0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.04	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.10/0.37	% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
0.10/0.37	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.37	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.37	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.10/0.37	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.10/0.37	% CPULimit : 1440
0.10/0.37	% WCLimit  : 180
0.10/0.37	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:15:59 UTC 2026
0.10/0.38	% CPUTime  : 
0.10/0.38	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.10/0.42	Running first-order theorem proving
0.10/0.42	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.10/0.44	% Version: 3.5.1
0.10/0.44	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.10/0.44	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.10/0.44	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.10/0.44	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.10/0.44	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.10/0.44	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.10/0.44	% new_bool_3 with pid 2470588 completed with status 0
0.10/0.44	% Result found by new_bool_3
0.10/0.44	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.10/0.44	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.10/0.44	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.10/0.44	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.10/0.44	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.10/0.44	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.10/0.44	% Search class: FGHNF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN
0.10/0.44	% partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
0.10/0.44	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.10/0.44	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.10/0.44	% SubtermCWHack with pid 2470591 completed with status 0
0.10/0.44	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.10/0.44	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.10/0.44	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.10/0.44	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.10/0.44	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.10/0.44	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.10/0.44	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.10/0.44	% Search class: FGHNF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN
0.10/0.44	% partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
0.10/0.44	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.10/0.44	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.10/0.44	% Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.10/0.44	
0.10/0.44	% Proof found!
0.10/0.44	% SZS status Theorem
0.10/0.44	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.10/0.44	fof(thm, axiom, ![X1, X2]:((status(X1,X2,thm)<=>![X3]:((model(X3,X1)=>model(X3,X2))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax', thm)).
0.10/0.44	fof(tau, axiom, ![X1, X2]:((status(X1,X2,tau)<=>![X3]:((model(X3,X1)&model(X3,X2))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax', tau)).
0.10/0.44	fof(tautology, axiom, ?[X8]:(![X7]:(model(X7,X8))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax', tautology)).
0.10/0.44	fof(mighta_tau_thm, conjecture, mighta(tau,thm), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mighta_tau_thm)).
0.10/0.44	fof(mighta, axiom, ![X9, X10]:((mighta(X9,X10)<=>?[X1, X2]:((status(X1,X2,X9)&status(X1,X2,X10))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax', mighta)).
0.10/0.44	fof(c_0_5, plain, ![X19, X20, X21, X22, X23]:(((~status(X19,X20,thm)|(~model(X21,X19)|model(X21,X20)))&((model(esk3_2(X22,X23),X22)|status(X22,X23,thm))&(~model(esk3_2(X22,X23),X23)|status(X22,X23,thm))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm])])])])])])])).
0.10/0.44	fof(c_0_6, plain, ![X25, X26, X27, X28, X29, X30]:((((model(X27,X25)|~status(X25,X26,tau))&(model(X28,X26)|~status(X25,X26,tau)))&(~model(esk4_2(X29,X30),X29)|~model(esk5_2(X29,X30),X30)|status(X29,X30,tau)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[tau])])])])])])])).
0.10/0.44	fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X50]:(model(X50,esk20_0)), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[tautology])])).
0.10/0.44	fof(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ~(mighta(tau,thm)), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[mighta_tau_thm])).
0.10/0.44	fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X11, X12, X15, X16, X17, X18]:((((status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X11)|~mighta(X11,X12))&(status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X12)|~mighta(X11,X12)))&(~status(X17,X18,X15)|~status(X17,X18,X16)|mighta(X15,X16)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mighta])])])])])])])).
0.10/0.44	cnf(c_0_10, plain, (status(X1,X2,thm)|~model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.10/0.44	cnf(c_0_11, plain, (model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1)|status(X1,X2,thm)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.10/0.44	cnf(c_0_12, plain, (status(X1,X2,tau)|~model(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1)|~model(esk5_2(X1,X2),X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.10/0.44	cnf(c_0_13, plain, (model(X1,esk20_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.10/0.44	fof(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ~mighta(tau,thm), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.10/0.44	cnf(c_0_15, plain, (mighta(X3,X4)|~status(X1,X2,X3)|~status(X1,X2,X4)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.10/0.44	cnf(c_0_16, plain, (status(X1,X1,thm)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])).
0.10/0.44	cnf(c_0_17, plain, (status(esk20_0,X1,tau)|~model(esk5_2(esk20_0,X1),X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])).
0.10/0.44	fof(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ~mighta(tau,thm), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
0.10/0.44	cnf(c_0_19, plain, (mighta(X1,thm)|~status(X2,X2,X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])).
0.10/0.44	cnf(c_0_20, plain, (status(esk20_0,esk20_0,tau)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_13])).
0.10/0.44	cnf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, (~mighta(tau,thm)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])).
0.10/0.44	cnf(c_0_22, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20]), c_0_21]), ['proof']).
0.10/0.44	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.10/0.44	% Parsed axioms                        : 33
0.10/0.44	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 23
0.10/0.44	% Initial clauses                      : 25
0.10/0.44	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.10/0.44	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 25
0.10/0.44	% Processed clauses                    : 56
0.10/0.44	% ...of these trivial                  : 6
0.10/0.44	% ...subsumed                          : 2
0.10/0.44	% ...remaining for further processing  : 48
0.10/0.44	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.10/0.44	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.10/0.45	% Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.10/0.45	% Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.10/0.45	% Generated clauses                    : 72
0.10/0.45	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 56
0.10/0.45	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.10/0.45	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.10/0.45	% Paramodulations                      : 72
0.10/0.45	% Factorizations                       : 0
0.10/0.45	% NegExts                              : 0
0.10/0.45	% Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.10/0.45	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.10/0.45	% Total rewrite steps                  : 19
0.10/0.45	% ...of those cached                   : 17
0.10/0.45	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.10/0.45	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.10/0.45	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.10/0.45	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.10/0.45	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.10/0.45	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.10/0.45	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.10/0.45	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.10/0.45	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.10/0.45	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.10/0.45	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.10/0.45	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.10/0.45	% Current number of processed clauses  : 48
0.10/0.45	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 14
0.10/0.45	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.10/0.45	%    Negative unit clauses             : 8
0.10/0.45	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 26
0.10/0.45	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 24
0.10/0.45	% ...number of literals in the above   : 68
0.10/0.45	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.10/0.45	% Current number of archived clauses   : 0
0.10/0.45	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 20
0.10/0.45	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20
0.10/0.45	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
0.10/0.45	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
0.10/0.45	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.10/0.45	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
0.10/0.45	% BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.10/0.45	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.10/0.45	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.10/0.45	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 2430
0.10/0.45	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 522
0.10/0.45	
0.10/0.45	% -------------------------------------------------
0.10/0.45	% User time                : 0.005 s
0.10/0.45	% System time              : 0.003 s
0.10/0.45	% Total time               : 0.008 s
0.10/0.45	% Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
0.10/0.45	
0.10/0.45	% -------------------------------------------------
0.10/0.45	% User time                : 0.007 s
0.10/0.45	% System time              : 0.007 s
0.10/0.45	% Total time               : 0.014 s
0.10/0.45	% Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
0.10/0.45	% E exiting
0.10/0.45	EOF