0.00/0.03	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.04	% Command    : eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule --cpu-limit=%d %s
0.03/0.24	% Computer   : n123.star.cs.uiowa.edu
0.03/0.24	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.03/0.24	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
0.03/0.24	% Memory     : 32218.625MB
0.03/0.24	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
0.03/0.24	% CPULimit   : 300
0.03/0.24	% DateTime   : Fri Jul 13 14:54:25 CDT 2018
0.03/0.25	% CPUTime    : 
0.03/0.25	# Version: 2.2pre001
0.03/0.25	# No SInE strategy applied
0.03/0.25	# Trying AutoSched0 for 151 seconds
0.07/0.27	# AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_CO_S4S
0.07/0.27	# and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
0.07/0.27	#
0.07/0.27	# Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
0.07/0.27	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.07/0.27	
0.07/0.27	# Proof found!
0.07/0.27	# SZS status Theorem
0.07/0.27	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.07/0.27	fof(contradiction, axiom, ?[X9]:![X10]:~(model(X10,X9)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax', contradiction)).
0.07/0.27	fof(unp, axiom, ![X1, X2]:(status(X1,X2,unp)<=>(~(?[X3]:model(X3,X2))<=~(?[X4]:model(X4,X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax', unp)).
0.07/0.27	fof(nota, axiom, ![X7, X8]:(nota(X7,X8)<=>?[X1, X2]:(status(X1,X2,X7)&~(status(X1,X2,X8)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax', nota)).
0.07/0.27	fof(nota_unp_thm, conjecture, nota(unp,thm), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', nota_unp_thm)).
0.07/0.27	fof(thm, axiom, ![X1, X2]:(![X4]:(model(X4,X1)=>model(X4,X2))<=>status(X1,X2,thm)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax', thm)).
0.07/0.27	fof(not, axiom, ![X10, X9]:(~(model(X10,not(X9)))<=>model(X10,X9)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax', not)).
0.07/0.27	fof(c_0_6, plain, ![X179]:~model(X179,esk70_0), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[contradiction])])])).
0.07/0.27	fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X11, X12, X14, X11, X12, X15]:((~status(X11,X12,unp)|(model(esk1_2(X11,X12),X11)|~model(X14,X12)))&((~model(X15,X11)|status(X11,X12,unp))&(model(esk2_2(X11,X12),X12)|status(X11,X12,unp)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[unp])])])])])])])])).
0.07/0.27	fof(c_0_8, plain, ![X156, X157, X156, X157, X160, X161]:(((status(esk56_2(X156,X157),esk57_2(X156,X157),X156)|~nota(X156,X157))&(~status(esk56_2(X156,X157),esk57_2(X156,X157),X157)|~nota(X156,X157)))&(~status(X160,X161,X156)|status(X160,X161,X157)|nota(X156,X157))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[nota])])])])])])])])).
0.07/0.27	cnf(c_0_9, plain, (~model(X1,esk70_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.07/0.27	cnf(c_0_10, plain, (model(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)|status(X1,X2,unp)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.07/0.27	fof(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ~(nota(unp,thm)), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[nota_unp_thm])).
0.07/0.27	fof(c_0_12, plain, ![X41, X42, X41, X42, X44]:(((model(esk12_2(X41,X42),X41)|status(X41,X42,thm))&(~model(esk12_2(X41,X42),X42)|status(X41,X42,thm)))&(~status(X41,X42,thm)|(~model(X44,X41)|model(X44,X42)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm])])])])])])])).
0.07/0.27	cnf(c_0_13, plain, (status(X1,X2,X4)|nota(X3,X4)|~status(X1,X2,X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.07/0.27	cnf(c_0_14, plain, (status(X1,esk70_0,unp)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])).
0.07/0.27	fof(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ~nota(unp,thm), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.07/0.27	fof(c_0_16, plain, ![X182, X183, X182, X183]:((model(X182,not(X183))|model(X182,X183))&(~model(X182,X183)|~model(X182,not(X183)))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not])])])])])).
0.07/0.27	cnf(c_0_17, plain, (model(X3,X2)|~status(X1,X2,thm)|~model(X3,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
0.07/0.27	cnf(c_0_18, plain, (nota(unp,X1)|status(X2,esk70_0,X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14])).
0.07/0.27	cnf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, (~nota(unp,thm)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])).
0.07/0.27	cnf(c_0_20, plain, (model(X1,not(X2))|model(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])).
0.07/0.27	cnf(c_0_21, plain, (~model(X1,X2)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18]), c_0_9]), c_0_19])).
0.07/0.27	cnf(c_0_22, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21]), c_0_21]), ['proof']).
0.07/0.27	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.07/0.27	# Proof object total steps             : 23
0.07/0.27	# Proof object clause steps            : 10
0.07/0.27	# Proof object formula steps           : 13
0.07/0.27	# Proof object conjectures             : 4
0.07/0.27	# Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
0.07/0.27	# Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
0.07/0.27	# Proof object initial clauses used    : 6
0.07/0.27	# Proof object initial formulas used   : 6
0.07/0.27	# Proof object generating inferences   : 3
0.07/0.27	# Proof object simplifying inferences  : 4
0.07/0.27	# Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
0.07/0.27	# Parsed axioms                        : 33
0.07/0.27	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.07/0.27	# Initial clauses                      : 109
0.07/0.27	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.07/0.27	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 109
0.07/0.27	# Processed clauses                    : 235
0.07/0.27	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.07/0.27	# ...subsumed                          : 4
0.07/0.27	# ...remaining for further processing  : 231
0.07/0.27	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.07/0.27	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.07/0.27	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.07/0.27	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.07/0.27	# Generated clauses                    : 509
0.07/0.27	# ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 487
0.07/0.27	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.07/0.27	# Paramodulations                      : 494
0.07/0.27	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.07/0.27	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.07/0.27	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.07/0.27	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.07/0.27	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.07/0.27	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.07/0.27	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.07/0.27	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.07/0.27	# Current number of processed clauses  : 109
0.07/0.27	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 13
0.07/0.27	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.07/0.27	#    Negative unit clauses             : 7
0.07/0.27	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 89
0.07/0.27	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 250
0.07/0.27	# ...number of literals in the above   : 546
0.07/0.27	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.07/0.27	# Current number of archived clauses   : 122
0.07/0.27	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4658
0.07/0.27	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2460
0.07/0.27	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5
0.07/0.27	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 330
0.07/0.27	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.07/0.27	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
0.07/0.27	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.07/0.27	# Condensation attempts                : 235
0.07/0.27	# Condensation successes               : 3
0.07/0.27	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 14621
0.07/0.27	
0.07/0.27	# -------------------------------------------------
0.07/0.27	# User time                : 0.022 s
0.07/0.27	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.07/0.27	# Total time               : 0.024 s
0.07/0.27	# Maximum resident set size: 1572 pages
0.07/0.29	EOF