TSTP Solution File: ALG398-1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : ALG398-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 18:06:17 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 5.55s 1.22s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   37 (  22 unt;   3 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   55 (  31 equ;  25 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_pqc0_0,axiom,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_pqc0_0) ).

cnf(cls_poly__smult_0,axiom,
    ( c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_Polynomial_Opoly(X3,X4,X1),X1)
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_poly__smult_0) ).

cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0) ).

cnf(cls_class__semiring_Omul__a_0,axiom,
    ( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,X4,X1),X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1)
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_class__semiring_Omul__a_0) ).

cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).

cnf(cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I19_J_0,axiom,
    ( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,X4,X1),X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X4,X1),X1)
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I19_J_0) ).

cnf(cls_mult__1__right_0,axiom,
    ( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1),X1) = X2
    | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mult__1__right_0) ).

cnf(cls_field__inverse_0,axiom,
    ( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X2,X1),X2,X1) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1)
    | X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_field__inverse_0) ).

cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult,axiom,
    class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult) ).

cnf(cls_pc0_0,axiom,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_pc0_0) ).

cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ofield,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ofield) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    cls_pqc0_0 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_Polynomial_Opoly(X3,X4,X1),X1)
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_poly__smult_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_Osmult(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_Polynomial_Opoly(X3,X4,X1),X1)
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,X4,X1),X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1)
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_class__semiring_Omul__a_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,X4,X1),X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X3,X1),X4,X1)
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,X4,X1),X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X4,X1),X1)
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I19_J_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1),X1) = X2
    | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_mult__1__right_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,X4,X1),X1) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X3,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,X4,X1),X1)
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
    c_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X2,X1),X2,X1) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1)
    | X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_field__inverse_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X2,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1),X1) = X2
    | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(X1) ),
    c_0_24 ).

cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
    class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_pc0_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_q____,v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Oinverse(X2,X1),X2,X1) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X1)
    | X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(X1) ),
    c_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ofield ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(v_pa____,v_c____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    c_0_30 ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]),c_0_34])]),c_0_35]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : ALG398-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Sat May 18 23:35:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.55/1.22  # Version: 3.1.0
% 5.55/1.22  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 5.55/1.22  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.55/1.22  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 5.55/1.22  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 5.55/1.22  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 5.55/1.22  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 5.55/1.22  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 4578 completed with status 0
% 5.55/1.22  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 5.55/1.22  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 5.55/1.22  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.55/1.22  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 5.55/1.22  # No SInE strategy applied
% 5.55/1.22  # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 5.55/1.22  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 5.55/1.22  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 5.55/1.22  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 5.55/1.22  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 5.55/1.22  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 5.55/1.22  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 5.55/1.22  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 4585 completed with status 0
% 5.55/1.22  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 5.55/1.22  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 5.55/1.22  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.55/1.22  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 5.55/1.22  # No SInE strategy applied
% 5.55/1.22  # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 5.55/1.22  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 5.55/1.22  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 5.55/1.22  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 5.55/1.22  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 5.55/1.22  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 5.55/1.22  
% 5.55/1.22  # Proof found!
% 5.55/1.22  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 5.55/1.22  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.55/1.22  # Parsed axioms                        : 959
% 5.55/1.22  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 5.55/1.22  # Initial clauses                      : 959
% 5.55/1.22  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 5.55/1.22  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 959
% 5.55/1.22  # Processed clauses                    : 2565
% 5.55/1.22  # ...of these trivial                  : 144
% 5.55/1.22  # ...subsumed                          : 539
% 5.55/1.22  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1882
% 5.55/1.22  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 415
% 5.55/1.22  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 5.55/1.22  # Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 5.55/1.22  # Backward-rewritten                   : 11
% 5.55/1.22  # Generated clauses                    : 29144
% 5.55/1.22  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 27179
% 5.55/1.22  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 5.55/1.22  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 5.55/1.22  # Paramodulations                      : 28697
% 5.55/1.22  # Factorizations                       : 6
% 5.55/1.22  # NegExts                              : 0
% 5.55/1.22  # Equation resolutions                 : 441
% 5.55/1.22  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 5.55/1.22  # Total rewrite steps                  : 5504
% 5.55/1.22  # ...of those cached                   : 5088
% 5.55/1.22  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 5.55/1.22  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 5.55/1.22  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 5.55/1.22  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 5.55/1.22  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 5.55/1.22  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 5.55/1.22  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 5.55/1.22  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 5.55/1.22  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 5.55/1.22  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 5.55/1.22  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 5.55/1.22  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 5.55/1.22  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1015
% 5.55/1.22  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 116
% 5.55/1.22  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 5.55/1.22  #    Negative unit clauses             : 10
% 5.55/1.22  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 888
% 5.55/1.22  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 26411
% 5.55/1.22  # ...number of literals in the above   : 100852
% 5.55/1.22  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 5.55/1.22  # Current number of archived clauses   : 867
% 5.55/1.22  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 284809
% 5.55/1.22  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 113322
% 5.55/1.22  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 507
% 5.55/1.22  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3445
% 5.55/1.22  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 5.55/1.22  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 620
% 5.55/1.22  # BW rewrite match successes           : 18
% 5.55/1.22  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 5.55/1.22  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 5.55/1.22  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 443466
% 5.55/1.22  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 2050
% 5.55/1.22  
% 5.55/1.22  # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.55/1.22  # User time                : 0.648 s
% 5.55/1.22  # System time              : 0.028 s
% 5.55/1.22  # Total time               : 0.676 s
% 5.55/1.22  # Maximum resident set size: 3688 pages
% 5.55/1.22  
% 5.55/1.22  # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.55/1.22  # User time                : 3.252 s
% 5.55/1.22  # System time              : 0.051 s
% 5.55/1.22  # Total time               : 3.303 s
% 5.55/1.22  # Maximum resident set size: 2372 pages
% 5.55/1.22  % E---3.1 exiting
% 5.55/1.22  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------