0.00/0.02 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.10/0.42 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu 0.10/0.42 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.10/0.42 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.10/0.42 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.10/0.42 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.10/0.42 % CPULimit : 1440 0.10/0.42 % WCLimit : 180 0.10/0.42 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:04:26 UTC 2026 0.10/0.43 % CPUTime : 0.10/0.43 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.15/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving 0.15/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.15/0.50 % Version: 3.5.1 0.15/0.50 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.15/0.50 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.15/0.50 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores 0.15/0.50 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.50 % Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.50 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.15/0.50 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1164319 completed with status 0 0.15/0.50 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN 0.15/0.50 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.15/0.50 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.15/0.50 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores 0.15/0.50 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 0.15/0.50 % No SInE strategy applied 0.15/0.50 % Search class: FGHNM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN 0.15/0.50 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.15/0.50 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores 0.15/0.50 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 91s (1) cores 0.15/0.50 % Starting G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 139s (1) cores 0.15/0.50 % Starting new_bool_3 with 127s (1) cores 0.15/0.50 % Starting G-E--_107_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 82s (1) cores 0.15/0.50 % G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with pid 1164326 completed with status 0 0.15/0.50 % Result found by G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S 0.15/0.50 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.15/0.50 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.15/0.50 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores 0.15/0.50 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 0.15/0.50 % No SInE strategy applied 0.15/0.50 % Search class: FGHNM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN 0.15/0.50 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.15/0.50 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores 0.15/0.50 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 91s (1) cores 0.15/0.50 % Starting G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 139s (1) cores 0.15/0.50 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.15/0.50 % Presaturation interreduction done 0.15/0.50 0.15/0.50 % Proof found! 0.15/0.50 % SZS status Theorem 0.15/0.50 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.15/0.50 fof(xplustwoidy, conjecture, ?[X54, X13, X14]:((?[X48]:((?[X49]:((?[X16]:((r2(X16,X49)&r1(X16)))&r2(X49,X48)))&r3(X54,X48,X14)))&id(X14,X13))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', xplustwoidy)). 0.15/0.50 fof(axiom_6, axiom, ![X60, X61]:((id(X61,X60)|~(id(X60,X61)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_6)). 0.15/0.50 fof(axiom_1a, axiom, ![X46, X47]:(?[X48]:((?[X49]:((?[X50]:((r3(X46,X50,X49)&r2(X47,X50)))&id(X49,X48)))&?[X51]:((r3(X46,X47,X51)&r2(X51,X48)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_1a)). 0.15/0.50 fof(axiom_4a, axiom, ![X35]:(?[X36]:((id(X36,X35)&?[X37]:((r1(X37)&r3(X35,X37,X36)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_4a)). 0.15/0.50 fof(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X54, X13, X14]:((?[X48]:((?[X49]:((?[X16]:((r2(X16,X49)&r1(X16)))&r2(X49,X48)))&r3(X54,X48,X14)))&id(X14,X13)))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[xplustwoidy])). 0.15/0.50 fof(c_0_5, plain, ![X60, X61]:((id(X61,X60)|~id(X60,X61))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_6])). 0.15/0.50 fof(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X135, X136, X137, X138, X139, X140]:((~r2(X140,X139)|~r1(X140)|~r2(X139,X138)|~r3(X135,X138,X137)|~id(X137,X136))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])). 0.15/0.50 fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X113, X114]:((((r3(X113,esk13_2(X113,X114),esk12_2(X113,X114))&r2(X114,esk13_2(X113,X114)))&id(esk12_2(X113,X114),esk11_2(X113,X114)))&(r3(X113,X114,esk14_2(X113,X114))&r2(esk14_2(X113,X114),esk11_2(X113,X114))))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_1a])])). 0.15/0.50 fof(c_0_8, plain, ![X127, X128]:((id(X128,X127)|~id(X127,X128))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])). 