0.00/0.04	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.07	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.16/0.41	% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
0.16/0.41	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.16/0.41	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.16/0.41	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.16/0.41	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.16/0.41	% CPULimit : 1440
0.16/0.41	% WCLimit  : 180
0.16/0.41	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:22:07 UTC 2026
0.16/0.41	% CPUTime  : 
0.16/0.41	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.16/0.49	Running first-order theorem proving
0.16/0.49	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
142.65/21.26	% Version: 3.5.1
142.65/21.26	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
142.65/21.26	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
142.65/21.26	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
142.65/21.26	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
142.65/21.26	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
142.65/21.26	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
142.65/21.26	% new_bool_3 with pid 1184992 completed with status 0
142.65/21.26	% Result found by new_bool_3
142.65/21.26	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
142.65/21.26	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
142.65/21.26	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
142.65/21.26	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
142.65/21.26	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
142.65/21.26	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
142.65/21.26	% Search class: FGHNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
142.65/21.26	% Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
142.65/21.26	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
142.65/21.26	% SubtermCWHack with pid 1184996 completed with status 8
142.65/21.26	% Starting G-E--_107_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 79s (1) cores
142.65/21.26	% G-E--_107_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with pid 1185005 completed with status 0
142.65/21.26	% Result found by G-E--_107_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S
142.65/21.26	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
142.65/21.26	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
142.65/21.26	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
142.65/21.26	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
142.65/21.26	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
142.65/21.26	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
142.65/21.26	% Search class: FGHNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
142.65/21.26	% Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
142.65/21.26	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
142.65/21.26	% SubtermCWHack with pid 1184996 completed with status 8
142.65/21.26	% Starting G-E--_107_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 79s (1) cores
142.65/21.26	% Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
142.65/21.26	% Presaturation interreduction done
142.65/21.26	
142.65/21.26	% Proof found!
142.65/21.26	% SZS status Theorem
142.65/21.26	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
142.65/21.26	fof(not, axiom, ![X7, X8]:((~(model(X7,not(X8)))<=>model(X7,X8))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax', not)).
142.65/21.26	fof(csa, axiom, ![X1, X2]:((?[X3]:((model(X3,not(X2))&model(X3,X1)))<=>status(X1,X2,csa))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax', csa)).
142.65/21.26	fof(thm, axiom, ![X1, X2]:((status(X1,X2,thm)<=>![X3]:((model(X3,X1)=>model(X3,X2))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax', thm)).
142.65/21.26	fof(xora, axiom, ![X9, X10]:((![X1, X2]:((status(X1,X2,X9)<~>status(X1,X2,X10)))<=>xora(X9,X10))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax', xora)).
142.65/21.26	fof(xora_csa_thm, conjecture, xora(csa,thm), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', xora_csa_thm)).
142.65/21.26	fof(c_0_5, plain, ![X7, X8]:((~model(X7,not(X8))<=>model(X7,X8))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not])).
142.65/21.26	fof(c_0_6, plain, ![X27, X28, X29, X30, X31]:(((~model(X29,not(X28))|~model(X29,X27)|status(X27,X28,csa))&((model(esk4_2(X30,X31),not(X31))|~status(X30,X31,csa))&(model(esk4_2(X30,X31),X30)|~status(X30,X31,csa))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[csa])])])])])])])).
142.65/21.26	fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X54, X55]:(((model(X54,not(X55))|model(X54,X55))&(~model(X54,X55)|~model(X54,not(X55))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_8, plain, (status(X3,X2,csa)|~model(X1,not(X2))|~model(X1,X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_9, plain, (model(X1,not(X2))|model(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
142.65/21.26	fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X21, X22, X23, X24, X25]:(((~status(X21,X22,thm)|(~model(X23,X21)|model(X23,X22)))&((model(esk3_2(X24,X25),X24)|status(X24,X25,thm))&(~model(esk3_2(X24,X25),X25)|status(X24,X25,thm))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm])])])])])])])).
142.65/21.26	fof(c_0_11, plain, ![X9, X10]:((![X1, X2]:(~((status(X1,X2,X9)<=>status(X1,X2,X10))))<=>xora(X9,X10))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[xora])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_12, plain, (status(X1,X2,csa)|model(X3,X2)|~model(X3,X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_13, plain, (model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1)|status(X1,X2,thm)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
142.65/21.26	fof(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ~(xora(csa,thm)), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[xora_csa_thm])).
