TSTP Solution File: AGT031^1 by Leo-III---1.7.15

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.7.15
% Problem  : AGT031^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 03:39:37 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 11.48s 3.82s
% Output   : Refutation 11.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :   85
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  200 (  40 unt;  33 typ;  12 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  572 ( 103 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives : 1676 ( 221   ~; 174   |;  14   &;1245   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  22  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :  111 ( 111   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   38 (  35 usr;  11 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  343 (  37   ^ 298   !;   8   ?; 343   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(mu_type,type,
    mu: $tType ).

thf(mand_type,type,
    mand: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(mand_def,definition,
    ( mand
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o] : ( mnot @ ( mor @ ( mnot @ A ) @ ( mnot @ B ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(mimplies_type,type,
    mimplies: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(mimplies_def,definition,
    ( mimplies
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ A ) ) ) ) ).

thf(mforall_ind_type,type,
    mforall_ind: ( mu > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(mforall_ind_def,definition,
    ( mforall_ind
    = ( ^ [A: mu > $i > $o,B: $i] :
        ! [C: mu] : ( A @ C @ B ) ) ) ).

thf(mexists_ind_type,type,
    mexists_ind: ( mu > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(mexists_ind_def,definition,
    ( mexists_ind
    = ( ^ [A: mu > $i > $o] :
          ( mnot
          @ ( mforall_ind
            @ ^ [B: mu] : ( mnot @ ( A @ B ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(mbox_type,type,
    mbox: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(mbox_def,definition,
    ( mbox
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o,B: $i > $o,C: $i] :
        ! [D: $i] :
          ( ~ ( A @ C @ D )
          | ( B @ D ) ) ) ) ).

thf(mdia_type,type,
    mdia: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(mdia_def,definition,
    ( mdia
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o,B: $i > $o] : ( mnot @ ( mbox @ A @ ( mnot @ B ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(msymmetric_type,type,
    msymmetric: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(msymmetric_def,definition,
    ( msymmetric
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( A @ B @ C )
         => ( A @ C @ B ) ) ) ) ).

thf(mserial_type,type,
    mserial: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(mserial_def,definition,
    ( mserial
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [B: $i] :
        ? [C: $i] : ( A @ B @ C ) ) ) ).

thf(meuclidean_type,type,
    meuclidean: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(meuclidean_def,definition,
    ( meuclidean
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
          ( ( ( A @ B @ C )
            & ( A @ B @ D ) )
         => ( A @ C @ D ) ) ) ) ).

thf(mvalid_type,type,
    mvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(mvalid_def,definition,
    ( mvalid
    = ( '!' @ $i ) ) ).

thf(a1_type,type,
    a1: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(a2_type,type,
    a2: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(a3_type,type,
    a3: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(jan_type,type,
    jan: mu ).

thf(piotr_type,type,
    piotr: mu ).

thf(cola_type,type,
    cola: mu ).

thf(pepsi_type,type,
    pepsi: mu ).

thf(beer_type,type,
    beer: mu ).

thf(likes_type,type,
    likes: mu > mu > $i > $o ).

thf(very_much_likes_type,type,
    very_much_likes: mu > mu > $i > $o ).

thf(possibly_likes_type,type,
    possibly_likes: mu > mu > $i > $o ).

thf(subrel_type,type,
    subrel: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(subrel_def,definition,
    ( subrel
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o,B: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
          ( ( A @ C @ D )
         => ( B @ C @ D ) ) ) ) ).

thf(cond4s_type,type,
    cond4s: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(cond4s_def,definition,
    ( cond4s
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i > $o,B: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [C: $i,D: $i,E: $i] :
          ( ( ( A @ C @ D )
            & ( B @ D @ E ) )
         => ( B @ C @ E ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk1_type,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(sk2_type,type,
    sk2: $i > $i ).

thf(sk3_type,type,
    sk3: $i > $i ).

thf(sk4_type,type,
    sk4: $i > $i ).

thf(sk5_type,type,
    sk5: mu > mu > $i > $i ).

thf(sk6_type,type,
    sk6: $i > $i ).

thf(sk7_type,type,
    sk7: $i > $i ).

thf(sk8_type,type,
    sk8: $i > mu > mu > $i > $i ).

