TSTP Solution File: ALG011-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : ALG011-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 12:45:53 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.72s 1.92s
% Output   : Refutation 1.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (  11 unt;   2 nHn;  14 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   27 (   2 equ;   8 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ c(A)
    | ~ d(A) ),
    file('ALG011-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( d(f(A,B))
    | ~ c(A)
    | ~ c(B) ),
    file('ALG011-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( c(f(A,B))
    | ~ d(A)
    | ~ d(B) ),
    file('ALG011-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,plain,
    ( d(f(A,A))
    | ~ c(A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[2]),
    [iquote('factor,2.2.3')] ).

cnf(5,plain,
    ( c(f(A,A))
    | ~ d(A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[3]),
    [iquote('factor,3.2.3')] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    f(A,f(B,C)) = f(f(A,B),C),
    file('ALG011-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,plain,
    f(f(A,B),C) = f(A,f(B,C)),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[7])]),
    [iquote('copy,7,flip.1')] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ( c(A)
    | d(A) ),
    file('ALG011-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    c(a1),
    file('ALG011-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    d(a2),
    file('ALG011-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,plain,
    d(f(a1,a1)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[11,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,11,4')] ).

cnf(14,plain,
    c(f(a2,a2)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[12,5]),
    [iquote('hyper,12,5')] ).

cnf(16,plain,
    ( c(A)
    | c(f(a2,A)) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[10,3,12]),
    [iquote('hyper,10,3,12')] ).

cnf(20,plain,
    c(f(a2,f(a1,a1))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[13,3,12]),
    [iquote('hyper,13,3,12')] ).

cnf(30,plain,
    d(f(a2,f(a2,a1))),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[14,2,11]),9]),
    [iquote('hyper,14,2,11,demod,9')] ).

cnf(348,plain,
    c(f(a2,a1)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[30,1,16]),
    [iquote('hyper,30,1,16')] ).

cnf(403,plain,
    d(f(a2,f(a1,a1))),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[348,2,11]),9]),
    [iquote('hyper,348,2,11,demod,9')] ).

cnf(428,plain,
    $false,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[403,1,20]),
    [iquote('hyper,403,1,20')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : ALG011-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 03:02:33 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.72/1.92  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.72/1.92  The process was started by sandbox2 on n017.cluster.edu,
% 1.72/1.92  Wed Jul 27 03:02:33 2022
% 1.72/1.92  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 31001.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.72/1.92  set(auto).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.72/1.92  clear(print_given).
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  list(usable).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] A=A.
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] f(X,f(Y,Z))=f(f(X,Y),Z).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] c(X)|d(X).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] -c(X)| -d(X).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] c(a1).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] d(a2).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] d(f(X,Y))| -c(X)| -c(Y).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] c(f(X,Y))| -d(X)| -d(Y).
% 1.72/1.92  end_of_list.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.72/1.92  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.72/1.92  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.72/1.92  clauses in usable.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ------------> process usable:
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 1 [] -c(A)| -d(A).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 2 [] d(f(A,B))| -c(A)| -c(B).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 3 [] c(f(A,B))| -d(A)| -d(B).
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ------------> process sos:
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 6 [] A=A.
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 8 [copy,7,flip.1] f(f(A,B),C)=f(A,f(B,C)).
% 1.72/1.92  ---> New Demodulator: 9 [new_demod,8] f(f(A,B),C)=f(A,f(B,C)).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 10 [] c(A)|d(A).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 11 [] c(a1).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 12 [] d(a2).
% 1.72/1.92    Following clause subsumed by 6 during input processing: 0 [copy,6,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.72/1.92  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 9.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.07 sec ----> 428 [hyper,403,1,20] $F.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  Length of proof is 10.  Level of proof is 5.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.72/1.92  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.72/1.92  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.72/1.92  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ============ end of search ============
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.72/1.92  clauses given                 19
% 1.72/1.92  clauses generated            642
% 1.72/1.92  clauses kept                 425
% 1.72/1.92  clauses forward subsumed     225
% 1.72/1.92  clauses back subsumed          1
% 1.72/1.92  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.72/1.92  user CPU time          0.07          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.72/1.92  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.72/1.92  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  Process 31001 finished Wed Jul 27 03:02:34 2022
% 1.72/1.92  Otter interrupted
% 1.72/1.92  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------