TSTP Solution File: ALG210+2 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : ALG210+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 15:37:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 9.73s 3.14s
% Output   : Proof 33.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : ALG210+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun  8 22:38:51 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.48/0.58          ____       _                          
% 0.48/0.58    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.48/0.58   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.48/0.58  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.48/0.58  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.48/0.58  
% 0.48/0.58  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.48/0.58  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.48/0.58  
% 0.48/0.58  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.48/0.58  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.48/0.58  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.48/0.58  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.48/0.58  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.48/0.58  
% 0.48/0.58  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.48/0.58  
% 0.48/0.58  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.72/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.19/0.90  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 1.55/1.04  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.75/1.39  Prover 0: gave up
% 2.75/1.39  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 2.75/1.40  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.96/1.44  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.73/3.14  Prover 1: proved (1748ms)
% 9.73/3.14  
% 9.73/3.14  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 9.73/3.14  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 9.73/3.14  
% 9.73/3.14  Generating proof ... found it (size 418)
% 33.37/10.21  
% 33.37/10.21  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 33.37/10.21  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 33.37/10.21  | (0)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & element(v2) = v3 & element(v1) = 0 & element(v0) = 0 & times(v0, v1) = v2 &  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (times(v7, v6) = v8) |  ~ (times(v4, v5) = v7) |  ? [v9] : (times(v6, v4) = v9 & times(v5, v9) = v8)) &  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : (v5 = v4 |  ~ (times(v7, v6) = v5) |  ~ (times(v7, v6) = v4)) &  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v5 = v4 |  ~ (element(v6) = v5) |  ~ (element(v6) = v4)) &  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (element(v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] : (times(v4, v4) = v6 &  ~ (times(v4, v6) = v4))) &  ! [v4] : ( ~ (element(v4) = 0) |  ? [v5] : (times(v4, v5) = v4 & times(v4, v4) = v5)))
% 33.47/10.23  | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3 yields:
% 33.47/10.23  | (1)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0) & element(all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0 & element(all_0_2_2) = 0 & element(all_0_3_3) = 0 & times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (times(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (times(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : (times(v2, v0) = v5 & times(v1, v5) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (times(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (times(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (element(v2) = v1) |  ~ (element(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (element(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : (times(v0, v0) = v2 &  ~ (times(v0, v2) = v0))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (element(v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : (times(v0, v1) = v0 & times(v0, v0) = v1))
% 33.47/10.24  |
% 33.47/10.24  | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields:
% 33.47/10.24  | (2) times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1
% 33.47/10.24  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (element(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : (times(v0, v0) = v2 &  ~ (times(v0, v2) = v0)))
% 33.47/10.24  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (times(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (times(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : (times(v2, v0) = v5 & times(v1, v5) = v4))
% 33.47/10.24  | (5)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (element(v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : (times(v0, v1) = v0 & times(v0, v0) = v1))
% 33.47/10.24  | (6) element(all_0_2_2) = 0
% 33.47/10.24  | (7) element(all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0
% 33.47/10.24  | (8)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (times(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (times(v3, v2) = v0))
% 33.47/10.24  | (9) element(all_0_3_3) = 0
% 33.47/10.24  | (10)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (element(v2) = v1) |  ~ (element(v2) = v0))
% 33.47/10.24  | (11)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 33.47/10.24  |
% 33.47/10.24  | Instantiating formula (3) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms element(all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 33.47/10.24  | (12) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : (times(all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1) = v0 &  ~ (times(all_0_1_1, v0) = all_0_1_1))
% 33.47/10.24  |
% 33.47/10.24  | Instantiating formula (5) with all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms element(all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 33.47/10.24  | (13)  ? [v0] : (times(all_0_2_2, v0) = all_0_2_2 & times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 33.47/10.24  |
% 33.47/10.24  | Instantiating formula (5) with all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms element(all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 33.47/10.24  | (14)  ? [v0] : (times(all_0_3_3, v0) = all_0_3_3 & times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0)
% 33.47/10.24  |
% 33.47/10.24  | Instantiating (14) with all_8_0_4 yields:
% 33.47/10.24  | (15) times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_0_3_3 & times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_8_0_4
% 33.47/10.24  |
% 33.47/10.24  | Applying alpha-rule on (15) yields:
% 33.47/10.24  | (16) times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_0_3_3
% 33.47/10.24  | (17) times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_8_0_4
% 33.47/10.24  |
% 33.47/10.25  | Instantiating (13) with all_10_0_5 yields:
% 33.47/10.25  | (18) times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_0_2_2 & times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_10_0_5
% 33.47/10.25  |
% 33.47/10.25  | Applying alpha-rule on (18) yields:
% 33.47/10.25  | (19) times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_0_2_2
% 33.47/10.25  | (20) times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_10_0_5
% 33.47/10.25  |
% 33.47/10.25  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (12), into two cases.
% 33.47/10.25  |-Branch one:
% 33.47/10.25  | (21) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 33.47/10.25  |
% 33.47/10.25  	| Equations (21) can reduce 11 to:
% 33.47/10.25  	| (22) $false
% 33.47/10.25  	|
% 33.47/10.25  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.47/10.25  |-Branch two:
% 33.47/10.25  | (11)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 33.47/10.25  | (24)  ? [v0] : (times(all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1) = v0 &  ~ (times(all_0_1_1, v0) = all_0_1_1))
% 33.47/10.25  |
% 33.47/10.25  	| Instantiating (24) with all_16_0_6 yields:
% 33.47/10.25  	| (25) times(all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1) = all_16_0_6 &  ~ (times(all_0_1_1, all_16_0_6) = all_0_1_1)
% 33.47/10.25  	|
% 33.47/10.25  	| Applying alpha-rule on (25) yields:
% 33.47/10.25  	| (26) times(all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1) = all_16_0_6
% 33.47/10.25  	| (27)  ~ (times(all_0_1_1, all_16_0_6) = all_0_1_1)
% 33.47/10.25  	|
% 33.47/10.25  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_16_0_6, all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms times(all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1) = all_16_0_6, times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 33.47/10.25  	| (28)  ? [v0] : (times(all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3) = v0 & times(all_0_2_2, v0) = all_16_0_6)
% 33.47/10.25  	|
% 33.47/10.25  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5, all_10_0_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 33.47/10.25  	| (29)  ? [v0] : (times(all_10_0_5, v0) = all_0_2_2 & times(all_10_0_5, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 33.47/10.25  	|
% 33.47/10.25  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_10_0_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_0_2_2, times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_10_0_5, yields:
% 33.47/10.25  	| (30)  ? [v0] : (times(all_10_0_5, v0) = all_10_0_5 & times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 33.47/10.25  	|
% 33.47/10.25  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_0_3_3, times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 33.47/10.25  	| (31)  ? [v0] : (times(all_8_0_4, v0) = all_0_1_1 & times(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0)
% 33.47/10.25  	|
% 33.47/10.25  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 33.47/10.25  	| (32)  ? [v0] : (times(all_8_0_4, v0) = all_0_3_3 & times(all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3) = v0)
% 33.47/10.25  	|
% 33.47/10.25  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_0_3_3, times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_8_0_4, yields:
% 33.47/10.25  	| (33)  ? [v0] : (times(all_8_0_4, v0) = all_8_0_4 & times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0)
% 33.47/10.25  	|
% 33.47/10.25  	| Instantiating (33) with all_23_0_7 yields:
% 33.47/10.25  	| (34) times(all_8_0_4, all_23_0_7) = all_8_0_4 & times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_23_0_7
% 33.47/10.25  	|
% 33.47/10.25  	| Applying alpha-rule on (34) yields:
% 33.47/10.25  	| (35) times(all_8_0_4, all_23_0_7) = all_8_0_4
% 33.47/10.25  	| (36) times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_23_0_7
% 33.47/10.25  	|
% 33.47/10.25  	| Instantiating (32) with all_25_0_8 yields:
% 33.47/10.25  	| (37) times(all_8_0_4, all_25_0_8) = all_0_3_3 & times(all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3) = all_25_0_8
% 33.47/10.26  	|
% 33.47/10.26  	| Applying alpha-rule on (37) yields:
% 33.47/10.26  	| (38) times(all_8_0_4, all_25_0_8) = all_0_3_3
% 33.47/10.26  	| (39) times(all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3) = all_25_0_8
% 33.47/10.26  	|
% 33.47/10.26  	| Instantiating (29) with all_27_0_9 yields:
% 33.47/10.26  	| (40) times(all_10_0_5, all_27_0_9) = all_0_2_2 & times(all_10_0_5, all_0_2_2) = all_27_0_9
% 33.47/10.26  	|
% 33.47/10.26  	| Applying alpha-rule on (40) yields:
% 33.47/10.26  	| (41) times(all_10_0_5, all_27_0_9) = all_0_2_2
% 33.47/10.26  	| (42) times(all_10_0_5, all_0_2_2) = all_27_0_9
% 33.47/10.26  	|
% 33.47/10.26  	| Instantiating (28) with all_29_0_10 yields:
% 33.47/10.26  	| (43) times(all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_10 & times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_16_0_6
% 33.47/10.26  	|
% 33.47/10.26  	| Applying alpha-rule on (43) yields:
% 33.47/10.26  	| (44) times(all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_10
% 33.47/10.26  	| (45) times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_16_0_6
% 33.47/10.26  	|
% 33.47/10.26  	| Instantiating (31) with all_31_0_11 yields:
% 33.47/10.26  	| (46) times(all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11) = all_0_1_1 & times(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_31_0_11
% 33.47/10.26  	|
% 33.47/10.26  	| Applying alpha-rule on (46) yields:
% 33.47/10.26  	| (47) times(all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11) = all_0_1_1
% 33.47/10.26  	| (48) times(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_31_0_11
% 33.47/10.26  	|
% 33.47/10.26  	| Instantiating (30) with all_33_0_12 yields:
% 33.47/10.26  	| (49) times(all_10_0_5, all_33_0_12) = all_10_0_5 & times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_33_0_12
% 33.47/10.26  	|
% 33.47/10.26  	| Applying alpha-rule on (49) yields:
% 33.47/10.26  	| (50) times(all_10_0_5, all_33_0_12) = all_10_0_5
% 33.47/10.26  	| (51) times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_33_0_12
% 33.47/10.26  	|
% 33.47/10.26  	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_33_0_12, all_10_0_5 and discharging atoms times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_33_0_12, times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_10_0_5, yields:
% 33.47/10.26  	| (52) all_33_0_12 = all_10_0_5
% 33.47/10.26  	|
% 33.47/10.26  	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_23_0_7, all_8_0_4 and discharging atoms times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_23_0_7, times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_8_0_4, yields:
% 33.47/10.26  	| (53) all_23_0_7 = all_8_0_4
% 33.47/10.26  	|
% 33.47/10.26  	| From (52) and (50) follows:
% 33.47/10.26  	| (54) times(all_10_0_5, all_10_0_5) = all_10_0_5
% 33.47/10.26  	|
% 33.47/10.26  	| From (53) and (35) follows:
% 33.47/10.26  	| (55) times(all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4) = all_8_0_4
% 33.47/10.26  	|
% 33.47/10.26  	| From (52) and (51) follows:
% 33.47/10.26  	| (20) times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_10_0_5
% 33.47/10.26  	|
% 33.47/10.26  	| From (53) and (36) follows:
% 33.47/10.26  	| (17) times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_8_0_4
% 33.47/10.26  	|
% 33.47/10.26  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5, all_27_0_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms times(all_10_0_5, all_27_0_9) = all_0_2_2, times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_10_0_5, yields:
% 33.47/10.26  	| (58)  ? [v0] : (times(all_27_0_9, all_0_2_2) = v0 & times(all_0_2_2, v0) = all_0_2_2)
% 33.47/10.26  	|
