0.00/0.03 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.12/0.37 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu 0.12/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.12/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.12/0.37 % CPULimit : 1440 0.12/0.37 % WCLimit : 180 0.12/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:44:54 UTC 2026 0.12/0.37 % CPUTime : 0.12/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.12/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving 0.12/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.12/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1 0.12/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN. 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.12/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.12/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.12/0.45 % sh5l with pid 3486443 completed with status 0 0.12/0.45 % Result found by sh5l 0.12/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN. 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.12/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.12/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.12/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000) 0.12/0.45 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000 0.12/0.45 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN 0.12/0.45 % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.12/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores 0.12/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3486446 completed with status 0 0.12/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack 0.12/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN. 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.12/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.12/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.12/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000) 0.12/0.45 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000 0.12/0.45 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN 0.12/0.45 % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.12/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores 0.12/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.12/0.45 0.12/0.45 % Proof found! 0.12/0.45 % SZS status Theorem 0.12/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.12/0.45 fof(eth, axiom, ![X1, X2]:((((?[X3]:(model(X3,X1))&![X5]:((model(X5,X2)<=>model(X5,X1))))&?[X4]:(~(model(X4,X1))))<=>status(X1,X2,eth))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax', eth)). 0.12/0.45 fof(satisfiable, axiom, ?[X8]:((?[X3]:(model(X3,X8))&?[X4]:(~(model(X4,X8))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax', satisfiable)). 0.12/0.45 fof(thm, axiom, ![X1, X2]:((status(X1,X2,thm)<=>![X3]:((model(X3,X1)=>model(X3,X2))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax', thm)). 0.12/0.45 fof(mighta_eth_thm, conjecture, mighta(eth,thm), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mighta_eth_thm)). 0.12/0.45 fof(mighta, axiom, ![X9, X10]:((mighta(X9,X10)<=>?[X1, X2]:((status(X1,X2,X9)&status(X1,X2,X10))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax', mighta)). 0.12/0.45 fof(c_0_5, plain, ![X1, X2]:((((?[X3]:(model(X3,X1))&![X5]:((model(X5,X2)<=>model(X5,X1))))&?[X4]:(~model(X4,X1)))<=>status(X1,X2,eth))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[eth])). 0.12/0.45 fof(c_0_6, plain, ?[X8]:((?[X3]:(model(X3,X8))&?[X4]:(~model(X4,X8)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satisfiable])). 0.12/0.45 fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X25, X26, X27, X29, X30, X31, X33, X34]:((((~model(esk4_2(X25,X26),X26)|~model(esk4_2(X25,X26),X25)|~model(X27,X25)|model(X29,X25)|status(X25,X26,eth))&(model(esk4_2(X25,X26),X26)|model(esk4_2(X25,X26),X25)|~model(X27,X25)|model(X29,X25)|status(X25,X26,eth)))&(((model(esk5_2(X30,X31),X30)|~status(X30,X31,eth))&((~model(X33,X31)|model(X33,X30)|~status(X30,X31,eth))&(~model(X34,X30)|model(X34,X31)|~status(X30,X31,eth))))&(~model(esk6_2(X30,X31),X30)|~status(X30,X31,eth))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])])])). 0.12/0.45 fof(c_0_8, plain, (model(esk23_0,esk22_0)&~model(esk24_0,esk22_0)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])). 0.12/0.45 cnf(c_0_9, plain, (model(esk4_2(X1,X2),X2)|model(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1)|model(X4,X1)|status(X1,X2,eth)|~model(X3,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.12/0.45 cnf(c_0_10, plain, (model(esk23_0,esk22_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.12/0.45 fof(c_0_11, plain, ![X19, X20, X21, X22, X23]:(((~status(X19,X20,thm)|(~model(X21,X19)|model(X21,X20)))&((model(esk3_2(X22,X23),X22)|status(X22,X23,thm))&(~model(esk3_2(X22,X23),X23)|status(X22,X23,thm))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm])])])])])])])). 0.12/0.45 cnf(c_0_12, plain, (status(esk22_0,X1,eth)|model(esk4_2(esk22_0,X1),esk22_0)|model(esk4_2(esk22_0,X1),X1)|model(X2,esk22_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])). 0.12/0.45 fof(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ~(mighta(eth,thm)), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[mighta_eth_thm])). 0.12/0.45 fof(c_0_14, plain, ![X11, X12, X15, X16, X17, X18]:((((status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X11)|~mighta(X11,X12))&(status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X12)|~mighta(X11,X12)))&(~status(X17,X18,X15)|~status(X17,X18,X16)|mighta(X15,X16)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mighta])])])])])])])). 