TSTP Solution File: AGT014+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : AGT014+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 11:57:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.30s 2.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.30s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_10,plain,
( ~ accept_city(X1,X2)
| ~ accept_leader(X1,X3)
| ~ the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams(X1,X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qjztq3w1/input.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(i_0_110,plain,
the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,countryacivilorganization,towna),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qjztq3w1/input.p',i_0_110) ).
cnf(i_0_88,negated_conjecture,
accept_city(X1,towna),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qjztq3w1/input.p',i_0_88) ).
cnf(i_0_9,plain,
( accept_leader(X1,X2)
| ~ any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qjztq3w1/input.p',i_0_9) ).
cnf(i_0_121,plain,
any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,countryacivilorganization,towna),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qjztq3w1/input.p',i_0_121) ).
cnf(c_0_127,plain,
( ~ accept_city(X1,X2)
| ~ accept_leader(X1,X3)
| ~ the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams(X1,X3,X2) ),
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_128,plain,
the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,countryacivilorganization,towna),
i_0_110 ).
cnf(c_0_129,negated_conjecture,
accept_city(X1,towna),
i_0_88 ).
cnf(c_0_130,plain,
( accept_leader(X1,X2)
| ~ any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams(X1,X2,X3) ),
i_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_131,plain,
any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,countryacivilorganization,towna),
i_0_121 ).
cnf(c_0_132,plain,
~ accept_leader(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,countryacivilorganization),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_127,c_0_128]),c_0_129])]) ).
cnf(c_0_133,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_130,c_0_131]),c_0_132]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : AGT014+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 4 05:19:31 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.30/2.53 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 8.30/2.53 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.30/2.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 8.30/2.53
% 8.30/2.53 # Proof found!
% 8.30/2.53 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.30/2.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.30/2.53 # Proof object total steps : 12
% 8.30/2.53 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 8.30/2.53 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 8.30/2.53 # Proof object conjectures : 2
% 8.30/2.53 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 8.30/2.53 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 8.30/2.53 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 8.30/2.53 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 8.30/2.53 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 8.30/2.53 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 8.30/2.53 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.30/2.53 # Parsed axioms : 335
% 8.30/2.53 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 8.30/2.53 # Initial clauses : 335
% 8.30/2.53 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 8.30/2.53 # Initial clauses in saturation : 335
% 8.30/2.53 # Processed clauses : 415
% 8.30/2.53 # ...of these trivial : 10
% 8.30/2.53 # ...subsumed : 8
% 8.30/2.53 # ...remaining for further processing : 396
% 8.30/2.53 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 8.30/2.53 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 8.30/2.53 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 8.30/2.53 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 8.30/2.53 # Generated clauses : 766
% 8.30/2.53 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 441
% 8.30/2.53 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 8.30/2.53 # Paramodulations : 762
% 8.30/2.53 # Factorizations : 2
% 8.30/2.53 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 8.30/2.53 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 8.30/2.53 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 8.30/2.53 # Current number of processed clauses : 394
% 8.30/2.53 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 308
% 8.30/2.53 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.30/2.53 # Negative unit clauses : 44
% 8.30/2.53 # Non-unit-clauses : 42
% 8.30/2.53 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 361
% 8.30/2.53 # ...number of literals in the above : 687
% 8.30/2.53 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 8.30/2.53 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 8.30/2.53 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 374
% 8.30/2.53 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 330
% 8.30/2.53 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 8.30/2.53 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 483
% 8.30/2.53 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 8.30/2.53 # BW rewrite match attempts : 167
% 8.30/2.53 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 8.30/2.53 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 8.30/2.53 # Condensation successes : 0
% 8.30/2.53 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10987
% 8.30/2.53
% 8.30/2.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.30/2.53 # User time : 0.020 s
% 8.30/2.53 # System time : 0.003 s
% 8.30/2.53 # Total time : 0.023 s
% 8.30/2.53 # ...preprocessing : 0.014 s
% 8.30/2.53 # ...main loop : 0.009 s
% 8.30/2.53 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 8.30/2.53
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------