thf(sk9_type,type,
    sk9: $i > mu > mu > $i > $i ).

thf(5,axiom,
    mserial @ a3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axioms_D_a3) ).

thf(49,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
    ? [B: $i] : ( a3 @ A @ B ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(50,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( a3 @ A @ ( sk2 @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[49]) ).

thf(26,axiom,
    mvalid @ ( mdia @ a3 @ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_a3_2) ).

thf(92,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ! [B: $i] :
          ( ~ ( a3 @ A @ B )
          | ~ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

thf(93,plain,
    ~ ? [A: $i] :
      ! [B: $i] :
        ( ~ ( a3 @ A @ B )
        | ~ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ B ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[92]) ).

thf(94,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ ( sk6 @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[93]) ).

thf(38,axiom,
    ( mvalid
    @ ( mforall_ind
      @ ^ [A: mu] :
          ( mforall_ind
          @ ^ [B: mu] : ( mbox @ a3 @ ( mimplies @ ( mand @ ( likes @ A @ B ) @ ( mand @ ( mbox @ a1 @ ( likes @ A @ B ) ) @ ( mbox @ a2 @ ( likes @ A @ B ) ) ) ) @ ( very_much_likes @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_a3_4) ).

thf(120,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: mu,C: mu,D: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ A @ D )
      | ~ ( likes @ B @ C @ D )
      | ~ ! [E: $i] :
            ( ~ ( a1 @ D @ E )
            | ( likes @ B @ C @ E ) )
      | ~ ! [E: $i] :
            ( ~ ( a2 @ D @ E )
            | ( likes @ B @ C @ E ) )
      | ( very_much_likes @ B @ C @ D ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[38]) ).

thf(121,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: mu,B: mu,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ A @ D )
      | ~ ( likes @ B @ C @ D )
      | ~ ( likes @ B @ C @ ( sk8 @ D @ C @ B @ A ) )
      | ~ ( likes @ B @ C @ ( sk9 @ D @ C @ B @ A ) )
      | ( very_much_likes @ B @ C @ D ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[120]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( mvalid
    @ ( mexists_ind
      @ ^ [A: mu] : ( mexists_ind @ ( very_much_likes @ A ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mvalid
      @ ( mexists_ind
        @ ^ [A: mu] : ( mexists_ind @ ( very_much_likes @ A ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(42,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i] :
        ~ ! [B: mu,C: mu] :
            ~ ( very_much_likes @ B @ C @ A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(43,plain,
    ~ ~ ~ ! [A: $i] :
          ? [B: mu,C: mu] : ( very_much_likes @ B @ C @ A ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[42]) ).

thf(44,plain,
    ! [B: mu,A: mu] :
      ~ ( very_much_likes @ A @ B @ sk1 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[43]) ).

thf(135,plain,
    ! [F: mu,E: mu,D: $i,C: mu,B: mu,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ A @ D )
      | ~ ( likes @ B @ C @ D )
      | ~ ( likes @ B @ C @ ( sk8 @ D @ C @ B @ A ) )
      | ~ ( likes @ B @ C @ ( sk9 @ D @ C @ B @ A ) )
      | ( ( very_much_likes @ B @ C @ D )
       != ( very_much_likes @ E @ F @ sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[121,44]) ).

thf(136,plain,
    ! [C: mu,B: mu,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ A @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ B @ C @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ B @ C @ ( sk8 @ sk1 @ C @ B @ A ) )
      | ~ ( likes @ B @ C @ ( sk9 @ sk1 @ C @ B @ A ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[135:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( B )),bind(C,$thf( C )),bind(D,$thf( sk1 )),bind(E,$thf( B )),bind(F,$thf( C ))]]) ).

thf(167,plain,
    ! [D: mu,C: mu,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ B @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ C @ D @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ C @ D @ ( sk9 @ sk1 @ D @ C @ B ) )
      | ( ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ ( sk6 @ A ) )
       != ( likes @ C @ D @ ( sk8 @ sk1 @ D @ C @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[94,136]) ).

thf(178,plain,
    ! [D: mu,C: mu,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ B @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ C @ D @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ C @ D @ ( sk9 @ sk1 @ D @ C @ B ) )
      | ( piotr != C )
      | ( pepsi != D )
      | ( ( sk6 @ A )
       != ( sk8 @ sk1 @ D @ C @ B ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[167]) ).

