TMTP Model File: NUM286-2.003-Sat
View Problem
- Process Model
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.0
% Problem : NUM286-2 : TPTP v6.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transform : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc -t %d %s
% Computer : n164.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32286.75MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 9 22:13:09 EDT 2015
% Result : Satisfiable 12.48s
% Output : Saturation 12.48s
% Verified :
% Statistics : Number of clauses : 12 ( 12 expanded)
% Number of leaves : 12 ( 12 expanded)
% Depth : 0
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 22 expanded)
% Number of equality atoms : 0 ( 0 expanded)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 average)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 average)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Vampire---4.0 format not known, defaulting to TPTP
cnf(commutativity2,axiom,
( equalish(subtract(add(X0,X1),X2),add(subtract(X0,X2),X1)) )).
cnf(addition_inverts_subtraction1,axiom,
( equalish(subtract(add(X0,X1),X1),X0) )).
cnf(commutativity1,axiom,
( equalish(add(subtract(X0,X1),X2),subtract(add(X0,X2),X1)) )).
cnf(associativity_of_addition,axiom,
( equalish(add(X0,add(X1,X2)),add(add(X0,X1),X2)) )).
cnf(commutativity_of_addition,axiom,
( equalish(add(X0,X1),add(X1,X0)) )).
cnf(subtract_substitution1,axiom,
( equalish(X2,subtract(X1,X3))
| ~ equalish(X2,subtract(X0,X3))
| ~ equalish(X0,X1) )).
cnf(subtract_substitution2,axiom,
( equalish(X2,subtract(X3,X1))
| ~ equalish(X2,subtract(X3,X0))
| ~ equalish(X0,X1) )).
cnf(addition_inverts_subtraction2,axiom,
( equalish(X0,subtract(add(X0,X1),X1)) )).
cnf(add_substitution1,axiom,
( equalish(X2,add(X1,X3))
| ~ equalish(X2,add(X0,X3))
| ~ equalish(X0,X1) )).
cnf(add_substitution2,axiom,
( equalish(X2,add(X3,X1))
| ~ equalish(X2,add(X3,X0))
| ~ equalish(X0,X1) )).
cnf(transitivity,axiom,
( equalish(X0,X2)
| ~ equalish(X1,X2)
| ~ equalish(X0,X1) )).
cnf(reflexivity,axiom,
( equalish(X0,X0) )).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : NUM286-2 : TPTP v6.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : vampire --mode casc -t %d %s
% 0.02/1.07 % Computer : n164.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/1.07 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/1.07 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/1.07 % Memory : 32286.75MB
% 0.02/1.07 % OS : Linux 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64
% 0.02/1.07 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/1.07 % DateTime : Tue Jul 7 12:25:17 CDT 2015
% 0.02/1.07 % CPUTime :
% 0.02/1.07 Hi Geoff, go and have some cold beer while I am trying to solve this very hard problem!
% 0.02/1.07 % remaining time: 3000 next slice time: 14
% 0.02/1.08 lrs+11_10_bs=unit_only:br=off:gs=on:gsssp=full:nwc=1:stl=30:sos=all:sac=on:sdd=large:ssfp=100000:ssfq=1.2:smm=off:ssnc=none:sp=occurrence:urr=on_13 on theBenchmark
% 0.02/1.08 % Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.02/1.08 % ------------------------------
% 0.02/1.08 % Version: Vampire 4.0 (commit 2df2fce on 2015-07-07 02:33:56 +0100)
% 0.02/1.08 % Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.02/1.08
% 0.02/1.08 % Active clauses: 12
% 0.02/1.08 % Final active clauses: 12
% 0.02/1.08 % Input clauses: 12
% 0.02/1.08 % Initial clauses: 12
% 0.02/1.08 %
% 0.02/1.08 % Memory used [KB]: 511
% 0.02/1.08 % Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.02/1.08 % ------------------------------
% 0.02/1.08 ---- Runtime statistics ----
% 0.02/1.08 clauses created: 12
% 0.02/1.08 -----------------------------
% 0.02/1.08 % ------------------------------
% 0.02/1.08 % remaining time: 2999 next slice time: 3
% 0.02/1.08 dis+1002_5_gs=on:gsem=off:gsssp=full:lwlo=on:nwc=1:sas=minisat:sos=on:sac=on:sdd=large:sfr=on:ssfp=100000:ssfq=1.0:ssnc=none:sp=reverse_arity_1 on theBenchmark
% 0.02/1.08 % Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.02/1.08 % ------------------------------
% 0.02/1.08 % Version: Vampire 4.0 (commit 2df2fce on 2015-07-07 02:33:56 +0100)
% 0.02/1.08 % Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.02/1.08
% 0.02/1.08 % Active clauses: 12
% 0.02/1.08 % Final active clauses: 12
% 0.02/1.08 % Input clauses: 12
% 0.02/1.08 % Initial clauses: 12
% 0.02/1.08 %
% 0.02/1.08 % SAT solver clauses: 2
% 0.02/1.08 %
% 0.02/1.08 % Memory used [KB]: 511
% 0.02/1.08 % Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.02/1.08 % ------------------------------
% 0.02/1.08 ---- Runtime statistics ----
% 0.02/1.08 clauses created: 12
% 0.02/1.08 -----------------------------
% 0.02/1.08 % ------------------------------
% 0.02/1.08 % remaining time: 2999 next slice time: 123
% 0.02/1.08 dis+1_40_bs=unit_only:fsr=off:nwc=1:sas=minisat:sdd=large:ssfp=1000:ssfq=1.1:smm=sco:ssnc=none:sp=reverse_arity:updr=off_117 on theBenchmark
% 12.38/13.48 % (61373)Time limit reached!