% 33.47/10.26  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_10_0_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_27_0_9, all_10_0_5 and discharging atoms times(all_10_0_5, all_27_0_9) = all_0_2_2, times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_10_0_5, yields:
% 33.47/10.26  	| (59)  ? [v0] : (times(all_27_0_9, v0) = all_10_0_5 & times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = v0)
% 33.47/10.26  	|
% 33.47/10.26  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5, all_27_0_9, all_10_0_5, all_10_0_5 and discharging atoms times(all_10_0_5, all_27_0_9) = all_0_2_2, times(all_10_0_5, all_10_0_5) = all_10_0_5, yields:
% 33.47/10.26  	| (60)  ? [v0] : (times(all_27_0_9, all_10_0_5) = v0 & times(all_10_0_5, v0) = all_0_2_2)
% 33.47/10.26  	|
% 33.47/10.26  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_27_0_9, all_10_0_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms times(all_10_0_5, all_0_2_2) = all_27_0_9, times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_10_0_5, yields:
% 33.47/10.26  	| (61)  ? [v0] : (times(all_0_2_2, v0) = all_27_0_9 & times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 33.47/10.26  	|
% 33.47/10.26  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_16_0_6, all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11) = all_0_1_1, times(all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 33.47/10.26  	| (62)  ? [v0] : (times(all_31_0_11, v0) = all_16_0_6 & times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = v0)
% 33.47/10.26  	|
% 33.47/10.26  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11) = all_0_1_1, times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_8_0_4, yields:
% 33.47/10.26  	| (63)  ? [v0] : (times(all_31_0_11, all_0_3_3) = v0 & times(all_0_3_3, v0) = all_0_1_1)
% 33.47/10.27  	|
% 33.47/10.27  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11) = all_0_1_1, times(all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4) = all_8_0_4, yields:
% 33.47/10.27  	| (64)  ? [v0] : (times(all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4) = v0 & times(all_8_0_4, v0) = all_0_1_1)
% 33.47/10.27  	|
% 33.47/10.27  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4, all_25_0_8, all_8_0_4 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_25_0_8) = all_0_3_3, times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 33.47/10.27  	| (65)  ? [v0] : (times(all_25_0_8, v0) = all_0_3_3 & times(all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4) = v0)
% 33.47/10.27  	|
% 33.47/10.27  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_25_0_8, all_8_0_4 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_25_0_8) = all_0_3_3, times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 33.47/10.27  	| (66)  ? [v0] : (times(all_25_0_8, v0) = all_0_1_1 & times(all_0_2_2, all_8_0_4) = v0)
% 33.47/10.27  	|
% 33.47/10.27  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4, all_25_0_8, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_25_0_8) = all_0_3_3, times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_8_0_4, yields:
% 33.47/10.27  	| (67)  ? [v0] : (times(all_25_0_8, all_0_3_3) = v0 & times(all_0_3_3, v0) = all_0_3_3)
% 33.47/10.27  	|
% 33.47/10.27  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_25_0_8, all_8_0_4 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_25_0_8) = all_0_3_3, times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_8_0_4, yields:
% 33.47/10.27  	| (68)  ? [v0] : (times(all_25_0_8, v0) = all_8_0_4 & times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = v0)
% 33.47/10.27  	|
% 33.47/10.27  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4, all_25_0_8, all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_25_0_8) = all_0_3_3, times(all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4) = all_8_0_4, yields:
% 33.47/10.27  	| (69)  ? [v0] : (times(all_25_0_8, all_8_0_4) = v0 & times(all_8_0_4, v0) = all_0_3_3)
% 33.47/10.27  	|
% 33.47/10.27  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_25_0_8, all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3) = all_25_0_8, times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_8_0_4, yields:
% 33.47/10.27  	| (70)  ? [v0] : (times(all_0_3_3, v0) = all_25_0_8 & times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0)
% 33.47/10.27  	|
% 33.47/10.27  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_29_0_10, all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms times(all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_10, times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 33.47/10.27  	| (71)  ? [v0] : (times(all_0_2_2, v0) = all_29_0_10 & times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0)
% 33.47/10.27  	|
% 33.47/10.27  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_29_0_10, all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3, all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11) = all_0_1_1, times(all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_10, yields:
% 33.47/10.27  	| (72)  ? [v0] : (times(all_31_0_11, v0) = all_29_0_10 & times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = v0)
% 33.47/10.27  	|
% 33.47/10.27  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_16_0_6, all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10, all_10_0_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_16_0_6, times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 33.47/10.27  	| (73)  ? [v0] : (times(all_29_0_10, all_0_2_2) = v0 & times(all_10_0_5, v0) = all_16_0_6)
% 33.47/10.27  	|
% 33.47/10.27  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_16_0_6, all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10, all_27_0_9, all_10_0_5 and discharging atoms times(all_10_0_5, all_27_0_9) = all_0_2_2, times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 33.47/10.27  	| (74)  ? [v0] : (times(all_29_0_10, all_10_0_5) = v0 & times(all_27_0_9, v0) = all_16_0_6)
% 33.47/10.27  	|
% 33.47/10.27  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_31_0_11, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_10_0_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_0_2_2, times(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_31_0_11, yields:
% 33.47/10.27  	| (75)  ? [v0] : (times(all_10_0_5, v0) = all_31_0_11 & times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 33.47/10.27  	|
% 33.47/10.27  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_31_0_11, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_27_0_9, all_10_0_5 and discharging atoms times(all_10_0_5, all_27_0_9) = all_0_2_2, times(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_31_0_11, yields:
% 33.47/10.27  	| (76)  ? [v0] : (times(all_27_0_9, v0) = all_31_0_11 & times(all_0_3_3, all_10_0_5) = v0)
% 33.47/10.27  	|
% 33.47/10.27  	| Instantiating (76) with all_44_0_13 yields:
% 33.47/10.27  	| (77) times(all_27_0_9, all_44_0_13) = all_31_0_11 & times(all_0_3_3, all_10_0_5) = all_44_0_13
% 33.47/10.27  	|
% 33.47/10.27  	| Applying alpha-rule on (77) yields:
% 33.47/10.27  	| (78) times(all_27_0_9, all_44_0_13) = all_31_0_11
% 33.47/10.27  	| (79) times(all_0_3_3, all_10_0_5) = all_44_0_13
% 33.47/10.27  	|
% 33.47/10.27  	| Instantiating (75) with all_46_0_14 yields:
% 33.47/10.27  	| (80) times(all_10_0_5, all_46_0_14) = all_31_0_11 & times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_46_0_14
% 33.47/10.27  	|
% 33.47/10.27  	| Applying alpha-rule on (80) yields:
% 33.47/10.27  	| (81) times(all_10_0_5, all_46_0_14) = all_31_0_11
% 33.47/10.28  	| (82) times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_46_0_14
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Instantiating (66) with all_48_0_15 yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (83) times(all_25_0_8, all_48_0_15) = all_0_1_1 & times(all_0_2_2, all_8_0_4) = all_48_0_15
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Applying alpha-rule on (83) yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (84) times(all_25_0_8, all_48_0_15) = all_0_1_1
% 33.47/10.28  	| (85) times(all_0_2_2, all_8_0_4) = all_48_0_15
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Instantiating (63) with all_50_0_16 yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (86) times(all_31_0_11, all_0_3_3) = all_50_0_16 & times(all_0_3_3, all_50_0_16) = all_0_1_1
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Applying alpha-rule on (86) yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (87) times(all_31_0_11, all_0_3_3) = all_50_0_16
% 33.47/10.28  	| (88) times(all_0_3_3, all_50_0_16) = all_0_1_1
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Instantiating (62) with all_52_0_17 yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (89) times(all_31_0_11, all_52_0_17) = all_16_0_6 & times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_52_0_17
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Applying alpha-rule on (89) yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (90) times(all_31_0_11, all_52_0_17) = all_16_0_6
% 33.47/10.28  	| (91) times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_52_0_17
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Instantiating (65) with all_54_0_18 yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (92) times(all_25_0_8, all_54_0_18) = all_0_3_3 & times(all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4) = all_54_0_18
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Applying alpha-rule on (92) yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (93) times(all_25_0_8, all_54_0_18) = all_0_3_3
% 33.47/10.28  	| (94) times(all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4) = all_54_0_18
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Instantiating (61) with all_56_0_19 yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (95) times(all_0_2_2, all_56_0_19) = all_27_0_9 & times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_56_0_19
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Applying alpha-rule on (95) yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (96) times(all_0_2_2, all_56_0_19) = all_27_0_9
% 33.47/10.28  	| (97) times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_56_0_19
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Instantiating (60) with all_58_0_20 yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (98) times(all_27_0_9, all_10_0_5) = all_58_0_20 & times(all_10_0_5, all_58_0_20) = all_0_2_2
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Applying alpha-rule on (98) yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (99) times(all_27_0_9, all_10_0_5) = all_58_0_20
% 33.47/10.28  	| (100) times(all_10_0_5, all_58_0_20) = all_0_2_2
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Instantiating (64) with all_62_0_22 yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (101) times(all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4) = all_62_0_22 & times(all_8_0_4, all_62_0_22) = all_0_1_1
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Applying alpha-rule on (101) yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (102) times(all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4) = all_62_0_22
% 33.47/10.28  	| (103) times(all_8_0_4, all_62_0_22) = all_0_1_1
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Instantiating (74) with all_64_0_23 yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (104) times(all_29_0_10, all_10_0_5) = all_64_0_23 & times(all_27_0_9, all_64_0_23) = all_16_0_6
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Applying alpha-rule on (104) yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (105) times(all_29_0_10, all_10_0_5) = all_64_0_23
% 33.47/10.28  	| (106) times(all_27_0_9, all_64_0_23) = all_16_0_6
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Instantiating (59) with all_68_0_25 yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (107) times(all_27_0_9, all_68_0_25) = all_10_0_5 & times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_68_0_25
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Applying alpha-rule on (107) yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (108) times(all_27_0_9, all_68_0_25) = all_10_0_5
% 33.47/10.28  	| (109) times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_68_0_25
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Instantiating (58) with all_70_0_26 yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (110) times(all_27_0_9, all_0_2_2) = all_70_0_26 & times(all_0_2_2, all_70_0_26) = all_0_2_2
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Applying alpha-rule on (110) yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (111) times(all_27_0_9, all_0_2_2) = all_70_0_26
% 33.47/10.28  	| (112) times(all_0_2_2, all_70_0_26) = all_0_2_2
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Instantiating (73) with all_74_0_28 yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (113) times(all_29_0_10, all_0_2_2) = all_74_0_28 & times(all_10_0_5, all_74_0_28) = all_16_0_6
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Applying alpha-rule on (113) yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (114) times(all_29_0_10, all_0_2_2) = all_74_0_28
% 33.47/10.28  	| (115) times(all_10_0_5, all_74_0_28) = all_16_0_6
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Instantiating (72) with all_76_0_29 yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (116) times(all_31_0_11, all_76_0_29) = all_29_0_10 & times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_76_0_29
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Applying alpha-rule on (116) yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (117) times(all_31_0_11, all_76_0_29) = all_29_0_10
% 33.47/10.28  	| (118) times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_76_0_29
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Instantiating (71) with all_78_0_30 yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (119) times(all_0_2_2, all_78_0_30) = all_29_0_10 & times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_78_0_30
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Applying alpha-rule on (119) yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (120) times(all_0_2_2, all_78_0_30) = all_29_0_10
% 33.47/10.28  	| (121) times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_78_0_30
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Instantiating (70) with all_80_0_31 yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (122) times(all_0_3_3, all_80_0_31) = all_25_0_8 & times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_80_0_31
