0.00/0.02	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.04	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.09/0.36	% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
0.09/0.36	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.09/0.36	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.09/0.36	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.09/0.36	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.09/0.36	% CPULimit : 1440
0.09/0.36	% WCLimit  : 180
0.09/0.36	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 10:02:52 UTC 2026
0.09/0.37	% CPUTime  : 
0.09/0.37	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.09/0.41	Running first-order theorem proving
0.09/0.41	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.09/0.45	% Version: 3.5.1
0.09/0.45	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.09/0.45	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.09/0.45	% Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores
0.09/0.45	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.09/0.45	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.09/0.45	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.09/0.45	% G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 644381 completed with status 0
0.09/0.45	% Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
0.09/0.45	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.09/0.45	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.09/0.45	% Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores
0.09/0.45	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
0.09/0.45	% No SInE strategy applied
0.09/0.45	% Search class: FGHNM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
0.09/0.45	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.09/0.45	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
0.09/0.45	% Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 91s (1) cores
0.09/0.45	% Starting G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 139s (1) cores
0.09/0.45	% Starting new_bool_3 with 127s (1) cores
0.09/0.45	% Starting G-E--_107_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 82s (1) cores
0.09/0.45	% G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with pid 644388 completed with status 0
0.09/0.45	% Result found by G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S
0.09/0.45	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.09/0.45	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.09/0.45	% Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores
0.09/0.45	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
0.09/0.45	% No SInE strategy applied
0.09/0.45	% Search class: FGHNM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
0.09/0.45	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.09/0.45	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
0.09/0.45	% Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 91s (1) cores
0.09/0.45	% Starting G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 139s (1) cores
0.09/0.45	% Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
0.09/0.45	% Presaturation interreduction done
0.09/0.45	
0.09/0.45	% Proof found!
0.09/0.45	% SZS status Theorem
0.09/0.45	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.09/0.45	fof(greq4id, conjecture, ?[X54, X13, X14]:((id(X14,X54)&?[X48]:((r3(X13,X48,X14)&?[X49]:((r2(X49,X48)&?[X16]:((?[X51]:((r2(X51,X16)&?[X57]:((r1(X57)&r2(X57,X51)))))&r2(X16,X49))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', greq4id)).
0.09/0.45	fof(axiom_6, axiom, ![X60, X61]:((id(X61,X60)|~(id(X60,X61)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_6)).
0.09/0.45	fof(axiom_1a, axiom, ![X46, X47]:(?[X48]:((?[X49]:((?[X50]:((r3(X46,X50,X49)&r2(X47,X50)))&id(X49,X48)))&?[X51]:((r3(X46,X47,X51)&r2(X51,X48)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_1a)).
0.09/0.45	fof(axiom_4a, axiom, ![X35]:(?[X36]:((id(X36,X35)&?[X37]:((r1(X37)&r3(X35,X37,X36)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_4a)).
0.09/0.45	fof(axiom_2, axiom, ![X1]:(?[X2]:(![X3]:(((~(id(X3,X2))&~(r2(X1,X3)))|(id(X3,X2)&r2(X1,X3)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_2)).
0.09/0.45	fof(axiom_5, axiom, ![X34]:(id(X34,X34)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_5)).
0.09/0.45	fof(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X54, X13, X14]:((id(X14,X54)&?[X48]:((r3(X13,X48,X14)&?[X49]:((r2(X49,X48)&?[X16]:((?[X51]:((r2(X51,X16)&?[X57]:((r1(X57)&r2(X57,X51)))))&r2(X16,X49)))))))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[greq4id])).
0.09/0.45	fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X60, X61]:((id(X61,X60)|~id(X60,X61))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_6])).
0.09/0.45	fof(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X135, X136, X137, X138, X139, X140, X141, X142]:((~id(X137,X135)|(~r3(X136,X138,X137)|(~r2(X139,X138)|(~r2(X141,X140)|(~r1(X142)|~r2(X142,X141))|~r2(X140,X139)))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])).
0.09/0.45	fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X113, X114]:((((r3(X113,esk13_2(X113,X114),esk12_2(X113,X114))&r2(X114,esk13_2(X113,X114)))&id(esk12_2(X113,X114),esk11_2(X113,X114)))&(r3(X113,X114,esk14_2(X113,X114))&r2(esk14_2(X113,X114),esk11_2(X113,X114))))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_1a])])).
0.09/0.45	fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X127, X128]:((id(X128,X127)|~id(X127,X128))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])).
0.09/0.45	fof(c_0_11, plain, ![X102]:((id(esk8_1(X102),X102)&(r1(esk9_1(X102))&r3(X102,esk9_1(X102),esk8_1(X102))))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_4a])])).
