0.00/0.03	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.04	% Command    : vampire --mode casc -t %d %s
0.02/0.27	% Computer   : n133.star.cs.uiowa.edu
0.02/0.27	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.02/0.27	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
0.02/0.27	% Memory     : 32218.625MB
0.02/0.27	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
0.02/0.27	% CPULimit   : 300
0.02/0.27	% DateTime   : Fri Jul 13 14:53:32 CDT 2018
0.02/0.27	% CPUTime    : 
0.07/0.31	% lrs+1011_2:1_add=large:afr=on:afp=4000:afq=1.1:amm=off:anc=none:cond=on:fsr=off:gs=on:irw=on:nm=64:nwc=1:sas=z3:stl=30:sos=on:sp=reverse_arity:thf=on:urr=on:updr=off_2 on theBenchmark
0.55/0.81	% Time limit reached!
0.55/0.81	% ------------------------------
0.55/0.81	% Version: Vampire 4.2.2 (commit 552c234 on 2018-07-02 14:53:33 +0100)
0.55/0.81	% Termination reason: Time limit
0.55/0.81	% Termination phase: Saturation
0.55/0.81	
0.55/0.81	% Memory used [KB]: 23155
0.55/0.81	% Time elapsed: 0.500 s
0.55/0.81	% ------------------------------
0.55/0.81	% ------------------------------
0.60/0.85	% lrs+1_2:3_afr=on:afp=1000:afq=1.1:amm=sco:anc=none:fsr=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=on:lma=on:nm=64:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:stl=30:sac=on:tha=off:uwa=one_side_interpreted:updr=off_2 on theBenchmark
0.60/0.88	% Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
0.60/0.88	% SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
0.60/0.88	% SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
0.60/0.88	tff(func_def_0, type, u: $real).
0.60/0.88	tff(func_def_1, type, v: $real).
0.60/0.88	tff(func_def_2, type, w: $real).
0.60/0.88	tff(func_def_3, type, z: $real).
0.60/0.88	tff(f1,axiom,(
0.60/0.88	  $greater(z,0.0)),
0.60/0.88	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hypothesis_02)).
0.60/0.88	tff(f2,axiom,(
0.60/0.88	  $less($sum(1.0,z),w)),
0.60/0.88	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hypothesis_03)).
0.60/0.88	tff(f3,axiom,(
0.60/0.88	  $greater(u,0.0)),
0.60/0.88	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hypothesis)).
0.60/0.88	tff(f4,conjecture,(
0.60/0.88	  $less($product($product($sum($sum(u,v),z),$sum($sum(u,v),z)),$sum($sum(u,v),z)),$product($product($product($product($sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0),$sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0)),$sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0)),$sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0)),$sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0)))),
0.60/0.88	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conclusion)).
0.60/0.88	tff(f5,negated_conjecture,(
0.60/0.88	  ~$less($product($product($sum($sum(u,v),z),$sum($sum(u,v),z)),$sum($sum(u,v),z)),$product($product($product($product($sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0),$sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0)),$sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0)),$sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0)),$sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0)))),
0.60/0.88	  inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f4])).
0.60/0.88	tff(f6,axiom,(
0.60/0.88	  $less(u,v)),
0.60/0.88	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hypothesis_01)).
0.60/0.88	tff(f7,plain,(
0.60/0.88	  $less(0.0,z)),
0.60/0.88	  inference(evaluation,[],[f1])).
0.60/0.88	tff(f8,plain,(
0.60/0.88	  $less(0.0,u)),
0.60/0.88	  inference(evaluation,[],[f3])).
0.60/0.88	tff(f9,plain,(
0.60/0.88	  ~$less($product($product($sum($sum(u,v),z),$sum($sum(u,v),z)),$sum($sum(u,v),z)),$product($product($product($product($sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0),$sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0)),$sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0)),$sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0)),$sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0)))),
0.60/0.88	  inference(flattening,[],[f5])).
0.60/0.88	tff(f10,plain,(
0.60/0.88	  ~$less($product($product($sum($sum(u,v),z),$sum($sum(u,v),z)),$sum($sum(u,v),z)),$product($product($product($product($sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0),$sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0)),$sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0)),$sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0)),$sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0)))),
0.60/0.88	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
0.60/0.88	tff(f11,plain,(
0.60/0.88	  $less(0.0,z)),
0.60/0.88	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7])).
0.60/0.88	tff(f12,plain,(
0.60/0.88	  $less(0.0,u)),
0.60/0.88	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8])).
0.60/0.88	tff(f13,plain,(
0.60/0.88	  $less(u,v)),
0.60/0.88	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6])).
0.60/0.88	tff(f14,plain,(
0.60/0.88	  $less($sum(1.0,z),w)),
0.60/0.88	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2])).
0.60/0.88	tff(f19,plain,(
0.60/0.88	  spl0_0 <=> $less(0.0,z)),
0.60/0.88	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_0])])).
0.60/0.88	tff(f21,plain,(
0.60/0.88	  spl0_0),
0.60/0.88	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f11,f19])).
0.60/0.88	tff(f26,plain,(
0.60/0.88	  spl0_2 <=> $less(0.0,u)),
0.60/0.88	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])])).
0.60/0.88	tff(f28,plain,(
0.60/0.88	  spl0_2),
0.60/0.88	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f12,f26])).
0.60/0.88	tff(f33,plain,(
0.60/0.88	  spl0_4 <=> $less(u,v)),
0.60/0.88	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])])).
0.60/0.88	tff(f35,plain,(
0.60/0.88	  spl0_4),
0.60/0.88	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f13,f33])).
0.60/0.88	tff(f40,plain,(
0.60/0.88	  spl0_6 <=> $less($sum(1.0,z),w)),
0.60/0.88	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_6])])).
0.60/0.88	tff(f42,plain,(
0.60/0.88	  spl0_6),
0.60/0.88	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f14,f40])).
0.60/0.88	tff(f47,plain,(
0.60/0.88	  spl0_9 <=> ~$less($product($product($sum($sum(u,v),z),$sum($sum(u,v),z)),$sum($sum(u,v),z)),$product($product($product($product($sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0),$sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0)),$sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0)),$sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0)),$sum($sum($sum(u,v),w),1.0)))),
0.60/0.88	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_9])])).
0.60/0.88	tff(f49,plain,(
0.60/0.88	  ~spl0_9),
0.60/0.88	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f10,f47])).
0.60/0.88	tff(f50,plain,(
0.60/0.88	  $false),
0.60/0.88	  inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f21,f28,f35,f42,f49])).
0.60/0.88	% SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
0.60/0.88	% ------------------------------
0.60/0.88	% Version: Vampire 4.2.2 (commit 552c234 on 2018-07-02 14:53:33 +0100)
0.60/0.88	% Termination reason: Refutation
0.60/0.88	
0.60/0.88	% Memory used [KB]: 5117
0.60/0.88	% Time elapsed: 0.037 s
0.60/0.88	% ------------------------------
0.60/0.88	% ------------------------------
0.60/0.89	% Success in time 0.607 s
0.68/1.58	EOF