TSTP Solution File: ALG034+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : ALG034+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 18:00:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.02s 300.26s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : ALG034+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 02:05:05 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.90/1.16  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.90/1.16  The process was started by sandbox on n025.cluster.edu,
% 0.90/1.16  Thu Jun  9 02:05:05 2022
% 0.90/1.16  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 6181.
% 0.90/1.16  
% 0.90/1.16  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.90/1.16  set(auto).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.90/1.16  clear(print_given).
% 0.90/1.16  
% 0.90/1.16  formula_list(usable).
% 0.90/1.16  
% 0.90/1.16  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.90/1.16  
% 0.90/1.16  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.90/1.16  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.90/1.16  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.90/1.16  clauses in usable.
% 0.90/1.16  
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.90/1.16     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.90/1.16  
% 0.90/1.16  ------------> process usable:
% 0.90/1.16  
% 0.90/1.16  ------------> process sos:
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2428,flip.1] {-} op(e0,e0)=op(e0,e0).
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2445,flip.1] {-} op(e0,e1)=op(e0,e1).
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2446,flip.1] {-} op(e1,e1)=op(e1,e1).
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2460,flip.1] {-} op(e0,e2)=op(e0,e2).
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2462,flip.1] {-} op(e1,e2)=op(e1,e2).
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2463,flip.1] {-} op(e2,e2)=op(e2,e2).
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2474,flip.1] {-} op(e0,e3)=op(e0,e3).
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2476,flip.1] {-} op(e1,e3)=op(e1,e3).
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2478,flip.1] {-} op(e2,e3)=op(e2,e3).
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2479,flip.1] {-} op(e3,e3)=op(e3,e3).
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2487,flip.1] {-} op(e0,e4)=op(e0,e4).
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2489,flip.1] {-} op(e1,e4)=op(e1,e4).
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2491,flip.1] {-} op(e2,e4)=op(e2,e4).
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2493,flip.1] {-} op(e3,e4)=op(e3,e4).
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2494,flip.1] {-} op(e4,e4)=op(e4,e4).
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2499,flip.1] {-} op(e0,e5)=op(e0,e5).
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2501,flip.1] {-} op(e1,e5)=op(e1,e5).
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2503,flip.1] {-} op(e2,e5)=op(e2,e5).
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2505,flip.1] {-} op(e3,e5)=op(e3,e5).
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2507,flip.1] {-} op(e4,e5)=op(e4,e5).
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2508,flip.1] {-} op(e5,e5)=op(e5,e5).
% 0.90/1.16    Following clause subsumed by 2509 during input processing: 0 [copy,2509,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.90/1.16  2509 back subsumes 2508.
% 0.90/1.16  2509 back subsumes 2507.
% 0.90/1.16  2509 back subsumes 2505.
% 0.90/1.16  2509 back subsumes 2503.
% 0.90/1.16  2509 back subsumes 2501.
% 0.90/1.16  2509 back subsumes 2499.
% 0.90/1.16  2509 back subsumes 2494.
% 0.90/1.16  2509 back subsumes 2493.
% 1.00/1.18  2509 back subsumes 2491.
% 1.00/1.18  2509 back subsumes 2489.
% 1.00/1.18  2509 back subsumes 2487.
% 1.00/1.18  2509 back subsumes 2479.
% 1.00/1.18  2509 back subsumes 2478.
% 1.00/1.18  2509 back subsumes 2476.
% 1.00/1.18  2509 back subsumes 2474.
% 1.00/1.18  2509 back subsumes 2463.
% 1.00/1.18  2509 back subsumes 2462.
% 1.00/1.18  2509 back subsumes 2460.
% 1.00/1.18  2509 back subsumes 2446.
% 1.00/1.18  2509 back subsumes 2445.
% 1.00/1.18  2509 back subsumes 2428.