thf(184,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ B @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ ( sk9 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ B ) )
      | ( ( sk6 @ A )
       != ( sk8 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ B ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[178]) ).

thf(215,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ B @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ sk1 )
      | ( ( sk6 @ A )
       != ( sk8 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ B ) )
      | ( ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ ( sk9 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ B ) )
       != ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ sk1 ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[184]) ).

thf(222,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ B @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ sk1 )
      | ( ( sk6 @ A )
       != ( sk8 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ B ) )
      | ( piotr != piotr )
      | ( pepsi != pepsi )
      | ( ( sk9 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ B )
       != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[215]) ).

thf(228,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ B @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ sk1 )
      | ( ( sk6 @ A )
       != ( sk8 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ B ) )
      | ( ( sk9 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ B )
       != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[222]) ).

thf(288,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ sk1 )
      | ( ( sk6 @ B )
       != ( sk8 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ C ) )
      | ( ( sk9 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ C )
       != sk1 )
      | ( ( a3 @ A @ ( sk2 @ A ) )
       != ( a3 @ C @ sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[50,228]) ).

thf(292,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ sk1 )
      | ( ( sk6 @ B )
       != ( sk8 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ C ) )
      | ( ( sk9 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ C )
       != sk1 )
      | ( A != C )
      | ( ( sk2 @ A )
       != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[288]) ).

thf(297,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ sk1 )
      | ( ( sk6 @ A )
       != ( sk8 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ B ) )
      | ( ( sk9 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ B )
       != sk1 )
      | ( ( sk2 @ B )
       != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[292]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    cond4s @ a1 @ a1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axioms_Is_a3_a1) ).

thf(53,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( a1 @ A @ B )
        & ( a1 @ B @ C ) )
     => ( a1 @ A @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(41,axiom,
    ( mvalid
    @ ( mforall_ind
      @ ^ [A: mu] :
          ( mforall_ind
          @ ^ [B: mu] : ( mimplies @ ( mdia @ a2 @ ( likes @ A @ B ) ) @ ( possibly_likes @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_user_communication_4) ).

thf(129,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: mu,C: mu] :
      ( ! [D: $i] :
          ( ~ ( a2 @ A @ D )
          | ~ ( likes @ B @ C @ D ) )
      | ( possibly_likes @ B @ C @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[41]) ).

thf(17,axiom,
    meuclidean @ a2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axioms_5_a2) ).

thf(73,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( a2 @ A @ B )
        & ( a2 @ A @ C ) )
     => ( a2 @ B @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(18,axiom,
    subrel @ a1 @ a3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_I_a1_a3) ).

thf(75,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( a1 @ A @ B )
     => ( a3 @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    cond4s @ a2 @ a1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axioms_Is_a2_a1) ).

thf(69,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( a2 @ A @ B )
        & ( a1 @ B @ C ) )
     => ( a1 @ A @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(24,axiom,
    ( mvalid
    @ ( mforall_ind
      @ ^ [A: mu] :
          ( mforall_ind
          @ ^ [B: mu] : ( mimplies @ ( mbox @ a3 @ ( very_much_likes @ A @ B ) ) @ ( very_much_likes @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_user_communication_1) ).

thf(87,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: mu,C: mu] :
      ( ~ ! [D: $i] :
            ( ~ ( a3 @ A @ D )
            | ( very_much_likes @ B @ C @ D ) )
      | ( very_much_likes @ B @ C @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

thf(88,plain,
    ! [C: mu,B: mu,A: $i] :
      ( ( a3 @ A @ ( sk5 @ C @ B @ A ) )
      | ( very_much_likes @ B @ C @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[87]) ).

thf(640,plain,
    ! [E: mu,D: mu,C: mu,B: mu,A: $i] :
      ( ( a3 @ A @ ( sk5 @ C @ B @ A ) )
      | ( ( very_much_likes @ B @ C @ A )
       != ( very_much_likes @ D @ E @ sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[88,44]) ).