% 12.38/13.48 % ------------------------------
% 12.38/13.48 % Version: Vampire 4.0 (commit 2df2fce on 2015-07-07 02:33:56 +0100)
% 12.38/13.48 % Termination reason: Time limit
% 12.38/13.48 % Termination phase: Saturation
% 12.38/13.48
% 12.38/13.48 % Active clauses: 2756
% 12.38/13.48 % Passive clauses: 1142266
% 12.38/13.48 % Generated clauses: 1204875
% 12.38/13.48 % Final active clauses: 2756
% 12.38/13.48 % Final passive clauses: 1137920
% 12.38/13.48 % Input clauses: 12
% 12.38/13.48 % Initial clauses: 12
% 12.38/13.48 %
% 12.38/13.48 % Simple tautologies: 5
% 12.38/13.48 % Forward subsumptions: 64194
% 12.38/13.48 %
% 12.38/13.48 % Binary resolution: 1206171
% 12.38/13.48 %
% 12.38/13.48 % SAT solver clauses: 1
% 12.38/13.48 %
% 12.38/13.48 % Memory used [KB]: 656279
% 12.38/13.48 % Time elapsed: 12.400 s
% 12.38/13.48 % ------------------------------
% 12.38/13.48 ---- Runtime statistics ----
% 12.38/13.48 clauses created: 1206184
% 12.38/13.48 clauses deleted: 62609
% 12.38/13.48 -----------------------------
% 12.38/13.48 % ------------------------------
% 12.48/13.51 % remaining time: 2875 next slice time: 4
% 12.48/13.51 dis-11_5_cond=fast:fsr=off:gs=on:gsem=off:nwc=1:spl=off:sp=occurrence:updr=off_2 on theBenchmark
% 12.48/13.51 Satisfiable!
% 12.48/13.51 % SZS status Satisfiable for theBenchmark
% 12.48/13.51 % # SZS output start Saturation.
% 12.48/13.51 cnf(commutativity2,axiom,
% 12.48/13.51 equalish(subtract(add(X0,X1),X2),add(subtract(X0,X2),X1))).
% 12.48/13.51
% 12.48/13.51 cnf(addition_inverts_subtraction1,axiom,
% 12.48/13.51 equalish(subtract(add(X0,X1),X1),X0)).
% 12.48/13.51
% 12.48/13.51 cnf(commutativity1,axiom,
% 12.48/13.51 equalish(add(subtract(X0,X1),X2),subtract(add(X0,X2),X1))).
% 12.48/13.51
% 12.48/13.51 cnf(associativity_of_addition,axiom,
% 12.48/13.51 equalish(add(X0,add(X1,X2)),add(add(X0,X1),X2))).
% 12.48/13.51
% 12.48/13.51 cnf(commutativity_of_addition,axiom,
% 12.48/13.51 equalish(add(X0,X1),add(X1,X0))).
% 12.48/13.51
% 12.48/13.51 cnf(subtract_substitution1,axiom,
% 12.48/13.51 equalish(X2,subtract(X1,X3)) | ~equalish(X2,subtract(X0,X3)) | ~equalish(X0,X1)).
% 12.48/13.51
% 12.48/13.51 cnf(subtract_substitution2,axiom,
% 12.48/13.51 equalish(X2,subtract(X3,X1)) | ~equalish(X2,subtract(X3,X0)) | ~equalish(X0,X1)).
% 12.48/13.51
% 12.48/13.51 cnf(addition_inverts_subtraction2,axiom,
% 12.48/13.51 equalish(X0,subtract(add(X0,X1),X1))).
% 12.48/13.51
% 12.48/13.51 cnf(add_substitution1,axiom,
% 12.48/13.51 equalish(X2,add(X1,X3)) | ~equalish(X2,add(X0,X3)) | ~equalish(X0,X1)).
% 12.48/13.51
% 12.48/13.51 cnf(add_substitution2,axiom,
% 12.48/13.51 equalish(X2,add(X3,X1)) | ~equalish(X2,add(X3,X0)) | ~equalish(X0,X1)).
% 12.48/13.51
% 12.48/13.51 cnf(transitivity,axiom,
% 12.48/13.51 equalish(X0,X2) | ~equalish(X1,X2) | ~equalish(X0,X1)).
% 12.48/13.51
% 12.48/13.51 cnf(reflexivity,axiom,
% 12.48/13.51 equalish(X0,X0)).
% 12.48/13.51
% 12.48/13.51 % # SZS output end Saturation.
% 12.48/13.51 % ------------------------------
% 12.48/13.51 % Version: Vampire 4.0 (commit 2df2fce on 2015-07-07 02:33:56 +0100)
% 12.48/13.51 % Termination reason: Satisfiable
% 12.48/13.51
% 12.48/13.51 % Active clauses: 12
% 12.48/13.51 % Passive clauses: 12
% 12.48/13.51 % Generated clauses: 12
% 12.48/13.51 % Final active clauses: 12
% 12.48/13.51 % Input clauses: 12
% 12.48/13.51 % Initial clauses: 12
% 12.48/13.51 %
% 12.48/13.51 % SAT solver clauses: 24
% 12.48/13.51 % SAT solver unit clauses: 14
% 12.48/13.51 %
% 12.48/13.51 % TWLsolver clauses: 24
% 12.48/13.51 % TWLsolver calls for satisfiability: 144
% 12.48/13.51 %
% 12.48/13.51 % Memory used [KB]: 639
% 12.48/13.51 % Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 12.48/13.51 % ------------------------------
% 12.48/13.51 ---- Runtime statistics ----
% 12.48/13.51 clauses created: 12
% 12.48/13.51 -----------------------------
% 12.48/13.51 % ------------------------------
% 12.48/13.51 % Success in time 12.441 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------