0.00/0.03 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.04 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx4g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar %s -t %d -p --atp cvc4=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/cvc4 --atp e=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --atp iprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/iprover 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n180.star.cs.uiowa.edu 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 32218.625MB 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Sat Jul 14 05:52:54 CDT 2018 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime : 1.83/1.21 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode. 2.44/1.45 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy 2.83/1.53 % [INFO] iprover registered as external prover. 2.83/1.53 % [INFO] e registered as external prover. 2.83/1.54 % [INFO] cvc4 registered as external prover. 2.83/1.54 % [INFO] Parsing finished. Scanning for conjecture ... 2.83/1.59 % [INFO] Found a conjecture and 14 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 3.09/1.63 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 14 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 3.09/1.67 % [INFO] Type checking passed. Searching for refutation ... 18.64/5.91 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ... 18.64/5.91 % Time passed: 5585ms 18.64/5.91 % Effective reasoning time: 4696ms 18.64/5.91 % Solved by strategy 18.64/5.91 % Axioms used in derivation (14): sos_01, sos_05, sos_02, sos_12, sos_06, sos_11, sos_09, sos_03, sos_07, sos_13, sos_04, sos_10, sos_08, sos_14 18.64/5.91 % No. of inferences in proof: 32 18.64/5.91 % No. of processed clauses: 24 18.64/5.91 % No. of generated clauses: 283 18.64/5.91 % No. of forward subsumed clauses: 24 18.64/5.91 % No. of backward subsumed clauses: 3 18.64/5.91 % No. of ground rewrite rules in store: 2 18.64/5.91 % No. of non-ground rewrite rules in store: 11 18.64/5.91 % No. of positive (non-rewrite) units in store: 2 18.64/5.91 % No. of negative (non-rewrite) units in store: 2 18.64/5.91 % No. of choice functions detected: 0 18.64/5.91 % No. of choice instantiations: 0 18.64/5.91 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 5585 ms resp. 4696 ms w/o parsing 18.64/5.94 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 18.64/5.94 thf('==>_type', type, '==>': ($i > ($i > $i))). 18.64/5.94 thf('+_type', type, '+': ($i > ($i > $i))). 18.64/5.94 thf('>=_type', type, '>=': ($i > ($i > $o))). 18.64/5.94 thf('0_type', type, 0: $i). 18.64/5.94 thf('1_type', type, 1: $i). 18.64/5.94 thf(15,axiom,((! [A:$i]: ('>=' @ A @ A))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_04)). 18.64/5.94 thf(56,plain,((! [A:$i]: ('>=' @ A @ A))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15])). 18.64/5.94 thf(10,axiom,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: (('>=' @ ('==>' @ C @ A) @ ('==>' @ C @ B)) <= ('>=' @ A @ B)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_11)). 18.64/5.94 thf(42,plain,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: (('>=' @ ('==>' @ C @ A) @ ('==>' @ C @ B)) | ~ ('>=' @ A @ B)))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10])). 18.64/5.94 thf(5,axiom,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: (('>=' @ B @ ('==>' @ A @ C)) <=> ('>=' @ ('+' @ A @ B) @ C)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_07)). 18.64/5.94 thf(25,plain,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: ((('>=' @ B @ ('==>' @ A @ C)) => ('>=' @ ('+' @ A @ B) @ C)) & (('>=' @ ('+' @ A @ B) @ C) => ('>=' @ B @ ('==>' @ A @ C)))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5])). 18.64/5.94 thf(3,axiom,((! [A:$i,B:$i]: (('+' @ B @ ('==>' @ B @ A)) = ('+' @ A @ ('==>' @ A @ B))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_12)). 