thf(641,plain,
    ! [B: mu,A: mu] : ( a3 @ sk1 @ ( sk5 @ B @ A @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[640:[bind(A,$thf( sk1 )),bind(B,$thf( B )),bind(C,$thf( C )),bind(D,$thf( B )),bind(E,$thf( C ))]]) ).

thf(655,plain,
    ! [B: mu,A: mu] : ( a3 @ sk1 @ ( sk5 @ B @ A @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[641]) ).

thf(29,axiom,
    mvalid @ ( mdia @ a1 @ ( likes @ piotr @ beer ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_a3_3) ).

thf(100,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ! [B: $i] :
          ( ~ ( a1 @ A @ B )
          | ~ ( likes @ piotr @ beer @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[29]) ).

thf(101,plain,
    ~ ? [A: $i] :
      ! [B: $i] :
        ( ~ ( a1 @ A @ B )
        | ~ ( likes @ piotr @ beer @ B ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[100]) ).

thf(102,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( likes @ piotr @ beer @ ( sk7 @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[101]) ).

thf(162,plain,
    ! [D: mu,C: mu,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ B @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ C @ D @ ( sk8 @ sk1 @ D @ C @ B ) )
      | ~ ( likes @ C @ D @ ( sk9 @ sk1 @ D @ C @ B ) )
      | ( ( likes @ piotr @ beer @ ( sk7 @ A ) )
       != ( likes @ C @ D @ sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[102,136]) ).

thf(179,plain,
    ! [D: mu,C: mu,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ B @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ C @ D @ ( sk8 @ sk1 @ D @ C @ B ) )
      | ~ ( likes @ C @ D @ ( sk9 @ sk1 @ D @ C @ B ) )
      | ( piotr != C )
      | ( beer != D )
      | ( ( sk7 @ A )
       != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[162]) ).

thf(185,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ B @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ piotr @ beer @ ( sk8 @ sk1 @ beer @ piotr @ B ) )
      | ~ ( likes @ piotr @ beer @ ( sk9 @ sk1 @ beer @ piotr @ B ) )
      | ( ( sk7 @ A )
       != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[179]) ).

thf(95,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( a3 @ A @ ( sk6 @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[93]) ).

thf(287,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ sk1 )
      | ( ( sk6 @ B )
       != ( sk8 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ C ) )
      | ( ( sk9 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ C )
       != sk1 )
      | ( ( a3 @ A @ ( sk6 @ A ) )
       != ( a3 @ C @ sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[95,228]) ).

thf(296,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ sk1 )
      | ( ( sk6 @ B )
       != ( sk8 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ C ) )
      | ( ( sk9 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ C )
       != sk1 )
      | ( A != C )
      | ( ( sk6 @ A )
       != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[287]) ).

thf(301,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ sk1 )
      | ( ( sk6 @ A )
       != ( sk8 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ B ) )
      | ( ( sk9 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ B )
       != sk1 )
      | ( ( sk6 @ B )
       != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[296]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    cond4s @ a1 @ a1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axioms_Is_a1_a1) ).

thf(51,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( a1 @ A @ B )
        & ( a1 @ B @ C ) )
     => ( a1 @ A @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(52,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a1 @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( a1 @ B @ C )
      | ( a1 @ A @ C ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[51]) ).

thf(33,axiom,
    ( mvalid
    @ ( mforall_ind
      @ ^ [A: mu] : ( mbox @ a2 @ ( mimplies @ ( likes @ A @ pepsi ) @ ( likes @ A @ cola ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_a2_4) ).

thf(110,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: mu,C: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a2 @ A @ C )
      | ~ ( likes @ B @ pepsi @ C )
      | ( likes @ B @ cola @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[33]) ).

thf(39,axiom,
    mvalid @ ( mbox @ a3 @ ( likes @ jan @ cola ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_a3_1) ).

thf(125,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ A @ B )
      | ( likes @ jan @ cola @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[39]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    cond4s @ a1 @ a2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axioms_Is_a1_a2) ).

thf(45,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( a1 @ A @ B )
        & ( a2 @ B @ C ) )
     => ( a2 @ A @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(46,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a1 @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( a2 @ B @ C )
      | ( a2 @ A @ C ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[45]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    msymmetric @ a1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axioms_B_a1) ).