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Applying alpha-rule on (122) yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (123) times(all_0_3_3, all_80_0_31) = all_25_0_8
% 33.47/10.28  	| (124) times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_80_0_31
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Instantiating (69) with all_82_0_32 yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (125) times(all_25_0_8, all_8_0_4) = all_82_0_32 & times(all_8_0_4, all_82_0_32) = all_0_3_3
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Applying alpha-rule on (125) yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (126) times(all_25_0_8, all_8_0_4) = all_82_0_32
% 33.47/10.28  	| (127) times(all_8_0_4, all_82_0_32) = all_0_3_3
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Instantiating (68) with all_84_0_33 yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (128) times(all_25_0_8, all_84_0_33) = all_8_0_4 & times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_84_0_33
% 33.47/10.28  	|
% 33.47/10.28  	| Applying alpha-rule on (128) yields:
% 33.47/10.28  	| (129) times(all_25_0_8, all_84_0_33) = all_8_0_4
% 33.47/10.28  	| (130) times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_84_0_33
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Instantiating (67) with all_86_0_34 yields:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (131) times(all_25_0_8, all_0_3_3) = all_86_0_34 & times(all_0_3_3, all_86_0_34) = all_0_3_3
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Applying alpha-rule on (131) yields:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (132) times(all_25_0_8, all_0_3_3) = all_86_0_34
% 33.47/10.29  	| (133) times(all_0_3_3, all_86_0_34) = all_0_3_3
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_31_0_11, all_0_3_3, all_50_0_16, all_29_0_10 and discharging atoms times(all_31_0_11, all_0_3_3) = all_50_0_16, yields:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (134) all_50_0_16 = all_29_0_10 |  ~ (times(all_31_0_11, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_10)
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4, all_54_0_18, all_8_0_4 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4) = all_54_0_18, times(all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4) = all_8_0_4, yields:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (135) all_54_0_18 = all_8_0_4
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5, all_27_0_9, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (136) all_27_0_9 = all_0_2_2 |  ~ (times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_27_0_9)
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5, all_68_0_25, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_68_0_25, times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (137) all_68_0_25 = all_0_2_2
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5, all_68_0_25, all_58_0_20 and discharging atoms times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_68_0_25, yields:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (138) all_68_0_25 = all_58_0_20 |  ~ (times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_58_0_20)
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_2_2, all_8_0_4, all_48_0_15, all_29_0_10 and discharging atoms times(all_0_2_2, all_8_0_4) = all_48_0_15, yields:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (139) all_48_0_15 = all_29_0_10 |  ~ (times(all_0_2_2, all_8_0_4) = all_29_0_10)
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_56_0_19, all_10_0_5 and discharging atoms times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_56_0_19, times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_10_0_5, yields:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (140) all_56_0_19 = all_10_0_5
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_56_0_19, all_70_0_26 and discharging atoms times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_56_0_19, yields:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (141) all_70_0_26 = all_56_0_19 |  ~ (times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_70_0_26)
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_3_3, all_80_0_31, all_25_0_8, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms times(all_0_3_3, all_80_0_31) = all_25_0_8, yields:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (142) all_25_0_8 = all_0_3_3 |  ~ (times(all_0_3_3, all_80_0_31) = all_0_3_3)
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4, all_84_0_33, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_84_0_33, times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (143) all_84_0_33 = all_0_3_3
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4, all_76_0_29, all_82_0_32 and discharging atoms times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_76_0_29, yields:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (144) all_82_0_32 = all_76_0_29 |  ~ (times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_82_0_32)
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4, all_76_0_29, all_84_0_33 and discharging atoms times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_84_0_33, times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_76_0_29, yields:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (145) all_84_0_33 = all_76_0_29
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_46_0_14, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_46_0_14, times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (146) all_46_0_14 = all_0_1_1
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_80_0_31, all_8_0_4 and discharging atoms times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_80_0_31, times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_8_0_4, yields:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (147) all_80_0_31 = all_8_0_4
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_80_0_31, all_86_0_34 and discharging atoms times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_80_0_31, yields:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (148) all_86_0_34 = all_80_0_31 |  ~ (times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_86_0_34)
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_78_0_30, all_80_0_31 and discharging atoms times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_80_0_31, times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_78_0_30, yields:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (149) all_80_0_31 = all_78_0_30
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Combining equations (145,143) yields a new equation:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (150) all_76_0_29 = all_0_3_3
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Simplifying 150 yields:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (151) all_76_0_29 = all_0_3_3
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Combining equations (147,149) yields a new equation:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (152) all_78_0_30 = all_8_0_4
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| Combining equations (152,149) yields a new equation:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (147) all_80_0_31 = all_8_0_4
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| From (151) and (117) follows:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (154) times(all_31_0_11, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_10
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| From (146) and (81) follows:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (155) times(all_10_0_5, all_0_1_1) = all_31_0_11
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| From (135) and (94) follows:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (55) times(all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4) = all_8_0_4
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| From (152) and (120) follows:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (157) times(all_0_2_2, all_8_0_4) = all_29_0_10
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| From (140) and (96) follows:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (158) times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_27_0_9
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| From (151) and (118) follows:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (16) times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_0_3_3
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	| From (146) and (82) follows:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (2) times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (142), into two cases.
% 33.47/10.29  	|-Branch one:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (161)  ~ (times(all_0_3_3, all_80_0_31) = all_0_3_3)
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  		| From (147) and (161) follows:
% 33.47/10.29  		| (162)  ~ (times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_0_3_3)
% 33.47/10.29  		|
% 33.47/10.29  		| Using (16) and (162) yields:
% 33.47/10.29  		| (163) $false
% 33.47/10.29  		|
% 33.47/10.29  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.47/10.29  	|-Branch two:
% 33.47/10.29  	| (164) times(all_0_3_3, all_80_0_31) = all_0_3_3
% 33.47/10.29  	| (165) all_25_0_8 = all_0_3_3
% 33.47/10.29  	|
% 33.47/10.29  		| From (165) and (126) follows:
% 33.47/10.29  		| (166) times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_82_0_32
% 33.47/10.29  		|
% 33.47/10.29  		| From (165) and (132) follows:
% 33.47/10.29  		| (167) times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_86_0_34
% 33.47/10.29  		|
% 33.47/10.29  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (148), into two cases.
% 33.47/10.29  		|-Branch one:
% 33.47/10.29  		| (168)  ~ (times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_86_0_34)
% 33.47/10.30  		|
% 33.47/10.30  			| Using (167) and (168) yields:
% 33.47/10.30  			| (163) $false
% 33.47/10.30  			|
% 33.47/10.30  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.47/10.30  		|-Branch two:
% 33.47/10.30  		| (167) times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_86_0_34
% 33.47/10.30  		| (171) all_86_0_34 = all_80_0_31
% 33.47/10.30  		|
% 33.47/10.30  			| Combining equations (147,171) yields a new equation:
% 33.47/10.30  			| (172) all_86_0_34 = all_8_0_4
% 33.47/10.30  			|
% 33.47/10.30  			| From (172) and (167) follows:
% 33.47/10.30  			| (17) times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_8_0_4
% 33.47/10.30  			|
% 33.47/10.30  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (139), into two cases.
% 33.47/10.30  			|-Branch one:
% 33.47/10.30  			| (174)  ~ (times(all_0_2_2, all_8_0_4) = all_29_0_10)
% 33.47/10.30  			|
% 33.47/10.30  				| Using (157) and (174) yields:
% 33.47/10.30  				| (163) $false
% 33.47/10.30  				|
% 33.47/10.30  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.47/10.30  			|-Branch two:
% 33.47/10.30  			| (157) times(all_0_2_2, all_8_0_4) = all_29_0_10
% 33.47/10.30  			| (177) all_48_0_15 = all_29_0_10
% 33.47/10.30  			|
% 33.47/10.30  				| From (177) and (85) follows:
% 33.47/10.30  				| (157) times(all_0_2_2, all_8_0_4) = all_29_0_10
% 33.47/10.30  				|
% 33.47/10.30  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (136), into two cases.
% 33.47/10.30  				|-Branch one:
% 33.47/10.30  				| (179)  ~ (times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_27_0_9)
% 33.47/10.30  				|
% 33.47/10.30  					| Using (158) and (179) yields:
% 33.47/10.30  					| (163) $false
% 33.47/10.30  					|
% 33.47/10.30  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.47/10.30  				|-Branch two:
% 33.47/10.30  				| (158) times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_27_0_9
% 33.47/10.30  				| (182) all_27_0_9 = all_0_2_2
% 33.47/10.30  				|
% 33.47/10.30  					| From (182) and (106) follows:
% 33.47/10.30  					| (183) times(all_0_2_2, all_64_0_23) = all_16_0_6
% 33.47/10.30  					|
% 33.47/10.30  					| From (182) and (78) follows:
% 33.47/10.30  					| (184) times(all_0_2_2, all_44_0_13) = all_31_0_11
% 33.47/10.30  					|
% 33.47/10.30  					| From (182) and (99) follows:
% 33.47/10.30  					| (185) times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_58_0_20
% 33.47/10.30  					|
% 33.47/10.30  					| From (182) and (111) follows:
% 33.47/10.30  					| (186) times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_70_0_26
% 33.47/10.30  					|
% 33.47/10.30  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (144), into two cases.
% 33.47/10.30  					|-Branch one:
% 33.47/10.30  					| (187)  ~ (times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_82_0_32)
% 33.47/10.30  					|
% 33.47/10.30  						| Using (166) and (187) yields:
% 33.47/10.30  						| (163) $false
% 33.47/10.30  						|
% 33.47/10.30  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.47/10.30  					|-Branch two:
% 33.47/10.30  					| (166) times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_82_0_32
% 33.47/10.30  					| (190) all_82_0_32 = all_76_0_29
% 33.47/10.30  					|
% 33.47/10.30  						| Combining equations (151,190) yields a new equation:
% 33.47/10.30  						| (191) all_82_0_32 = all_0_3_3
% 33.47/10.30  						|
% 33.47/10.30  						| From (191) and (127) follows:
% 33.47/10.30  						| (192) times(all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3) = all_0_3_3
% 33.47/10.30  						|
% 33.47/10.30  						| From (191) and (166) follows:
% 33.47/10.30  						| (16) times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_0_3_3
% 33.47/10.30  						|
% 33.47/10.30  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (141), into two cases.
% 33.47/10.30  						|-Branch one:
% 33.47/10.30  						| (194)  ~ (times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_70_0_26)
% 33.47/10.30  						|
% 33.47/10.30  							| Using (186) and (194) yields:
% 33.47/10.30  							| (163) $false
% 33.47/10.30  							|
% 33.47/10.30  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.47/10.30  						|-Branch two:
% 33.47/10.30  						| (186) times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_70_0_26
% 33.47/10.30  						| (197) all_70_0_26 = all_56_0_19
% 33.47/10.30  						|
% 33.47/10.30  							| Combining equations (140,197) yields a new equation:
% 33.47/10.30  							| (198) all_70_0_26 = all_10_0_5
% 33.47/10.30  							|
% 33.47/10.30  							| From (198) and (186) follows:
% 33.47/10.30  							| (20) times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_10_0_5
% 33.47/10.30  							|
% 33.47/10.30  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (138), into two cases.