18.64/5.94 thf(20,plain,((! [A:$i,B:$i]: (('+' @ B @ ('==>' @ B @ A)) = ('+' @ A @ ('==>' @ A @ B))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3])). 18.64/5.94 thf(7,axiom,((! [A:$i]: (A = ('+' @ A @ '0')))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_03)). 18.64/5.94 thf(33,plain,((! [A:$i]: (A = ('+' @ A @ '0')))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7])). 18.64/5.94 thf(14,axiom,((! [A:$i]: (('==>' @ ('==>' @ A @ '1') @ '1') = A))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_13)). 18.64/5.94 thf(53,plain,((! [A:$i]: (('==>' @ ('==>' @ A @ '1') @ '1') = A))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14])). 18.64/5.94 thf(11,axiom,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: (('>=' @ A @ B) => ('>=' @ ('==>' @ B @ C) @ ('==>' @ A @ C))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_10)). 18.64/5.94 thf(45,plain,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: (('>=' @ A @ B) => ('>=' @ ('==>' @ B @ C) @ ('==>' @ A @ C))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11])). 18.64/5.94 thf(1,conjecture,((! [A:$i,B:$i]: (('==>' @ ('==>' @ A @ B) @ B) = ('==>' @ ('==>' @ B @ A) @ A)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals_15)). 18.64/5.94 thf(2,negated_conjecture,((~ (! [A:$i,B:$i]: (('==>' @ ('==>' @ A @ B) @ B) = ('==>' @ ('==>' @ B @ A) @ A))))),inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1])). 18.64/5.94 thf(17,plain,((~ (! [A:$i,B:$i]: (('==>' @ ('==>' @ A @ B) @ B) = ('==>' @ ('==>' @ B @ A) @ A))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2])). 18.64/5.94 thf(9,axiom,((! [A:$i]: ('1' = ('+' @ A @ '1')))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_14)). 18.64/5.94 thf(39,plain,((! [A:$i]: ('1' = ('+' @ A @ '1')))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9])). 18.64/5.94 thf(12,axiom,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: (('>=' @ A @ B) => ('>=' @ ('+' @ A @ C) @ ('+' @ B @ C))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_09)). 18.64/5.94 thf(48,plain,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: (('>=' @ A @ B) => ('>=' @ ('+' @ A @ C) @ ('+' @ B @ C))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12])). 18.64/5.94 thf(4,axiom,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: ((('>=' @ B @ C) & ('>=' @ A @ B)) => ('>=' @ A @ C)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_05)). 18.64/5.94 thf(23,plain,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: ((('>=' @ B @ C) & ('>=' @ A @ B)) => ('>=' @ A @ C)))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4])). 18.64/5.94 thf(16,axiom,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: (('+' @ ('+' @ A @ B) @ C) = ('+' @ A @ ('+' @ B @ C))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_01)). 18.64/5.94 thf(58,plain,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: (('+' @ ('+' @ A @ B) @ C) = ('+' @ A @ ('+' @ B @ C))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16])). 18.64/5.94 thf(8,axiom,((! [A:$i,B:$i]: (('+' @ A @ B) = ('+' @ B @ A)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_02)). 18.64/5.94 thf(36,plain,((! [A:$i,B:$i]: (('+' @ A @ B) = ('+' @ B @ A)))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8])). 18.64/5.94 thf(6,axiom,((! [A:$i,B:$i]: ((('>=' @ B @ A) & ('>=' @ A @ B)) => (B = A)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_06)). 18.64/5.94 thf(30,plain,((! [A:$i,B:$i]: ((('>=' @ B @ A) & ('>=' @ A @ B)) => (B = A)))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6])). 18.64/5.94 thf(13,axiom,((! [A:$i]: ('>=' @ A @ '0'))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_08)). 18.64/5.94 thf(51,plain,((! [A:$i]: ('>=' @ A @ '0'))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13])). 18.64/5.94 thf(1135,plain,($false),inference(e,[status(thm)],[56,42,25,20,33,53,45,17,39,48,23,58,36,30,51])). 18.64/5.94 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 18.64/5.94 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ... 18.78/6.00 EOF