0.00/0.05 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.06 % Command : eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule --cpu-limit=%d %s 0.02/0.34 % Computer : n145.star.cs.uiowa.edu 0.02/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.02/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz 0.02/0.34 % Memory : 32218.625MB 0.02/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 0.02/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 0.02/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jul 14 04:38:55 CDT 2018 0.02/0.34 % CPUTime : 0.02/0.34 # Version: 2.2pre001 0.06/0.35 # No SInE strategy applied 0.06/0.35 # Trying AutoSched0 for 151 seconds 0.06/0.47 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___100_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y 0.06/0.47 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred. 0.06/0.47 # 0.06/0.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.039 s 0.06/0.47 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.06/0.47 0.06/0.47 # Proof found! 0.06/0.47 # SZS status Theorem 0.06/0.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.06/0.47 fof('ass(cond(proof(385), 0), 2)', axiom, ![X35, X36, X37]:(((((((vangle(X35,X37,X36)=vangle(X35,X36,X37)&X37!=X36)&X35!=X36)&?[X38]:(X37=X38&rpoint(X38)))&?[X39]:(rpoint(X39)&X39=X35))&?[X40]:(rpoint(X40)&X40=X36))&X37!=X35)=>(vf(X35,X36)!=vf(X35,X37)=>~(rless(vf(X35,X37),vf(X35,X36))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'ass(cond(proof(385), 0), 2)')). 0.06/0.47 fof('ass(cond(proof(385), 0), 0)', axiom, ![X35, X36, X37]:(((rless(vf(X35,X36),vf(X35,X37))|rless(vf(X35,X37),vf(X35,X36)))<=vf(X35,X36)!=vf(X35,X37))<=((((((X35!=X37&X35!=X36)&?[X40]:(X36=X40&rpoint(X40)))&?[X39]:(X35=X39&rpoint(X39)))&?[X38]:(X37=X38&rpoint(X38)))&X37!=X36)&vangle(X35,X36,X37)=vangle(X35,X37,X36))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'ass(cond(proof(385), 0), 0)')). 0.06/0.47 fof('qe(s2(plural(383)))', axiom, ?[X115]:(rpoint(X115)&vd1353=X115), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'qe(s2(plural(383)))')). 0.06/0.47 fof('qe(s1(plural(383)))', axiom, ?[X299]:(X299=vd1352&rpoint(X299)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'qe(s1(plural(383)))')). 0.06/0.47 fof('qe(s3(plural(383)))', axiom, ?[X190]:(rpoint(X190)&vd1354=X190), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'qe(s3(plural(383)))')). 0.06/0.47 fof('holds(384, 1360, 0)', conjecture, vf(vd1352,vd1353)=vf(vd1352,vd1354), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'holds(384, 1360, 0)')). 0.06/0.47 fof('holds(383, 1356, 0)', axiom, vangle(vd1352,vd1353,vd1354)=vangle(vd1352,vd1354,vd1353), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'holds(383, 1356, 0)')). 0.06/0.47 fof('pred(383, 7)', axiom, vd1352!=vd1353, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'pred(383, 7)')). 0.06/0.47 fof('pred(383, 8)', axiom, vd1352!=vd1354, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'pred(383, 8)')). 0.06/0.47 fof('pred(383, 9)', axiom, vd1354!=vd1353, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'pred(383, 9)')). 0.06/0.47 fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X811, X812, X813, X814, X815, X816]:(vangle(X811,X813,X812)!=vangle(X811,X812,X813)|X813=X812|X811=X812|(X813!=X814|~rpoint(X814))|(~rpoint(X815)|X815!=X811)|(~rpoint(X816)|X816!=X812)|X813=X811|(vf(X811,X812)=vf(X811,X813)|~rless(vf(X811,X813),vf(X811,X812)))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(proof(385), 0), 2)'])])])])])])). 0.06/0.47 fof(c_0_11, plain, ![X1369, X1370, X1371, X1372, X1373, X1374]:(X1369=X1371|X1369=X1370|(X1370!=X1372|~rpoint(X1372))|(X1369!=X1373|~rpoint(X1373))|(X1371!=X1374|~rpoint(X1374))|X1371=X1370|vangle(X1369,X1370,X1371)!=vangle(X1369,X1371,X1370)|(vf(X1369,X1370)=vf(X1369,X1371)|(rless(vf(X1369,X1370),vf(X1369,X1371))|rless(vf(X1369,X1371),vf(X1369,X1370))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(proof(385), 0), 0)'])])])])])])). 0.06/0.47 cnf(c_0_12, plain, (X2=X3|X1=X3|X2=X1|vf(X1,X3)=vf(X1,X2)|vangle(X1,X2,X3)!=vangle(X1,X3,X2)|X2!=X4|~rpoint(X4)|~rpoint(X5)|X5!=X1|~rpoint(X6)|X6!=X3|~rless(vf(X1,X2),vf(X1,X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])). 0.06/0.47 fof(c_0_13, plain, (rpoint(esk3_0)&vd1353=esk3_0), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['qe(s2(plural(383)))'])])). 0.06/0.47 fof(c_0_14, plain, (esk17_0=vd1352&rpoint(esk17_0)), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['qe(s1(plural(383)))'])])). 0.06/0.47 fof(c_0_15, plain, (rpoint(esk10_0)&vd1354=esk10_0), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['qe(s3(plural(383)))'])])). 0.06/0.47 fof(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ~(vf(vd1352,vd1353)=vf(vd1352,vd1354)), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['holds(384, 1360, 0)'])). 0.06/0.47 cnf(c_0_17, plain, (X1=X2|X1=X3|X2=X3|vf(X1,X3)=vf(X1,X2)|rless(vf(X1,X3),vf(X1,X2))|rless(vf(X1,X2),vf(X1,X3))|X3!=X4|~rpoint(X4)|X1!=X5|~rpoint(X5)|X2!=X6|~rpoint(X6)|vangle(X1,X3,X2)!=vangle(X1,X2,X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 0.06/0.47 cnf(c_0_18, plain, (vf(X1,X2)=vf(X1,X3)|X2=X3|X1=X3|X1=X2|vangle(X1,X2,X3)!=vangle(X1,X3,X2)|~rless(vf(X1,X2),vf(X1,X3))|~rpoint(X3)|~rpoint(X1)|~rpoint(X2)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])])). 0.06/0.47 cnf(c_0_19, plain, (rpoint(esk3_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])). 