% 33.47/10.30  							|-Branch one:
% 33.47/10.30  							| (200)  ~ (times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_58_0_20)
% 33.47/10.30  							|
% 33.47/10.30  								| Using (185) and (200) yields:
% 33.47/10.30  								| (163) $false
% 33.47/10.30  								|
% 33.47/10.30  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.47/10.30  							|-Branch two:
% 33.47/10.30  							| (185) times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_58_0_20
% 33.47/10.30  							| (203) all_68_0_25 = all_58_0_20
% 33.47/10.30  							|
% 33.47/10.30  								| Combining equations (203,137) yields a new equation:
% 33.47/10.30  								| (204) all_58_0_20 = all_0_2_2
% 33.47/10.30  								|
% 33.47/10.30  								| Simplifying 204 yields:
% 33.47/10.30  								| (205) all_58_0_20 = all_0_2_2
% 33.47/10.30  								|
% 33.47/10.30  								| From (205) and (100) follows:
% 33.47/10.30  								| (206) times(all_10_0_5, all_0_2_2) = all_0_2_2
% 33.47/10.30  								|
% 33.47/10.30  								| From (205) and (185) follows:
% 33.47/10.30  								| (19) times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_0_2_2
% 33.47/10.30  								|
% 33.47/10.30  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (134), into two cases.
% 33.47/10.30  								|-Branch one:
% 33.47/10.30  								| (208)  ~ (times(all_31_0_11, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_10)
% 33.47/10.30  								|
% 33.47/10.30  									| Using (154) and (208) yields:
% 33.47/10.30  									| (163) $false
% 33.47/10.30  									|
% 33.47/10.30  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.47/10.30  								|-Branch two:
% 33.47/10.30  								| (154) times(all_31_0_11, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_10
% 33.47/10.30  								| (211) all_50_0_16 = all_29_0_10
% 33.47/10.30  								|
% 33.47/10.30  									| From (211) and (87) follows:
% 33.47/10.30  									| (154) times(all_31_0_11, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_10
% 33.47/10.30  									|
% 33.47/10.30  									| From (211) and (88) follows:
% 33.47/10.30  									| (213) times(all_0_3_3, all_29_0_10) = all_0_1_1
% 33.47/10.30  									|
% 33.47/10.30  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_16_0_6, all_31_0_11, all_52_0_17, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms times(all_31_0_11, all_52_0_17) = all_16_0_6, times(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_31_0_11, yields:
% 33.47/10.30  									| (214)  ? [v0] : (times(all_52_0_17, all_0_2_2) = v0 & times(all_0_3_3, v0) = all_16_0_6)
% 33.47/10.30  									|
% 33.47/10.30  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_16_0_6, all_31_0_11, all_52_0_17, all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11 and discharging atoms times(all_31_0_11, all_52_0_17) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 33.47/10.30  									| (215)  ~ (times(all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11) |  ? [v0] : (times(all_52_0_17, all_31_0_11) = v0 & times(all_8_0_4, v0) = all_16_0_6)
% 33.47/10.30  									|
% 33.47/10.30  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_31_0_11, all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11 yields:
% 33.47/10.30  									| (216)  ~ (times(all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11) |  ? [v0] : (times(all_8_0_4, v0) = all_31_0_11 & times(all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11) = v0)
% 33.47/10.30  									|
% 33.47/10.30  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_29_0_10, all_31_0_11, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms times(all_31_0_11, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_10, times(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_31_0_11, yields:
% 33.47/10.30  									| (217)  ? [v0] : (times(all_0_3_3, v0) = all_29_0_10 & times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 33.47/10.30  									|
% 33.47/10.30  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_29_0_10, all_31_0_11, all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11 and discharging atoms times(all_31_0_11, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_10, yields:
% 33.47/10.30  									| (218)  ~ (times(all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11) |  ? [v0] : (times(all_8_0_4, v0) = all_29_0_10 & times(all_0_3_3, all_31_0_11) = v0)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_64_0_23, all_29_0_10, all_10_0_5, all_0_3_3, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms times(all_29_0_10, all_10_0_5) = all_64_0_23, times(all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_10, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (219)  ? [v0] : (times(all_10_0_5, all_0_1_1) = v0 & times(all_0_3_3, v0) = all_64_0_23)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_74_0_28, all_29_0_10, all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5, all_29_0_10 and discharging atoms times(all_29_0_10, all_0_2_2) = all_74_0_28, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (220)  ~ (times(all_29_0_10, all_10_0_5) = all_29_0_10) |  ? [v0] : (times(all_10_0_5, v0) = all_74_0_28 & times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = v0)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_16_0_6, all_10_0_5, all_74_0_28, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms times(all_10_0_5, all_74_0_28) = all_16_0_6, times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_10_0_5, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (221)  ? [v0] : (times(all_74_0_28, all_0_2_2) = v0 & times(all_0_2_2, v0) = all_16_0_6)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_31_0_11, all_10_0_5, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms times(all_10_0_5, all_0_1_1) = all_31_0_11, times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_10_0_5, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (222)  ? [v0] : (times(all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2) = v0 & times(all_0_2_2, v0) = all_31_0_11)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4, all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_8_0_4, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (223)  ~ (times(all_8_0_4, all_0_1_1) = all_31_0_11) |  ? [v0] : (times(all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3) = v0 & times(all_0_3_3, v0) = all_31_0_11)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_62_0_22, all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4, all_0_1_1, all_10_0_5 and discharging atoms times(all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4) = all_62_0_22, times(all_10_0_5, all_0_1_1) = all_31_0_11, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (224)  ? [v0] : (times(all_8_0_4, all_10_0_5) = v0 & times(all_0_1_1, v0) = all_62_0_22)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_16_0_6, all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_62_0_22, all_8_0_4 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_62_0_22) = all_0_1_1, times(all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (225)  ? [v0] : (times(all_62_0_22, v0) = all_16_0_6 & times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = v0)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_52_0_17, all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11) = all_0_1_1, times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_52_0_17, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (226)  ? [v0] : (times(all_31_0_11, v0) = all_52_0_17 & times(all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4) = v0)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_52_0_17, all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_52_0_17, times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (227)  ? [v0] : (times(all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3) = v0 & times(all_0_2_2, v0) = all_52_0_17)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_16_0_6, all_31_0_11, all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4, all_0_1_1 yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (228)  ~ (times(all_31_0_11, all_31_0_11) = all_16_0_6) |  ~ (times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11) |  ? [v0] : (times(all_31_0_11, all_0_1_1) = v0 & times(all_8_0_4, v0) = all_16_0_6)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_62_0_22, all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms times(all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4) = all_62_0_22, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (229)  ~ (times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11) |  ? [v0] : (times(all_8_0_4, v0) = all_62_0_22 & times(all_8_0_4, all_0_1_1) = v0)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_29_0_10, all_31_0_11, all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms times(all_31_0_11, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_10, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (230)  ~ (times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11) |  ? [v0] : (times(all_8_0_4, v0) = all_29_0_10 & times(all_0_3_3, all_0_1_1) = v0)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_52_0_17, all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4, all_62_0_22, all_8_0_4 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_62_0_22) = all_0_1_1, times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_52_0_17, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (231)  ? [v0] : (times(all_62_0_22, v0) = all_52_0_17 & times(all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4) = v0)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_16_0_6, all_0_2_2, all_64_0_23, all_10_0_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms times(all_0_2_2, all_64_0_23) = all_16_0_6, times(all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (232)  ? [v0] : (times(all_64_0_23, all_0_2_2) = v0 & times(all_10_0_5, v0) = all_16_0_6)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_16_0_6, all_0_2_2, all_64_0_23, all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5 and discharging atoms times(all_10_0_5, all_0_2_2) = all_0_2_2, times(all_0_2_2, all_64_0_23) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (233)  ? [v0] : (times(all_64_0_23, all_10_0_5) = v0 & times(all_0_2_2, v0) = all_16_0_6)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_16_0_6, all_31_0_11, all_52_0_17, all_44_0_13, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms times(all_31_0_11, all_52_0_17) = all_16_0_6, times(all_0_2_2, all_44_0_13) = all_31_0_11, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (234)  ? [v0] : (times(all_52_0_17, all_0_2_2) = v0 & times(all_44_0_13, v0) = all_16_0_6)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_29_0_10, all_31_0_11, all_0_3_3, all_44_0_13, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms times(all_31_0_11, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_10, times(all_0_2_2, all_44_0_13) = all_31_0_11, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (235)  ? [v0] : (times(all_44_0_13, v0) = all_29_0_10 & times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_74_0_28, all_29_0_10, all_0_2_2, all_8_0_4, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms times(all_29_0_10, all_0_2_2) = all_74_0_28, times(all_0_2_2, all_8_0_4) = all_29_0_10, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (236)  ? [v0] : (times(all_8_0_4, v0) = all_74_0_28 & times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_29_0_10, all_0_2_2, all_8_0_4, all_0_2_2, all_10_0_5 and discharging atoms times(all_10_0_5, all_0_2_2) = all_0_2_2, times(all_0_2_2, all_8_0_4) = all_29_0_10, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (237)  ? [v0] : (times(all_8_0_4, all_10_0_5) = v0 & times(all_0_2_2, v0) = all_29_0_10)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_29_0_10, all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3, all_29_0_10, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms times(all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_10, times(all_0_3_3, all_29_0_10) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (238)  ? [v0] : (times(all_29_0_10, v0) = all_29_0_10 & times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3, all_29_0_10, all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms times(all_0_3_3, all_29_0_10) = all_0_1_1, times(all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (239)  ? [v0] : (times(all_29_0_10, all_0_3_3) = v0 & times(all_8_0_4, v0) = all_0_1_1)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3, all_29_0_10, all_0_3_3, all_8_0_4 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3) = all_0_3_3, times(all_0_3_3, all_29_0_10) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (240)  ? [v0] : (times(all_29_0_10, all_8_0_4) = v0 & times(all_0_3_3, v0) = all_0_1_1)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating formula (4) with all_52_0_17, all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4, all_29_0_10, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_52_0_17, times(all_0_3_3, all_29_0_10) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (241)  ? [v0] : (times(all_29_0_10, v0) = all_52_0_17 & times(all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3) = v0)
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Instantiating (241) with all_131_0_36 yields:
% 33.47/10.31  									| (242) times(all_29_0_10, all_131_0_36) = all_52_0_17 & times(all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3) = all_131_0_36
% 33.47/10.31  									|
% 33.47/10.31  									| Applying alpha-rule on (242) yields:
% 33.47/10.32  									| (243) times(all_29_0_10, all_131_0_36) = all_52_0_17
% 33.47/10.32  									| (244) times(all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3) = all_131_0_36
% 33.47/10.32  									|
% 33.47/10.32  									| Instantiating (239) with all_133_0_37 yields:
% 33.47/10.32  									| (245) times(all_29_0_10, all_0_3_3) = all_133_0_37 & times(all_8_0_4, all_133_0_37) = all_0_1_1
% 33.47/10.32  									|
% 33.47/10.32  									| Applying alpha-rule on (245) yields:
% 33.47/10.32  									| (246) times(all_29_0_10, all_0_3_3) = all_133_0_37
% 33.47/10.32  									| (247) times(all_8_0_4, all_133_0_37) = all_0_1_1
% 33.47/10.32  									|
% 33.47/10.32  									| Instantiating (236) with all_139_0_40 yields:
% 33.47/10.32  									| (248) times(all_8_0_4, all_139_0_40) = all_74_0_28 & times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_139_0_40
% 33.47/10.32  									|
% 33.47/10.32  									| Applying alpha-rule on (248) yields:
% 33.47/10.32  									| (249) times(all_8_0_4, all_139_0_40) = all_74_0_28
% 33.47/10.32  									| (250) times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_139_0_40
% 33.47/10.32  									|
% 33.47/10.32  									| Instantiating (240) with all_147_0_44 yields:
