TSTP Solution File: ALG398-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : ALG398-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 18:13:15 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.84s 0.95s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.84s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 37 ( 22 unt; 3 nHn; 21 RR)
% Number of literals : 55 ( 31 equ; 25 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 49 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_pqc0_0,axiom,
c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_pqc0_0) ).
cnf(cls_poly__smult_0,axiom,
( c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_Polynomial_Opoly(X3,X4,X1),X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_poly__smult_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0) ).
cnf(cls_class__semiring_Omul__a_0,axiom,
( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,X4,X1),X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_class__semiring_Omul__a_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).
cnf(cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I19_J_0,axiom,
( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,X4,X1),X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X4,X1),X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I19_J_0) ).
cnf(cls_mult__1__right_0,axiom,
( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1),X1) = X2
| ~ class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mult__1__right_0) ).
cnf(cls_field__inverse_0,axiom,
( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X2,X1),X2,X1) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1)
| X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_field__inverse_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult,axiom,
class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult) ).
cnf(cls_pc0_0,axiom,
c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_pc0_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ofield,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ofield) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
cls_pqc0_0 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_Polynomial_Opoly(X3,X4,X1),X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_poly__smult_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_Polynomial_Opoly(X3,X4,X1),X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1) ),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0 ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,X4,X1),X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_class__semiring_Omul__a_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,X4,X1),X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
c_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1 ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,X4,X1),X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X4,X1),X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I19_J_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1),X1) = X2
| ~ class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_mult__1__right_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,X4,X1),X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X4,X1),X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
c_0_23 ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X2,X1),X2,X1) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1)
| X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_field__inverse_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1),X1) = X2
| ~ class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(X1) ),
c_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_pc0_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X2,X1),X2,X1) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1)
| X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1) ),
c_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ofield ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
c_0_30 ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]),c_0_34])]),c_0_35]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : ALG398-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat May 18 23:35:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.84/0.95 # Version: 3.1.0
% 3.84/0.95 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.84/0.95 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.84/0.95 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.84/0.95 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.84/0.95 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.84/0.95 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 3.84/0.95 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 21634 completed with status 0
% 3.84/0.95 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 3.84/0.95 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.84/0.95 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.84/0.95 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.84/0.95 # No SInE strategy applied
% 3.84/0.95 # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 3.84/0.95 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.84/0.95 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 3.84/0.95 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 3.84/0.95 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 3.84/0.95 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 3.84/0.95 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 3.84/0.95 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 21641 completed with status 0
% 3.84/0.95 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 3.84/0.95 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 3.84/0.95 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.84/0.95 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.84/0.95 # No SInE strategy applied
% 3.84/0.95 # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 3.84/0.95 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.84/0.95 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 3.84/0.95 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 3.84/0.95 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 3.84/0.95 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 3.84/0.95
% 3.84/0.95 # Proof found!
% 3.84/0.95 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.84/0.95 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.84/0.95 # Parsed axioms : 959
% 3.84/0.95 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 3.84/0.95 # Initial clauses : 959
% 3.84/0.95 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 3.84/0.95 # Initial clauses in saturation : 959
% 3.84/0.95 # Processed clauses : 2565
% 3.84/0.95 # ...of these trivial : 144
% 3.84/0.95 # ...subsumed : 539
% 3.84/0.95 # ...remaining for further processing : 1882
% 3.84/0.95 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 415
% 3.84/0.95 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 3.84/0.95 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 3.84/0.95 # Backward-rewritten : 11
% 3.84/0.95 # Generated clauses : 29144
% 3.84/0.95 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 27179
% 3.84/0.95 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 3.84/0.95 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 3.84/0.95 # Paramodulations : 28697
% 3.84/0.95 # Factorizations : 6
% 3.84/0.95 # NegExts : 0
% 3.84/0.95 # Equation resolutions : 441
% 3.84/0.95 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 3.84/0.95 # Total rewrite steps : 5504
% 3.84/0.95 # ...of those cached : 5086
% 3.84/0.95 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 3.84/0.95 # Propositional check models : 0
% 3.84/0.95 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 3.84/0.95 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 3.84/0.95 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 3.84/0.95 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 3.84/0.95 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 3.84/0.95 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 3.84/0.95 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 3.84/0.95 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 3.84/0.95 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 3.84/0.95 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 3.84/0.95 # Current number of processed clauses : 1015
% 3.84/0.95 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 116
% 3.84/0.95 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 3.84/0.95 # Negative unit clauses : 10
% 3.84/0.95 # Non-unit-clauses : 888
% 3.84/0.95 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 26411
% 3.84/0.95 # ...number of literals in the above : 100852
% 3.84/0.95 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 3.84/0.95 # Current number of archived clauses : 867
% 3.84/0.95 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 284804
% 3.84/0.95 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 113317
% 3.84/0.95 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 507
% 3.84/0.95 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3445
% 3.84/0.95 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 3.84/0.95 # BW rewrite match attempts : 620
% 3.84/0.95 # BW rewrite match successes : 18
% 3.84/0.95 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 3.84/0.95 # Condensation successes : 0
% 3.84/0.95 # Termbank termtop insertions : 443468
% 3.84/0.95 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2050
% 3.84/0.95
% 3.84/0.95 # -------------------------------------------------
% 3.84/0.95 # User time : 0.425 s
% 3.84/0.95 # System time : 0.021 s
% 3.84/0.95 # Total time : 0.446 s
% 3.84/0.95 # Maximum resident set size: 3688 pages
% 3.84/0.95
% 3.84/0.95 # -------------------------------------------------
% 3.84/0.95 # User time : 2.146 s
% 3.84/0.95 # System time : 0.043 s
% 3.84/0.95 # Total time : 2.189 s
% 3.84/0.95 # Maximum resident set size: 2372 pages
% 3.84/0.95 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------