TSTP Solution File: ALG069+1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : ALG069+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 17:53:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.41s 0.97s
% Output : Refutation 0.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : ALG069+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 8 17:02:11 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.41/0.97 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.41/0.97 Process 1954 was started by sandbox2 on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.41/0.97 Wed Jun 8 17:02:12 2022
% 0.41/0.97 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_1792_n027.cluster.edu".
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_1792_n027.cluster.edu
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.41/0.97 set(auto2).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.41/0.97 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.41/0.97 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.41/0.97 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.41/0.97 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.41/0.97 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.41/0.97 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.41/0.97 clear(print_given).
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (5 formulas)
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.41/0.97 1 (all U (sorti1(U) -> (all V (sorti1(V) -> sorti1(op1(U,V)))))) # label(ax1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.97 2 (all U (sorti2(U) -> (all V (sorti2(V) -> sorti2(op2(U,V)))))) # label(ax2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.97 3 (all U (sorti1(U) -> (exists V (sorti1(V) & op1(V,V) = U)))) # label(ax3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.97 4 -(all U (sorti2(U) -> (exists V (sorti2(V) & op2(V,V) = U)))) # label(ax4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.97 5 -((all U (sorti1(U) -> sorti2(h(U)))) & (all V (sorti2(V) -> sorti1(j(V)))) -> -((all W (sorti1(W) -> (all X (sorti1(X) -> h(op1(W,X)) = op2(h(W),h(X)))))) & (all Y (sorti2(Y) -> (all Z (sorti2(Z) -> j(op2(Y,Z)) = op1(j(Y),j(Z)))))) & (all X1 (sorti2(X1) -> h(j(X1)) = X1)) & (all X2 (sorti1(X2) -> j(h(X2)) = X2)))) # label(co1) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 Auto_denials:
% 0.41/0.97 % copying label ax4 to answer in negative clause
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.41/0.97 Function symbol KB weights: c1=1. op1=1. op2=1. h=1. j=1. f1=1.
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.41/0.97 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.41/0.97 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds: ax4.
% 0.41/0.97 % Length of proof is 19.
% 0.41/0.97 % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.41/0.97 % Maximum clause weight is 14.000.
% 0.41/0.97 % Given clauses 21.
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 3 (all U (sorti1(U) -> (exists V (sorti1(V) & op1(V,V) = U)))) # label(ax3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.97 4 -(all U (sorti2(U) -> (exists V (sorti2(V) & op2(V,V) = U)))) # label(ax4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.97 5 -((all U (sorti1(U) -> sorti2(h(U)))) & (all V (sorti2(V) -> sorti1(j(V)))) -> -((all W (sorti1(W) -> (all X (sorti1(X) -> h(op1(W,X)) = op2(h(W),h(X)))))) & (all Y (sorti2(Y) -> (all Z (sorti2(Z) -> j(op2(Y,Z)) = op1(j(Y),j(Z)))))) & (all X1 (sorti2(X1) -> h(j(X1)) = X1)) & (all X2 (sorti1(X2) -> j(h(X2)) = X2)))) # label(co1) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.97 6 sorti2(c1) # label(ax4) # label(axiom). [clausify(4)].
% 0.41/0.97 7 -sorti2(A) | op2(A,A) != c1 # label(ax4) # label(axiom) # answer(ax4). [clausify(4)].
% 0.41/0.97 8 -sorti1(A) | sorti1(f1(A)) # label(ax3) # label(axiom). [clausify(3)].
% 0.41/0.97 9 -sorti1(A) | sorti2(h(A)) # label(co1) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(5)].
% 0.41/0.97 10 -sorti2(A) | sorti1(j(A)) # label(co1) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(5)].
% 0.41/0.97 11 -sorti2(A) | h(j(A)) = A # label(co1) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(5)].
% 0.41/0.97 15 -sorti1(A) | op1(f1(A),f1(A)) = A # label(ax3) # label(axiom). [clausify(3)].
% 0.41/0.97 16 -sorti1(A) | -sorti1(B) | h(op1(A,B)) = op2(h(A),h(B)) # label(co1) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(5)].
% 0.41/0.97 17 -sorti1(A) | -sorti1(B) | op2(h(A),h(B)) = h(op1(A,B)). [copy(16),flip(c)].
% 0.41/0.97 21 sorti1(j(c1)). [hyper(10,a,6,a)].
% 0.41/0.97 22 h(j(c1)) = c1. [hyper(11,a,6,a)].
% 0.41/0.97 26 op1(f1(j(c1)),f1(j(c1))) = j(c1). [hyper(15,a,21,a)].
% 0.41/0.97 28 sorti1(f1(j(c1))). [hyper(8,a,21,a)].
% 0.41/0.97 36 op2(h(f1(j(c1))),h(f1(j(c1)))) = c1. [hyper(17,a,28,a,b,28,a),rewrite([26(16),22(12)])].
% 0.41/0.97 43 sorti2(h(f1(j(c1)))). [hyper(9,a,28,a)].
% 0.41/0.97 65 $F # answer(ax4). [ur(7,a,43,a),rewrite([36(9)]),xx(a)].
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 Given=21. Generated=81. Kept=57. proofs=1.
% 0.41/0.97 Usable=21. Sos=28. Demods=22. Limbo=8, Disabled=12. Hints=0.
% 0.41/0.97 Megabytes=0.10.
% 0.41/0.97 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.41/0.97 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 Process 1954 exit (max_proofs) Wed Jun 8 17:02:12 2022
% 0.41/0.97 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------