% 33.47/10.32  									| (251) times(all_29_0_10, all_8_0_4) = all_147_0_44 & times(all_0_3_3, all_147_0_44) = all_0_1_1
% 33.47/10.32  									|
% 33.47/10.32  									| Applying alpha-rule on (251) yields:
% 33.47/10.32  									| (252) times(all_29_0_10, all_8_0_4) = all_147_0_44
% 33.47/10.32  									| (253) times(all_0_3_3, all_147_0_44) = all_0_1_1
% 33.47/10.32  									|
% 33.47/10.32  									| Instantiating (238) with all_149_0_45 yields:
% 33.47/10.32  									| (254) times(all_29_0_10, all_149_0_45) = all_29_0_10 & times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_149_0_45
% 33.47/10.32  									|
% 33.47/10.32  									| Applying alpha-rule on (254) yields:
% 33.47/10.32  									| (255) times(all_29_0_10, all_149_0_45) = all_29_0_10
% 33.90/10.32  									| (256) times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_149_0_45
% 33.90/10.32  									|
% 33.90/10.32  									| Instantiating (237) with all_151_0_46 yields:
% 33.90/10.32  									| (257) times(all_8_0_4, all_10_0_5) = all_151_0_46 & times(all_0_2_2, all_151_0_46) = all_29_0_10
% 33.90/10.32  									|
% 33.90/10.32  									| Applying alpha-rule on (257) yields:
% 33.90/10.32  									| (258) times(all_8_0_4, all_10_0_5) = all_151_0_46
% 33.90/10.32  									| (259) times(all_0_2_2, all_151_0_46) = all_29_0_10
% 33.90/10.32  									|
% 33.90/10.32  									| Instantiating (235) with all_153_0_47 yields:
% 33.90/10.32  									| (260) times(all_44_0_13, all_153_0_47) = all_29_0_10 & times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_153_0_47
% 33.90/10.32  									|
% 33.90/10.32  									| Applying alpha-rule on (260) yields:
% 33.90/10.32  									| (261) times(all_44_0_13, all_153_0_47) = all_29_0_10
% 33.90/10.32  									| (262) times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_153_0_47
% 33.90/10.32  									|
% 33.90/10.32  									| Instantiating (234) with all_157_0_49 yields:
% 33.90/10.32  									| (263) times(all_52_0_17, all_0_2_2) = all_157_0_49 & times(all_44_0_13, all_157_0_49) = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.32  									|
% 33.90/10.32  									| Applying alpha-rule on (263) yields:
% 33.90/10.32  									| (264) times(all_52_0_17, all_0_2_2) = all_157_0_49
% 33.90/10.32  									| (265) times(all_44_0_13, all_157_0_49) = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.32  									|
% 33.90/10.32  									| Instantiating (233) with all_163_0_52 yields:
% 33.90/10.32  									| (266) times(all_64_0_23, all_10_0_5) = all_163_0_52 & times(all_0_2_2, all_163_0_52) = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.32  									|
% 33.90/10.32  									| Applying alpha-rule on (266) yields:
% 33.90/10.32  									| (267) times(all_64_0_23, all_10_0_5) = all_163_0_52
% 33.90/10.32  									| (268) times(all_0_2_2, all_163_0_52) = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.32  									|
% 33.90/10.32  									| Instantiating (231) with all_167_0_54 yields:
% 33.90/10.32  									| (269) times(all_62_0_22, all_167_0_54) = all_52_0_17 & times(all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4) = all_167_0_54
% 33.90/10.32  									|
% 33.90/10.32  									| Applying alpha-rule on (269) yields:
% 33.90/10.32  									| (270) times(all_62_0_22, all_167_0_54) = all_52_0_17
% 33.90/10.32  									| (271) times(all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4) = all_167_0_54
% 33.90/10.32  									|
% 33.90/10.32  									| Instantiating (227) with all_169_0_55 yields:
% 33.90/10.32  									| (272) times(all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3) = all_169_0_55 & times(all_0_2_2, all_169_0_55) = all_52_0_17
% 33.90/10.32  									|
% 33.90/10.32  									| Applying alpha-rule on (272) yields:
% 33.90/10.32  									| (273) times(all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3) = all_169_0_55
% 33.90/10.32  									| (274) times(all_0_2_2, all_169_0_55) = all_52_0_17
% 33.90/10.32  									|
% 33.90/10.32  									| Instantiating (232) with all_171_0_56 yields:
% 33.90/10.32  									| (275) times(all_64_0_23, all_0_2_2) = all_171_0_56 & times(all_10_0_5, all_171_0_56) = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.32  									|
% 33.90/10.32  									| Applying alpha-rule on (275) yields:
% 33.90/10.32  									| (276) times(all_64_0_23, all_0_2_2) = all_171_0_56
% 33.90/10.32  									| (277) times(all_10_0_5, all_171_0_56) = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.32  									|
% 33.90/10.32  									| Instantiating (226) with all_173_0_57 yields:
% 33.90/10.32  									| (278) times(all_31_0_11, all_173_0_57) = all_52_0_17 & times(all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4) = all_173_0_57
% 33.90/10.32  									|
% 33.90/10.32  									| Applying alpha-rule on (278) yields:
% 33.90/10.32  									| (279) times(all_31_0_11, all_173_0_57) = all_52_0_17
% 33.90/10.32  									| (280) times(all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4) = all_173_0_57
% 33.90/10.32  									|
% 33.90/10.32  									| Instantiating (224) with all_175_0_58 yields:
% 33.90/10.32  									| (281) times(all_8_0_4, all_10_0_5) = all_175_0_58 & times(all_0_1_1, all_175_0_58) = all_62_0_22
% 33.90/10.32  									|
% 33.90/10.32  									| Applying alpha-rule on (281) yields:
% 33.90/10.32  									| (282) times(all_8_0_4, all_10_0_5) = all_175_0_58
% 33.90/10.32  									| (283) times(all_0_1_1, all_175_0_58) = all_62_0_22
% 33.90/10.32  									|
% 33.90/10.32  									| Instantiating (219) with all_179_0_60 yields:
% 33.90/10.32  									| (284) times(all_10_0_5, all_0_1_1) = all_179_0_60 & times(all_0_3_3, all_179_0_60) = all_64_0_23
% 33.90/10.32  									|
% 33.90/10.32  									| Applying alpha-rule on (284) yields:
% 33.90/10.32  									| (285) times(all_10_0_5, all_0_1_1) = all_179_0_60
% 33.90/10.32  									| (286) times(all_0_3_3, all_179_0_60) = all_64_0_23
% 33.90/10.32  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating (214) with all_185_0_63 yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (287) times(all_52_0_17, all_0_2_2) = all_185_0_63 & times(all_0_3_3, all_185_0_63) = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Applying alpha-rule on (287) yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (288) times(all_52_0_17, all_0_2_2) = all_185_0_63
% 33.90/10.33  									| (289) times(all_0_3_3, all_185_0_63) = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating (217) with all_187_0_64 yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (290) times(all_0_3_3, all_187_0_64) = all_29_0_10 & times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_187_0_64
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Applying alpha-rule on (290) yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (291) times(all_0_3_3, all_187_0_64) = all_29_0_10
% 33.90/10.33  									| (292) times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_187_0_64
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating (225) with all_193_0_67 yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (293) times(all_62_0_22, all_193_0_67) = all_16_0_6 & times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_193_0_67
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Applying alpha-rule on (293) yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (294) times(all_62_0_22, all_193_0_67) = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.33  									| (295) times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_193_0_67
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating (222) with all_197_0_69 yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (296) times(all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2) = all_197_0_69 & times(all_0_2_2, all_197_0_69) = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Applying alpha-rule on (296) yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (297) times(all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2) = all_197_0_69
% 33.90/10.33  									| (298) times(all_0_2_2, all_197_0_69) = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating (221) with all_199_0_70 yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (299) times(all_74_0_28, all_0_2_2) = all_199_0_70 & times(all_0_2_2, all_199_0_70) = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Applying alpha-rule on (299) yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (300) times(all_74_0_28, all_0_2_2) = all_199_0_70
% 33.90/10.33  									| (301) times(all_0_2_2, all_199_0_70) = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating formula (8) with all_29_0_10, all_10_0_5, all_163_0_52, all_29_0_10 yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (302) all_163_0_52 = all_29_0_10 |  ~ (times(all_29_0_10, all_10_0_5) = all_163_0_52) |  ~ (times(all_29_0_10, all_10_0_5) = all_29_0_10)
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating formula (8) with all_29_0_10, all_0_2_2, all_171_0_56, all_74_0_28 and discharging atoms times(all_29_0_10, all_0_2_2) = all_74_0_28, yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (303) all_171_0_56 = all_74_0_28 |  ~ (times(all_29_0_10, all_0_2_2) = all_171_0_56)
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating formula (8) with all_52_0_17, all_0_2_2, all_157_0_49, all_185_0_63 and discharging atoms times(all_52_0_17, all_0_2_2) = all_185_0_63, times(all_52_0_17, all_0_2_2) = all_157_0_49, yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (304) all_185_0_63 = all_157_0_49
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating formula (8) with all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4, all_52_0_17, all_62_0_22 and discharging atoms times(all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4) = all_62_0_22, yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (305) all_62_0_22 = all_52_0_17 |  ~ (times(all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4) = all_52_0_17)
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating formula (8) with all_29_0_10, all_8_0_4, all_147_0_44, all_29_0_10 and discharging atoms times(all_29_0_10, all_8_0_4) = all_147_0_44, yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (306) all_147_0_44 = all_29_0_10 |  ~ (times(all_29_0_10, all_8_0_4) = all_29_0_10)
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating formula (8) with all_29_0_10, all_0_3_3, all_133_0_37, all_52_0_17 and discharging atoms times(all_29_0_10, all_0_3_3) = all_133_0_37, yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (307) all_133_0_37 = all_52_0_17 |  ~ (times(all_29_0_10, all_0_3_3) = all_52_0_17)
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating formula (8) with all_10_0_5, all_0_1_1, all_179_0_60, all_31_0_11 and discharging atoms times(all_10_0_5, all_0_1_1) = all_179_0_60, times(all_10_0_5, all_0_1_1) = all_31_0_11, yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (308) all_179_0_60 = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating formula (8) with all_8_0_4, all_10_0_5, all_175_0_58, all_74_0_28 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_10_0_5) = all_175_0_58, yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (309) all_175_0_58 = all_74_0_28 |  ~ (times(all_8_0_4, all_10_0_5) = all_74_0_28)
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating formula (8) with all_8_0_4, all_10_0_5, all_151_0_46, all_175_0_58 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_10_0_5) = all_175_0_58, times(all_8_0_4, all_10_0_5) = all_151_0_46, yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (310) all_175_0_58 = all_151_0_46
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating formula (8) with all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4, all_173_0_57, all_8_0_4 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4) = all_173_0_57, times(all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4) = all_8_0_4, yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (311) all_173_0_57 = all_8_0_4
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating formula (8) with all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4, all_167_0_54, all_173_0_57 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4) = all_173_0_57, times(all_8_0_4, all_8_0_4) = all_167_0_54, yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (312) all_173_0_57 = all_167_0_54
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating formula (8) with all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3, all_169_0_55, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3) = all_169_0_55, times(all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (313) all_169_0_55 = all_0_3_3
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating formula (8) with all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3, all_131_0_36, all_169_0_55 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3) = all_169_0_55, times(all_8_0_4, all_0_3_3) = all_131_0_36, yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (314) all_169_0_55 = all_131_0_36
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4, all_193_0_67, all_52_0_17 and discharging atoms times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_193_0_67, times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_52_0_17, yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (315) all_193_0_67 = all_52_0_17
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_197_0_69, all_157_0_49 and discharging atoms times(all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2) = all_197_0_69, yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (316) all_197_0_69 = all_157_0_49 |  ~ (times(all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2) = all_157_0_49)
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_2_2, all_169_0_55, all_52_0_17, all_31_0_11 and discharging atoms times(all_0_2_2, all_169_0_55) = all_52_0_17, yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (317) all_52_0_17 = all_31_0_11 |  ~ (times(all_0_2_2, all_169_0_55) = all_31_0_11)
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_139_0_40, all_10_0_5 and discharging atoms times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_139_0_40, times(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_10_0_5, yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (318) all_139_0_40 = all_10_0_5
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_187_0_64, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_187_0_64, times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (319) all_187_0_64 = all_0_1_1
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_153_0_47, all_187_0_64 and discharging atoms times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_187_0_64, times(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_153_0_47, yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (320) all_187_0_64 = all_153_0_47
