TSTP Solution File: ALG421-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : ALG421-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 18:00:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.21s 1.40s
% Output   : Refutation 1.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   11 (   6 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_poly__mult_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X)
    | c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(Y,Z,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X)),U,X) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(Y,U,X),c_Polynomial_Opoly(Z,U,X),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_poly__mult_0) ).

cnf(cls_poly__power_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X)
    | c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(Y,Z,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X)),U,X) = c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_Polynomial_Opoly(Y,U,X),Z,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_poly__power_0) ).

cnf(cls_u_0,axiom,
    c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(v_r____,c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_s____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_s____,v_u____,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_u_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_s____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_u____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_r____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_s____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).

cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0) ).

cnf(1552,plain,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X,Y,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),Z,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X,Z,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),Y,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_poly__power_0,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1]) ).

cnf(1553,plain,
    c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_s____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_u____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(v_s____,v_u____,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0,cls_u_0,1552,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1771,plain,
    $false,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_poly__mult_0,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0,1553]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : ALG421-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun  8 08:08:04 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.46  * 
% 0.20/0.46  * 
% 0.20/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  "."
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-08T08:08:04
% 0.20/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n025.cluster.edu at 2022-06-08T08:08:04
% 0.47/0.64  
% 0.47/0.64  ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless| ?X (|c_Suc| ?X) |tc_nat|).
% 0.47/0.66  WARNING:
% 0.47/0.66     |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__idem__mult| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.47/0.66  WARNING:
% 0.47/0.66     |class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__add__abs| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.47/0.66  WARNING:
% 0.47/0.66     |class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.47/0.66  WARNING:
% 0.47/0.66     |class_Lattices_Oboolean__algebra| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.47/0.66  WARNING:
% 0.47/0.66     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 1.21/1.40  ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless| ?X (|c_Suc| ?X) |tc_nat|).
% 1.21/1.40  
% 1.21/1.40  #||
% 1.21/1.40  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.21/1.40  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.21/1.40  ||#
% 1.21/1.40  
% 1.21/1.40  ; Summary of computation:
% 1.21/1.40  ;      5663 formulas have been input or derived (from 553 formulas).
% 1.21/1.40  ;      1771 (31%) were retained.  Of these,
% 1.21/1.40  ;           64 ( 4%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.21/1.40  ;         1707 (96%) are still being kept.
% 1.21/1.40  ; 
% 1.21/1.40  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.21/1.40  ;     0.160  17%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 1.21/1.40  ;     0.016   2%   Assert                       (846 calls)
% 1.21/1.40  ;     0.146  16%   Process new row              (4,996 calls)
% 1.21/1.40  ;     0.130  14%   Resolution                   (1,104 calls)
% 1.21/1.40  ;     0.026   3%   Paramodulation               (552 calls)
