TSTP Solution File: ALG428-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : ALG428-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:04:45 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 265.45s 35.34s
% Output : CNFRefutation 265.45s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 7 unt; 3 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 35 ( 29 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_126,plain,
( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),X0,tc_nat)
| c_Suc(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X0,c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),tc_nat)) = X0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Suc__pred_0) ).
cnf(c_715,plain,
( c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat) = X0
| c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),X0,tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_gr0I_0) ).
cnf(c_821,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Suc(X0)
| v_thesis____ ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_that_0) ).
cnf(c_839,plain,
c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(c_840,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_841,negated_conjecture,
( c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Suc(X0)
| v_thesis____ ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_1341,plain,
c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Suc(X0),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_821,c_840,c_841]) ).
cnf(c_36350,plain,
X0 = X0,
theory(equality) ).
cnf(c_36352,plain,
( X0 != X1
| X2 != X1
| X2 = X0 ),
theory(equality) ).
cnf(c_88484,plain,
( c_Suc(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X0,c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),tc_nat)) = X0
| c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat) = X0 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_715,c_126]) ).
cnf(c_90791,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != X0
| c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat) = X0 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_88484,c_1341]) ).
cnf(c_135838,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != X0
| c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat) != X0
| c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_36352]) ).
cnf(c_138933,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat) != c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_135838]) ).
cnf(c_138934,plain,
c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_36350]) ).
cnf(c_141079,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != X0
| c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat) != X0
| c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat) = c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_36352]) ).
cnf(c_269310,plain,
( c_Suc(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X0,c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),tc_nat)) = X0
| c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat) = X0 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_715,c_126]) ).
cnf(c_276113,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != X0
| c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat) = X0 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_269310,c_1341]) ).
cnf(c_541592,plain,
c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != X0,
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_276113,c_839,c_90791,c_138933,c_138934,c_141079]) ).
cnf(c_541595,plain,
$false,
inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_541592]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.13 % Problem : ALG428-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.05/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Thu May 2 22:44:05 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 265.45/35.34 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 265.45/35.34 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34 ------ iProver source info
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 265.45/35.34 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 265.45/35.34 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34 ------ Parsing...successful
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 15 sf_s rm: 141 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e sup_sim: 10 sf_s rm: 26 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 27 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 27 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 27 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 265.45/35.34 ------ Proving...
% 265.45/35.34 ------ Problem Properties
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34 clauses 491
% 265.45/35.34 conjectures 0
% 265.45/35.34 EPR 40
% 265.45/35.34 Horn 409
% 265.45/35.34 unary 166
% 265.45/35.34 binary 213
% 265.45/35.34 lits 943
% 265.45/35.34 lits eq 359
% 265.45/35.34 fd_pure 0
% 265.45/35.34 fd_pseudo 0
% 265.45/35.34 fd_cond 14
% 265.45/35.34 fd_pseudo_cond 45
% 265.45/35.34 AC symbols 0
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34 ------
% 265.45/35.34 Current options:
% 265.45/35.34 ------
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34 ------ Proving...
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 265.45/35.34
% 265.45/35.34
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------