18:00:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.75s 0.99s
% Output   : Refutation 0.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   16 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   21 (  12 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_group__add__class_Odiff__0_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add(X)
    | c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X),Y,X) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(Y,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_group__add__class_Odiff__0_0) ).

cnf(cls_diff__minus__eq__add_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add(X)
    | c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(Y,c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(Z,X),X) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(Y,Z,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_diff__minus__eq__add_0) ).

cnf(cls_minus__zero_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add(X)
    | c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X),X) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_minus__zero_0) ).

cnf(cls_mult__eq__0__iff_2,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors(X)
    | c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(Y,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X),X) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mult__eq__0__iff_2) ).

cnf(cls_poly__pCons_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X)
    | c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(Y,Z,X),U,X) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(Y,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(U,c_Polynomial_Opoly(Z,U,X),X),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_poly__pCons_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_p,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors) ).

cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0) ).

cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add,axiom,
    class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add) ).

cnf(1046,plain,
    c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_minus__zero_0,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add]) ).

cnf(1091,plain,
    c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_mult__eq__0__iff_2,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Oring__no__zero__divisors]) ).

cnf(1109,plain,
    c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_group__add__class_Odiff__0_0,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add]) ).

cnf(1210,plain,
    c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X,c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(Y,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X,Y,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_diff__minus__eq__add_0,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add]) ).

cnf(1659,plain,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X,Y,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),Z,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X,c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(Z,c_Polynomial_Opoly(Y,Z,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_poly__pCons_0,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0]),1210,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1660,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1,1109,1046,1091,cls_conjecture_0,1659,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : ALG432-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun  8 02:51:26 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  "."
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-08T02:51:26
% 0.18/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n027.cluster.edu at 2022-06-08T02:51:26
% 0.45/0.66  WARNING:
% 0.45/0.66     |class_Lattices_Oboolean__algebra| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.45/0.66  WARNING:
% 0.45/0.66     |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__idem__mult| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.75/0.99  
% 0.75/0.99  
% 0.75/0.99  #||
% 0.75/0.99  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.75/0.99  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.75/0.99  ||#
% 0.75/0.99  
% 0.75/0.99  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.75/0.99  ;      3127 formulas have been input or derived (from 683 formulas).
% 0.75/0.99  ;      1660 (53%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.75/0.99  ;          128 ( 8%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.75/0.99  ;         1532 (92%) are still being kept.
% 0.75/0.99  ; 
% 0.75/0.99  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.75/0.99  ;     0.166  32%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.75/0.99  ;     0.018   3%   Assert                       (938 calls)
% 0.75/0.99  ;     0.107  20%   Process new row              (2,803 calls)
% 0.75/0.99  ;     0.091  17%   Resolution                   (1,364 calls)
% 0.75/0.99  ;     0.007   1%   Paramodulation               (682 calls)
% 0.75/0.99  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (1 call)
% 0.75/0.99  ;     0.013   2%   Condensing                   (792 calls)
% 0.75/0.99  ;     0.008   2%   Forward subsumption          (792 calls)
% 0.75/0.99  ;     0.011   2%   Backward subsumption         (703 calls)
% 0.75/0.99  ;     0.002   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (750 calls)
% 0.75/0.99  ;     0.045   9%   Forward simplification       (2,796 calls)
% 0.75/0.99  ;     0.017   3%   Backward simplification      (1,659 calls)
% 0.75/0.99  ;     0.006   1%   Ordering                     (1,624 calls)
% 0.75/0.99  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.75/0.99  ;     0.002   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.75/0.99  ;     0.030   6%   Other
% 0.75/0.99  ;     0.523        Total
% 0.75/0.99  ;     0.526        Real time
% 0.75/0.99  ; 
% 0.75/0.99  ; Term-hash-array has 3,196 terms in all.
% 0.75/0.99  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 698 entries (700 at peak, 703 added, 5 deleted).
% 0.75/0.99  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,233 nodes (2,239 at peak, 2,258 added, 25 deleted).
% 0.75/0.99  ;  Retrieved 864 possibly forward subsuming rows in 792 calls.
% 0.75/0.99  ;  Retrieved 777 possibly backward subsumed rows in 703 calls.
% 0.75/0.99  ; Path-index has 2,933 entries (3,037 at peak, 3,213 added, 280 deleted).
% 0.75/0.99  ; Path-index has 7,441 nodes (7,691 at peak, 7,837 added, 396 deleted).
% 0.75/0.99  ; Trie-index has 2,933 entries (3,037 at peak, 3,213 added, 280 deleted).
% 0.75/0.99  ; Trie-index has 11,520 nodes (12,427 at peak, 13,241 added, 1,721 deleted).
% 0.75/0.99  ; Retrieved 3,788 generalization terms in 8,167 calls.
% 0.75/0.99  ; Retrieved 1,240 instance terms in 1,030 calls.
% 0.75/0.99  ; Retrieved 102,402 unifiable terms in 4,622 calls.
% 0.75/0.99  ; 
% 0.75/0.99  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 57 entries:
% 0.75/0.99  ;    57 with value 0
% 0.75/0.99  ; The agenda of rows to process has 4 entries:
% 0.75/0.99  ;     4 with value 23
% 0.75/0.99  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 157 entries:
% 0.75/0.99  ;     1 with value 25              3 with value 33               3 with value 42
% 0.75/0.99  ;    13 with value 26              4 with value 34               3 with value 43
% 0.75/0.99  ;    43 with value 27              7 with value 36               1 with value 44
% 0.75/0.99  ;    10 with value 28              8 with value 37               1 with value 45
% 0.75/0.99  ;    15 with value 29              9 with value 38               2 with value 46
% 0.75/0.99  ;    17 with value 30              4 with value 39               1 with value 47
% 0.75/0.99  ;     6 with value 31              4 with value 40               1 with value 52
% 0.75/0.99  ;     1 with value 32
% 0.75/0.99  ; The agenda of rows to give has 694 entries:
% 0.75/0.99  ;     1 with value (4 5)          22 with value (4 16)          14 with value (4 26)
% 0.75/0.99  ;   114 with value (4 6)          34 with value (4 17)           2 with value (4 27)
% 0.75/0.99  ;     7 with value (4 7)          17 with value (4 18)           3 with value (4 28)
% 0.75/0.99  ;    33 with value (4 8)          78 with value (4 19)           2 with value (4 29)
% 0.75/0.99  ;    41 with value (4 9)          11 with value (4 20)           1 with value (4 32)
% 0.75/0.99  ;    22 with value (4 10)          5 with value (4 21)           2 with value (4 34)
% 0.75/0.99  ;    44 with value (4 11)         23 with value (4 22)           2 with value (4 36)
% 0.75/0.99  ;    55 with value (4 12)          4 with value (4 23)           2 with value (4 37)
% 0.75/0.99  ;    38 with value (4 13)          4 with value (4 24)           2 with value (4 42)
% 0.75/0.99  ;    57 with value (4 14)          3 with value (4 25)           1 with value (4 43)
% 0.75/0.99  ;    50 with value (4 15)
% 0.75/0.99  Evaluation took:
% 0.75/0.99    0.526 seconds of real time
% 0.75/0.99    0.487972 seconds of user run time
% 0.75/0.99    0.038079 seconds of system run time
% 0.75/0.99    [Run times include 0.025 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.75/0.99    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.75/0.99    0 page faults and
% 0.75/0.99    34,167,568 bytes consed.
% 0.75/0.99  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.75/0.99  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-08T02:51:26
% 0.75/0.99  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.75/0.99  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------