0.00/0.03 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.04 % Command : vampire --mode casc -m 90000 -t %d %s 0.02/0.23 % Computer : n115.star.cs.uiowa.edu 0.02/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.02/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz 0.02/0.23 % Memory : 32218.625MB 0.02/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 0.02/0.23 % CPULimit : 300 0.02/0.23 % DateTime : Sat Jul 14 05:37:25 CDT 2018 0.02/0.23 % CPUTime : 0.02/0.24 Hi Geoff, go and have some cold beer while I am trying to solve this very hard problem! 0.02/0.24 % remaining time: 3000 next slice time: 3 0.02/0.26 dis+1002_4_gs=on:inst=on:nm=64:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sac=on:sfr=on:smm=off:ssnc=none:sp=occurrence:tha=off:thf=on:updr=off_1 on theBenchmark 0.43/0.66 % (21217)Time limit reached! 0.43/0.66 % ------------------------------ 0.43/0.66 % Version: Vampire 4.1 for CASC J8 Entry 0.43/0.66 % Termination reason: Time limit 0.43/0.66 % Termination phase: Saturation 0.43/0.66 0.43/0.66 % Memory used [KB]: 9083 0.43/0.66 % Time elapsed: 0.400 s 0.43/0.66 % ------------------------------ 0.43/0.66 % ------------------------------ 0.43/0.67 % remaining time: 2995 next slice time: 3 0.43/0.67 lrs+1_24_bs=unit_only:fsr=off:gs=on:gsem=on:inst=on:nm=64:nwc=3:sas=z3:stl=30:sac=on:sdd=large:sfr=on:ssfp=4000:ssfq=2.0:ssnc=none:sp=reverse_arity:thf=on:updr=off_1 on theBenchmark 0.49/1.07 % (21218)Time limit reached! 0.49/1.07 % ------------------------------ 0.49/1.07 % Version: Vampire 4.1 for CASC J8 Entry 0.49/1.07 % Termination reason: Time limit 0.49/1.07 % Termination phase: Saturation 0.49/1.07 0.49/1.07 % Memory used [KB]: 19317 0.49/1.07 % Time elapsed: 0.400 s 0.49/1.07 % ------------------------------ 0.49/1.07 % ------------------------------ 0.49/1.07 % remaining time: 2991 next slice time: 5 0.49/1.07 lrs+11_4:1_cond=on:gs=on:gsem=on:irw=on:lma=on:nm=64:nwc=1.7:sas=z3:stl=30:sdd=large:ssfp=100000:ssfq=1.2:smm=off:ssnc=none:tha=off_3 on theBenchmark 0.49/1.08 % Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya! 0.49/1.08 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark 0.49/1.08 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark 0.49/1.08 tff(func_def_0, type, a: $int). 0.49/1.08 tff(func_def_1, type, b: $int). 0.49/1.08 tff(func_def_2, type, c: $int). 0.49/1.08 tff(func_def_3, type, d: $int). 0.49/1.08 tff(f1,axiom,( 0.49/1.08 0 = $sum($sum($sum($product(a,a),$product($product($sum(a,b),$sum($sum(c,d),1)),$sum(a,2))),b),$product(-1,$product($sum($sum($sum(a,b),c),d),$sum(2,c))))), 0.49/1.08 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',eq)). 0.49/1.08 tff(f2,conjecture,( 0.49/1.08 0 = $sum($product($product(d,b),a),$product(-1,$sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($difference($sum($product(-2,$product(a,a)),$product(-1,$product(c,a))),b),$product(-1,$product(b,a))),$product(2,c)),$product(-1,$product(c,b))),$product(c,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(c,a),a))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,a)))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,b)))),$product(-1,$product($product(c,b),a))),$product(d,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(d,a),a))),$product(2,d))))), 0.49/1.08 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj)). 0.49/1.08 tff(f3,negated_conjecture,( 0.49/1.08 ~0 = $sum($product($product(d,b),a),$product(-1,$sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($difference($sum($product(-2,$product(a,a)),$product(-1,$product(c,a))),b),$product(-1,$product(b,a))),$product(2,c)),$product(-1,$product(c,b))),$product(c,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(c,a),a))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,a)))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,b)))),$product(-1,$product($product(c,b),a))),$product(d,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(d,a),a))),$product(2,d))))), 0.49/1.08 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f2])). 