TSTP Solution File: AGT004+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : AGT004+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 11:57:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 1.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 42 ( 20 ~; 13 |; 6 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 7 sgn 24 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query_4,conjecture,
~ accept_team(countryamedicalorganization,countryahumanitarianorganization,coastvillage,n5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query_4) ).
fof(a1_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( accept_team(X1,X4,X2,X3)
<=> ( accept_city(X1,X2)
& accept_leader(X1,X4)
& accept_number(X1,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+0.ax',a1_1) ).
fof(a1_6,axiom,
! [X1,X4,X2] :
( the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams(X1,X4,X2)
=> ~ ( accept_city(X1,X2)
& accept_leader(X1,X4) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+0.ax',a1_6) ).
fof(a1_5,axiom,
! [X1,X4,X2] :
( any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams(X1,X4,X2)
=> accept_leader(X1,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+0.ax',a1_5) ).
fof(event_37,axiom,
the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams(countryamedicalorganization,christiancountrychumanitarianorganization,coastvillage),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+1.ax',event_37) ).
fof(event_38,axiom,
any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams(countryamedicalorganization,christiancountrychumanitarianorganization,coastvillage),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+1.ax',event_38) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ accept_team(countryamedicalorganization,countryahumanitarianorganization,coastvillage,n5),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( ( accept_city(X5,X6)
| ~ accept_team(X5,X8,X6,X7) )
& ( accept_leader(X5,X8)
| ~ accept_team(X5,X8,X6,X7) )
& ( accept_number(X5,X7)
| ~ accept_team(X5,X8,X6,X7) )
& ( ~ accept_city(X5,X6)
| ~ accept_leader(X5,X8)
| ~ accept_number(X5,X7)
| accept_team(X5,X8,X6,X7) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[a1_1])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
accept_team(countryamedicalorganization,countryahumanitarianorganization,coastvillage,n5),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7] :
( ~ the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams(X5,X6,X7)
| ~ accept_city(X5,X7)
| ~ accept_leader(X5,X6) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[a1_6])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( accept_city(X1,X3)
| ~ accept_team(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
accept_team(countryamedicalorganization,countryahumanitarianorganization,coastvillage,n5),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7] :
( ~ any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams(X5,X6,X7)
| accept_leader(X5,X6) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[a1_5])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ accept_leader(X1,X2)
| ~ accept_city(X1,X3)
| ~ the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
the_agent_not_in_any_proposed_teams(countryamedicalorganization,christiancountrychumanitarianorganization,coastvillage),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[event_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
accept_city(countryamedicalorganization,coastvillage),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( accept_leader(X1,X2)
| ~ any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
any_agent_in_all_proposed_teams(countryamedicalorganization,christiancountrychumanitarianorganization,coastvillage),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[event_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
~ accept_leader(countryamedicalorganization,christiancountrychumanitarianorganization),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : AGT004+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 4 05:22:02 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/1.43 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.25/1.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 0.25/1.43
% 0.25/1.43 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.25/1.43 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.25/1.43 # Parsed axioms : 556
% 0.25/1.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 455
% 0.25/1.43 # Initial clauses : 101
% 0.25/1.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 101
% 0.25/1.43 # Processed clauses : 101
% 0.25/1.43 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 101
% 0.25/1.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 101
% 0.25/1.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 79
% 0.25/1.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Negative unit clauses : 22
% 0.25/1.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 102
% 0.25/1.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 85
% 0.25/1.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6409
% 0.25/1.43
% 0.25/1.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.43 # User time : 0.021 s
% 0.25/1.43 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.25/1.43 # Total time : 0.025 s
% 0.25/1.43 # Maximum resident set size: 4080 pages
% 0.25/1.43 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.029 s
% 0.25/1.43
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object total steps : 20
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.25/1.43 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.43 # Parsed axioms : 556
% 0.25/1.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Initial clauses : 629
% 0.25/1.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 629
% 0.25/1.43 # Processed clauses : 658
% 0.25/1.43 # ...of these trivial : 6
% 0.25/1.43 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 651
% 0.25/1.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.25/1.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Generated clauses : 969
% 0.25/1.43 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 808
% 0.25/1.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Paramodulations : 965
% 0.25/1.43 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.25/1.43 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 649
% 0.25/1.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 498
% 0.25/1.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Negative unit clauses : 42
% 0.25/1.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 109
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 779
% 0.25/1.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 1510
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2767
% 0.25/1.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1063
% 0.25/1.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 635
% 0.25/1.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 172
% 0.25/1.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 32707
% 0.25/1.43
% 0.25/1.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.43 # User time : 0.052 s
% 0.25/1.43 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.25/1.43 # Total time : 0.057 s
% 0.25/1.43 # Maximum resident set size: 7376 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------