thf(57,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( a1 @ A @ B )
     => ( a1 @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(31,axiom,
    mvalid @ ( mbox @ a1 @ ( likes @ piotr @ beer ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_a2_3) ).

thf(106,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a1 @ A @ B )
      | ( likes @ piotr @ beer @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[31]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    cond4s @ a2 @ a3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axioms_Is_a2_a3) ).

thf(61,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( a2 @ A @ B )
        & ( a3 @ B @ C ) )
     => ( a3 @ A @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(36,axiom,
    ( mvalid
    @ ( mforall_ind
      @ ^ [A: mu] : ( mbox @ a1 @ ( mimplies @ ( mdia @ a1 @ ( likes @ A @ cola ) ) @ ( likes @ A @ pepsi ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_a1_4) ).

thf(116,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: mu,C: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a1 @ A @ C )
      | ! [D: $i] :
          ( ~ ( a1 @ C @ D )
          | ~ ( likes @ B @ cola @ D ) )
      | ( likes @ B @ pepsi @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[36]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    mserial @ a1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axioms_D_a1) ).

thf(59,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
    ? [B: $i] : ( a1 @ A @ B ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(60,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( a1 @ A @ ( sk3 @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[59]) ).

thf(23,axiom,
    cond4s @ a1 @ a3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axioms_Is_a1_a3) ).

thf(85,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( a1 @ A @ B )
        & ( a3 @ B @ C ) )
     => ( a3 @ A @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    msymmetric @ a2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axioms_B_a2) ).

thf(65,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( a2 @ A @ B )
     => ( a2 @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(27,axiom,
    mvalid @ ( mbox @ a1 @ ( likes @ jan @ cola ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_a1_1) ).

thf(96,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a1 @ A @ B )
      | ( likes @ jan @ cola @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[27]) ).

thf(97,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a1 @ A @ B )
      | ( likes @ jan @ cola @ B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[96]) ).

thf(19,axiom,
    meuclidean @ a3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axioms_5_a3) ).

thf(77,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( a3 @ A @ B )
        & ( a3 @ A @ C ) )
     => ( a3 @ B @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(103,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( a1 @ A @ ( sk7 @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[101]) ).

thf(25,axiom,
    mvalid @ ( mbox @ a1 @ ( likes @ piotr @ cola ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_a2_2) ).

thf(90,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a1 @ A @ B )
      | ( likes @ piotr @ cola @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[25]) ).

thf(91,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a1 @ A @ B )
      | ( likes @ piotr @ cola @ B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[90]) ).

thf(264,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( likes @ piotr @ cola @ C )
      | ( ( a1 @ A @ ( sk7 @ A ) )
       != ( a1 @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[103,91]) ).

thf(265,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( likes @ piotr @ cola @ ( sk7 @ A ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[264:[bind(A,$thf( D )),bind(B,$thf( D )),bind(C,$thf( sk7 @ D ))]]) ).

thf(279,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( likes @ piotr @ cola @ ( sk7 @ A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[265]) ).

thf(37,axiom,
    mvalid @ ( mbox @ a1 @ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_a1_2) ).

thf(118,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a1 @ A @ B )
      | ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[37]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    mserial @ a2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axioms_D_a2) ).

thf(71,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
    ? [B: $i] : ( a2 @ A @ B ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(34,axiom,
    mvalid @ ( mbox @ a2 @ ( likes @ jan @ pepsi ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_a2_1) ).

thf(112,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a2 @ A @ B )
      | ( likes @ jan @ pepsi @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[34]) ).

thf(113,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a2 @ A @ B )
      | ( likes @ jan @ pepsi @ B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[112]) ).

thf(21,axiom,
    cond4s @ a3 @ a3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axioms_Is_a3_a3) ).

thf(81,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( a3 @ A @ B )
        & ( a3 @ B @ C ) )
     => ( a3 @ A @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

thf(28,axiom,
    ( mvalid
    @ ( mforall_ind
      @ ^ [A: mu] :
          ( mforall_ind
          @ ^ [B: mu] : ( mimplies @ ( mdia @ a3 @ ( very_much_likes @ A @ B ) ) @ ( likes @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_user_communication_2) ).

