0.00/0.05 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.14/0.40 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu 0.14/0.40 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.14/0.40 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.14/0.40 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.14/0.40 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.14/0.40 % CPULimit : 1440 0.14/0.40 % WCLimit : 180 0.14/0.40 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:41:34 UTC 2026 0.14/0.41 % CPUTime : 0.14/0.41 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.20/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving 0.20/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 1.62/0.70 % Version: 3.5.1 1.62/0.70 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN. 1.62/0.70 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 1.62/0.70 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores 1.62/0.70 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 1.62/0.70 % Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 1.62/0.70 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 1.62/0.70 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2881784 completed with status 0 1.62/0.70 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN 1.62/0.70 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN. 1.62/0.70 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 1.62/0.70 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores 1.62/0.70 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 1.62/0.70 % No SInE strategy applied 1.62/0.70 % Search class: FGHNM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN 1.62/0.70 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 1.62/0.70 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores 1.62/0.70 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 91s (1) cores 1.62/0.70 % Starting G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 139s (1) cores 1.62/0.70 % Starting new_bool_3 with 127s (1) cores 1.62/0.70 % Starting G-E--_107_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 82s (1) cores 1.62/0.70 % G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with pid 2881797 completed with status 0 1.62/0.70 % Result found by G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S 1.62/0.70 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN. 1.62/0.70 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 1.62/0.70 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores 1.62/0.70 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 1.62/0.70 % No SInE strategy applied 1.62/0.70 % Search class: FGHNM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN 1.62/0.70 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 1.62/0.70 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores 1.62/0.70 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 91s (1) cores 1.62/0.70 % Starting G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 139s (1) cores 1.62/0.70 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s 1.62/0.70 % Presaturation interreduction done 1.62/0.70 1.62/0.70 % Proof found! 1.62/0.70 % SZS status Theorem 1.62/0.70 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 1.62/0.70 fof(axiom_3, axiom, ![X30, X31]:(?[X32]:(![X33]:(((r3(X30,X31,X33)&id(X33,X32))|(~(r3(X30,X31,X33))&~(id(X33,X32))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_3)). 1.62/0.70 fof(axiom_7, axiom, ![X4, X5, X6]:((~(id(X4,X5))|id(X4,X6)|~(id(X5,X6)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_7)). 1.62/0.70 fof(axiom_4a, axiom, ![X35]:(?[X36]:((id(X36,X35)&?[X37]:((r1(X37)&r3(X35,X37,X36)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_4a)). 1.62/0.70 fof(axiom_6, axiom, ![X60, X61]:((id(X61,X60)|~(id(X60,X61)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_6)). 1.62/0.70 fof(zeroplusoneidone, conjecture, ?[X54]:((?[X14]:((?[X16]:((r2(X16,X14)&r1(X16)))&id(X54,X14)))&?[X13]:((?[X48]:((r3(X48,X13,X54)&r1(X48)))&?[X49]:((r2(X49,X13)&r1(X49))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', zeroplusoneidone)). 1.62/0.70 fof(axiom_1a, axiom, ![X46, X47]:(?[X48]:((?[X49]:((?[X50]:((r3(X46,X50,X49)&r2(X47,X50)))&id(X49,X48)))&?[X51]:((r3(X46,X47,X51)&r2(X51,X48)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_1a)). 1.62/0.70 fof(axiom_8, axiom, ![X17, X18]:((~(id(X17,X18))|(r1(X18)&r1(X17))|(~(r1(X17))&~(r1(X18))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_8)). 1.62/0.70 fof(axiom_1, axiom, ?[X44]:(![X45]:(((~(r1(X45))&~(id(X45,X44)))|(id(X45,X44)&r1(X45))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_1)). 1.62/0.70 fof(axiom_5, axiom, ![X34]:(id(X34,X34)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax', axiom_5)). 1.62/0.70 fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X30, X31]:(?[X32]:(![X33]:(((r3(X30,X31,X33)&id(X33,X32))|(~r3(X30,X31,X33)&~id(X33,X32)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_3])). 