TSTP Solution File: ALG348-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : ALG348-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.H0CDii1rPR true
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 17:12:53 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 5.67s 1.43s
% Output : Refutation 5.67s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : ALG348-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.H0CDii1rPR true
% 0.11/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 04:45:13 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.11/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.11/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.11/0.34 % Running in FO mode
% 0.17/0.64 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.17/0.64 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.17/0.64 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.17/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.17/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.17/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.17/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.17/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.17/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.17/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 5.67/1.43 % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 5.67/1.43 % BCE start: 292
% 5.67/1.43 % BCE eliminated: 94
% 5.67/1.43 % PE start: 198
% 5.67/1.43 logic: eq
% 5.67/1.43 % PE eliminated: -44
% 5.67/1.43 % done 229 iterations in 0.667s
% 5.67/1.43 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 5.67/1.43 % SZS output start Refutation
% 5.67/1.43 thf(tc_Complex_Ocomplex_type, type, tc_Complex_Ocomplex: $i).
% 5.67/1.43 thf(v_p_type, type, v_p: $i).
% 5.67/1.43 thf(v_a_type, type, v_a: $i).
% 5.67/1.43 thf(c_Polynomial_Opoly_type, type, c_Polynomial_Opoly: $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 5.67/1.43 thf(class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0_type, type, class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0:
% 5.67/1.43 $i > $o).
% 5.67/1.43 thf(c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly_type, type,
% 5.67/1.43 c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly: $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 5.67/1.43 thf(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus_type, type, c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus: $i > $i >
% 5.67/1.43 $i > $i).
% 5.67/1.43 thf(v_x_type, type, v_x: $i).
% 5.67/1.43 thf(cls_poly__offset__poly_0, axiom,
% 5.67/1.43 (( ~( class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0 @ T_a ) ) |
% 5.67/1.43 ( ( c_Polynomial_Opoly @
% 5.67/1.43 ( c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly @
% 5.67/1.43 V_p @ V_h @ T_a ) @
% 5.67/1.43 V_x @ T_a ) =
% 5.67/1.43 ( c_Polynomial_Opoly @
% 5.67/1.43 V_p @ ( c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus @ V_h @ V_x @ T_a ) @ T_a ) ))).
% 5.67/1.43 thf(zip_derived_cl244, plain,
% 5.67/1.43 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 5.67/1.43 (~ (class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0 @ X0)
% 5.67/1.43 | ((c_Polynomial_Opoly @
% 5.67/1.43 (c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly @ X1 @
% 5.67/1.43 X2 @ X0) @
% 5.67/1.43 X3 @ X0)
% 5.67/1.43 = (c_Polynomial_Opoly @ X1 @
% 5.67/1.43 (c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus @ X2 @ X3 @ X0) @ X0)))),
% 5.67/1.43 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cls_poly__offset__poly_0])).
% 5.67/1.43 thf(cls_conjecture_0, conjecture,
% 5.67/1.43 (( c_Polynomial_Opoly @
% 5.67/1.43 ( c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly @
% 5.67/1.43 v_p @ v_a @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex ) @
% 5.67/1.43 v_x @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex ) =
% 5.67/1.43 ( c_Polynomial_Opoly @
% 5.67/1.43 v_p @ ( c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus @ v_a @ v_x @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex ) @
% 5.67/1.43 tc_Complex_Ocomplex ))).
% 5.67/1.43 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 5.67/1.43 (( c_Polynomial_Opoly @
% 5.67/1.43 ( c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly @
% 5.67/1.43 v_p @ v_a @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex ) @
% 5.67/1.43 v_x @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex ) !=
% 5.67/1.43 ( c_Polynomial_Opoly @
% 5.67/1.43 v_p @ ( c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus @ v_a @ v_x @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex ) @
% 5.67/1.43 tc_Complex_Ocomplex )),
% 5.67/1.43 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_0])).
% 5.67/1.43 thf(zip_derived_cl291, plain,
% 5.67/1.43 (((c_Polynomial_Opoly @
% 5.67/1.43 (c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly @ v_p @
% 5.67/1.43 v_a @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex) @
% 5.67/1.43 v_x @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
% 5.67/1.43 != (c_Polynomial_Opoly @ v_p @
% 5.67/1.43 (c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus @ v_a @ v_x @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex) @
% 5.67/1.43 tc_Complex_Ocomplex))),
% 5.67/1.43 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 5.67/1.43 thf(zip_derived_cl3895, plain,
% 5.67/1.43 ((((c_Polynomial_Opoly @ v_p @
% 5.67/1.43 (c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus @ v_a @ v_x @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex) @
% 5.67/1.43 tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
% 5.67/1.43 != (c_Polynomial_Opoly @ v_p @
% 5.67/1.43 (c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus @ v_a @ v_x @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex) @
% 5.67/1.43 tc_Complex_Ocomplex))
% 5.67/1.43 | ~ (class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0 @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex))),
% 5.67/1.43 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl244, zip_derived_cl291])).
% 5.67/1.43 thf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0, axiom,
% 5.67/1.43 (class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0 @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex)).
% 5.67/1.43 thf(zip_derived_cl268, plain,
% 5.67/1.43 ( (class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0 @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
% 5.67/1.43 inference('cnf', [status(esa)],
% 5.67/1.43 [clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0])).
% 5.67/1.43 thf(zip_derived_cl3900, plain,
% 5.67/1.43 (((c_Polynomial_Opoly @ v_p @
% 5.67/1.43 (c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus @ v_a @ v_x @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex) @
% 5.67/1.43 tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
% 5.67/1.43 != (c_Polynomial_Opoly @ v_p @
% 5.67/1.43 (c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus @ v_a @ v_x @ tc_Complex_Ocomplex) @
% 5.67/1.43 tc_Complex_Ocomplex))),
% 5.67/1.43 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3895, zip_derived_cl268])).
% 5.67/1.43 thf(zip_derived_cl3901, plain, ($false),
% 5.67/1.43 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3900])).
% 5.67/1.43
% 5.67/1.43 % SZS output end Refutation
% 5.67/1.43
% 5.67/1.43
% 5.67/1.43 % Terminating...
% 6.71/1.61 % Runner terminated.
% 6.71/1.62 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------