0.09/0.45	fof(c_0_12, plain, ![X1]:(?[X2]:(![X3]:(((~id(X3,X2)&~r2(X1,X3))|(id(X3,X2)&r2(X1,X3)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, (~id(X1,X2)|~r3(X3,X4,X1)|~r2(X5,X4)|~r2(X6,X7)|~r1(X8)|~r2(X8,X6)|~r2(X7,X5)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_14, plain, (r3(X1,X2,esk14_2(X1,X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_15, plain, (id(X1,X2)|~id(X2,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_16, plain, (id(esk8_1(X1),X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.09/0.45	fof(c_0_17, plain, ![X68, X70]:((((id(X70,esk1_1(X68))|~id(X70,esk1_1(X68)))&(r2(X68,X70)|~id(X70,esk1_1(X68))))&((id(X70,esk1_1(X68))|~r2(X68,X70))&(r2(X68,X70)|~r2(X68,X70))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])])])).
0.09/0.45	fof(c_0_18, plain, ![X101]:(id(X101,X101)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_5])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, (~r1(X1)|~r2(X1,X2)|~r2(X3,X4)|~r2(X2,X3)|~r2(X4,X5)|~id(esk14_2(X6,X5),X7)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_20, plain, (id(X1,esk8_1(X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_21, plain, (r2(X1,X2)|~id(X2,esk1_1(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_22, plain, (id(X1,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, (~r1(X1)|~r2(X1,X2)|~r2(X3,X4)|~r2(X2,X3)|~r2(X4,X5)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_24, plain, (r2(X1,esk1_1(X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, (~r1(X1)|~r2(esk1_1(X1),X2)|~r2(X2,X3)|~r2(X3,X4)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, (~r1(X1)|~r2(esk1_1(esk1_1(X1)),X2)|~r2(X2,X3)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_24])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, (~r1(X1)|~r2(esk1_1(esk1_1(esk1_1(X1))),X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_24])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_28, plain, (r2(X1,esk13_2(X2,X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_29, plain, (r1(esk9_1(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, (~r1(X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_31, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_30]), ['proof']).
0.09/0.45	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.09/0.45	% Parsed axioms                        : 19
0.09/0.45	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.09/0.45	% Initial clauses                      : 59
0.09/0.45	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 16
0.09/0.45	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 43
0.09/0.45	% Processed clauses                    : 182
0.09/0.45	% ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.09/0.45	% ...subsumed                          : 26
0.09/0.45	% ...remaining for further processing  : 156
0.09/0.45	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.09/0.45	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.09/0.45	% Backward-subsumed                    : 35
0.09/0.45	% Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.09/0.45	% Generated clauses                    : 476
0.09/0.45	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 390
0.09/0.45	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.09/0.45	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.09/0.45	% Paramodulations                      : 466
0.09/0.45	% Factorizations                       : 0
0.09/0.45	% NegExts                              : 0
0.09/0.45	% Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.09/0.45	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.09/0.45	% Total rewrite steps                  : 100
0.09/0.45	% ...of those cached                   : 67
0.09/0.45	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.09/0.45	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.09/0.45	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.09/0.45	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.09/0.45	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.09/0.45	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.09/0.45	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.09/0.45	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.09/0.45	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.09/0.45	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.09/0.45	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.09/0.45	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.09/0.45	% Current number of processed clauses  : 68
0.09/0.45	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 41
0.09/0.45	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.09/0.45	%    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.09/0.45	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 26
0.09/0.45	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 292
0.09/0.45	% ...number of literals in the above   : 721
0.09/0.45	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.09/0.45	% Current number of archived clauses   : 88
0.09/0.45	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 387
0.09/0.45	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 254
0.09/0.45	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 11
0.09/0.45	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 224
0.09/0.45	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.09/0.45	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 22
0.09/0.45	% BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.09/0.45	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.09/0.45	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.09/0.45	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 7882
0.09/0.45	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 466
0.09/0.45	
0.09/0.45	% -------------------------------------------------
0.09/0.45	% User time                : 0.018 s
0.09/0.45	% System time              : 0.004 s
0.09/0.45	% Total time               : 0.022 s
0.09/0.45	% Maximum resident set size: 3696 pages
0.09/0.45	
0.09/0.45	% -------------------------------------------------
0.09/0.45	% User time                : 0.063 s
0.09/0.45	% System time              : 0.015 s
0.09/0.45	% Total time               : 0.078 s
0.09/0.45	% Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
0.09/0.45	% E exiting
0.09/0.45	EOF