0.00/0.03 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.04 % Command : eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule --cpu-limit=%d %s 0.02/0.23 % Computer : n183.star.cs.uiowa.edu 0.02/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.02/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz 0.02/0.23 % Memory : 32218.625MB 0.02/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 0.06/0.23 % CPULimit : 300 0.06/0.23 % DateTime : Sat Jul 14 05:35:39 CDT 2018 0.06/0.23 % CPUTime : 0.06/0.23 # Version: 2.2pre001 0.06/0.24 # No SInE strategy applied 0.06/0.24 # Trying AutoSched0 for 151 seconds 0.06/0.25 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S 0.06/0.25 # and selection function SelectComplexG. 0.06/0.25 # 0.06/0.25 # Preprocessing time : 0.009 s 0.06/0.25 0.06/0.25 # Proof found! 0.06/0.25 # SZS status Theorem 0.06/0.25 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.06/0.25 fof(t34_funct_1, axiom, ![X1, X2]:(((X1=relation_dom(X2)&![X3]:(in(X3,X1)=>X3=apply(X2,X3)))<=>X2=identity_relation(X1))<=(function(X2)&relation(X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', t34_funct_1)). 0.06/0.25 fof(dt_k6_relat_1, axiom, ![X1]:relation(identity_relation(X1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', dt_k6_relat_1)). 0.06/0.25 fof(fc2_funct_1, axiom, ![X1]:(relation(identity_relation(X1))&function(identity_relation(X1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fc2_funct_1)). 0.06/0.25 fof(d8_funct_1, axiom, ![X1]:((relation(X1)&function(X1))=>(![X2, X3]:(X3=X2<=((in(X3,relation_dom(X1))&apply(X1,X2)=apply(X1,X3))&in(X2,relation_dom(X1))))<=>one_to_one(X1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', d8_funct_1)). 0.06/0.25 fof(t52_funct_1, conjecture, ![X1]:one_to_one(identity_relation(X1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', t52_funct_1)). 0.06/0.25 fof(c_0_5, plain, ![X28, X29, X31]:(((in(esk8_2(X28,X29),X28)|X28!=relation_dom(X29)|X29=identity_relation(X28)|(~function(X29)|~relation(X29)))&(esk8_2(X28,X29)!=apply(X29,esk8_2(X28,X29))|X28!=relation_dom(X29)|X29=identity_relation(X28)|(~function(X29)|~relation(X29))))&((X28=relation_dom(X29)|X29!=identity_relation(X28)|(~function(X29)|~relation(X29)))&(~in(X31,X28)|X31=apply(X29,X31)|X29!=identity_relation(X28)|(~function(X29)|~relation(X29))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t34_funct_1])])])])])])])])). 0.06/0.25 fof(c_0_6, plain, ![X6]:relation(identity_relation(X6)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[dt_k6_relat_1])). 0.06/0.25 fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X36, X36]:(relation(identity_relation(X36))&function(identity_relation(X36))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fc2_funct_1])])])). 0.06/0.25 fof(c_0_8, plain, ![X37, X40, X41]:(((((in(esk11_1(X37),relation_dom(X37))|one_to_one(X37)|(~relation(X37)|~function(X37)))&(apply(X37,esk10_1(X37))=apply(X37,esk11_1(X37))|one_to_one(X37)|(~relation(X37)|~function(X37))))&(in(esk10_1(X37),relation_dom(X37))|one_to_one(X37)|(~relation(X37)|~function(X37))))&(esk11_1(X37)!=esk10_1(X37)|one_to_one(X37)|(~relation(X37)|~function(X37))))&(~one_to_one(X37)|(~in(X41,relation_dom(X37))|apply(X37,X40)!=apply(X37,X41)|~in(X40,relation_dom(X37))|X41=X40)|(~relation(X37)|~function(X37)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d8_funct_1])])])])])])])])). 0.06/0.25 cnf(c_0_9, plain, (X1=relation_dom(X2)|X2!=identity_relation(X1)|~function(X2)|~relation(X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.06/0.25 cnf(c_0_10, plain, (relation(identity_relation(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.06/0.25 cnf(c_0_11, plain, (function(identity_relation(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.06/0.25 cnf(c_0_12, plain, (X1=apply(X3,X1)|~in(X1,X2)|X3!=identity_relation(X2)|~function(X3)|~relation(X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.06/0.25 cnf(c_0_13, plain, (in(esk11_1(X1),relation_dom(X1))|one_to_one(X1)|~relation(X1)|~function(X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.06/0.25 cnf(c_0_14, plain, (relation_dom(identity_relation(X1))=X1), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]), c_0_10]), c_0_11])])). 0.06/0.25 cnf(c_0_15, plain, (in(esk10_1(X1),relation_dom(X1))|one_to_one(X1)|~relation(X1)|~function(X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.06/0.25 cnf(c_0_16, plain, (apply(X1,esk10_1(X1))=apply(X1,esk11_1(X1))|one_to_one(X1)|~relation(X1)|~function(X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.06/0.25 cnf(c_0_17, plain, (apply(identity_relation(X1),X2)=X2|~in(X2,X1)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]), c_0_10]), c_0_11])])). 0.06/0.25 cnf(c_0_18, plain, (one_to_one(identity_relation(X1))|in(esk11_1(identity_relation(X1)),X1)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_10]), c_0_11])]), c_0_14])). 0.06/0.25 fof(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1]:one_to_one(identity_relation(X1))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t52_funct_1])). 