TSTP Solution File: ALG229+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : ALG229+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 18:01:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 1.37s 1.53s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : ALG229+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.11 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 04:22:19 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.11/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.11/0.36 Thu Jun 9 04:22:19 2022
% 0.11/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 11509.
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.11/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.11/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.11/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.11/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.11/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.11/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v1_xboole_0(A)| -m1_pboole(B,A)| -v3_relat_1(B)| -v2_relat_1(B).
% 0.11/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 13 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -m1_pboole(A,B)| -m1_subset_1(C,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_closure2(B,A)))| -v4_closure2(C,B,A)|v1_fraenkel(C).
% 0.11/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -m1_pboole(A,B)| -m1_subset_1(C,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_closure2(B,A)))| -v2_closure2(C,B,A)|v1_fraenkel(C).
% 0.11/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -v1_xboole_0(A)| -v1_fraenkel(A)|v1_relat_1(k3_closure2(A)).
% 0.11/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 39 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -v1_xboole_0(A)| -v1_fraenkel(A)|v1_funct_1(k3_closure2(A)).
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.11/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 190 during input processing: 0 [demod,184] {-} v1_relat_1(k2_funcop_1(A,k1_xboole_0)).
% 0.11/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 192 during input processing: 0 [demod,184] {-} v3_relat_1(k2_funcop_1(A,k1_xboole_0)).
% 0.11/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 194 during input processing: 0 [demod,184] {-} v1_funct_1(k2_funcop_1(A,k1_xboole_0)).
% 0.11/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 242 during input processing: 0 [copy,242,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.11/0.36 242 back subsumes 180.
% 0.11/0.36 242 back subsumes 179.
% 0.11/0.36 242 back subsumes 178.
% 0.11/0.36 242 back subsumes 177.
% 0.11/0.36 242 back subsumes 176.
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.20/1.39
% 1.20/1.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.39
% 1.20/1.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.20/1.39
% 1.20/1.39
% 1.20/1.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.20/1.39
% 1.20/1.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.20/1.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.20/1.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.20/1.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 168
% 1.20/1.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 225
% 1.20/1.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 74
% 1.20/1.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 81
% 1.20/1.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 1.20/1.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 83
% 1.20/1.39 distinct predicate count: 25
% 1.20/1.39 distinct function count: 44
% 1.20/1.39 distinct constant count: 14
% 1.20/1.39
% 1.20/1.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.20/1.39
% 1.20/1.39
% 1.20/1.39
% 1.20/1.39 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.20/1.39
% 1.20/1.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 Model 2 [ 1 1 2004 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 Model 3 [ 1 2 1982 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.37/1.53 k1_pboole(A)=k2_funcop_1(A,k1_xboole_0).
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 1.37/1.53 24 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 766.4 K.
% 1.37/1.53 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 1.37/1.53 sym_ent ( 304) 199 0 199 0 59.1 K
% 1.37/1.53 term ( 32) 23055 19639 3416 21 107.4 K
% 1.37/1.53 rel ( 40) 18295 14674 3621 18 142.1 K
% 1.37/1.53 term_ptr ( 16) 8696 1046 7650 18 119.8 K
% 1.37/1.53 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.37/1.53 fpa_head ( 24) 2352 81 2271 16 53.6 K
% 1.37/1.53 fpa_tree ( 56) 1589 1589 0 17 0.9 K
% 1.37/1.53 context (1288) 2754 2754 0 6 7.5 K
% 1.37/1.53 trail ( 24) 31640 31640 0 5 0.1 K
% 1.37/1.53 imd_tree ( 32) 12 2 10 0 0.3 K
% 1.37/1.53 imd_pos (4024) 11 11 0 1 3.9 K
% 1.37/1.53 is_tree ( 24) 1558 137 1421 8 33.5 K
% 1.37/1.53 is_pos (2424) 7399 7399 0 12 28.4 K
% 1.37/1.53 fsub_pos ( 16) 1438 1438 0 1 0.0 K
% 1.37/1.53 literal ( 32) 1876 467 1409 3 44.1 K
% 1.37/1.53 clause ( 88) 686 117 569 1 49.0 K
% 1.37/1.53 list ( 272) 117 110 7 2 2.4 K
% 1.37/1.53 clash_nd ( 80) 230 230 0 4 0.3 K
% 1.37/1.53 clause_ptr ( 16) 409 45 364 5 5.8 K
% 1.37/1.53 int_ptr ( 16) 1222 478 744 7 11.7 K
% 1.37/1.53 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.37/1.53 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.37/1.53 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.37/1.53 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.37/1.53 formula( 40) 1686 1686 0 863 33.7 K
% 1.37/1.53 formula_ptr( 16) 107 107 0 107 1.7 K
% 1.37/1.53 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 1.37/1.53 0.00
% 1.37/1.53 print_cl time 0.00
% 1.37/1.53 conflict time 0.00
% 1.37/1.53 new demod time 0.00
% 1.37/1.53 post_process time 0.00
% 1.37/1.53 back demod time 0.00
% 1.37/1.53 back subsume 0.00
% 1.37/1.53 factor time 0.00
% 1.37/1.53 FINDER time 0.00
% 1.37/1.53 unindex time 0.00
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 true clauses given 0 (0.0%)
% 1.37/1.53 false clauses given 3
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 FALSE TRUE
% 1.37/1.53 2 9 20
% 1.37/1.53 3 5 4
% 1.37/1.53 4 19 10
% 1.37/1.53 5 9 2
% 1.37/1.53 6 10 6
% 1.37/1.53 7 6 2
% 1.37/1.53 8 5 1
% 1.37/1.53 10 1 0
% 1.37/1.53 11 1 0
% 1.37/1.53 12 0 2
% 1.37/1.53 13 1 5
% 1.37/1.53 14 0 3
% 1.37/1.53 15 0 2
% 1.37/1.53 16 0 1
% 1.37/1.53 17 0 2
% 1.37/1.53 19 0 2
% 1.37/1.53 20 0 1
% 1.37/1.53 21 0 2
% 1.37/1.53 22 0 4
% 1.37/1.53 24 0 1
% 1.37/1.53 25 0 3
% 1.37/1.53 26 0 2
% 1.37/1.53 36 0 1
% 1.37/1.53 37 0 2
% 1.37/1.53 tot: 66 78 (54.2% true)
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 Model 3 [ 1 2 1982 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 1.37/1.53 1:0 2:0 3:0 4:0 5:0 6:0 7:1 8:1 9:0 10:0
% 1.37/1.53 11:0 12:0 13:1 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:0
% 1.37/1.53 21:0 22:0 23:0 24:0 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 1.37/1.53 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:1 39:1 40:0
% 1.37/1.53 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 1.37/1.53 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:0 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:0
% 1.37/1.53 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:0 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 1.37/1.53 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 1.37/1.53 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 1.37/1.53 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 1.37/1.53 All others: 47.
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------