1.62/0.70 fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X4, X5, X6]:((~id(X4,X5)|id(X4,X6)|~id(X5,X6))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_7])). 1.62/0.70 fof(c_0_11, plain, ![X97, X98, X100]:((((~r3(X97,X98,X100)|r3(X97,X98,X100))&(~id(X100,esk7_2(X97,X98))|r3(X97,X98,X100)))&((~r3(X97,X98,X100)|id(X100,esk7_2(X97,X98)))&(~id(X100,esk7_2(X97,X98))|id(X100,esk7_2(X97,X98)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])])). 1.62/0.70 fof(c_0_12, plain, ![X102]:((id(esk8_1(X102),X102)&(r1(esk9_1(X102))&r3(X102,esk9_1(X102),esk8_1(X102))))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_4a])])). 1.62/0.70 fof(c_0_13, plain, ![X60, X61]:((id(X61,X60)|~id(X60,X61))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_6])). 1.62/0.70 fof(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X54]:((?[X14]:((?[X16]:((r2(X16,X14)&r1(X16)))&id(X54,X14)))&?[X13]:((?[X48]:((r3(X48,X13,X54)&r1(X48)))&?[X49]:((r2(X49,X13)&r1(X49)))))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[zeroplusoneidone])). 1.62/0.70 fof(c_0_15, plain, ![X71, X72, X73]:((~id(X71,X72)|id(X71,X73)|~id(X72,X73))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_16, plain, (id(X3,esk7_2(X1,X2))|~r3(X1,X2,X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_17, plain, (r3(X1,esk9_1(X1),esk8_1(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])). 1.62/0.70 fof(c_0_18, plain, ![X127, X128]:((id(X128,X127)|~id(X127,X128))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])). 1.62/0.70 fof(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ![X135, X136, X137, X138, X139, X140]:((~r2(X137,X136)|~r1(X137)|~id(X135,X136)|(~r3(X139,X138,X135)|~r1(X139)|(~r2(X140,X138)|~r1(X140))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])])])])). 1.62/0.70 fof(c_0_20, plain, ![X113, X114]:((((r3(X113,esk13_2(X113,X114),esk12_2(X113,X114))&r2(X114,esk13_2(X113,X114)))&id(esk12_2(X113,X114),esk11_2(X113,X114)))&(r3(X113,X114,esk14_2(X113,X114))&r2(esk14_2(X113,X114),esk11_2(X113,X114))))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_1a])])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_21, plain, (id(X1,X3)|~id(X1,X2)|~id(X2,X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_22, plain, (id(esk8_1(X1),esk7_2(X1,esk9_1(X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_23, plain, (id(X1,X2)|~id(X2,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_24, plain, (id(esk8_1(X1),X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, (~r2(X1,X2)|~r1(X1)|~id(X3,X2)|~r3(X4,X5,X3)|~r1(X4)|~r2(X6,X5)|~r1(X6)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_26, plain, (r3(X1,esk13_2(X1,X2),esk12_2(X1,X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])). 1.62/0.70 fof(c_0_27, plain, ![X17, X18]:((~id(X17,X18)|(r1(X18)&r1(X17))|(~r1(X17)&~r1(X18)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_8])). 1.62/0.70 fof(c_0_28, plain, ?[X44]:(![X45]:(((~r1(X45)&~id(X45,X44))|(id(X45,X44)&r1(X45))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_1])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_29, plain, (id(X1,esk7_2(X2,esk9_1(X2)))|~id(X1,esk8_1(X2))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_30, plain, (id(X1,esk8_1(X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, (~r1(X1)|~r1(X2)|~r1(X3)|~r2(X1,esk13_2(X2,X4))|~r2(X3,X5)|~id(esk12_2(X2,X4),X5)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_32, plain, (r2(X1,esk13_2(X2,X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])). 1.62/0.70 fof(c_0_33, plain, ![X84, X85]:((((~r1(X84)|(r1(X85)|~id(X84,X85)))&(~r1(X85)|(r1(X85)|~id(X84,X85))))&((~r1(X84)|(r1(X84)|~id(X84,X85)))&(~r1(X85)|(r1(X84)|~id(X84,X85)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])])])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_34, plain, (r3(X1,X2,esk14_2(X1,X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])). 1.62/0.70 fof(c_0_35, plain, ![X112]:((((id(X112,esk10_0)|~r1(X112))&(r1(X112)|~r1(X112)))&((id(X112,esk10_0)|~id(X112,esk10_0))&(r1(X112)|~id(X112,esk10_0))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_28])])])])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_36, plain, (id(X1,esk7_2(X1,esk9_1(X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_30])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_37, negated_conjecture, (~r1(X1)|~r1(X2)|~r1(X3)|~r2(X3,X4)|~id(esk12_2(X2,X1),X4)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31, c_0_32])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_38, plain, (id(esk12_2(X1,X2),esk11_2(X1,X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_39, plain, (r1(X2)|~r1(X1)|~id(X2,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_40, plain, (id(esk14_2(X1,X2),esk7_2(X1,X2))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_34])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_41, plain, (r1(X1)|~id(X1,esk10_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_42, plain, (id(esk7_2(X1,esk9_1(X1)),X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_36])). 