TSTP Solution File: AGT004+2 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : AGT004+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 11:57:11 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 242.28s 186.53s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : AGT004+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun  4 05:12:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.48/0.60          ____       _                          
% 0.48/0.60    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.48/0.60   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.48/0.60  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.48/0.60  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.48/0.60  
% 0.48/0.60  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.48/0.61  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.48/0.61  
% 0.48/0.61  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.48/0.61  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.48/0.61  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.48/0.61  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.48/0.61  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.48/0.61  
% 0.48/0.61  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.48/0.61  
% 0.48/0.61  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.65/0.66  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.45/1.33  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 5.49/1.79  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.67/1.83  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 16.10/5.95  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 16.72/6.17  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 18.27/6.51  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 26.44/8.55  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 27.68/8.81  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 29.34/9.23  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 29.34/9.26  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 37.43/11.56  Prover 0: stopped
% 37.86/11.76  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 38.10/11.92  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 38.33/11.97  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 38.33/11.98  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 84.27/53.10  Prover 3: stopped
% 84.44/53.30  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 85.11/53.50  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 86.35/53.83  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 86.35/53.84  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 140.63/100.83  Prover 1: stopped
% 140.82/101.03  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 141.12/101.24  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 141.85/101.44  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 151.14/110.21  Prover 5: stopped
% 151.36/110.41  Prover 6: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 151.59/110.59  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 152.37/110.78  Prover 6: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 152.37/110.79  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 169.85/126.91  Prover 2: stopped
% 170.08/127.11  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 170.31/127.30  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 170.53/127.36  Prover 7: Proving ...
% 215.89/165.99  Prover 4: stopped
% 216.06/166.19  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 216.71/166.41  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 217.44/166.52  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 242.28/186.53  Prover 6: proved (29412ms)
% 242.28/186.53  Prover 8: stopped
% 242.28/186.53  Prover 7: stopped
% 242.28/186.53  
% 242.28/186.53  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 242.28/186.53  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 242.28/186.53  
% 242.28/186.53  Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------