0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.04	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.10/0.41	% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
0.10/0.41	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.41	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.41	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.10/0.41	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.10/0.41	% CPULimit : 1440
0.10/0.41	% WCLimit  : 180
0.10/0.41	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 10:08:07 UTC 2026
0.10/0.41	% CPUTime  : 
0.10/0.41	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.10/0.46	Running first-order theorem proving
0.10/0.46	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.15/21.51	% Version: 3.5.1
0.15/21.51	% Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
0.15/21.51	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 166 seconds (1328 total)
0.15/21.51	% Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 830s (5) cores
0.15/21.51	% Starting new_bool_3 with 166s (1) cores
0.15/21.51	% Starting new_bool_1 with 166s (1) cores
0.15/21.51	% Starting sh5l with 166s (1) cores
0.15/21.51	% sh5l with pid 2566431 completed with status 0
0.15/21.51	% Result found by sh5l
0.15/21.51	% Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
0.15/21.51	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 166 seconds (1328 total)
0.15/21.51	% Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 830s (5) cores
0.15/21.51	% Starting new_bool_3 with 166s (1) cores
0.15/21.51	% Starting new_bool_1 with 166s (1) cores
0.15/21.51	% Starting sh5l with 166s (1) cores
0.15/21.51	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
0.15/21.51	% SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
0.15/21.51	% Search class: FHUNF-SMLM00-SFFFFFNN
0.15/21.51	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 163 seconds (163 total)
0.15/21.51	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 15s (1) cores
0.15/21.51	% SubtermCWHack with pid 2566432 completed with status 0
0.15/21.51	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.15/21.51	% Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
0.15/21.51	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 166 seconds (1328 total)
0.15/21.51	% Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 830s (5) cores
0.15/21.51	% Starting new_bool_3 with 166s (1) cores
0.15/21.51	% Starting new_bool_1 with 166s (1) cores
0.15/21.51	% Starting sh5l with 166s (1) cores
0.15/21.51	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
0.15/21.51	% SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
0.15/21.51	% Search class: FHUNF-SMLM00-SFFFFFNN
0.15/21.51	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 163 seconds (163 total)
0.15/21.51	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 15s (1) cores
0.15/21.51	% Preprocessing time       : 0.376 s
0.15/21.51	
0.15/21.51	% Proof found!
0.15/21.51	% SZS status Theorem
0.15/21.51	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.15/21.51	fof(axiom1, axiom, ![X1, X2, X3]:((hypernym(X1,X3)<=(hypernym(X1,X2)&hypernym(X2,X3)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom1)).
0.15/21.51	fof(hypernym_transitiviy_1, conjecture, hypernym(n9986904,n10560637), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', hypernym_transitiviy_1)).
0.15/21.51	fof(kb340304, axiom, hypernym(n10126424,n9855630), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NLP001+0.ax', kb340304)).
0.15/21.51	fof(kb886122, axiom, hypernym(n9855630,n10560637), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NLP001+0.ax', kb886122)).
0.15/21.51	fof(kb1049, axiom, hypernym(n9986904,n10126424), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NLP001+0.ax', kb1049)).
0.15/21.51	fof(c_0_5, plain, ![X1, X2, X3]:(((hypernym(X1,X2)&hypernym(X2,X3))=>hypernym(X1,X3))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom1])).
0.15/21.51	fof(c_0_6, plain, ![X8, X9, X10]:((~hypernym(X8,X9)|~hypernym(X9,X10)|hypernym(X8,X10))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])).
0.15/21.51	fof(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ~(hypernym(n9986904,n10560637)), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[hypernym_transitiviy_1])).
0.15/21.51	cnf(c_0_8, plain, (hypernym(X1,X3)|~hypernym(X1,X2)|~hypernym(X2,X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.15/21.51	cnf(c_0_9, plain, (hypernym(n10126424,n9855630)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb340304])).
0.15/21.51	fof(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ~hypernym(n9986904,n10560637), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.15/21.51	cnf(c_0_11, plain, (hypernym(n9855630,n10560637)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb886122])).
0.15/21.51	cnf(c_0_12, plain, (hypernym(X1,n9855630)|~hypernym(X1,n10126424)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])).
0.15/21.51	cnf(c_0_13, plain, (hypernym(n9986904,n10126424)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb1049])).
0.15/21.51	fof(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ~hypernym(n9986904,n10560637), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.15/21.51	cnf(c_0_15, plain, (hypernym(X1,n10560637)|~hypernym(X1,n9855630)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_11])).
0.15/21.51	cnf(c_0_16, plain, (hypernym(n9986904,n9855630)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])).
0.15/21.51	cnf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (~hypernym(n9986904,n10560637)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
0.15/21.51	cnf(c_0_18, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16]), c_0_17]), ['proof']).
0.15/21.51	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.15/21.51	% Parsed axioms                        : 1026861
0.15/21.51	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1022478
0.15/21.51	% Initial clauses                      : 4383
0.15/21.51	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.15/21.51	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 4383
0.15/21.51	% Processed clauses                    : 5116
0.15/21.51	% ...of these trivial                  : 218
0.15/21.51	% ...subsumed                          : 0
0.15/21.51	% ...remaining for further processing  : 4898
0.15/21.51	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.15/21.51	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.15/21.51	% Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.15/21.51	% Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.15/21.51	% Generated clauses                    : 1616
0.15/21.51	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1064
0.15/21.51	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.15/21.51	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.15/21.51	% Paramodulations                      : 1616
0.15/21.51	% Factorizations                       : 0
0.15/21.51	% NegExts                              : 0
0.15/21.51	% Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.15/21.51	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.15/21.51	% Total rewrite steps                  : 768
0.15/21.51	% ...of those cached                   : 33
0.15/21.51	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.15/21.51	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.15/21.51	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.15/21.51	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.15/21.51	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.15/21.51	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.15/21.51	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.15/21.51	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.15/21.51	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.15/21.51	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.15/21.51	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.15/21.51	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.15/21.51	% Current number of processed clauses  : 4898
0.15/21.51	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4346
0.15/21.51	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.15/21.51	%    Negative unit clauses             : 2
0.15/21.51	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 550
0.15/21.51	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 330
0.15/21.51	% ...number of literals in the above   : 778
0.15/21.51	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.15/21.51	% Current number of archived clauses   : 0
0.15/21.51	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 58818
0.15/21.51	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20456
0.15/21.51	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.15/21.51	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 405
0.15/21.51	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.15/21.51	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.15/21.51	% BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.15/21.51	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.15/21.51	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.15/21.51	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 4184766
0.15/21.51	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 2400912
0.15/21.51	
0.15/21.51	% -------------------------------------------------
0.15/21.51	% User time                : 3.206 s
0.15/21.51	% System time              : 2.133 s
0.15/21.51	% Total time               : 5.340 s
0.15/21.51	% Maximum resident set size: 1441748 pages
0.15/21.51	
0.15/21.51	% -------------------------------------------------
0.15/21.51	% User time                : 17.089 s
0.15/21.51	% System time              : 3.043 s
0.15/21.51	% Total time               : 20.132 s
0.15/21.51	% Maximum resident set size: 602368 pages
0.15/21.51	% E exiting
0.15/21.51	EOF