1.62/0.70 fof(c_0_43, plain, ![X101]:(id(X101,X101)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_5])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_44, negated_conjecture, (~r1(X1)|~r1(X2)|~r1(X3)|~r2(X3,esk11_2(X2,X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37, c_0_38])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_45, plain, (r2(esk14_2(X1,X2),esk11_2(X1,X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_46, plain, (r1(esk14_2(X1,X2))|~r1(esk7_2(X1,X2))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39, c_0_40])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_47, plain, (r1(esk7_2(esk10_0,esk9_1(esk10_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41, c_0_42])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_48, plain, (id(X1,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_49, negated_conjecture, (~r1(esk14_2(X1,X2))|~r1(X2)|~r1(X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44, c_0_45])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_50, plain, (r1(esk14_2(esk10_0,esk9_1(esk10_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46, c_0_47])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_51, plain, (r1(esk9_1(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_52, plain, (r1(esk10_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41, c_0_48])). 1.62/0.70 cnf(c_0_53, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49, c_0_50]), c_0_51]), c_0_52])]), ['proof']). 1.62/0.70 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 1.62/0.70 % Parsed axioms : 19 1.62/0.70 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 1.62/0.70 % Initial clauses : 59 1.62/0.70 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 16 1.62/0.70 % Initial clauses in saturation : 43 1.62/0.70 % Processed clauses : 1853 1.62/0.70 % ...of these trivial : 47 1.62/0.70 % ...subsumed : 872 1.62/0.70 % ...remaining for further processing : 934 1.62/0.70 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 1.62/0.70 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 1.62/0.70 % Backward-subsumed : 4 1.62/0.70 % Backward-rewritten : 2 1.62/0.70 % Generated clauses : 13659 1.62/0.70 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11389 1.62/0.70 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 1.62/0.70 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 1.62/0.70 % Paramodulations : 13659 1.62/0.70 % Factorizations : 0 1.62/0.70 % NegExts : 0 1.62/0.70 % Equation resolutions : 0 1.62/0.70 % Disequality decompositions : 0 1.62/0.70 % Total rewrite steps : 4102 1.62/0.70 % ...of those cached : 3789 1.62/0.70 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 1.62/0.70 % Propositional check models : 0 1.62/0.70 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 1.62/0.70 % Propositional clauses : 0 1.62/0.70 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 1.62/0.70 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 1.62/0.70 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 1.62/0.70 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 1.62/0.70 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 1.62/0.70 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 1.62/0.70 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 1.62/0.70 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 1.62/0.70 % Current number of processed clauses : 885 1.62/0.70 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 258 1.62/0.70 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 1.62/0.70 % Negative unit clauses : 23 1.62/0.70 % Non-unit-clauses : 604 1.62/0.70 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9598 1.62/0.70 % ...number of literals in the above : 18264 1.62/0.70 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 1.62/0.70 % Current number of archived clauses : 49 1.62/0.70 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 88647 1.62/0.70 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13945 1.62/0.70 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 504 1.62/0.70 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2148 1.62/0.70 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 1.62/0.70 % BW rewrite match attempts : 171 1.62/0.70 % BW rewrite match successes : 2 1.62/0.70 % Condensation attempts : 0 1.62/0.70 % Condensation successes : 0 1.62/0.70 % Termbank termtop insertions : 145267 1.62/0.70 % Search garbage collected termcells : 454 1.62/0.70 1.62/0.70 % ------------------------------------------------- 1.62/0.70 % User time : 0.198 s 1.62/0.70 % System time : 0.021 s 1.62/0.70 % Total time : 0.219 s 1.62/0.70 % Maximum resident set size: 3696 pages 1.62/0.70 1.62/0.70 % ------------------------------------------------- 1.62/0.70 % User time : 0.982 s 1.62/0.70 % System time : 0.071 s 1.62/0.70 % Total time : 1.053 s 1.62/0.70 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages 1.62/0.70 % E exiting 1.96/0.70 EOF