TSTP Solution File: ALG198+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : ALG198+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 16:50:16 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 76 ( 75 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 21 ( 6 avg)
% Number of connectives : 110 ( 46 ~; 0 |; 64 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 22 ( 7 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
~ ( op(e0,e0) != e0
& op(e1,e1) != e1
& op(e2,e2) != e2
& op(e3,e3) != e3
& op(e4,e4) != e4
& op(e5,e5) != e5
& op(e6,e6) != e6
& op(e0,e0) = e0
& op(e1,e1) = e1
& op(e2,e2) = e2
& op(e3,e3) = e3
& op(e4,e4) = e4
& op(e5,e5) = e5
& op(e6,e6) = e6 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',co1) ).
fof(ax6,axiom,
( e0 = op(op(op(e5,op(e5,e5)),op(e5,op(e5,e5))),op(e5,op(e5,e5)))
& e1 = op(e5,e5)
& e2 = op(op(e5,op(e5,e5)),op(e5,op(e5,e5)))
& e3 = op(op(op(e5,op(e5,e5)),op(e5,op(e5,e5))),e5)
& e4 = op(e5,op(e5,e5))
& e6 = op(op(op(op(e5,op(e5,e5)),op(e5,op(e5,e5))),e5),op(e5,op(e5,e5))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax6) ).
fof(ax5,axiom,
( e0 != e1
& e0 != e2
& e0 != e3
& e0 != e4
& e0 != e5
& e0 != e6
& e1 != e2
& e1 != e3
& e1 != e4
& e1 != e5
& e1 != e6
& e2 != e3
& e2 != e4
& e2 != e5
& e2 != e6
& e3 != e4
& e3 != e5
& e3 != e6
& e4 != e5
& e4 != e6
& e5 != e6 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax5) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ ( op(e0,e0) != e0
& op(e1,e1) != e1
& op(e2,e2) != e2
& op(e3,e3) != e3
& op(e4,e4) != e4
& op(e5,e5) != e5
& op(e6,e6) != e6
& op(e0,e0) = e0
& op(e1,e1) = e1
& op(e2,e2) = e2
& op(e3,e3) = e3
& op(e4,e4) = e4
& op(e5,e5) = e5
& op(e6,e6) = e6 ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( op(e0,e0) != e0
& op(e1,e1) != e1
& op(e2,e2) != e2
& op(e3,e3) != e3
& op(e4,e4) != e4
& op(e5,e5) != e5
& op(e6,e6) != e6
& op(e0,e0) = e0
& op(e1,e1) = e1
& op(e2,e2) = e2
& op(e3,e3) = e3
& op(e4,e4) = e4
& op(e5,e5) = e5
& op(e6,e6) = e6 ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
op(e5,e5) = e5,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
e1 = op(e5,e5),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax6]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
e4 = op(e5,op(e5,e5)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
e5 = e1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
op(e1,e1) = e1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
e1 != e4,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax5]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]),c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_9]),c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : ALG198+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 8 18:42:49 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.43 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.032 s
% 0.24/1.43
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object total steps : 12
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 7
% 0.24/1.43 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.43 # Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.24/1.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Initial clauses : 531
% 0.24/1.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 531
% 0.24/1.43 # Processed clauses : 19
% 0.24/1.43 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 18
% 0.24/1.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.24/1.43 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 17
% 0.24/1.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.24/1.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Negative unit clauses : 10
% 0.24/1.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 512
% 0.24/1.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 1394
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.24/1.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.24/1.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.24/1.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 32845
% 0.24/1.43
% 0.24/1.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.43 # User time : 0.030 s
% 0.24/1.43 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/1.43 # Total time : 0.033 s
% 0.24/1.43 # Maximum resident set size: 3864 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------