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_149_0_45, all_8_0_4 and discharging atoms times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_149_0_45, times(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_8_0_4, yields:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (321) all_149_0_45 = all_8_0_4
% 33.90/10.33  									|
% 33.90/10.33  									| Combining equations (319,320) yields a new equation:
% 33.90/10.33  									| (322) all_153_0_47 = all_0_1_1
% 33.90/10.34  									|
% 33.90/10.34  									| Combining equations (311,312) yields a new equation:
% 33.90/10.34  									| (323) all_167_0_54 = all_8_0_4
% 33.90/10.34  									|
% 33.90/10.34  									| Combining equations (314,313) yields a new equation:
% 33.90/10.34  									| (324) all_131_0_36 = all_0_3_3
% 33.90/10.34  									|
% 33.90/10.34  									| Simplifying 324 yields:
% 33.90/10.34  									| (325) all_131_0_36 = all_0_3_3
% 33.90/10.34  									|
% 33.90/10.34  									| Combining equations (323,312) yields a new equation:
% 33.90/10.34  									| (311) all_173_0_57 = all_8_0_4
% 33.90/10.34  									|
% 33.90/10.34  									| Combining equations (322,320) yields a new equation:
% 33.90/10.34  									| (319) all_187_0_64 = all_0_1_1
% 33.90/10.34  									|
% 33.90/10.34  									| From (304) and (288) follows:
% 33.90/10.34  									| (264) times(all_52_0_17, all_0_2_2) = all_157_0_49
% 33.90/10.34  									|
% 33.90/10.34  									| From (311) and (279) follows:
% 33.90/10.34  									| (329) times(all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4) = all_52_0_17
% 33.90/10.34  									|
% 33.90/10.34  									| From (321) and (255) follows:
% 33.90/10.34  									| (330) times(all_29_0_10, all_8_0_4) = all_29_0_10
% 33.90/10.34  									|
% 33.90/10.34  									| From (325) and (243) follows:
% 33.90/10.34  									| (331) times(all_29_0_10, all_0_3_3) = all_52_0_17
% 33.90/10.34  									|
% 33.90/10.34  									| From (318) and (249) follows:
% 33.90/10.34  									| (332) times(all_8_0_4, all_10_0_5) = all_74_0_28
% 33.90/10.34  									|
% 33.90/10.34  									| From (310) and (283) follows:
% 33.90/10.34  									| (333) times(all_0_1_1, all_151_0_46) = all_62_0_22
% 33.90/10.34  									|
% 33.90/10.34  									| From (315) and (295) follows:
% 33.90/10.34  									| (91) times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_52_0_17
% 33.90/10.34  									|
% 33.90/10.34  									| From (319) and (291) follows:
% 33.90/10.34  									| (335) times(all_0_3_3, all_0_1_1) = all_29_0_10
% 33.90/10.34  									|
% 33.90/10.34  									| From (308) and (286) follows:
% 33.90/10.34  									| (336) times(all_0_3_3, all_31_0_11) = all_64_0_23
% 33.90/10.34  									|
% 33.90/10.34  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (317), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.34  									|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.34  									| (337)  ~ (times(all_0_2_2, all_169_0_55) = all_31_0_11)
% 33.90/10.34  									|
% 33.90/10.34  										| From (313) and (337) follows:
% 33.90/10.34  										| (338)  ~ (times(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_31_0_11)
% 33.90/10.34  										|
% 33.90/10.34  										| Using (48) and (338) yields:
% 33.90/10.34  										| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.34  										|
% 33.90/10.34  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.34  									|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.34  									| (340) times(all_0_2_2, all_169_0_55) = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.34  									| (341) all_52_0_17 = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.34  									|
% 33.90/10.34  										| From (341) and (264) follows:
% 33.90/10.34  										| (342) times(all_31_0_11, all_0_2_2) = all_157_0_49
% 33.90/10.34  										|
% 33.90/10.34  										| From (341) and (90) follows:
% 33.90/10.34  										| (343) times(all_31_0_11, all_31_0_11) = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.34  										|
% 33.90/10.34  										| From (341) and (329) follows:
% 33.90/10.34  										| (344) times(all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.34  										|
% 33.90/10.34  										| From (341) and (331) follows:
% 33.90/10.34  										| (345) times(all_29_0_10, all_0_3_3) = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.34  										|
% 33.90/10.34  										| From (341) and (91) follows:
% 33.90/10.34  										| (346) times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.34  										|
% 33.90/10.34  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (215), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.34  										|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.34  										| (347)  ~ (times(all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11)
% 33.90/10.34  										|
% 33.90/10.34  											| Using (344) and (347) yields:
% 33.90/10.34  											| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.34  											|
% 33.90/10.34  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.34  										|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.34  										| (344) times(all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.34  										| (350)  ? [v0] : (times(all_52_0_17, all_31_0_11) = v0 & times(all_8_0_4, v0) = all_16_0_6)
% 33.90/10.34  										|
% 33.90/10.34  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (218), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.34  											|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.34  											| (347)  ~ (times(all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11)
% 33.90/10.34  											|
% 33.90/10.34  												| Using (344) and (347) yields:
% 33.90/10.34  												| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.34  												|
% 33.90/10.34  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.34  											|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.34  											| (344) times(all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.34  											| (354)  ? [v0] : (times(all_8_0_4, v0) = all_29_0_10 & times(all_0_3_3, all_31_0_11) = v0)
% 33.90/10.34  											|
% 33.90/10.34  												| Instantiating (354) with all_229_0_75 yields:
% 33.90/10.34  												| (355) times(all_8_0_4, all_229_0_75) = all_29_0_10 & times(all_0_3_3, all_31_0_11) = all_229_0_75
% 33.90/10.34  												|
% 33.90/10.34  												| Applying alpha-rule on (355) yields:
% 33.90/10.34  												| (356) times(all_8_0_4, all_229_0_75) = all_29_0_10
% 33.90/10.34  												| (357) times(all_0_3_3, all_31_0_11) = all_229_0_75
% 33.90/10.34  												|
% 33.90/10.34  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (228), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.34  												|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.34  												| (358)  ~ (times(all_31_0_11, all_31_0_11) = all_16_0_6)
% 33.90/10.34  												|
% 33.90/10.34  													| Using (343) and (358) yields:
% 33.90/10.34  													| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.34  													|
% 33.90/10.34  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.34  												|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.34  												| (343) times(all_31_0_11, all_31_0_11) = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.34  												| (361)  ~ (times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11) |  ? [v0] : (times(all_31_0_11, all_0_1_1) = v0 & times(all_8_0_4, v0) = all_16_0_6)
% 33.90/10.35  												|
% 33.90/10.35  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.35  													|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.35  													| (362)  ~ (times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11)
% 33.90/10.35  													|
% 33.90/10.35  														| Using (346) and (362) yields:
% 33.90/10.35  														| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.35  														|
% 33.90/10.35  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.35  													|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.35  													| (346) times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.35  													| (365)  ? [v0] : (times(all_8_0_4, v0) = all_29_0_10 & times(all_0_3_3, all_0_1_1) = v0)
% 33.90/10.35  													|
% 33.90/10.35  														| Instantiating (365) with all_238_0_76 yields:
% 33.90/10.35  														| (366) times(all_8_0_4, all_238_0_76) = all_29_0_10 & times(all_0_3_3, all_0_1_1) = all_238_0_76
% 33.90/10.35  														|
% 33.90/10.35  														| Applying alpha-rule on (366) yields:
% 33.90/10.35  														| (367) times(all_8_0_4, all_238_0_76) = all_29_0_10
% 33.90/10.35  														| (368) times(all_0_3_3, all_0_1_1) = all_238_0_76
% 33.90/10.35  														|
% 33.90/10.35  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (361), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.35  														|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.35  														| (362)  ~ (times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11)
% 33.90/10.35  														|
% 33.90/10.35  															| Using (346) and (362) yields:
% 33.90/10.35  															| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.35  															|
% 33.90/10.35  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.35  														|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.35  														| (346) times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.35  														| (372)  ? [v0] : (times(all_31_0_11, all_0_1_1) = v0 & times(all_8_0_4, v0) = all_16_0_6)
% 33.90/10.35  														|
% 33.90/10.35  															| Instantiating (372) with all_243_0_77 yields:
% 33.90/10.35  															| (373) times(all_31_0_11, all_0_1_1) = all_243_0_77 & times(all_8_0_4, all_243_0_77) = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.35  															|
% 33.90/10.35  															| Applying alpha-rule on (373) yields:
% 33.90/10.35  															| (374) times(all_31_0_11, all_0_1_1) = all_243_0_77
% 33.90/10.35  															| (375) times(all_8_0_4, all_243_0_77) = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.35  															|
% 33.90/10.35  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (216), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.35  															|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.35  															| (347)  ~ (times(all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11)
% 33.90/10.35  															|
% 33.90/10.35  																| Using (344) and (347) yields:
% 33.90/10.35  																| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.35  																|
% 33.90/10.35  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.35  															|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.35  															| (344) times(all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.35  															| (379)  ? [v0] : (times(all_8_0_4, v0) = all_31_0_11 & times(all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11) = v0)
% 33.90/10.35  															|
% 33.90/10.35  																| Instantiating (379) with all_249_0_78 yields:
% 33.90/10.35  																| (380) times(all_8_0_4, all_249_0_78) = all_31_0_11 & times(all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11) = all_249_0_78
% 33.90/10.35  																|
% 33.90/10.35  																| Applying alpha-rule on (380) yields:
% 33.90/10.35  																| (381) times(all_8_0_4, all_249_0_78) = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.35  																| (382) times(all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11) = all_249_0_78
% 33.90/10.35  																|
% 33.90/10.35  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (309), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.35  																|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.35  																| (383)  ~ (times(all_8_0_4, all_10_0_5) = all_74_0_28)
% 33.90/10.35  																|
% 33.90/10.35  																	| Using (332) and (383) yields:
% 33.90/10.35  																	| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.35  																	|
% 33.90/10.35  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.35  																|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.35  																| (332) times(all_8_0_4, all_10_0_5) = all_74_0_28
% 33.90/10.35  																| (386) all_175_0_58 = all_74_0_28
% 33.90/10.35  																|
% 33.90/10.35  																	| Combining equations (310,386) yields a new equation:
% 33.90/10.35  																	| (387) all_151_0_46 = all_74_0_28
% 33.90/10.35  																	|
% 33.90/10.35  																	| Simplifying 387 yields:
% 33.90/10.35  																	| (388) all_151_0_46 = all_74_0_28
% 33.90/10.35  																	|
% 33.90/10.35  																	| From (388) and (333) follows:
% 33.90/10.35  																	| (389) times(all_0_1_1, all_74_0_28) = all_62_0_22
% 33.90/10.35  																	|
% 33.90/10.35  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.35  																	|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.35  																	| (362)  ~ (times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11)
% 33.90/10.35  																	|
% 33.90/10.35  																		| Using (346) and (362) yields:
% 33.90/10.35  																		| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.35  																		|
% 33.90/10.35  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.35  																	|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.36  																	| (346) times(all_0_1_1, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.36  																	| (393)  ? [v0] : (times(all_8_0_4, v0) = all_62_0_22 & times(all_8_0_4, all_0_1_1) = v0)
% 33.90/10.36  																	|
% 33.90/10.36  																		| Instantiating (393) with all_262_0_79 yields:
% 33.90/10.36  																		| (394) times(all_8_0_4, all_262_0_79) = all_62_0_22 & times(all_8_0_4, all_0_1_1) = all_262_0_79
% 33.90/10.36  																		|
% 33.90/10.36  																		| Applying alpha-rule on (394) yields:
% 33.90/10.36  																		| (395) times(all_8_0_4, all_262_0_79) = all_62_0_22
% 33.90/10.36  																		| (396) times(all_8_0_4, all_0_1_1) = all_262_0_79
% 33.90/10.36  																		|
% 33.90/10.36  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (306), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.36  																		|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.36  																		| (397)  ~ (times(all_29_0_10, all_8_0_4) = all_29_0_10)