0.15/0.50 fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X102]:((id(esk8_1(X102),X102)&(r1(esk9_1(X102))&r3(X102,esk9_1(X102),esk8_1(X102))))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_4a])])). 0.15/0.50 cnf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (~r2(X1,X2)|~r1(X1)|~r2(X2,X3)|~r3(X4,X3,X5)|~id(X5,X6)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.15/0.50 cnf(c_0_11, plain, (r3(X1,X2,esk14_2(X1,X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.15/0.50 cnf(c_0_12, plain, (id(X1,X2)|~id(X2,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.15/0.50 cnf(c_0_13, plain, (id(esk8_1(X1),X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 0.15/0.50 cnf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, (~r1(X1)|~r2(X2,X3)|~r2(X1,X2)|~id(esk14_2(X4,X3),X5)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])). 0.15/0.50 cnf(c_0_15, plain, (id(X1,esk8_1(X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])). 0.15/0.50 cnf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, (~r1(X1)|~r2(X2,X3)|~r2(X1,X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])). 0.15/0.50 cnf(c_0_17, plain, (r2(X1,esk13_2(X2,X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.15/0.50 cnf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, (~r1(X1)|~r2(X1,X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])). 0.15/0.50 cnf(c_0_19, plain, (r1(esk9_1(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 0.15/0.50 cnf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, (~r1(X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_17])). 0.15/0.50 cnf(c_0_21, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20]), ['proof']). 0.15/0.50 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.15/0.50 % Parsed axioms : 19 0.15/0.50 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.15/0.50 % Initial clauses : 59 0.15/0.50 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 16 0.15/0.50 % Initial clauses in saturation : 43 0.15/0.50 % Processed clauses : 116 0.15/0.50 % ...of these trivial : 0 0.15/0.50 % ...subsumed : 4 0.15/0.50 % ...remaining for further processing : 112 0.15/0.50 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.15/0.50 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.15/0.50 % Backward-subsumed : 18 0.15/0.50 % Backward-rewritten : 0 0.15/0.50 % Generated clauses : 187 0.15/0.50 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 149 0.15/0.50 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.15/0.50 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.15/0.50 % Paramodulations : 179 0.15/0.50 % Factorizations : 0 0.15/0.50 % NegExts : 0 0.15/0.50 % Equation resolutions : 0 0.15/0.50 % Disequality decompositions : 0 0.15/0.50 % Total rewrite steps : 43 0.15/0.50 % ...of those cached : 30 0.15/0.50 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.15/0.50 % Propositional check models : 0 0.15/0.50 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.15/0.50 % Propositional clauses : 0 0.15/0.50 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.15/0.50 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.15/0.50 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.15/0.50 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.50 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.50 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.15/0.50 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.50 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.50 % Current number of processed clauses : 43 0.15/0.50 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 24 0.15/0.50 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.15/0.50 % Negative unit clauses : 1 0.15/0.50 % Non-unit-clauses : 18 0.15/0.50 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 117 0.15/0.50 % ...number of literals in the above : 302 0.15/0.50 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.15/0.50 % Current number of archived clauses : 69 0.15/0.50 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 237 0.15/0.50 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 166 0.15/0.50 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5 0.15/0.50 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 112 0.15/0.50 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.15/0.50 % BW rewrite match attempts : 6 0.15/0.50 % BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.15/0.50 % Condensation attempts : 0 0.15/0.50 % Condensation successes : 0 0.15/0.50 % Termbank termtop insertions : 5006 0.15/0.50 % Search garbage collected termcells : 438 0.15/0.50 0.15/0.50 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.50 % User time : 0.009 s 0.15/0.50 % System time : 0.003 s 0.15/0.50 % Total time : 0.013 s 0.15/0.50 % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages 0.15/0.50 0.15/0.50 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.50 % User time : 0.029 s 0.15/0.50 % System time : 0.014 s 0.15/0.50 % Total time : 0.043 s 0.15/0.50 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages 0.15/0.50 % E exiting 0.15/0.51 EOF