0.06/0.47 cnf(c_0_20, plain, (vd1353=esk3_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])). 0.06/0.47 cnf(c_0_21, plain, (rpoint(esk17_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])). 0.06/0.47 cnf(c_0_22, plain, (esk17_0=vd1352), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])). 0.06/0.47 cnf(c_0_23, plain, (rpoint(esk10_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])). 0.06/0.47 cnf(c_0_24, plain, (vd1354=esk10_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])). 0.06/0.47 fof(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, vf(vd1352,vd1353)!=vf(vd1352,vd1354), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])). 0.06/0.47 cnf(c_0_26, plain, (vf(X1,X2)=vf(X1,X3)|X2=X3|X1=X3|X1=X2|vangle(X1,X2,X3)!=vangle(X1,X3,X2)|~rpoint(X2)|~rpoint(X1)|~rpoint(X3)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])])]), c_0_18]), c_0_18])). 0.06/0.47 cnf(c_0_27, plain, (vangle(vd1352,vd1353,vd1354)=vangle(vd1352,vd1354,vd1353)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(383, 1356, 0)'])). 0.06/0.47 cnf(c_0_28, plain, (rpoint(vd1353)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20])). 0.06/0.47 cnf(c_0_29, plain, (rpoint(vd1352)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])). 0.06/0.47 cnf(c_0_30, plain, (rpoint(vd1354)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24])). 0.06/0.47 cnf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, (vf(vd1352,vd1353)!=vf(vd1352,vd1354)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])). 0.06/0.47 cnf(c_0_32, plain, (vd1352!=vd1353), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(383, 7)'])). 0.06/0.47 cnf(c_0_33, plain, (vd1352!=vd1354), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(383, 8)'])). 0.06/0.47 cnf(c_0_34, plain, (vd1354!=vd1353), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(383, 9)'])). 0.06/0.47 cnf(c_0_35, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_27]), c_0_28]), c_0_29]), c_0_30])]), c_0_31]), c_0_32]), c_0_33]), c_0_34]), ['proof']). 0.06/0.47 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.06/0.47 # Proof object total steps : 36 0.06/0.47 # Proof object clause steps : 19 0.06/0.47 # Proof object formula steps : 17 0.06/0.47 # Proof object conjectures : 4 0.06/0.47 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1 0.06/0.47 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3 0.06/0.47 # Proof object initial clauses used : 13 0.06/0.47 # Proof object initial formulas used : 10 0.06/0.47 # Proof object generating inferences : 1 0.06/0.47 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 19 0.06/0.47 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative 0.06/0.47 # Parsed axioms : 126 0.06/0.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.06/0.47 # Initial clauses : 284 0.06/0.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2 0.06/0.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 282 0.06/0.47 # Processed clauses : 686 0.06/0.47 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.06/0.47 # ...subsumed : 3 0.06/0.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 683 0.06/0.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1203 0.06/0.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.06/0.47 # Backward-subsumed : 1 0.06/0.47 # Backward-rewritten : 0 0.06/0.47 # Generated clauses : 373 0.06/0.47 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 364 0.06/0.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 10 0.06/0.47 # Paramodulations : 105 0.06/0.47 # Factorizations : 0 0.06/0.47 # Equation resolutions : 1214 0.06/0.47 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.06/0.47 # Propositional check models : 0 0.06/0.47 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.06/0.47 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.06/0.47 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.06/0.47 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.06/0.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 147 0.06/0.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10 0.06/0.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.06/0.47 # Negative unit clauses : 4 0.06/0.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 133 0.06/0.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 238 0.06/0.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 2248 0.06/0.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.06/0.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 279 0.06/0.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 125998 0.06/0.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3006 0.06/0.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 14 0.06/0.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4 0.06/0.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.06/0.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0 0.06/0.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.06/0.47 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.06/0.47 # Condensation successes : 0 0.06/0.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 69243 0.06/0.47 0.06/0.47 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.06/0.47 # User time : 0.120 s 0.06/0.47 # System time : 0.007 s 0.06/0.47 # Total time : 0.127 s 0.06/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 2544 pages 0.06/0.47 EOF