% 1.00/1.18  
% 1.00/1.18  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.05/1.23  
% 1.05/1.23  
% 1.05/1.23  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 1.05/1.23  
% 1.05/1.23  
% 1.05/1.23  
% 1.05/1.23  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.05/1.23  
% 1.05/1.23  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.05/1.23  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.05/1.23  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.05/1.23  number of clauses in intial UL: 130
% 1.05/1.23  number of clauses initially in problem: 1383
% 1.05/1.23  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 9
% 1.05/1.23  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 90
% 1.05/1.23  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 1.05/1.23  absolute distinct symbol count: 10
% 1.05/1.23     distinct predicate count: 1
% 1.05/1.23     distinct function count: 2
% 1.05/1.23     distinct constant count: 7
% 1.05/1.23  
% 1.05/1.23  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.05/1.23  
% 1.05/1.23  
% 1.05/1.23  
% 1.05/1.23  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.74/2.93  
% 2.74/2.93  
% 2.74/2.93  Changing weight limit from 60 to 45.
% 2.74/2.93  
% 2.74/2.93  Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 2.74/2.93  
% 2.74/2.93  
% 2.74/2.93  Resetting weight limit to 45 after 1020 givens.
% 2.74/2.93  
% 6.62/6.83  
% 6.62/6.83  
% 6.62/6.83  Changing weight limit from 45 to 35.
% 6.62/6.83  
% 6.62/6.83  Resetting weight limit to 35 after 1040 givens.
% 6.62/6.83  
% 7.49/7.67  
% 7.49/7.67  
% 7.49/7.67  Changing weight limit from 35 to 34.
% 7.49/7.67  
% 7.49/7.67  Resetting weight limit to 34 after 1045 givens.
% 7.49/7.67  
% 16.91/17.10  
% 16.91/17.10  
% 16.91/17.10  Changing weight limit from 34 to 32.
% 16.91/17.10  
% 16.91/17.10  Resetting weight limit to 32 after 1135 givens.
% 16.91/17.10  
% 39.11/39.36  
% 39.11/39.36  
% 39.11/39.36  Changing weight limit from 32 to 31.
% 39.11/39.36  
% 39.11/39.36  Resetting weight limit to 31 after 1735 givens.
% 39.11/39.36  
% 42.82/43.06  
% 42.82/43.06  
% 42.82/43.06  Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 42.82/43.06  
% 42.82/43.06  Resetting weight limit to 30 after 1800 givens.
% 42.82/43.06  
% 76.13/76.36  
% 76.13/76.36  
% 76.13/76.36  Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 76.13/76.36  
% 76.13/76.36  Resetting weight limit to 29 after 2355 givens.
% 76.13/76.36  
% 116.22/116.49  
% 116.22/116.49  
% 116.22/116.49  Changing weight limit from 29 to 28.
% 116.22/116.49  
% 116.22/116.49  Resetting weight limit to 28 after 2515 givens.
% 116.22/116.49  
% 131.22/131.46  
% 131.22/131.46  
% 131.22/131.46  Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 131.22/131.46  
% 131.22/131.46  Resetting weight limit to 27 after 2550 givens.
% 131.22/131.46  
% 140.50/140.74  
% 140.50/140.74  
% 140.50/140.74  Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 140.50/140.74  
% 140.50/140.74  Resetting weight limit to 26 after 2570 givens.
% 140.50/140.74  
% 149.12/149.37  
% 149.12/149.37  
% 149.12/149.37  Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 149.12/149.37  
% 149.12/149.37  Resetting weight limit to 25 after 2590 givens.
% 149.12/149.37  
% 175.70/175.96  
% 175.70/175.96  
% 175.70/175.96  Changing weight limit from 25 to 24.
% 175.70/175.96  
% 175.70/175.96  Resetting weight limit to 24 after 2685 givens.
% 175.70/175.96  
% 198.02/198.24  
% 198.02/198.24  
% 198.02/198.24  Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 198.02/198.24  
% 198.02/198.24  Resetting weight limit to 23 after 2805 givens.
% 198.02/198.24  
% 204.32/204.59  
% 204.32/204.59  
% 204.32/204.59  Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 204.32/204.59  
% 204.32/204.59  Resetting weight limit to 22 after 2815 givens.
% 204.32/204.59  
% 300.02/300.26  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------