0.00/0.03	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.04	% Command    : do_CVC4 %s
0.03/0.23	% Computer   : n165.star.cs.uiowa.edu
0.03/0.23	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.03/0.23	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
0.03/0.23	% Memory     : 32218.625MB
0.03/0.23	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
0.03/0.23	% CPULimit   : 300
0.03/0.23	% DateTime   : Sat Jul 14 04:35:25 CDT 2018
0.03/0.24	% CPUTime    : 
0.03/0.27	%----Proving without arithmetic mode
0.03/0.28	------- cvc4-fof casc j9 : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p at ...
0.03/0.28	--- Run --decision=internal --simplification=none --no-inst-no-entail --no-quant-cf --full-saturate-quant at 20...
20.59/25.56	--- Run --no-e-matching --full-saturate-quant at 20...
40.63/45.60	--- Run --finite-model-find --uf-ss=no-minimal at 15...
55.69/60.72	--- Run --multi-trigger-when-single --full-saturate-quant at 5...
55.71/60.74	% SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
55.71/60.74	% SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
55.71/60.74	(skolem (forall ((C1 $$unsorted) (C2 $$unsorted) (C3 $$unsorted) (P $$unsorted)) (or (not (part_of C1 C3)) (not (meet P C1 C2)) (not (part_of C2 C3)) (part_of (sum C1 C2) C3)) )
55.71/60.74	  ( skv_1 skv_2 skv_3 skv_4 )
55.71/60.74	)
55.71/60.74	(skolem (forall ((P $$unsorted)) (or (not (incident_c P (sum skv_1 skv_2))) (incident_c P skv_3)) )
55.71/60.74	  ( skv_5 )
55.71/60.74	)
55.71/60.74	(instantiation (forall ((C $$unsorted) (C1 $$unsorted) (C2 $$unsorted)) (= (= C (sum C1 C2)) (forall ((Q $$unsorted)) (= (or (incident_c Q C1) (incident_c Q C2)) (incident_c Q C)) )) )
55.71/60.74	  ( (sum skv_1 skv_2), skv_1, skv_2 )
55.71/60.74	)
55.71/60.74	(instantiation (forall ((P $$unsorted) (C $$unsorted) (C1 $$unsorted)) (= (and (incident_c P C) (incident_c P C1) (forall ((Q $$unsorted)) (or (not (incident_c Q C1)) (not (incident_c Q C)) (and (end_point Q C1) (end_point Q C))) )) (meet P C C1)) )
55.71/60.74	  ( skv_4, skv_1, skv_2 )
55.71/60.74	)
55.71/60.74	(instantiation (forall ((C $$unsorted) (C1 $$unsorted)) (or (= C C1) (not (part_of C1 C)) (open C1)) )
55.71/60.74	  ( skv_3, skv_1 )
55.71/60.74	  ( skv_3, skv_2 )
55.71/60.74	)
55.71/60.74	(instantiation (forall ((C $$unsorted) (C1 $$unsorted)) (= (forall ((P $$unsorted)) (or (not (incident_c P C1)) (incident_c P C)) ) (part_of C1 C)) )
55.71/60.74	  ( skv_3, skv_1 )
55.71/60.74	  ( skv_3, skv_2 )
55.71/60.74	  ( skv_3, (sum skv_1 skv_2) )
55.71/60.74	)
55.71/60.74	(instantiation (forall ((P $$unsorted)) (or (not (incident_c P skv_1)) (incident_c P skv_3)) )
55.71/60.74	  ( skv_5 )
55.71/60.74	)
55.71/60.74	(instantiation (forall ((P $$unsorted)) (or (not (incident_c P skv_2)) (incident_c P skv_3)) )
55.71/60.74	  ( skv_5 )
55.71/60.74	)
55.71/60.74	(instantiation (forall ((Q $$unsorted)) (= (or (incident_c Q skv_1) (incident_c Q skv_2)) (incident_c Q (sum skv_1 skv_2))) )
55.71/60.74	  ( skv_5 )
55.71/60.74	)
55.71/60.74	% SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
55.71/60.82	EOF