thf(98,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: mu,C: mu] :
      ( ! [D: $i] :
          ( ~ ( a3 @ A @ D )
          | ~ ( very_much_likes @ B @ C @ D ) )
      | ( likes @ B @ C @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

thf(32,axiom,
    ( mvalid
    @ ( mforall_ind
      @ ^ [A: mu] : ( mbox @ a1 @ ( mimplies @ ( mdia @ a1 @ ( likes @ A @ pepsi ) ) @ ( likes @ A @ cola ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_a1_3) ).

thf(108,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: mu,C: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a1 @ A @ C )
      | ! [D: $i] :
          ( ~ ( a1 @ C @ D )
          | ~ ( likes @ B @ pepsi @ D ) )
      | ( likes @ B @ cola @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[32]) ).

thf(262,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( likes @ piotr @ cola @ C )
      | ( ( a1 @ A @ ( sk3 @ A ) )
       != ( a1 @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[60,91]) ).

thf(263,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( likes @ piotr @ cola @ ( sk3 @ A ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[262:[bind(A,$thf( D )),bind(B,$thf( D )),bind(C,$thf( sk3 @ D ))]]) ).

thf(278,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( likes @ piotr @ cola @ ( sk3 @ A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[263]) ).

thf(291,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ C @ sk1 )
      | ( ( sk6 @ B )
       != ( sk8 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ C ) )
      | ( ( sk9 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ C )
       != sk1 )
      | ( ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ ( sk6 @ A ) )
       != ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[94,228]) ).

thf(294,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ C @ sk1 )
      | ( ( sk6 @ B )
       != ( sk8 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ C ) )
      | ( ( sk9 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ C )
       != sk1 )
      | ( piotr != piotr )
      | ( pepsi != pepsi )
      | ( ( sk6 @ A )
       != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[291]) ).

thf(299,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ C @ sk1 )
      | ( ( sk6 @ B )
       != ( sk8 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ C ) )
      | ( ( sk9 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ C )
       != sk1 )
      | ( ( sk6 @ A )
       != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[294]) ).

thf(670,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: mu,A: mu] :
      ( ~ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ sk1 )
      | ( ( sk6 @ C )
       != ( sk8 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ D ) )
      | ( ( sk9 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ D )
       != sk1 )
      | ( ( a3 @ sk1 @ ( sk5 @ B @ A @ sk1 ) )
       != ( a3 @ D @ sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[655,228]) ).

thf(673,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: mu,A: mu] :
      ( ~ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ sk1 )
      | ( ( sk6 @ C )
       != ( sk8 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ D ) )
      | ( ( sk9 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ D )
       != sk1 )
      | ( sk1 != D )
      | ( ( sk5 @ B @ A @ sk1 )
       != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[670]) ).

thf(680,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: mu,A: mu] :
      ( ~ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ sk1 )
      | ( ( sk6 @ C )
       != ( sk8 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ sk1 ) )
      | ( ( sk9 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ sk1 )
       != sk1 )
      | ( ( sk5 @ B @ A @ sk1 )
       != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[673]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    cond4s @ a2 @ a2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axioms_Is_a3_a2) ).

thf(47,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( a2 @ A @ B )
        & ( a2 @ B @ C ) )
     => ( a2 @ A @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(48,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a2 @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( a2 @ B @ C )
      | ( a2 @ A @ C ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[47]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    cond4s @ a2 @ a2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axioms_Is_a2_a2) ).

thf(63,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( a2 @ A @ B )
        & ( a2 @ B @ C ) )
     => ( a2 @ A @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(304,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk6 @ B )
       != ( sk8 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ C ) )
      | ( ( sk9 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ C )
       != sk1 )
      | ( ( sk2 @ C )
       != sk1 )
      | ( ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ ( sk6 @ A ) )
       != ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[94,297]) ).

thf(307,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk6 @ B )
       != ( sk8 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ C ) )
      | ( ( sk9 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ C )
       != sk1 )
      | ( ( sk2 @ C )
       != sk1 )
      | ( piotr != piotr )
      | ( pepsi != pepsi )
      | ( ( sk6 @ A )
       != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[304]) ).

