TSTP Solution File: ALG365-1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : ALG365-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 18:03:29 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.50s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 8 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(340,axiom,
( ~ c_SEQ_OLIMSEQ(c_COMBB(c_Complex_OIm,c_COMBB(v_s,c_COMBB(v_f____,v_ga____,tc_nat,tc_nat,tc_nat),tc_nat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_nat),u,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| v_thesis____ ),
file('ALG365-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(385,axiom,
c_SEQ_OLIMSEQ(c_COMBB(c_Complex_OIm,c_COMBB(v_s,c_COMBB(v_f____,v_ga____,tc_nat,tc_nat,tc_nat),tc_nat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_nat),v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_f____,v_ga____,v_s),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('ALG365-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(476,axiom,
~ v_thesis____,
file('ALG365-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(481,plain,
~ c_SEQ_OLIMSEQ(c_COMBB(c_Complex_OIm,c_COMBB(v_s,c_COMBB(v_f____,v_ga____,tc_nat,tc_nat,tc_nat),tc_nat,tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex,tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_nat),u,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[340,476]),
[iquote('0:MRR:340.1,476.0')] ).
cnf(484,plain,
$false,
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[385,481]),
[iquote('0:MRR:385.0,481.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : ALG365-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Jun 8 11:19:21 EDT 2022
% 0.20/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.21/0.50 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.21/0.50 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.50 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.50 SPASS derived 0 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 286 clauses.
% 0.21/0.50 SPASS allocated 76438 KBytes.
% 0.21/0.50 SPASS spent 0:00:00.14 on the problem.
% 0.21/0.50 0:00:00.05 for the input.
% 0.21/0.50 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.21/0.50 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.21/0.50 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.21/0.50 0:00:00.04 for the reduction.
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 Here is a proof with depth 0, length 5 :
% 0.21/0.50 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50 Formulae used in the proof : cls_that_0 cls_CHAINED_0 cls_conjecture_0
% 0.21/0.50
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------