TSTP Solution File: ALG282^5 by Vampire---4.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.9
% Problem  : ALG282^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire %s %d THM

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 04:09:09 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.39s
% Output   : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  11 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (  40 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  180 (  13   ~;   0   |;  18   &; 145   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   72 (   0   ^  61   !;  11   ?;  72   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    cP: a > a > a ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    cE: a ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    cJ: a > a ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    sK0: a ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    sK1: a ).

thf(f55,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f54]) ).

thf(f54,plain,
    ! [X0: a] : ( sK0 != X0 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f51,f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X3: a] :
      ( ( cP @ cE @ X3 )
      = X3 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ! [X2: a] :
        ( ( cP @ X2 @ sK1 )
       != sK0 )
    & ! [X3: a] :
        ( ( cP @ cE @ X3 )
        = X3 )
    & ! [X4: a] :
        ( cE
        = ( cP @ ( cJ @ X4 ) @ X4 ) )
    & ! [X5: a,X6: a,X7: a] :
        ( ( cP @ X7 @ ( cP @ X5 @ X6 ) )
        = ( cP @ ( cP @ X7 @ X5 ) @ X6 ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f7,f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a,X1: a] :
      ! [X2: a] :
        ( ( cP @ X2 @ X1 )
       != X0 )
   => ! [X2: a] :
        ( ( cP @ X2 @ sK1 )
       != sK0 ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a,X1: a] :
      ! [X2: a] :
        ( ( cP @ X2 @ X1 )
       != X0 )
    & ! [X3: a] :
        ( ( cP @ cE @ X3 )
        = X3 )
    & ! [X4: a] :
        ( cE
        = ( cP @ ( cJ @ X4 ) @ X4 ) )
    & ! [X5: a,X6: a,X7: a] :
        ( ( cP @ X7 @ ( cP @ X5 @ X6 ) )
        = ( cP @ ( cP @ X7 @ X5 ) @ X6 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ? [X5: a,X6: a] :
      ! [X7: a] :
        ( ( cP @ X7 @ X6 )
       != X5 )
    & ! [X3: a] :
        ( ( cP @ cE @ X3 )
        = X3 )
    & ! [X4: a] :
        ( cE
        = ( cP @ ( cJ @ X4 ) @ X4 ) )
    & ! [X2: a,X0: a,X1: a] :
        ( ( cP @ ( cP @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X0 )
        = ( cP @ X1 @ ( cP @ X2 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ( ? [X5: a,X6: a] :
      ! [X7: a] :
        ( ( cP @ X7 @ X6 )
       != X5 )
    & ! [X3: a] :
        ( ( cP @ cE @ X3 )
        = X3 )
    & ! [X4: a] :
        ( cE
        = ( cP @ ( cJ @ X4 ) @ X4 ) )
    & ! [X2: a,X0: a,X1: a] :
        ( ( cP @ ( cP @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X0 )
        = ( cP @ X1 @ ( cP @ X2 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ( ( ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( cP @ cE @ X3 )
            = X3 )
        & ! [X4: a] :
            ( cE
            = ( cP @ ( cJ @ X4 ) @ X4 ) )
        & ! [X2: a,X0: a,X1: a] :
            ( ( cP @ ( cP @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X0 )
            = ( cP @ X1 @ ( cP @ X2 @ X0 ) ) ) )
     => ! [X6: a,X5: a] :
        ? [X7: a] :
          ( ( cP @ X7 @ X6 )
          = X5 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [X2: a,X0: a,X1: a] :
            ( ( cP @ ( cP @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X2 )
            = ( cP @ X0 @ ( cP @ X1 @ X2 ) ) )
        & ! [X0: a] :
            ( ( cP @ cE @ X0 )
            = X0 )
        & ! [X1: a] :
            ( cE
            = ( cP @ ( cJ @ X1 ) @ X1 ) ) )
     => ! [X4: a,X3: a] :
        ? [X5: a] :
          ( ( cP @ X5 @ X3 )
          = X4 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [X2: a,X0: a,X1: a] :
          ( ( cP @ ( cP @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X2 )
          = ( cP @ X0 @ ( cP @ X1 @ X2 ) ) )
      & ! [X0: a] :
          ( ( cP @ cE @ X0 )
          = X0 )
      & ! [X1: a] :
          ( cE
          = ( cP @ ( cJ @ X1 ) @ X1 ) ) )
   => ! [X4: a,X3: a] :
      ? [X5: a] :
        ( ( cP @ X5 @ X3 )
        = X4 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM21_pme) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ! [X0: a] :
      ( ( cP @ cE @ X0 )
     != sK0 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f21,f36]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ! [X0: a] :
      ( ( cP @ cE @ X0 )
      = ( cP @ ( cJ @ ( cJ @ X0 ) ) @ cE ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f17,f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X4: a] :
      ( cE
      = ( cP @ ( cJ @ X4 ) @ X4 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ! [X0: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( cP @ cE @ X1 )
      = ( cP @ ( cJ @ X0 ) @ ( cP @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f10,f11]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X6: a,X7: a,X5: a] :
      ( ( cP @ X7 @ ( cP @ X5 @ X6 ) )
      = ( cP @ ( cP @ X7 @ X5 ) @ X6 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ! [X0: a] :
      ( sK0
     != ( cP @ X0 @ cE ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f19,f11]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ! [X0: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( cP @ X0 @ ( cP @ X1 @ sK1 ) )
     != sK0 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f13,f10]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ! [X2: a] :
      ( ( cP @ X2 @ sK1 )
     != sK0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : ALG282^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : run_vampire %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Wed Jun 19 15:54:24 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.36  This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.13/0.36  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.36  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire_ho --cores 7 --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -m 16384 -t 300
% 0.13/0.38  % (18127)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.13/0.38  % (18128)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.13/0.38  % (18130)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.13/0.38  % (18131)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.13/0.38  % (18129)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.13/0.38  % (18132)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.13/0.38  % (18133)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.13/0.38  % (18131)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.13/0.38  % (18131)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.38  % (18131)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
% 0.13/0.38  % (18131)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.13/0.38  % (18131)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % (18131)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.38  % (18131)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.38  % (18131)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.13/0.38  % (18131)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.38  % (18131)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.38  % (18130)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.13/0.38  % (18130)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.38  % (18130)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
% 0.13/0.38  % (18130)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.13/0.38  % (18130)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % (18130)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.38  % (18130)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.13/0.38  % (18130)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.13/0.38  % (18130)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.38  % (18130)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.38  % (18128)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.13/0.38  % (18128)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.38  % (18128)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
% 0.13/0.38  % (18128)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.13/0.38  % (18128)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % (18128)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.38  % (18128)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.13/0.38  % (18128)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.13/0.38  % (18128)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.38  % (18128)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.39  % (18127)First to succeed.
% 0.13/0.39  % (18132)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.13/0.39  % (18127)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.13/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.39  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.39  % (18127)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.39  % (18127)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
% 0.13/0.39  % (18127)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  % (18127)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.39  % (18127)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 0.13/0.39  % (18127)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.13/0.39  % (18127)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.39  % (18127)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.39  % (18126)Success in time 0.022 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------