TSTP Solution File: ALG173+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : ALG173+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Dec 28 21:00:36 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.97s
% Output   : Solution 0.97s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP2262/ALG173+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP2262/ALG173+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP2262/ALG173+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 2366
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.021 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(5, axiom,(((e0=op(op(e3,op(e3,e3)),op(e3,op(e3,e3)))&e1=op(e3,op(e3,op(e3,e3))))&e2=op(e3,e3))&e4=op(e3,op(e3,e3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax6)).
% fof(6, axiom,(((((((((~(e0=e1)&~(e0=e2))&~(e0=e3))&~(e0=e4))&~(e1=e2))&~(e1=e3))&~(e1=e4))&~(e2=e3))&~(e2=e4))&~(e3=e4)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax5)).
% fof(7, conjecture,~((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((~(op(e0,e0)=e0)&~(op(e0,e1)=e1))&~(op(e0,e2)=e2))&~(op(e0,e3)=e3))&~(op(e0,e4)=e4))|((((~(op(e1,e0)=e0)&~(op(e1,e1)=e1))&~(op(e1,e2)=e2))&~(op(e1,e3)=e3))&~(op(e1,e4)=e4)))|((((~(op(e2,e0)=e0)&~(op(e2,e1)=e1))&~(op(e2,e2)=e2))&~(op(e2,e3)=e3))&~(op(e2,e4)=e4)))|((((~(op(e3,e0)=e0)&~(op(e3,e1)=e1))&~(op(e3,e2)=e2))&~(op(e3,e3)=e3))&~(op(e3,e4)=e4)))|((((~(op(e4,e0)=e0)&~(op(e4,e1)=e1))&~(op(e4,e2)=e2))&~(op(e4,e3)=e3))&~(op(e4,e4)=e4)))&op(e0,op(e0,e0))=e0)&op(e0,op(e0,e1))=e1)&op(e0,op(e0,e2))=e2)&op(e0,op(e0,e3))=e3)&op(e0,op(e0,e4))=e4)&op(e1,op(e1,e0))=e0)&op(e1,op(e1,e1))=e1)&op(e1,op(e1,e2))=e2)&op(e1,op(e1,e3))=e3)&op(e1,op(e1,e4))=e4)&op(e2,op(e2,e0))=e0)&op(e2,op(e2,e1))=e1)&op(e2,op(e2,e2))=e2)&op(e2,op(e2,e3))=e3)&op(e2,op(e2,e4))=e4)&op(e3,op(e3,e0))=e0)&op(e3,op(e3,e1))=e1)&op(e3,op(e3,e2))=e2)&op(e3,op(e3,e3))=e3)&op(e3,op(e3,e4))=e4)&op(e4,op(e4,e0))=e0)&op(e4,op(e4,e1))=e1)&op(e4,op(e4,e2))=e2)&op(e4,op(e4,e3))=e3)&op(e4,op(e4,e4))=e4)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', co1)).
% fof(8, negated_conjecture,~(~((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((~(op(e0,e0)=e0)&~(op(e0,e1)=e1))&~(op(e0,e2)=e2))&~(op(e0,e3)=e3))&~(op(e0,e4)=e4))|((((~(op(e1,e0)=e0)&~(op(e1,e1)=e1))&~(op(e1,e2)=e2))&~(op(e1,e3)=e3))&~(op(e1,e4)=e4)))|((((~(op(e2,e0)=e0)&~(op(e2,e1)=e1))&~(op(e2,e2)=e2))&~(op(e2,e3)=e3))&~(op(e2,e4)=e4)))|((((~(op(e3,e0)=e0)&~(op(e3,e1)=e1))&~(op(e3,e2)=e2))&~(op(e3,e3)=e3))&~(op(e3,e4)=e4)))|((((~(op(e4,e0)=e0)&~(op(e4,e1)=e1))&~(op(e4,e2)=e2))&~(op(e4,e3)=e3))&~(op(e4,e4)=e4)))&op(e0,op(e0,e0))=e0)&op(e0,op(e0,e1))=e1)&op(e0,op(e0,e2))=e2)&op(e0,op(e0,e3))=e3)&op(e0,op(e0,e4))=e4)&op(e1,op(e1,e0))=e0)&op(e1,op(e1,e1))=e1)&op(e1,op(e1,e2))=e2)&op(e1,op(e1,e3))=e3)&op(e1,op(e1,e4))=e4)&op(e2,op(e2,e0))=e0)&op(e2,op(e2,e1))=e1)&op(e2,op(e2,e2))=e2)&op(e2,op(e2,e3))=e3)&op(e2,op(e2,e4))=e4)&op(e3,op(e3,e0))=e0)&op(e3,op(e3,e1))=e1)&op(e3,op(e3,e2))=e2)&op(e3,op(e3,e3))=e3)&op(e3,op(e3,e4))=e4)&op(e4,op(e4,e0))=e0)&op(e4,op(e4,e1))=e1)&op(e4,op(e4,e2))=e2)&op(e4,op(e4,e3))=e3)&op(e4,op(e4,e4))=e4))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[7])).
% fof(10, plain,(epred2_0=>(((((((~(op(e0,e0)=e0)&~(op(e0,e1)=e1))&~(op(e0,e2)=e2))&~(op(e0,e3)=e3))&~(op(e0,e4)=e4))|((((~(op(e1,e0)=e0)&~(op(e1,e1)=e1))&~(op(e1,e2)=e2))&~(op(e1,e3)=e3))&~(op(e1,e4)=e4)))|((((~(op(e2,e0)=e0)&~(op(e2,e1)=e1))&~(op(e2,e2)=e2))&~(op(e2,e3)=e3))&~(op(e2,e4)=e4)))|((((~(op(e3,e0)=e0)&~(op(e3,e1)=e1))&~(op(e3,e2)=e2))&~(op(e3,e3)=e3))&~(op(e3,e4)=e4)))),introduced(definition)).
