0.00/0.04	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.06	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.15/0.40	% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
0.15/0.40	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.15/0.40	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.15/0.40	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.15/0.40	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.15/0.40	% CPULimit : 1440
0.15/0.40	% WCLimit  : 180
0.15/0.40	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 10:17:25 UTC 2026
0.15/0.41	% CPUTime  : 
0.15/0.41	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.15/0.46	Running first-order theorem proving
0.15/0.46	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.20/20.32	% Version: 3.5.1
0.20/20.32	% Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
0.20/20.32	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 167 seconds (1336 total)
0.20/20.32	% Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 835s (5) cores
0.20/20.32	% Starting new_bool_3 with 167s (1) cores
0.20/20.32	% Starting new_bool_1 with 167s (1) cores
0.20/20.32	% Starting sh5l with 167s (1) cores
0.20/20.32	% sh5l with pid 4086460 completed with status 0
0.20/20.32	% Result found by sh5l
0.20/20.32	% Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
0.20/20.32	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 167 seconds (1336 total)
0.20/20.32	% Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 835s (5) cores
0.20/20.32	% Starting new_bool_3 with 167s (1) cores
0.20/20.32	% Starting new_bool_1 with 167s (1) cores
0.20/20.32	% Starting sh5l with 167s (1) cores
0.20/20.32	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
0.20/20.32	% SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
0.20/20.32	% Search class: FHUNF-FSMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.20/20.32	% partial match(1): FHUNF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.20/20.32	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 162 seconds (162 total)
0.20/20.32	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores
0.20/20.32	% SubtermCWHack with pid 4086736 completed with status 0
0.20/20.32	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.20/20.32	% Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
0.20/20.32	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 167 seconds (1336 total)
0.20/20.32	% Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 835s (5) cores
0.20/20.32	% Starting new_bool_3 with 167s (1) cores
0.20/20.32	% Starting new_bool_1 with 167s (1) cores
0.20/20.32	% Starting sh5l with 167s (1) cores
0.20/20.32	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
0.20/20.32	% SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
0.20/20.32	% Search class: FHUNF-FSMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.20/20.32	% partial match(1): FHUNF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.20/20.32	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 162 seconds (162 total)
0.20/20.32	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores
0.20/20.32	% Preprocessing time       : 0.274 s
0.20/20.32	
0.20/20.32	% Proof found!
0.20/20.32	% SZS status Theorem
0.20/20.32	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.20/20.32	fof(hypernym_transitiviy_1, conjecture, hypernym(n9986904,n7846), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', hypernym_transitiviy_1)).
0.20/20.32	fof(axiom1, axiom, ![X1, X2, X3]:((hypernym(X1,X3)<=(hypernym(X2,X3)&hypernym(X1,X2)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom1)).
0.20/20.32	fof(kb1049, axiom, hypernym(n9986904,n10126424), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NLP001+0.ax', kb1049)).
0.20/20.32	fof(kb340304, axiom, hypernym(n10126424,n9855630), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NLP001+0.ax', kb340304)).
0.20/20.32	fof(kb886122, axiom, hypernym(n9855630,n10560637), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NLP001+0.ax', kb886122)).
0.20/20.32	fof(kb117091, axiom, hypernym(n10560637,n7846), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NLP001+0.ax', kb117091)).
0.20/20.32	fof(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~(hypernym(n9986904,n7846)), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[hypernym_transitiviy_1])).
0.20/20.32	fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X1, X2, X3]:(((hypernym(X2,X3)&hypernym(X1,X2))=>hypernym(X1,X3))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom1])).
0.20/20.32	fof(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ~hypernym(n9986904,n7846), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.20/20.32	fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X4, X5, X6]:((~hypernym(X5,X6)|~hypernym(X4,X5)|hypernym(X4,X6))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])).
0.20/20.32	fof(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ~hypernym(n9986904,n7846), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.20/20.32	cnf(c_0_11, plain, (hypernym(X3,X2)|~hypernym(X1,X2)|~hypernym(X3,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.20/20.32	cnf(c_0_12, plain, (hypernym(n9986904,n10126424)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb1049])).
0.20/20.32	cnf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, (~hypernym(n9986904,n7846)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.20/20.32	cnf(c_0_14, plain, (hypernym(n9986904,X1)|~hypernym(n10126424,X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])).
0.20/20.32	cnf(c_0_15, plain, (hypernym(n10126424,n9855630)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb340304])).
0.20/20.32	cnf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, (~hypernym(n10126424,n7846)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14])).
0.20/20.32	cnf(c_0_17, plain, (hypernym(n10126424,X1)|~hypernym(n9855630,X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_15])).
0.20/20.32	cnf(c_0_18, plain, (hypernym(n9855630,n10560637)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb886122])).
0.20/20.32	cnf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, (~hypernym(n9855630,n7846)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])).
0.20/20.32	cnf(c_0_20, plain, (hypernym(n9855630,X1)|~hypernym(n10560637,X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_18])).
0.20/20.32	cnf(c_0_21, plain, (hypernym(n10560637,n7846)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb117091])).
0.20/20.32	cnf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20]), c_0_21])]), ['proof']).
0.20/20.32	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.20/20.32	% Parsed axioms                        : 1026861
0.20/20.32	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1026439
0.20/20.32	% Initial clauses                      : 422
0.20/20.32	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.20/20.32	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 422
0.20/20.32	% Processed clauses                    : 485
0.20/20.32	% ...of these trivial                  : 26
0.20/20.32	% ...subsumed                          : 0
0.20/20.32	% ...remaining for further processing  : 459
0.20/20.32	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.20/20.32	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.20/20.32	% Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.20/20.32	% Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.20/20.32	% Generated clauses                    : 179
0.20/20.32	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 118
0.20/20.32	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.20/20.32	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.20/20.32	% Paramodulations                      : 179
0.20/20.32	% Factorizations                       : 0
0.20/20.32	% NegExts                              : 0
0.20/20.32	% Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.20/20.32	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.20/20.32	% Total rewrite steps                  : 86
0.20/20.32	% ...of those cached                   : 10
0.20/20.32	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.20/20.32	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.20/20.32	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.20/20.32	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.20/20.32	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.20/20.32	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.20/20.32	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.20/20.32	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.20/20.32	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.20/20.32	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.20/20.32	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.20/20.32	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.20/20.32	% Current number of processed clauses  : 459
0.20/20.32	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 393
0.20/20.32	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.20/20.32	%    Negative unit clauses             : 3
0.20/20.32	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 63
0.20/20.32	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 55
0.20/20.32	% ...number of literals in the above   : 162
0.20/20.32	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.20/20.32	% Current number of archived clauses   : 0
0.20/20.32	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1094
0.20/20.32	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1094
0.20/20.32	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.20/20.32	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 67
0.20/20.32	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.20/20.32	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.20/20.32	% BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.20/20.32	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.20/20.32	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.20/20.32	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 4115316
0.20/20.32	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 2409915
0.20/20.32	
0.20/20.32	% -------------------------------------------------
0.20/20.32	% User time                : 3.893 s
0.20/20.32	% System time              : 1.753 s
0.20/20.32	% Total time               : 5.645 s
0.20/20.32	% Maximum resident set size: 1441492 pages
0.20/20.32	
0.20/20.32	% -------------------------------------------------
0.20/20.32	% User time                : 16.481 s
0.20/20.32	% System time              : 2.504 s
0.20/20.32	% Total time               : 18.985 s
0.20/20.32	% Maximum resident set size: 601856 pages
0.20/20.32	% E exiting
0.20/20.33	EOF