TSTP Solution File: AGT004+1 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : AGT004+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 11:57:11 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 265.93s 211.34s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : AGT004+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.13/0.31  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.31  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.31  % DateTime : Sat Jun  4 05:30:18 EDT 2022
% 0.17/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.55          ____       _                          
% 0.17/0.55    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.17/0.55   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.17/0.55  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.17/0.55  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.17/0.55  
% 0.17/0.55  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.17/0.55  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.17/0.55  
% 0.17/0.55  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.17/0.55  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.17/0.55  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.17/0.55  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.17/0.55  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.17/0.55  
% 0.17/0.55  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.17/0.55  
% 0.17/0.56  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.66/0.61  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.10/1.22  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 5.07/1.65  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.29/1.69  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 15.54/5.90  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 16.25/6.09  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 17.67/6.42  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 26.12/8.50  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 27.03/8.68  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 28.62/9.11  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 28.96/9.13  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 37.63/11.51  Prover 0: stopped
% 38.01/11.71  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 38.33/11.86  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 38.33/11.91  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 38.33/11.92  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 83.15/53.05  Prover 3: stopped
% 83.43/53.29  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 83.79/53.42  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 85.13/53.71  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 85.13/53.72  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 140.14/101.10  Prover 1: stopped
% 140.39/101.31  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 140.61/101.48  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 141.36/101.66  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 150.41/110.27  Prover 5: stopped
% 150.61/110.47  Prover 6: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 150.85/110.61  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 151.61/110.81  Prover 6: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 151.61/110.82  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 168.96/126.57  Prover 2: stopped
% 169.19/126.77  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 169.41/126.92  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 169.66/126.99  Prover 7: Proving ...
% 214.90/166.13  Prover 4: stopped
% 215.11/166.33  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 215.74/166.51  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 216.22/166.63  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 265.93/211.34  Prover 6: proved (37676ms)
% 265.93/211.34  Prover 8: stopped
% 265.93/211.34  Prover 7: stopped
% 265.93/211.34  
% 265.93/211.34  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 265.93/211.34  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 265.93/211.34  
% 265.93/211.34  Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------