% fof(11, negated_conjecture,~(~(((((((((((((((((((((((((((epred2_0|((((~(op(e4,e0)=e0)&~(op(e4,e1)=e1))&~(op(e4,e2)=e2))&~(op(e4,e3)=e3))&~(op(e4,e4)=e4)))&op(e0,op(e0,e0))=e0)&op(e0,op(e0,e1))=e1)&op(e0,op(e0,e2))=e2)&op(e0,op(e0,e3))=e3)&op(e0,op(e0,e4))=e4)&op(e1,op(e1,e0))=e0)&op(e1,op(e1,e1))=e1)&op(e1,op(e1,e2))=e2)&op(e1,op(e1,e3))=e3)&op(e1,op(e1,e4))=e4)&op(e2,op(e2,e0))=e0)&op(e2,op(e2,e1))=e1)&op(e2,op(e2,e2))=e2)&op(e2,op(e2,e3))=e3)&op(e2,op(e2,e4))=e4)&op(e3,op(e3,e0))=e0)&op(e3,op(e3,e1))=e1)&op(e3,op(e3,e2))=e2)&op(e3,op(e3,e3))=e3)&op(e3,op(e3,e4))=e4)&op(e4,op(e4,e0))=e0)&op(e4,op(e4,e1))=e1)&op(e4,op(e4,e2))=e2)&op(e4,op(e4,e3))=e3)&op(e4,op(e4,e4))=e4))),inference(apply_def,[status(esa)],[8,10,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(213,plain,(e4=op(e3,op(e3,e3))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[5])).
% cnf(214,plain,(e2=op(e3,e3)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[5])).
% cnf(217,plain,(e3!=e4),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[6])).
% fof(227, negated_conjecture,((((((((((((((((((((((((((epred2_0|((((~(op(e4,e0)=e0)&~(op(e4,e1)=e1))&~(op(e4,e2)=e2))&~(op(e4,e3)=e3))&~(op(e4,e4)=e4)))&op(e0,op(e0,e0))=e0)&op(e0,op(e0,e1))=e1)&op(e0,op(e0,e2))=e2)&op(e0,op(e0,e3))=e3)&op(e0,op(e0,e4))=e4)&op(e1,op(e1,e0))=e0)&op(e1,op(e1,e1))=e1)&op(e1,op(e1,e2))=e2)&op(e1,op(e1,e3))=e3)&op(e1,op(e1,e4))=e4)&op(e2,op(e2,e0))=e0)&op(e2,op(e2,e1))=e1)&op(e2,op(e2,e2))=e2)&op(e2,op(e2,e3))=e3)&op(e2,op(e2,e4))=e4)&op(e3,op(e3,e0))=e0)&op(e3,op(e3,e1))=e1)&op(e3,op(e3,e2))=e2)&op(e3,op(e3,e3))=e3)&op(e3,op(e3,e4))=e4)&op(e4,op(e4,e0))=e0)&op(e4,op(e4,e1))=e1)&op(e4,op(e4,e2))=e2)&op(e4,op(e4,e3))=e3)&op(e4,op(e4,e4))=e4),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[11])).
% fof(228, negated_conjecture,((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((~(op(e4,e0)=e0)|epred2_0)&(~(op(e4,e1)=e1)|epred2_0))&(~(op(e4,e2)=e2)|epred2_0))&(~(op(e4,e3)=e3)|epred2_0))&(~(op(e4,e4)=e4)|epred2_0))&op(e0,op(e0,e0))=e0)&op(e0,op(e0,e1))=e1)&op(e0,op(e0,e2))=e2)&op(e0,op(e0,e3))=e3)&op(e0,op(e0,e4))=e4)&op(e1,op(e1,e0))=e0)&op(e1,op(e1,e1))=e1)&op(e1,op(e1,e2))=e2)&op(e1,op(e1,e3))=e3)&op(e1,op(e1,e4))=e4)&op(e2,op(e2,e0))=e0)&op(e2,op(e2,e1))=e1)&op(e2,op(e2,e2))=e2)&op(e2,op(e2,e3))=e3)&op(e2,op(e2,e4))=e4)&op(e3,op(e3,e0))=e0)&op(e3,op(e3,e1))=e1)&op(e3,op(e3,e2))=e2)&op(e3,op(e3,e3))=e3)&op(e3,op(e3,e4))=e4)&op(e4,op(e4,e0))=e0)&op(e4,op(e4,e1))=e1)&op(e4,op(e4,e2))=e2)&op(e4,op(e4,e3))=e3)&op(e4,op(e4,e4))=e4),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[227])).
% cnf(235,negated_conjecture,(op(e3,op(e3,e3))=e3),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[228])).
% cnf(313,negated_conjecture,(op(e3,e2)=e3),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[235,214,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(315,plain,(e3=e4),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[213,214,theory(equality)]),313,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(316,plain,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[315,217,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(317,plain,($false),316,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 36
% # ...of these trivial                : 0
% # ...subsumed                        : 0
% # ...remaining for further processing: 36
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 1
% # Generated clauses                  : 0
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 0
% # Paramodulations                    : 0
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 34
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 19
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 10
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 5
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 258
% # ...number of literals in the above : 683
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 1
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 1
% # Backwards rewriting index:    48 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:           19 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           46 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.018 s
% # System time            : 0.004 s
% # Total time             : 0.022 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.11 CPU 0.20 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.11 CPU 0.20 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP2262/ALG173+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------