TSTP Solution File: ALG004-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : ALG004-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 17:59:35 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.65s 3.87s
% Output   : Refutation 3.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (  15 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   21 (  20 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(left_cancellation,axiom,
    ( multiply(X,Y) != Z
    | multiply(U,Y) != Z
    | X = U ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',left_cancellation) ).

cnf(right_cancelaation,axiom,
    ( multiply(X,Y) != Z
    | multiply(X,U) != Z
    | Y = U ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_cancelaation) ).

cnf(medial_law,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X,Y),multiply(Z,U)) = multiply(multiply(X,Z),multiply(Y,U)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',medial_law) ).

cnf(prove_quotient_condition1,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(b,b0) = multiply(a,a0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_quotient_condition1) ).

cnf(prove_quotient_condition2,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(d,b0) = multiply(c,a0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_quotient_condition2) ).

cnf(prove_quotient_condition3,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(b,d0) = multiply(a,c0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_quotient_condition3) ).

cnf(prove_quotient_condition4,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(d,d0) != multiply(c,c0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_quotient_condition4) ).

cnf(17,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,Y),multiply(d,d0)) != multiply(multiply(X,c),multiply(Y,c0)),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[right_cancelaation,medial_law,prove_quotient_condition4]) ).

cnf(21,plain,
    multiply(multiply(a,a0),multiply(X,Y)) = multiply(multiply(b,X),multiply(b0,Y)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[medial_law,prove_quotient_condition1,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(22,plain,
    multiply(multiply(c,a0),multiply(X,Y)) = multiply(multiply(d,X),multiply(b0,Y)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[medial_law,prove_quotient_condition2,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(26,plain,
    multiply(multiply(multiply(X,Y),multiply(Z,U)),multiply(V,W)) = multiply(multiply(multiply(X,Z),V),multiply(multiply(Y,U),W)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[medial_law,medial_law,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(54,plain,
    multiply(multiply(multiply(X,c),multiply(Y,c0)),multiply(Z,U)) != multiply(multiply(multiply(X,Y),Z),multiply(multiply(d,d0),U)),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[left_cancellation,17,medial_law]) ).