% 33.90/10.36  																		|
% 33.90/10.36  																			| Using (330) and (397) yields:
% 33.90/10.36  																			| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.36  																			|
% 33.90/10.36  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.36  																		|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.36  																		| (330) times(all_29_0_10, all_8_0_4) = all_29_0_10
% 33.90/10.36  																		| (400) all_147_0_44 = all_29_0_10
% 33.90/10.36  																		|
% 33.90/10.36  																			| From (400) and (252) follows:
% 33.90/10.36  																			| (330) times(all_29_0_10, all_8_0_4) = all_29_0_10
% 33.90/10.36  																			|
% 33.90/10.36  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (307), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.36  																			|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.36  																			| (402)  ~ (times(all_29_0_10, all_0_3_3) = all_52_0_17)
% 33.90/10.36  																			|
% 33.90/10.36  																				| From (341) and (402) follows:
% 33.90/10.36  																				| (403)  ~ (times(all_29_0_10, all_0_3_3) = all_31_0_11)
% 33.90/10.36  																				|
% 33.90/10.36  																				| Using (345) and (403) yields:
% 33.90/10.36  																				| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.36  																				|
% 33.90/10.36  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.36  																			|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.36  																			| (331) times(all_29_0_10, all_0_3_3) = all_52_0_17
% 33.90/10.36  																			| (406) all_133_0_37 = all_52_0_17
% 33.90/10.36  																			|
% 33.90/10.36  																				| From (341) and (331) follows:
% 33.90/10.36  																				| (345) times(all_29_0_10, all_0_3_3) = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.36  																				|
% 33.90/10.36  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (305), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.36  																				|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.36  																				| (408)  ~ (times(all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4) = all_52_0_17)
% 33.90/10.36  																				|
% 33.90/10.36  																					| From (341) and (408) follows:
% 33.90/10.36  																					| (347)  ~ (times(all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4) = all_31_0_11)
% 33.90/10.36  																					|
% 33.90/10.36  																					| Using (344) and (347) yields:
% 33.90/10.36  																					| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.36  																					|
% 33.90/10.36  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.36  																				|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.36  																				| (329) times(all_31_0_11, all_8_0_4) = all_52_0_17
% 33.90/10.36  																				| (412) all_62_0_22 = all_52_0_17
% 33.90/10.36  																				|
% 33.90/10.36  																					| Combining equations (341,412) yields a new equation:
% 33.90/10.36  																					| (413) all_62_0_22 = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.36  																					|
% 33.90/10.36  																					| From (413) and (395) follows:
% 33.90/10.36  																					| (414) times(all_8_0_4, all_262_0_79) = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.36  																					|
% 33.90/10.36  																					| From (413) and (103) follows:
% 33.90/10.36  																					| (47) times(all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11) = all_0_1_1
% 33.90/10.36  																					|
% 33.90/10.36  																					| From (413) and (389) follows:
% 33.90/10.36  																					| (416) times(all_0_1_1, all_74_0_28) = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.36  																					|
% 33.90/10.36  																					| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_243_0_77, all_16_0_6 and discharging atoms times(all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 33.90/10.36  																					| (417) all_243_0_77 = all_16_0_6 |  ~ (times(all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1) = all_243_0_77)
% 33.90/10.36  																					|
% 33.90/10.36  																					| Instantiating formula (8) with all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11, all_31_0_11, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 33.90/10.36  																					| (418) all_31_0_11 = all_0_1_1 |  ~ (times(all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11) = all_31_0_11)
% 33.90/10.36  																					|
% 33.90/10.36  																					| Instantiating formula (8) with all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11, all_249_0_78, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11) = all_249_0_78, times(all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 33.90/10.36  																					| (419) all_249_0_78 = all_0_1_1
% 33.90/10.36  																					|
% 33.90/10.36  																					| Instantiating formula (8) with all_8_0_4, all_0_1_1, all_262_0_79, all_31_0_11 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_0_1_1) = all_262_0_79, yields:
% 33.90/10.36  																					| (420) all_262_0_79 = all_31_0_11 |  ~ (times(all_8_0_4, all_0_1_1) = all_31_0_11)
% 33.90/10.36  																					|
% 33.90/10.36  																					| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_3_3, all_31_0_11, all_229_0_75, all_64_0_23 and discharging atoms times(all_0_3_3, all_31_0_11) = all_229_0_75, times(all_0_3_3, all_31_0_11) = all_64_0_23, yields:
% 33.90/10.36  																					| (421) all_229_0_75 = all_64_0_23
% 33.90/10.36  																					|
% 33.90/10.36  																					| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_3_3, all_0_1_1, all_238_0_76, all_29_0_10 and discharging atoms times(all_0_3_3, all_0_1_1) = all_238_0_76, times(all_0_3_3, all_0_1_1) = all_29_0_10, yields:
% 33.90/10.36  																					| (422) all_238_0_76 = all_29_0_10
% 33.90/10.36  																					|
% 33.90/10.36  																					| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_3_3, all_0_1_1, all_238_0_76, all_229_0_75 and discharging atoms times(all_0_3_3, all_0_1_1) = all_238_0_76, yields:
% 33.90/10.36  																					| (423) all_238_0_76 = all_229_0_75 |  ~ (times(all_0_3_3, all_0_1_1) = all_229_0_75)
% 33.90/10.36  																					|
% 33.90/10.36  																					| From (419) and (381) follows:
% 33.90/10.36  																					| (424) times(all_8_0_4, all_0_1_1) = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.36  																					|
% 33.90/10.36  																					| From (421) and (357) follows:
% 33.90/10.36  																					| (336) times(all_0_3_3, all_31_0_11) = all_64_0_23
% 33.90/10.36  																					|
% 33.90/10.36  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (223), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.36  																					|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.36  																					| (426)  ~ (times(all_8_0_4, all_0_1_1) = all_31_0_11)
% 33.90/10.36  																					|
% 33.90/10.36  																						| Using (424) and (426) yields:
% 33.90/10.36  																						| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.36  																						|
% 33.90/10.36  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.36  																					|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.36  																					| (424) times(all_8_0_4, all_0_1_1) = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.36  																					| (429)  ? [v0] : (times(all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3) = v0 & times(all_0_3_3, v0) = all_31_0_11)
% 33.90/10.36  																					|
% 33.90/10.36  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (420), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.36  																						|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.36  																						| (426)  ~ (times(all_8_0_4, all_0_1_1) = all_31_0_11)
% 33.90/10.36  																						|
% 33.90/10.36  																							| Using (424) and (426) yields:
% 33.90/10.37  																							| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.37  																							|
% 33.90/10.37  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.37  																						|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.37  																						| (424) times(all_8_0_4, all_0_1_1) = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.37  																						| (433) all_262_0_79 = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.37  																						|
% 33.90/10.37  																							| From (433) and (414) follows:
% 33.90/10.37  																							| (434) times(all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11) = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.37  																							|
% 33.90/10.37  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (418), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.37  																							|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.37  																							| (435)  ~ (times(all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11) = all_31_0_11)
% 33.90/10.37  																							|
% 33.90/10.37  																								| Using (434) and (435) yields:
% 33.90/10.37  																								| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.37  																								|
% 33.90/10.37  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.37  																							|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.37  																							| (434) times(all_8_0_4, all_31_0_11) = all_31_0_11
% 33.90/10.37  																							| (438) all_31_0_11 = all_0_1_1
% 33.90/10.37  																							|
% 33.90/10.37  																								| From (438) and (374) follows:
% 33.90/10.37  																								| (439) times(all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1) = all_243_0_77
% 33.90/10.37  																								|
% 33.90/10.37  																								| From (438) and (342) follows:
% 33.90/10.37  																								| (440) times(all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2) = all_157_0_49
% 33.90/10.37  																								|
% 33.90/10.37  																								| From (438) and (345) follows:
% 33.90/10.37  																								| (441) times(all_29_0_10, all_0_3_3) = all_0_1_1
% 33.90/10.37  																								|
% 33.90/10.37  																								| From (438) and (416) follows:
% 33.90/10.37  																								| (442) times(all_0_1_1, all_74_0_28) = all_0_1_1
% 33.90/10.37  																								|
% 33.90/10.37  																								| From (438) and (336) follows:
% 33.90/10.37  																								| (443) times(all_0_3_3, all_0_1_1) = all_64_0_23
% 33.90/10.37  																								|
% 33.90/10.37  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (423), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.37  																								|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.37  																								| (444)  ~ (times(all_0_3_3, all_0_1_1) = all_229_0_75)
% 33.90/10.37  																								|
% 33.90/10.37  																									| From (421) and (444) follows:
% 33.90/10.37  																									| (445)  ~ (times(all_0_3_3, all_0_1_1) = all_64_0_23)
% 33.90/10.37  																									|
% 33.90/10.37  																									| Using (443) and (445) yields:
% 33.90/10.37  																									| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.37  																									|
% 33.90/10.37  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.37  																								|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.37  																								| (447) times(all_0_3_3, all_0_1_1) = all_229_0_75
% 33.90/10.37  																								| (448) all_238_0_76 = all_229_0_75
% 33.90/10.37  																								|
% 33.90/10.37  																									| Combining equations (448,422) yields a new equation:
% 33.90/10.37  																									| (449) all_229_0_75 = all_29_0_10
% 33.90/10.37  																									|
% 33.90/10.37  																									| Simplifying 449 yields:
% 33.90/10.37  																									| (450) all_229_0_75 = all_29_0_10
% 33.90/10.37  																									|
% 33.90/10.37  																									| Combining equations (450,421) yields a new equation:
% 33.90/10.37  																									| (451) all_64_0_23 = all_29_0_10
% 33.90/10.37  																									|
% 33.90/10.37  																									| From (451) and (267) follows:
% 33.90/10.37  																									| (452) times(all_29_0_10, all_10_0_5) = all_163_0_52
% 33.90/10.37  																									|
% 33.90/10.37  																									| From (451) and (276) follows:
% 33.90/10.37  																									| (453) times(all_29_0_10, all_0_2_2) = all_171_0_56
% 33.90/10.37  																									|
% 33.90/10.37  																									| From (451) and (105) follows:
% 33.90/10.37  																									| (454) times(all_29_0_10, all_10_0_5) = all_29_0_10
% 33.90/10.37  																									|
% 33.90/10.37  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (316), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.37  																									|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.37  																									| (455)  ~ (times(all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2) = all_157_0_49)
% 33.90/10.37  																									|
% 33.90/10.37  																										| Using (440) and (455) yields:
% 33.90/10.37  																										| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.37  																										|
% 33.90/10.37  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.37  																									|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.37  																									| (440) times(all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2) = all_157_0_49
% 33.90/10.37  																									| (458) all_197_0_69 = all_157_0_49
% 33.90/10.37  																									|
% 33.90/10.37  																										| From (458) and (297) follows:
% 33.90/10.37  																										| (440) times(all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2) = all_157_0_49
% 33.90/10.37  																										|