thf(310,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk6 @ B )
       != ( sk8 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ C ) )
      | ( ( sk9 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ C )
       != sk1 )
      | ( ( sk2 @ C )
       != sk1 )
      | ( ( sk6 @ A )
       != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[307]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    subrel @ a2 @ a3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_I_a2_a3) ).

thf(67,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( a2 @ A @ B )
     => ( a3 @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(40,axiom,
    ( mvalid
    @ ( mforall_ind
      @ ^ [A: mu] : ( mbox @ a2 @ ( mimplies @ ( likes @ A @ cola ) @ ( likes @ A @ pepsi ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_a2_5) ).

thf(127,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: mu,C: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a2 @ A @ C )
      | ~ ( likes @ B @ cola @ C )
      | ( likes @ B @ pepsi @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[40]) ).

thf(72,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( a2 @ A @ ( sk4 @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[71]) ).

thf(831,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( likes @ jan @ pepsi @ C )
      | ( ( a2 @ A @ ( sk4 @ A ) )
       != ( a2 @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[72,113]) ).

thf(832,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( likes @ jan @ pepsi @ ( sk4 @ A ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[831:[bind(A,$thf( D )),bind(B,$thf( D )),bind(C,$thf( sk4 @ D ))]]) ).

thf(864,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( likes @ jan @ pepsi @ ( sk4 @ A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[832]) ).

thf(440,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( likes @ jan @ cola @ C )
      | ( ( a1 @ A @ ( sk7 @ A ) )
       != ( a1 @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[103,97]) ).

thf(441,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( likes @ jan @ cola @ ( sk7 @ A ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[440:[bind(A,$thf( D )),bind(B,$thf( D )),bind(C,$thf( sk7 @ D ))]]) ).

thf(465,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( likes @ jan @ cola @ ( sk7 @ A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[441]) ).

thf(30,axiom,
    ( mvalid
    @ ( mforall_ind
      @ ^ [A: mu] :
          ( mforall_ind
          @ ^ [B: mu] : ( mimplies @ ( mdia @ a1 @ ( likes @ A @ B ) ) @ ( possibly_likes @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_user_communication_3) ).

thf(104,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: mu,C: mu] :
      ( ! [D: $i] :
          ( ~ ( a1 @ A @ D )
          | ~ ( likes @ B @ C @ D ) )
      | ( possibly_likes @ B @ C @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[30]) ).

thf(168,plain,
    ! [D: mu,C: mu,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ B @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ C @ D @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ C @ D @ ( sk8 @ sk1 @ D @ C @ B ) )
      | ( ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ ( sk6 @ A ) )
       != ( likes @ C @ D @ ( sk9 @ sk1 @ D @ C @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[94,136]) ).

thf(180,plain,
    ! [D: mu,C: mu,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ B @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ C @ D @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ C @ D @ ( sk8 @ sk1 @ D @ C @ B ) )
      | ( piotr != C )
      | ( pepsi != D )
      | ( ( sk6 @ A )
       != ( sk9 @ sk1 @ D @ C @ B ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[168]) ).

thf(186,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ B @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ ( sk8 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ B ) )
      | ( ( sk6 @ A )
       != ( sk9 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ B ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[180]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    msymmetric @ a3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axioms_B_a3) ).

thf(55,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( a3 @ A @ B )
     => ( a3 @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(35,axiom,
    ( mvalid
    @ ( mforall_ind
      @ ^ [A: mu] :
          ( mforall_ind
          @ ^ [B: mu] : ( mimplies @ ( mdia @ a3 @ ( likes @ A @ B ) ) @ ( possibly_likes @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_user_communication_5) ).

thf(114,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: mu,C: mu] :
      ( ! [D: $i] :
          ( ~ ( a3 @ A @ D )
          | ~ ( likes @ B @ C @ D ) )
      | ( possibly_likes @ B @ C @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[35]) ).

thf(166,plain,
    ! [D: mu,C: mu,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ B @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ C @ D @ ( sk8 @ sk1 @ D @ C @ B ) )
      | ~ ( likes @ C @ D @ ( sk9 @ sk1 @ D @ C @ B ) )
      | ( ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ ( sk6 @ A ) )
       != ( likes @ C @ D @ sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[94,136]) ).