0.12/0.45 cnf(c_0_15, plain, (status(X1,X2,thm)|~model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 0.12/0.45 cnf(c_0_16, plain, (model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1)|status(X1,X2,thm)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 0.12/0.45 cnf(c_0_17, plain, (model(X4,X1)|status(X1,X2,eth)|~model(esk4_2(X1,X2),X2)|~model(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1)|~model(X3,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.12/0.45 cnf(c_0_18, plain, (status(esk22_0,esk22_0,eth)|model(esk4_2(esk22_0,esk22_0),esk22_0)), inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])). 0.12/0.45 fof(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ~mighta(eth,thm), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])). 0.12/0.45 cnf(c_0_20, plain, (mighta(X3,X4)|~status(X1,X2,X3)|~status(X1,X2,X4)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])). 0.12/0.45 cnf(c_0_21, plain, (status(X1,X1,thm)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])). 0.12/0.45 cnf(c_0_22, plain, (status(esk22_0,esk22_0,eth)|model(X1,esk22_0)|~model(X2,esk22_0)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18]), c_0_18])). 0.12/0.45 fof(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ~mighta(eth,thm), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])). 0.12/0.45 cnf(c_0_24, plain, (mighta(X1,thm)|~status(X2,X2,X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21])). 0.12/0.45 cnf(c_0_25, plain, (status(esk22_0,esk22_0,eth)|model(X1,esk22_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_10])). 0.12/0.45 cnf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, (~mighta(eth,thm)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])). 0.12/0.45 cnf(c_0_27, plain, (~model(esk24_0,esk22_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.12/0.45 cnf(c_0_28, plain, (model(X1,esk22_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25]), c_0_26])). 0.12/0.45 cnf(c_0_29, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28])]), ['proof']). 0.12/0.45 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.12/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 33 0.12/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 23 0.12/0.45 % Initial clauses : 28 0.12/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.12/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 28 0.12/0.45 % Processed clauses : 147 0.12/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 2 0.12/0.45 % ...subsumed : 49 0.12/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 96 0.12/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.12/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.12/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 17 0.12/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 4 0.12/0.45 % Generated clauses : 367 0.12/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 323 0.12/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.12/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1 0.12/0.45 % Paramodulations : 297 0.12/0.45 % Factorizations : 70 0.12/0.45 % NegExts : 0 0.12/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 0 0.12/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0 0.12/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 23 0.12/0.45 % ...of those cached : 13 0.12/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.12/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0 0.12/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.12/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0 0.12/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.12/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.12/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.12/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.12/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.12/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.12/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.12/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.12/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 75 0.12/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 13 0.12/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.12/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 9 0.12/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 53 0.12/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 174 0.12/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 884 0.12/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.12/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 21 0.12/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 732 0.12/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 412 0.12/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 65 0.12/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20 0.12/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.12/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 9 0.12/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 5 0.12/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0 0.12/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0 0.12/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 7250 0.12/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 611 0.12/0.45 0.12/0.45 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.12/0.45 % User time : 0.009 s 0.12/0.45 % System time : 0.003 s 0.12/0.45 % Total time : 0.012 s 0.12/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages 0.12/0.45 0.12/0.45 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.12/0.45 % User time : 0.010 s 0.12/0.45 % System time : 0.008 s 0.12/0.45 % Total time : 0.018 s 0.12/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages 0.12/0.45 % E exiting 0.12/0.45 EOF