TSTP Solution File: AGT004+2 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : AGT004+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 15:38:16 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.53s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 41 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 46 ( 18 ~; 13 |; 13 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 24 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1284,plain,
$false,
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f1117,f1242,f1018]) ).
fof(f1018,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( accept_city(X2,X0)
| ~ accept_team(X2,X3,X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f954]) ).
fof(f954,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ( ( accept_number(X2,X1)
& accept_leader(X2,X3)
& accept_city(X2,X0) )
| ~ accept_team(X2,X3,X0,X1) )
& ( accept_team(X2,X3,X0,X1)
| ~ accept_number(X2,X1)
| ~ accept_leader(X2,X3)
| ~ accept_city(X2,X0) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f953]) ).
fof(f953,plain,
! [X2,X1,X0,X3] :
( ( ( accept_number(X0,X1)
& accept_leader(X0,X3)
& accept_city(X0,X2) )
| ~ accept_team(X0,X3,X2,X1) )
& ( accept_team(X0,X3,X2,X1)
| ~ accept_number(X0,X1)
| ~ accept_leader(X0,X3)
| ~ accept_city(X0,X2) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f952]) ).
fof(f952,plain,
! [X2,X1,X0,X3] :
( ( ( accept_number(X0,X1)
& accept_leader(X0,X3)
& accept_city(X0,X2) )
| ~ accept_team(X0,X3,X2,X1) )
& ( accept_team(X0,X3,X2,X1)
| ~ accept_number(X0,X1)
| ~ accept_leader(X0,X3)
| ~ accept_city(X0,X2) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f926]) ).
fof(f926,plain,
! [X2,X1,X0,X3] :
( ( accept_number(X0,X1)
& accept_leader(X0,X3)
& accept_city(X0,X2) )
<=> accept_team(X0,X3,X2,X1) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0,X2,X1,X3] :
( accept_team(X0,X3,X1,X2)
<=> ( accept_leader(X0,X3)
& accept_city(X0,X1)
& accept_number(X0,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a1_1) ).
fof(f1242,plain,
accept_team(countryamedicalorganization,countryahumanitarianorganization,coastvillage,n5),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f925]) ).
fof(f925,plain,
accept_team(countryamedicalorganization,countryahumanitarianorganization,coastvillage,n5),
inference(flattening,[],[f924]) ).
fof(f924,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ accept_team(countryamedicalorganization,countryahumanitarianorganization,coastvillage,n5),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f923]) ).
fof(f923,conjecture,
~ accept_team(countryamedicalorganization,countryahumanitarianorganization,coastvillage,n5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query_4) ).
fof(f1117,plain,
~ accept_city(countryamedicalorganization,coastvillage),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f282]) ).
fof(f282,axiom,
~ accept_city(countryamedicalorganization,coastvillage),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',deduced_13) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10 % Problem : AGT004+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% 0.05/0.11 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 14:52:17 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.48 % (23888)dis+1010_1:50_awrs=decay:awrsf=128:nwc=10.0:s2pl=no:sp=frequency:ss=axioms:i=39:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/39Mi)
% 0.15/0.48 % (23896)lrs+10_1:1_ins=3:sp=reverse_frequency:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=3:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.49 % (23896)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.49 % (23896)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.49 % (23896)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.15/0.49 % (23904)dis+1010_2:3_fs=off:fsr=off:nm=0:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2agt=32:i=82:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/82Mi)
% 0.15/0.49 % (23896)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.15/0.49 % (23896)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.49 % (23896)Termination phase: Naming
% 0.15/0.49
% 0.15/0.49 % (23896)Memory used [KB]: 2046
% 0.15/0.49 % (23896)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.49 % (23896)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.15/0.49 % (23896)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.49 % (23896)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.50 % (23906)dis+21_1:1_ep=RS:nwc=10.0:s2a=on:s2at=1.5:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.15/0.50 % (23897)lrs+10_1:1_drc=off:sp=reverse_frequency:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.15/0.51 % (23889)lrs+2_1:1_lcm=reverse:lma=on:sos=all:spb=goal_then_units:ss=included:urr=on:i=39:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/39Mi)
% 0.15/0.51 % (23884)dis+1002_1:1_aac=none:bd=off:sac=on:sos=on:spb=units:i=3:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.51 % (23897)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.51 % (23897)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.51 % (23897)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.15/0.51 % (23897)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.15/0.51 % (23897)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.51 % (23897)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.15/0.51
% 0.15/0.51 % (23897)Memory used [KB]: 2174
% 0.15/0.51 % (23897)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.51 % (23897)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.15/0.51 % (23897)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.51 % (23897)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.51 % (23884)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.51 % (23884)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.51 % (23884)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.15/0.51 % (23884)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.15/0.51 % (23884)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.51 % (23884)Termination phase: Preprocessing 2
% 0.15/0.51
% 0.15/0.51 % (23884)Memory used [KB]: 2046
% 0.15/0.51 % (23884)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.51 % (23884)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.15/0.51 % (23884)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.51 % (23884)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.52 % (23889)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.52 % (23885)lrs+10_5:1_br=off:fde=none:nwc=3.0:sd=1:sgt=10:sos=on:ss=axioms:urr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.15/0.53 % (23882)dis+1002_1:12_drc=off:fd=preordered:tgt=full:i=99978:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99978Mi)
% 0.15/0.53 % (23889)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.53 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.53 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.53 % (23889)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.53 % (23889)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.15/0.53 % (23889)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.15/0.53 % (23889)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.53
% 0.15/0.53 % (23889)Memory used [KB]: 6780
% 0.15/0.53 % (23889)Time elapsed: 0.086 s
% 0.15/0.53 % (23889)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 0.15/0.53 % (23889)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.53 % (23889)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.53 % (23881)Success in time 0.213 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------