% 1.21/1.40  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (3 calls)
% 1.21/1.40  ;     0.024   3%   Condensing                   (2,023 calls)
% 1.21/1.40  ;     0.112  12%   Forward subsumption          (2,023 calls)
% 1.21/1.40  ;     0.047   5%   Backward subsumption         (1,070 calls)
% 1.21/1.40  ;     0.014   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (6,442 calls)
% 1.21/1.40  ;     0.130  14%   Forward simplification       (4,915 calls)
% 1.21/1.40  ;     0.012   1%   Backward simplification      (1,763 calls)
% 1.21/1.40  ;     0.065   7%   Ordering                     (13,485 calls)
% 1.21/1.40  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 1.21/1.40  ;     0.003   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 1.21/1.40  ;     0.049   5%   Other
% 1.21/1.40  ;     0.934        Total
% 1.21/1.40  ;     0.935        Real time
% 1.21/1.40  ; 
% 1.21/1.40  ; Term-hash-array has 3,214 terms in all.
% 1.21/1.40  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,051 entries (1,051 at peak, 1,070 added, 19 deleted).
% 1.21/1.40  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 4,076 nodes (4,076 at peak, 4,194 added, 118 deleted).
% 1.21/1.40  ;  Retrieved 9,432 possibly forward subsuming rows in 2,023 calls.
% 1.21/1.40  ;  Retrieved 1,008 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1,070 calls.
% 1.21/1.40  ; Path-index has 3,125 entries (3,125 at peak, 3,243 added, 118 deleted).
% 1.21/1.40  ; Path-index has 7,258 nodes (7,258 at peak, 7,367 added, 109 deleted).
% 1.21/1.40  ; Trie-index has 3,125 entries (3,125 at peak, 3,243 added, 118 deleted).
% 1.21/1.40  ; Trie-index has 12,138 nodes (12,138 at peak, 12,692 added, 554 deleted).
% 1.21/1.40  ; Retrieved 19,151 generalization terms in 26,270 calls.
% 1.21/1.40  ; Retrieved 1,352 instance terms in 808 calls.
% 1.21/1.40  ; Retrieved 169,865 unifiable terms in 4,161 calls.
% 1.21/1.40  ; 
% 1.21/1.40  ; The agenda of rows to process has 5 entries:
% 1.21/1.40  ;     1 with value 4               4 with value 24
% 1.21/1.40  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 86 entries:
% 1.21/1.40  ;    31 with value 27              4 with value 34               3 with value 43
% 1.21/1.40  ;     9 with value 28              1 with value 36               1 with value 44
% 1.21/1.40  ;     5 with value 29              5 with value 37               1 with value 45
% 1.21/1.40  ;     6 with value 30              1 with value 38               2 with value 46
% 1.21/1.40  ;     2 with value 31              5 with value 39               1 with value 47
% 1.21/1.40  ;     2 with value 32              3 with value 42               1 with value 52
% 1.21/1.40  ;     3 with value 33
% 1.21/1.40  ; The agenda of rows to give has 1068 entries:
% 1.21/1.40  ;     2 with value (4 4)          40 with value (4 20)          15 with value (4 34)
% 1.21/1.40  ;    53 with value (4 6)          36 with value (4 21)          17 with value (4 35)
% 1.21/1.40  ;    12 with value (4 8)          54 with value (4 22)          16 with value (4 36)
% 1.21/1.40  ;     7 with value (4 9)          36 with value (4 23)           8 with value (4 37)
% 1.21/1.40  ;    19 with value (4 10)         31 with value (4 24)          13 with value (4 38)
% 1.21/1.40  ;    22 with value (4 11)         29 with value (4 25)           7 with value (4 39)
% 1.21/1.40  ;    42 with value (4 12)         56 with value (4 26)           3 with value (4 40)
% 1.21/1.40  ;    32 with value (4 13)         21 with value (4 27)           2 with value (4 41)
% 1.21/1.40  ;    48 with value (4 14)         25 with value (4 28)           3 with value (4 43)
% 1.21/1.40  ;    52 with value (4 15)         32 with value (4 29)           4 with value (4 46)
% 1.21/1.40  ;    54 with value (4 16)         37 with value (4 30)           4 with value (4 49)
% 1.21/1.40  ;    46 with value (4 17)         28 with value (4 31)           1 with value (4 50)
% 1.21/1.40  ;    43 with value (4 18)         21 with value (4 32)           2 with value (4 53)
% 1.21/1.40  ;    75 with value (4 19)         16 with value (4 33)           4 with value (4 54)
% 1.21/1.40  Evaluation took:
% 1.21/1.40    0.936 seconds of real time
% 1.21/1.40    0.868164 seconds of user run time
% 1.21/1.40    0.068201 seconds of system run time
% 1.21/1.40    [Run times include 0.085 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.21/1.40    0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.21/1.40    0 page faults and
% 1.21/1.40    63,941,824 bytes consed.
% 1.21/1.40  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.21/1.40  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-08T08:08:05
% 1.21/1.40  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.21/1.40  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------