A Case Study
The Problem
- Encoding of general education requirements
at UM ...
Composition, Humanities, Science, Mathematics, Social science,
Second language, Writing
- Conjecture to prove it's possible to complete the requirements
- There are alternative ways, i.e., alternative proofs
- Three proofs, two by EP and one by Metis
- Formula equivalence modulo obvious properties of connectives,
variable renaming and reordering, Skolem symbol renaming
The Proofs
- Initial target EP1: Art, Biology, Computer Science, Anthropology,
Arabic, Philosophy
- 13 initial self-combining steps, then 5 non-self-combining and 28
more self-combining
- Self-combining steps collapse sequences of equivalent formulae
- 1st non-self-combining step replaces EP1 proof by EP2
- 2nd and 3rd non-self-combining steps bring in EP1 and Metis
components
- 4th and 5th non-self-combining steps change inference orders
- Final combined proof: Art History (Metis), Biology (EP1), Statistics
(EP2), Psychology (EP2), Japanese (EP2), SpecialWriting (EP2)
Is the Combined Proof Different?
Proof
|
| CswLeaves
| CswInferred
| CswInferences
|
|
EP1
|
| 0.6466
| 0.7105
| 0.6155
|
EP2
|
| 0.6274
| 0.7045
| 0.6475
|
Metis
|
| 0.6466
| 0.6475
| 0.5166
|
After 13
|
| 0.6466
| 0.7063
| 0.5791
|
Final combined
|
| 0.6270
| 0.6815
| 0.5428
|