TSTP Solution File: AGT004+2 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : AGT004+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 16:59:15 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.45s 0.65s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.45s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 23 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 24 ( 11 ~; 7 |; 5 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 2 sgn; 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(a1_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( accept_team(X1,X4,X2,X3)
<=> ( accept_city(X1,X2)
& accept_leader(X1,X4)
& accept_number(X1,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JYmmvQHNls/E---3.1_24881.p',a1_1) ).
fof(query_4,conjecture,
~ accept_team(countryamedicalorganization,countryahumanitarianorganization,coastvillage,n5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JYmmvQHNls/E---3.1_24881.p',query_4) ).
fof(deduced_13,axiom,
~ accept_city(countryamedicalorganization,coastvillage),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JYmmvQHNls/E---3.1_24881.p',deduced_13) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X18,X19,X20,X21] :
( ( accept_city(X18,X19)
| ~ accept_team(X18,X21,X19,X20) )
& ( accept_leader(X18,X21)
| ~ accept_team(X18,X21,X19,X20) )
& ( accept_number(X18,X20)
| ~ accept_team(X18,X21,X19,X20) )
& ( ~ accept_city(X18,X19)
| ~ accept_leader(X18,X21)
| ~ accept_number(X18,X20)
| accept_team(X18,X21,X19,X20) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[a1_1])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
accept_team(countryamedicalorganization,countryahumanitarianorganization,coastvillage,n5),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query_4])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
~ accept_city(countryamedicalorganization,coastvillage),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[deduced_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( accept_city(X1,X2)
| ~ accept_team(X1,X3,X2,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
accept_team(countryamedicalorganization,countryahumanitarianorganization,coastvillage,n5),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
~ accept_city(countryamedicalorganization,coastvillage),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.18 % Problem : AGT004+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% 0.18/0.19 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.20/0.41 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.41 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.20/0.41 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.20/0.41 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.20/0.41 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.41 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 22:05:29 EDT 2023
% 0.20/0.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.27/0.60 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.27/0.60 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JYmmvQHNls/E---3.1_24881.p
% 0.45/0.65 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.45/0.65 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.45/0.65 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # new_bool_1 with pid 24961 completed with status 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.45/0.65 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.45/0.65 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.45/0.65 # Search class: FHUNF-FSLM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.45/0.65 # partial match(2): FGUNF-FSLF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.45/0.65 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 225s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 94s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with pid 24966 completed with status 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 0.45/0.65 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.45/0.65 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.45/0.65 # Search class: FHUNF-FSLM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.45/0.65 # partial match(2): FGUNF-FSLF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.45/0.65 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 225s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 94s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.65 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.45/0.65 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.45/0.65
% 0.45/0.65 # Proof found!
% 0.45/0.65 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.45/0.65 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.45/0.65 # Parsed axioms : 923
% 0.45/0.65 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 442
% 0.45/0.65 # Initial clauses : 484
% 0.45/0.65 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Initial clauses in saturation : 484
% 0.45/0.65 # Processed clauses : 928
% 0.45/0.65 # ...of these trivial : 37
% 0.45/0.65 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # ...remaining for further processing : 891
% 0.45/0.65 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Generated clauses : 113
% 0.45/0.65 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Paramodulations : 113
% 0.45/0.65 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # NegExts : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Total rewrite steps : 74
% 0.45/0.65 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.65 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.65 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.65 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.65 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.65 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.45/0.65 # Current number of processed clauses : 444
% 0.45/0.65 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 398
% 0.45/0.65 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Negative unit clauses : 45
% 0.45/0.65 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.45/0.65 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3
% 0.45/0.65 # ...number of literals in the above : 8
% 0.45/0.65 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Current number of archived clauses : 447
% 0.45/0.65 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4
% 0.45/0.65 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.45/0.65 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 569
% 0.45/0.65 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # BW rewrite match attempts : 440
% 0.45/0.65 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.45/0.65 # Termbank termtop insertions : 14544
% 0.45/0.65
% 0.45/0.65 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.45/0.65 # User time : 0.022 s
% 0.45/0.65 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.45/0.65 # Total time : 0.031 s
% 0.45/0.65 # Maximum resident set size: 3280 pages
% 0.45/0.65
% 0.45/0.65 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.45/0.65 # User time : 0.047 s
% 0.45/0.65 # System time : 0.015 s
% 0.45/0.65 # Total time : 0.062 s
% 0.45/0.65 # Maximum resident set size: 2296 pages
% 0.45/0.65 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.45/0.65 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------