cnf(75,plain,
    multiply(multiply(b,X),multiply(b0,Y)) = multiply(multiply(a,X),multiply(a0,Y)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[medial_law,21,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(76,plain,
    multiply(multiply(d,X),multiply(b0,Y)) = multiply(multiply(c,X),multiply(a0,Y)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[medial_law,22,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(117,plain,
    multiply(multiply(a,c0),multiply(b0,X)) = multiply(multiply(a,d0),multiply(a0,X)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[75,prove_quotient_condition3,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(697,plain,
    multiply(multiply(multiply(X,Y),multiply(Z,U)),multiply(multiply(V,W),X1)) = multiply(multiply(multiply(X,V),multiply(Y,U)),multiply(multiply(Z,W),X1)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[26,26,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2250,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[54,117,theory(equality)]),697,76,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : ALG004-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun  8 19:59:16 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  "."
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-08T19:59:16
% 0.20/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n028.cluster.edu at 2022-06-08T19:59:16
% 3.65/3.87  
% 3.65/3.87  
% 3.65/3.87  #||
% 3.65/3.87  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.65/3.87  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 3.65/3.89  ||#
% 3.65/3.89  
% 3.65/3.89  ; Summary of computation:
% 3.65/3.89  ;     14446 formulas have been input or derived (from 103 formulas).
% 3.65/3.89  ;      2250 (16%) were retained.  Of these,
% 3.65/3.89  ;           25 ( 1%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 3.65/3.89  ;         2225 (99%) are still being kept.
% 3.65/3.89  ; 
% 3.65/3.89  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 3.65/3.89  ;     0.002   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 3.65/3.89  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (7 calls)
% 3.65/3.89  ;     0.352  10%   Process new row              (13,396 calls)
% 3.65/3.89  ;     0.367  11%   Resolution                   (204 calls)
% 3.65/3.89  ;     0.088   3%   Paramodulation               (102 calls)
% 3.65/3.89  ;     0.001   0%   Condensing                   (106 calls)
% 3.65/3.89  ;     0.007   0%   Forward subsumption          (106 calls)
% 3.65/3.89  ;     0.002   0%   Backward subsumption         (52 calls)
% 3.65/3.89  ;     0.008   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (279 calls)
% 3.65/3.89  ;     1.221  36%   Forward simplification       (12,759 calls)
% 3.65/3.89  ;     0.110   3%   Backward simplification      (2,250 calls)
% 3.65/3.89  ;     1.163  34%   Ordering                     (136,215 calls)
% 3.65/3.89  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 3.65/3.89  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 3.65/3.89  ;     0.074   2%   Other
% 3.65/3.89  ;     3.395        Total
% 3.65/3.89  ;     3.410        Real time
% 3.65/3.89  ; 
% 3.65/3.89  ; Term-hash-array has 9,171 terms in all.
% 3.65/3.89  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 52 entries (52 at peak, 52 added, 0 deleted).
% 3.65/3.89  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 340 nodes (340 at peak, 340 added, 0 deleted).
% 3.65/3.89  ;  Retrieved 468 possibly forward subsuming rows in 106 calls.
% 3.65/3.89  ;  Retrieved 20 possibly backward subsumed rows in 52 calls.
% 3.65/3.89  ; Path-index has 9,124 entries (9,124 at peak, 9,227 added, 103 deleted).
% 3.65/3.89  ; Path-index has 901 nodes (901 at peak, 901 added, 0 deleted).
% 3.65/3.89  ; Trie-index has 9,124 entries (9,124 at peak, 9,227 added, 103 deleted).
% 3.65/3.89  ; Trie-index has 51,951 nodes (51,951 at peak, 52,444 added, 493 deleted).
% 3.65/3.89  ; Retrieved 142,332 generalization terms in 165,898 calls.
% 3.65/3.89  ; Retrieved 10,994 instance terms in 2,921 calls.
% 3.65/3.89  ; Retrieved 468,134 unifiable terms in 6,083 calls.
% 3.65/3.89  ; 
% 3.65/3.89  ; The agenda of rows to process has 58 entries:
% 3.65/3.89  ;     9 with value 39              4 with value 41              10 with value 47
% 3.65/3.89  ;    10 with value 40             21 with value 43               4 with value 48
% 3.65/3.89  ; The agenda of rows to give has 2128 entries:
% 3.65/3.89  ;    27 with value (4 29)        126 with value (4 36)         144 with value (4 43)
% 3.65/3.89  ;    85 with value (4 30)         67 with value (4 37)          64 with value (4 44)
% 3.65/3.89  ;    80 with value (4 31)         94 with value (4 38)          64 with value (4 45)
% 3.65/3.89  ;    52 with value (4 32)        298 with value (4 39)           8 with value (4 46)
% 3.65/3.89  ;    79 with value (4 33)        238 with value (4 40)          76 with value (4 47)
% 3.65/3.89  ;   183 with value (4 34)        176 with value (4 41)          36 with value (4 48)
% 3.65/3.89  ;   212 with value (4 35)         19 with value (4 42)
% 3.65/3.89  Evaluation took:
% 3.65/3.89    3.41 seconds of real time
% 3.65/3.89    3.171067 seconds of user run time
% 3.65/3.89    0.238946 seconds of system run time
% 3.65/3.89    [Run times include 0.213 seconds GC run time.]
% 3.65/3.89    0 calls to %EVAL
% 3.65/3.89    0 page faults and
% 3.65/3.89    227,048,896 bytes consed.
% 3.65/3.89  :PROOF-FOUND
% 3.65/3.89  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-08T19:59:20
% 3.65/3.89  :PROOF-FOUND
% 3.65/3.89  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------