0.49/1.08 tff(f4,plain,( 0.49/1.08 ~0 = $sum($product($product(d,b),a),$product(-1,$sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($product(-2,$product(a,a)),$product(-1,$product(c,a))),$uminus(b)),$product(-1,$product(b,a))),$product(2,c)),$product(-1,$product(c,b))),$product(c,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(c,a),a))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,a)))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,b)))),$product(-1,$product($product(c,b),a))),$product(d,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(d,a),a))),$product(2,d))))), 0.49/1.08 inference(evaluation,[],[f3])). 0.49/1.08 tff(f5,plain,( 0.49/1.08 0 != $sum($product($product(d,b),a),$product(-1,$sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($product(-2,$product(a,a)),$product(-1,$product(c,a))),$uminus(b)),$product(-1,$product(b,a))),$product(2,c)),$product(-1,$product(c,b))),$product(c,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(c,a),a))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,a)))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,b)))),$product(-1,$product($product(c,b),a))),$product(d,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(d,a),a))),$product(2,d))))), 0.49/1.08 inference(flattening,[],[f4])). 0.49/1.08 tff(f6,plain,( 0.49/1.08 0 != $sum($product($product(d,b),a),$product(-1,$sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($product(-2,$product(a,a)),$product(-1,$product(c,a))),$uminus(b)),$product(-1,$product(b,a))),$product(2,c)),$product(-1,$product(c,b))),$product(c,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(c,a),a))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,a)))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,b)))),$product(-1,$product($product(c,b),a))),$product(d,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(d,a),a))),$product(2,d))))), 0.49/1.08 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5])). 0.49/1.08 tff(f7,plain,( 0.49/1.08 0 = $sum($sum($sum($product(a,a),$product($product($sum(a,b),$sum($sum(c,d),1)),$sum(a,2))),b),$product(-1,$product($sum($sum($sum(a,b),c),d),$sum(2,c))))), 0.49/1.08 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1])). 0.49/1.08 tff(f12,plain,( 0.49/1.08 spl0_1 <=> 0 != $sum($product($product(d,b),a),$product(-1,$sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($product(-2,$product(a,a)),$product(-1,$product(c,a))),$uminus(b)),$product(-1,$product(b,a))),$product(2,c)),$product(-1,$product(c,b))),$product(c,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(c,a),a))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,a)))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,b)))),$product(-1,$product($product(c,b),a))),$product(d,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(d,a),a))),$product(2,d))))), 0.49/1.08 introduced(AVATAR_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])])). 0.49/1.08 tff(f14,plain,( 0.49/1.08 ~spl0_1), 0.49/1.08 inference(AVATAR_split_clause,[],[f6,f12])). 0.49/1.08 tff(f19,plain,( 0.49/1.08 spl0_2 <=> 0 = $sum($sum($sum($product(a,a),$product($product($sum(a,b),$sum($sum(c,d),1)),$sum(a,2))),b),$product(-1,$product($sum($sum($sum(a,b),c),d),$sum(2,c))))), 0.49/1.08 introduced(AVATAR_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])])). 0.49/1.08 tff(f21,plain,( 0.49/1.08 spl0_2), 0.49/1.08 inference(AVATAR_split_clause,[],[f7,f19])). 0.49/1.08 tff(f22,plain,( 0.49/1.08 $false), 0.49/1.08 inference(AVATAR_sat_refutation,[],[f14,f21])). 0.49/1.08 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark 0.49/1.08 % ------------------------------ 0.49/1.08 % Version: Vampire 4.1 for CASC J8 Entry 0.49/1.08 % Termination reason: Refutation 0.49/1.08 0.49/1.08 % Memory used [KB]: 511 0.49/1.08 % Time elapsed: 0.014 s 0.49/1.08 % ------------------------------ 0.49/1.08 % ------------------------------ 0.49/1.08 % Success in time 0.846 s 0.49/1.09 EOF