% 33.90/10.37  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (417), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.37  																										|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.37  																										| (460)  ~ (times(all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1) = all_243_0_77)
% 33.90/10.37  																										|
% 33.90/10.37  																											| Using (439) and (460) yields:
% 33.90/10.37  																											| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.37  																											|
% 33.90/10.37  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.37  																										|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.37  																										| (439) times(all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1) = all_243_0_77
% 33.90/10.37  																										| (463) all_243_0_77 = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.37  																										|
% 33.90/10.37  																											| From (463) and (375) follows:
% 33.90/10.37  																											| (464) times(all_8_0_4, all_16_0_6) = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.37  																											|
% 33.90/10.37  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (302), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.37  																											|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.37  																											| (465)  ~ (times(all_29_0_10, all_10_0_5) = all_163_0_52)
% 33.90/10.37  																											|
% 33.90/10.37  																												| Using (452) and (465) yields:
% 33.90/10.37  																												| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.37  																												|
% 33.90/10.37  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.37  																											|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.37  																											| (452) times(all_29_0_10, all_10_0_5) = all_163_0_52
% 33.90/10.37  																											| (468) all_163_0_52 = all_29_0_10 |  ~ (times(all_29_0_10, all_10_0_5) = all_29_0_10)
% 33.90/10.37  																											|
% 33.90/10.37  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (468), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.37  																												|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.37  																												| (469)  ~ (times(all_29_0_10, all_10_0_5) = all_29_0_10)
% 33.90/10.37  																												|
% 33.90/10.37  																													| Using (454) and (469) yields:
% 33.90/10.37  																													| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.37  																													|
% 33.90/10.37  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.37  																												|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.37  																												| (454) times(all_29_0_10, all_10_0_5) = all_29_0_10
% 33.90/10.37  																												| (472) all_163_0_52 = all_29_0_10
% 33.90/10.37  																												|
% 33.90/10.37  																													| From (472) and (452) follows:
% 33.90/10.37  																													| (454) times(all_29_0_10, all_10_0_5) = all_29_0_10
% 33.90/10.37  																													|
% 33.90/10.37  																													| From (472) and (268) follows:
% 33.90/10.37  																													| (45) times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.37  																													|
% 33.90/10.37  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (303), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.37  																													|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.37  																													| (475)  ~ (times(all_29_0_10, all_0_2_2) = all_171_0_56)
% 33.90/10.37  																													|
% 33.90/10.37  																														| Using (453) and (475) yields:
% 33.90/10.37  																														| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.37  																														|
% 33.90/10.37  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.37  																													|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.37  																													| (453) times(all_29_0_10, all_0_2_2) = all_171_0_56
% 33.90/10.37  																													| (478) all_171_0_56 = all_74_0_28
% 33.90/10.37  																													|
% 33.90/10.37  																														| From (478) and (453) follows:
% 33.90/10.37  																														| (114) times(all_29_0_10, all_0_2_2) = all_74_0_28
% 33.90/10.37  																														|
% 33.90/10.37  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (220), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.37  																														|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.37  																														| (469)  ~ (times(all_29_0_10, all_10_0_5) = all_29_0_10)
% 33.90/10.37  																														|
% 33.90/10.37  																															| Using (454) and (469) yields:
% 33.90/10.37  																															| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.37  																															|
% 33.90/10.37  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.37  																														|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.37  																														| (454) times(all_29_0_10, all_10_0_5) = all_29_0_10
% 33.90/10.37  																														| (483)  ? [v0] : (times(all_10_0_5, v0) = all_74_0_28 & times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = v0)
% 33.90/10.37  																														|
% 33.90/10.37  																															| Instantiating (483) with all_342_0_81 yields:
% 33.90/10.37  																															| (484) times(all_10_0_5, all_342_0_81) = all_74_0_28 & times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_342_0_81
% 33.90/10.37  																															|
% 33.90/10.37  																															| Applying alpha-rule on (484) yields:
% 33.90/10.37  																															| (485) times(all_10_0_5, all_342_0_81) = all_74_0_28
% 33.90/10.37  																															| (486) times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_342_0_81
% 33.90/10.37  																															|
% 33.90/10.37  																															| Using (442) and (27) yields:
% 33.90/10.37  																															| (487)  ~ (all_74_0_28 = all_16_0_6)
% 33.90/10.37  																															|
% 33.90/10.37  																															| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10, all_342_0_81, all_16_0_6 and discharging atoms times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_342_0_81, times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 33.90/10.37  																															| (488) all_342_0_81 = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.37  																															|
% 33.90/10.37  																															| From (488) and (486) follows:
% 33.90/10.37  																															| (45) times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.37  																															|
% 33.90/10.37  																															| Instantiating formula (8) with all_8_0_4, all_16_0_6, all_74_0_28, all_16_0_6 and discharging atoms times(all_8_0_4, all_16_0_6) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 33.90/10.37  																															| (490) all_74_0_28 = all_16_0_6 |  ~ (times(all_8_0_4, all_16_0_6) = all_74_0_28)
% 33.90/10.37  																															|
% 33.90/10.37  																															| Instantiating formula (4) with all_199_0_70, all_74_0_28, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10 and discharging atoms times(all_74_0_28, all_0_2_2) = all_199_0_70, times(all_29_0_10, all_0_2_2) = all_74_0_28, yields:
% 33.90/10.37  																															| (491)  ? [v0] : (times(all_0_2_2, v0) = all_199_0_70 & times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = v0)
% 33.90/10.37  																															|
% 33.90/10.37  																															| Instantiating formula (4) with all_74_0_28, all_29_0_10, all_0_2_2, all_8_0_4, all_29_0_10 and discharging atoms times(all_29_0_10, all_8_0_4) = all_29_0_10, times(all_29_0_10, all_0_2_2) = all_74_0_28, yields:
% 33.90/10.37  																															| (492)  ? [v0] : (times(all_8_0_4, v0) = all_74_0_28 & times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = v0)
% 33.90/10.37  																															|
% 33.90/10.37  																															| Instantiating formula (4) with all_157_0_49, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_29_0_10 and discharging atoms times(all_29_0_10, all_0_3_3) = all_0_1_1, times(all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2) = all_157_0_49, yields:
% 33.90/10.37  																															| (493)  ? [v0] : (times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = v0 & times(all_0_3_3, v0) = all_157_0_49)
% 33.90/10.37  																															|
% 33.90/10.37  																															| Instantiating (493) with all_537_0_96 yields:
% 33.90/10.37  																															| (494) times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_537_0_96 & times(all_0_3_3, all_537_0_96) = all_157_0_49
% 33.90/10.38  																															|
% 33.90/10.38  																															| Applying alpha-rule on (494) yields:
% 33.90/10.38  																															| (495) times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_537_0_96
% 33.90/10.38  																															| (496) times(all_0_3_3, all_537_0_96) = all_157_0_49
% 33.90/10.38  																															|
% 33.90/10.38  																															| Instantiating (492) with all_717_0_186 yields:
% 33.90/10.38  																															| (497) times(all_8_0_4, all_717_0_186) = all_74_0_28 & times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_717_0_186
% 33.90/10.38  																															|
% 33.90/10.38  																															| Applying alpha-rule on (497) yields:
% 33.90/10.38  																															| (498) times(all_8_0_4, all_717_0_186) = all_74_0_28
% 33.90/10.38  																															| (499) times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_717_0_186
% 33.90/10.38  																															|
% 33.90/10.38  																															| Instantiating (491) with all_721_0_188 yields:
% 33.90/10.38  																															| (500) times(all_0_2_2, all_721_0_188) = all_199_0_70 & times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_721_0_188
% 33.90/10.38  																															|
% 33.90/10.38  																															| Applying alpha-rule on (500) yields:
% 33.90/10.38  																															| (501) times(all_0_2_2, all_721_0_188) = all_199_0_70
% 33.90/10.38  																															| (502) times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_721_0_188
% 33.90/10.38  																															|
% 33.90/10.38  																															| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10, all_721_0_188, all_16_0_6 and discharging atoms times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_721_0_188, times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 33.90/10.38  																															| (503) all_721_0_188 = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.38  																															|
% 33.90/10.38  																															| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10, all_717_0_186, all_721_0_188 and discharging atoms times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_721_0_188, times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_717_0_186, yields:
% 33.90/10.38  																															| (504) all_721_0_188 = all_717_0_186
% 33.90/10.38  																															|
% 33.90/10.38  																															| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10, all_537_0_96, all_721_0_188 and discharging atoms times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_721_0_188, times(all_0_2_2, all_29_0_10) = all_537_0_96, yields:
% 33.90/10.38  																															| (505) all_721_0_188 = all_537_0_96
% 33.90/10.38  																															|
% 33.90/10.38  																															| Combining equations (505,504) yields a new equation:
% 33.90/10.38  																															| (506) all_717_0_186 = all_537_0_96
% 33.90/10.38  																															|
% 33.90/10.38  																															| Combining equations (503,504) yields a new equation:
% 33.90/10.38  																															| (507) all_717_0_186 = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.38  																															|
% 33.90/10.38  																															| Combining equations (507,506) yields a new equation:
% 33.90/10.38  																															| (508) all_537_0_96 = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.38  																															|
% 33.90/10.38  																															| Combining equations (508,506) yields a new equation:
% 33.90/10.38  																															| (507) all_717_0_186 = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.38  																															|
% 33.90/10.38  																															| From (507) and (498) follows:
% 33.90/10.38  																															| (510) times(all_8_0_4, all_16_0_6) = all_74_0_28
% 33.90/10.38  																															|
% 33.90/10.38  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (490), into two cases.
% 33.90/10.38  																															|-Branch one:
% 33.90/10.38  																															| (511)  ~ (times(all_8_0_4, all_16_0_6) = all_74_0_28)
% 33.90/10.38  																															|
% 33.90/10.38  																																| Using (510) and (511) yields:
% 33.90/10.38  																																| (163) $false
% 33.90/10.38  																																|
% 33.90/10.38  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.38  																															|-Branch two:
% 33.90/10.38  																															| (510) times(all_8_0_4, all_16_0_6) = all_74_0_28
% 33.90/10.38  																															| (514) all_74_0_28 = all_16_0_6
% 33.90/10.38  																															|
% 33.90/10.38  																																| Equations (514) can reduce 487 to:
% 33.90/10.38  																																| (22) $false
% 33.90/10.38  																																|
% 33.90/10.38  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 33.90/10.38  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 33.90/10.38  
% 33.90/10.38  9784ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------