0.06/0.25 cnf(c_0_20, plain, (one_to_one(identity_relation(X1))|in(esk10_1(identity_relation(X1)),X1)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_10]), c_0_11])]), c_0_14])). 0.06/0.25 cnf(c_0_21, plain, (apply(identity_relation(X1),esk11_1(identity_relation(X1)))=apply(identity_relation(X1),esk10_1(identity_relation(X1)))|one_to_one(identity_relation(X1))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_10]), c_0_11])])). 0.06/0.25 cnf(c_0_22, plain, (apply(identity_relation(X1),esk11_1(identity_relation(X1)))=esk11_1(identity_relation(X1))|one_to_one(identity_relation(X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18])). 0.06/0.25 cnf(c_0_23, plain, (one_to_one(X1)|esk11_1(X1)!=esk10_1(X1)|~relation(X1)|~function(X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.06/0.25 fof(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ~one_to_one(identity_relation(esk12_0)), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])])])). 0.06/0.25 cnf(c_0_25, plain, (apply(identity_relation(X1),esk10_1(identity_relation(X1)))=esk10_1(identity_relation(X1))|one_to_one(identity_relation(X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_20])). 0.06/0.25 cnf(c_0_26, plain, (apply(identity_relation(X1),esk10_1(identity_relation(X1)))=esk11_1(identity_relation(X1))|one_to_one(identity_relation(X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])). 0.06/0.25 cnf(c_0_27, plain, (one_to_one(identity_relation(X1))|esk11_1(identity_relation(X1))!=esk10_1(identity_relation(X1))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_10]), c_0_11])])). 0.06/0.25 cnf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, (~one_to_one(identity_relation(esk12_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])). 0.06/0.25 cnf(c_0_29, plain, (one_to_one(identity_relation(X1))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26]), c_0_27])). 0.06/0.25 cnf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_29])]), ['proof']). 0.06/0.25 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.06/0.25 # Proof object total steps : 31 0.06/0.25 # Proof object clause steps : 20 0.06/0.25 # Proof object formula steps : 11 0.06/0.25 # Proof object conjectures : 5 0.06/0.25 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2 0.06/0.25 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3 0.06/0.25 # Proof object initial clauses used : 9 0.06/0.25 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5 0.06/0.25 # Proof object generating inferences : 8 0.06/0.25 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 21 0.06/0.25 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative 0.06/0.25 # Parsed axioms : 32 0.06/0.25 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.06/0.25 # Initial clauses : 51 0.06/0.25 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.06/0.25 # Initial clauses in saturation : 51 0.06/0.25 # Processed clauses : 184 0.06/0.25 # ...of these trivial : 10 0.06/0.25 # ...subsumed : 31 0.06/0.25 # ...remaining for further processing : 143 0.06/0.25 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4 0.06/0.25 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.06/0.25 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.06/0.25 # Backward-rewritten : 45 0.06/0.25 # Generated clauses : 306 0.06/0.25 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 234 0.06/0.25 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4 0.06/0.25 # Paramodulations : 302 0.06/0.25 # Factorizations : 0 0.06/0.25 # Equation resolutions : 4 0.06/0.25 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.06/0.25 # Propositional check models : 0 0.06/0.25 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.06/0.25 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.06/0.25 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.06/0.25 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.06/0.25 # Current number of processed clauses : 94 0.06/0.25 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 30 0.06/0.25 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.06/0.25 # Negative unit clauses : 6 0.06/0.25 # Non-unit-clauses : 58 0.06/0.25 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10 0.06/0.25 # ...number of literals in the above : 30 0.06/0.25 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.06/0.25 # Current number of archived clauses : 45 0.06/0.25 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 838 0.06/0.25 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 605 0.06/0.25 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 24 0.06/0.25 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 93 0.06/0.25 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.06/0.25 # BW rewrite match attempts : 26 0.06/0.25 # BW rewrite match successes : 17 0.06/0.25 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.06/0.25 # Condensation successes : 0 0.06/0.25 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6362 0.06/0.25 0.06/0.25 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.06/0.25 # User time : 0.013 s 0.06/0.25 # System time : 0.003 s 0.06/0.25 # Total time : 0.016 s 0.06/0.25 # Maximum resident set size: 1500 pages 0.06/0.25 EOF