TPTP Problem File: SWV329-1.p
View Solutions
- Solve Problem
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SWV329-1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Domain : Software Verification (Security)
% Problem : Cryptographic protocol problem for Yahalom
% Version : [Pau06] axioms : Especial.
% English :
% Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% Source : [Pau06]
% Names : Yahalom__A_Said_YM3_lemma_2 [Pau06]
% Status : Unsatisfiable
% Rating : 0.45 v8.2.0, 0.52 v8.1.0, 0.53 v7.5.0, 0.68 v7.4.0, 0.65 v7.3.0, 0.58 v7.1.0, 0.50 v7.0.0, 0.67 v6.4.0, 0.60 v6.3.0, 0.64 v6.2.0, 0.80 v6.1.0, 0.86 v6.0.0, 0.80 v5.5.0, 0.90 v5.3.0, 0.94 v5.2.0, 0.88 v5.0.0, 0.86 v4.1.0, 0.85 v4.0.1, 0.82 v3.7.0, 0.80 v3.5.0, 0.82 v3.4.0, 0.83 v3.3.0, 0.86 v3.2.0
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 2969 ( 772 unt; 269 nHn;2118 RR)
% Number of literals : 6389 (1448 equ;3255 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 9 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 88 ( 87 usr; 0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 281 ( 281 usr; 62 con; 0-18 aty)
% Number of variables : 6312 (1432 sgn)
% SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN
% Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% can be quite easily found.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
include('Axioms/MSC001-0.ax').
include('Axioms/MSC001-1.ax').
include('Axioms/SWV005-0.ax').
include('Axioms/SWV005-2.ax').
include('Axioms/SWV005-3.ax').
include('Axioms/SWV005-4.ax').
include('Axioms/SWV005-5.ax').
include('Axioms/SWV005-6.ax').
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_evsf,c_Yahalom_Oyahalom,tc_List_Olist(tc_Event_Oevent)) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_X,c_Message_Osynth(c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf))),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K),c_Message_Oanalz(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_insert(v_X,c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf),tc_Message_Omsg)),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_B,c_Event_Obad,tc_Message_Oagent) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(c_Public_OshrK(v_B),c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(c_Message_Omsg_OAgent(v_A),c_Message_Omsg_OKey(v_K))),c_Message_Oparts(c_Event_Oknows(c_Message_Oagent_OSpy,v_evsf)),tc_Message_Omsg) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Event_Oevent_OSays(v_A,v_B,c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_U,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB)))),c_List_Oset(v_evsf,tc_Event_Oevent),tc_Event_Oevent) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_8,negated_conjecture,
( c_Message_Omsg_OMPair(V_U,c_Message_Omsg_OCrypt(v_K,c_Message_Omsg_ONonce(v_NB))) != v_X
| v_B != v_Ba
| v_A != c_Message_Oagent_OSpy ) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------