thf(177,plain,
    ! [D: mu,C: mu,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ B @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ C @ D @ ( sk8 @ sk1 @ D @ C @ B ) )
      | ~ ( likes @ C @ D @ ( sk9 @ sk1 @ D @ C @ B ) )
      | ( piotr != C )
      | ( pepsi != D )
      | ( ( sk6 @ A )
       != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[166]) ).

thf(183,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a3 @ B @ sk1 )
      | ~ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ ( sk8 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ B ) )
      | ~ ( likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ ( sk9 @ sk1 @ pepsi @ piotr @ B ) )
      | ( ( sk6 @ A )
       != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[177]) ).

thf(107,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( a1 @ A @ B )
      | ( likes @ piotr @ beer @ B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[106]) ).

thf(20,axiom,
    meuclidean @ a1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axioms_5_a1) ).

thf(79,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( a1 @ A @ B )
        & ( a1 @ A @ C ) )
     => ( a1 @ B @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

thf(438,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( likes @ jan @ cola @ C )
      | ( ( a1 @ A @ ( sk3 @ A ) )
       != ( a1 @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[60,97]) ).

thf(439,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( likes @ jan @ cola @ ( sk3 @ A ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[438:[bind(A,$thf( D )),bind(B,$thf( D )),bind(C,$thf( sk3 @ D ))]]) ).

thf(464,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( likes @ jan @ cola @ ( sk3 @ A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[439]) ).

thf(22,axiom,
    subrel @ a1 @ a2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_I_a1_a2) ).

thf(83,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( a1 @ A @ B )
     => ( a2 @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

thf(736,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( likes @ piotr @ beer @ C )
      | ( ( a1 @ A @ ( sk3 @ A ) )
       != ( a1 @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[60,107]) ).

thf(737,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( likes @ piotr @ beer @ ( sk3 @ A ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[736:[bind(A,$thf( D )),bind(B,$thf( D )),bind(C,$thf( sk3 @ D ))]]) ).

thf(755,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( likes @ piotr @ beer @ ( sk3 @ A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[737]) ).

thf(1110,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[297,53,129,73,75,69,88,120,655,185,42,301,52,184,110,125,46,228,57,106,121,61,116,60,85,102,92,65,97,77,96,45,279,44,59,118,71,49,113,81,98,103,91,108,278,299,680,112,48,63,95,310,50,67,127,864,72,465,87,104,186,55,114,51,183,107,136,79,94,464,47,90,83,755,100]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem  : AGT031^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d THM
% 0.08/0.29  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.29  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.29  % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 03:53:40 EDT 2024
% 0.08/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.90/0.89  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.36/1.13  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (241ms). 
% 1.36/1.14  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.10/1.48  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.12/1.48  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.44/1.65  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 39 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.65/1.72  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 39 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.65/1.74  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.65/1.75  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.65/1.75  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 11.38/3.81  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 11.38/3.81  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 11.48/3.81  % Time passed: 3366ms (effective reasoning time: 2668ms)
% 11.48/3.81  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 11.48/3.82  % Axioms used in derivation (39): axioms_5_a3, axioms_B_a1, axiom_a1_4, axiom_a3_3, axiom_a2_2, axioms_5_a2, axiom_user_communication_4, axioms_5_a1, axioms_D_a1, axiom_a1_2, axiom_user_communication_2, axiom_I_a1_a3, axiom_a1_3, axiom_a3_2, axiom_user_communication_3, axioms_Is_a1_a2, axioms_Is_a2_a1, axioms_Is_a3_a2, axioms_Is_a3_a1, axioms_D_a3, axiom_I_a2_a3, axiom_a3_4, axiom_I_a1_a2, axiom_a1_1, axioms_Is_a1_a1, axiom_a2_3, axiom_user_communication_1, axioms_B_a3, axiom_a2_4, axioms_Is_a1_a3, axioms_Is_a2_a2, axiom_user_communication_5, axiom_a3_1, axioms_B_a2, axioms_Is_a3_a3, axioms_Is_a2_a3, axiom_a2_5, axioms_D_a2, axiom_a2_1
% 11.48/3.82  % No. of inferences in proof: 155
% 11.48/3.82  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 3366 ms resp. 2668 ms w/o parsing
% 11.48/3.92  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 11.48/3.92  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------