0.00/0.04 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.04 % Command : vampire --mode casc -m 90000 -t %d %s 0.03/0.24 % Computer : n002.star.cs.uiowa.edu 0.03/0.24 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.03/0.24 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz 0.03/0.24 % Memory : 32218.625MB 0.03/0.24 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 0.03/0.24 % CPULimit : 300 0.03/0.24 % DateTime : Sat Jul 14 04:24:26 CDT 2018 0.03/0.24 % CPUTime : 0.03/0.25 Hi Geoff, go and have some cold beer while I am trying to solve this very hard problem! 0.03/0.25 % remaining time: 3000 next slice time: 3 0.03/0.28 dis+1002_4_gs=on:inst=on:nm=64:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sac=on:sfr=on:smm=off:ssnc=none:sp=occurrence:tha=off:thf=on:updr=off_1 on theBenchmark 0.41/0.67 % (8087)Time limit reached! 0.41/0.67 % ------------------------------ 0.41/0.67 % Version: Vampire 4.1 for CASC J8 Entry 0.41/0.67 % Termination reason: Time limit 0.41/0.67 % Termination phase: Saturation 0.41/0.67 0.41/0.67 % Memory used [KB]: 767 0.41/0.67 % Time elapsed: 0.400 s 0.41/0.67 % ------------------------------ 0.41/0.67 % ------------------------------ 0.41/0.68 % remaining time: 2995 next slice time: 3 0.41/0.68 lrs+1_24_bs=unit_only:fsr=off:gs=on:gsem=on:inst=on:nm=64:nwc=3:sas=z3:stl=30:sac=on:sdd=large:sfr=on:ssfp=4000:ssfq=2.0:ssnc=none:sp=reverse_arity:thf=on:updr=off_1 on theBenchmark 0.48/1.08 % (8088)Time limit reached! 0.48/1.08 % ------------------------------ 0.48/1.08 % Version: Vampire 4.1 for CASC J8 Entry 0.48/1.08 % Termination reason: Time limit 0.48/1.08 % Termination phase: Saturation 0.48/1.08 0.48/1.08 % Memory used [KB]: 7036 0.48/1.08 % Time elapsed: 0.400 s 0.48/1.08 % ------------------------------ 0.48/1.08 % ------------------------------ 0.48/1.08 % remaining time: 2991 next slice time: 5 0.48/1.08 lrs+11_4:1_cond=on:gs=on:gsem=on:irw=on:lma=on:nm=64:nwc=1.7:sas=z3:stl=30:sdd=large:ssfp=100000:ssfq=1.2:smm=off:ssnc=none:tha=off_3 on theBenchmark 0.88/1.09 % Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya! 0.88/1.09 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark 0.88/1.09 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark 0.88/1.09 tff(func_def_0, type, y: $int). 0.88/1.09 tff(func_def_1, type, a: $int). 0.88/1.09 tff(func_def_2, type, x: $int). 0.88/1.09 tff(func_def_3, type, b: $int). 0.88/1.09 tff(f1,axiom,( 0.88/1.09 a = $product($product(98164184,y),y)), 0.88/1.09 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',eq1)). 0.88/1.09 tff(f2,axiom,( 0.88/1.09 b = $product($product(6472,x),y)), 0.88/1.09 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',eq2)). 0.88/1.09 tff(f3,conjecture,( 0.88/1.09 $product(12270523,$product($product(123,b),b)) = $product(5235848,$product($product($product(123,x),x),a))), 0.88/1.09 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj)). 0.88/1.09 tff(f4,negated_conjecture,( 0.88/1.09 ~$product(12270523,$product($product(123,b),b)) = $product(5235848,$product($product($product(123,x),x),a))), 0.88/1.09 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f3])). 0.88/1.09 tff(f5,plain,( 0.88/1.09 $product(12270523,$product($product(123,b),b)) != $product(5235848,$product($product($product(123,x),x),a))), 0.88/1.09 inference(flattening,[],[f4])). 0.88/1.09 tff(f6,plain,( 0.88/1.09 $product(12270523,$product($product(123,b),b)) != $product(5235848,$product($product($product(123,x),x),a))), 0.88/1.09 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5])). 0.88/1.09 tff(f7,plain,( 0.88/1.09 a = $product($product(98164184,y),y)), 0.88/1.09 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1])). 0.88/1.09 tff(f8,plain,( 0.88/1.09 b = $product($product(6472,x),y)), 0.88/1.09 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2])). 0.88/1.09 tff(f13,plain,( 0.88/1.09 spl0_1 <=> $product(12270523,$product($product(123,b),b)) != $product(5235848,$product($product($product(123,x),x),a))), 0.88/1.09 introduced(AVATAR_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])])). 0.88/1.09 tff(f15,plain,( 0.88/1.09 ~spl0_1), 0.88/1.09 inference(AVATAR_split_clause,[],[f6,f13])). 0.88/1.09 tff(f20,plain,( 0.88/1.09 spl0_2 <=> a = $product($product(98164184,y),y)), 0.88/1.09 introduced(AVATAR_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])])). 0.88/1.09 tff(f22,plain,( 0.88/1.09 spl0_2), 0.88/1.09 inference(AVATAR_split_clause,[],[f7,f20])). 0.88/1.09 tff(f27,plain,( 0.88/1.09 spl0_4 <=> b = $product($product(6472,x),y)), 0.88/1.09 introduced(AVATAR_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])])). 0.88/1.09 tff(f29,plain,( 0.88/1.09 spl0_4), 0.88/1.09 inference(AVATAR_split_clause,[],[f8,f27])). 0.88/1.09 tff(f30,plain,( 0.88/1.09 $false), 0.88/1.09 inference(AVATAR_sat_refutation,[],[f15,f22,f29])). 0.88/1.09 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark 0.88/1.09 % ------------------------------ 0.88/1.09 % Version: Vampire 4.1 for CASC J8 Entry 0.88/1.09 % Termination reason: Refutation 0.88/1.09 0.88/1.09 % Memory used [KB]: 511 0.88/1.09 % Time elapsed: 0.014 s 0.88/1.09 % ------------------------------ 0.88/1.09 % ------------------------------ 0.88/1.10 % Success in time 0.848 s 0.88/1.10 EOF