142.65/21.26	fof(c_0_15, plain, ![X11, X12, X15, X16, X17, X18, X19, X20]:((((~status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X11)|status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X12)|xora(X11,X12))&(~status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X12)|status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X11)|xora(X11,X12)))&((~status(X17,X18,X15)|~status(X17,X18,X16)|~xora(X15,X16))&(status(X19,X20,X15)|status(X19,X20,X16)|~xora(X15,X16))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])])])])])])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_16, plain, (status(X1,X2,thm)|~model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_17, plain, (status(X1,X2,thm)|status(X1,X3,csa)|model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X3)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])).
142.65/21.26	fof(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ~xora(csa,thm), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_19, plain, (status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)|xora(X1,X2)|~status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_20, plain, (status(X1,X2,csa)|status(X1,X2,thm)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])).
142.65/21.26	fof(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ~xora(csa,thm), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_22, plain, (xora(csa,X1)|status(esk1_2(csa,X1),esk2_2(csa,X1),thm)|status(esk1_2(csa,X1),esk2_2(csa,X1),X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, (~xora(csa,thm)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_24, plain, (status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)|xora(X1,X2)|~status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_25, plain, (status(esk1_2(csa,thm),esk2_2(csa,thm),thm)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]), c_0_23])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_26, plain, (model(X3,X2)|~status(X1,X2,thm)|~model(X3,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_27, plain, (model(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1)|~status(X1,X2,csa)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_28, plain, (status(esk1_2(csa,thm),esk2_2(csa,thm),csa)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25]), c_0_23])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_29, plain, (model(esk4_2(X1,X2),not(X2))|~status(X1,X2,csa)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_30, plain, (model(X1,esk2_2(csa,thm))|~model(X1,esk1_2(csa,thm))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_25])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_31, plain, (model(esk4_2(esk1_2(csa,thm),esk2_2(csa,thm)),esk1_2(csa,thm))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_32, plain, (~model(X1,X2)|~model(X1,not(X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_33, plain, (model(esk4_2(esk1_2(csa,thm),esk2_2(csa,thm)),not(esk2_2(csa,thm)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_28])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_34, plain, (model(esk4_2(esk1_2(csa,thm),esk2_2(csa,thm)),esk2_2(csa,thm))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30, c_0_31])).
142.65/21.26	cnf(c_0_35, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32, c_0_33]), c_0_34])]), ['proof']).
142.65/21.26	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
142.65/21.26	% Parsed axioms                        : 33
142.65/21.26	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 21
142.65/21.26	% Initial clauses                      : 30
142.65/21.26	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
142.65/21.26	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 30
142.65/21.26	% Processed clauses                    : 5016
142.65/21.26	% ...of these trivial                  : 514
142.65/21.26	% ...subsumed                          : 2566
142.65/21.26	% ...remaining for further processing  : 1936
142.65/21.26	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
142.65/21.26	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
142.65/21.26	% Backward-subsumed                    : 22
142.65/21.26	% Backward-rewritten                   : 4
142.65/21.26	% Generated clauses                    : 52306
142.65/21.26	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 46373
142.65/21.26	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
142.65/21.26	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
142.65/21.26	% Paramodulations                      : 52218
142.65/21.26	% Factorizations                       : 88
142.65/21.26	% NegExts                              : 0
142.65/21.26	% Equation resolutions                 : 0
142.65/21.26	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
142.65/21.26	% Total rewrite steps                  : 6571
142.65/21.26	% ...of those cached                   : 5975
142.65/21.26	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
142.65/21.26	%    Propositional check models        : 0
142.65/21.26	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
142.65/21.26	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
142.65/21.26	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
142.65/21.26	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
142.65/21.26	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
142.65/21.26	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
142.65/21.26	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
142.65/21.26	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
142.65/21.26	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
142.65/21.26	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
142.65/21.26	% Current number of processed clauses  : 1882
142.65/21.26	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 348
142.65/21.26	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
142.65/21.26	%    Negative unit clauses             : 66
142.65/21.26	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1468
142.65/21.26	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 41103
142.65/21.26	% ...number of literals in the above   : 121370
142.65/21.26	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
142.65/21.26	% Current number of archived clauses   : 54
142.65/21.26	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 252417
142.65/21.26	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 153350
142.65/21.26	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2583
142.65/21.26	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6149
142.65/21.26	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
142.65/21.26	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 2140
142.65/21.26	% BW rewrite match successes           : 4
142.65/21.26	% Condensation attempts                : 0
142.65/21.26	% Condensation successes               : 0
142.65/21.26	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 662244
142.65/21.26	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 589
142.65/21.26	
142.65/21.26	% -------------------------------------------------
142.65/21.26	% User time                : 19.652 s
142.65/21.26	% System time              : 0.753 s
142.65/21.26	% Total time               : 20.405 s
142.65/21.26	% Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
142.65/21.26	
142.65/21.26	% -------------------------------------------------
142.65/21.26	% User time                : 19.655 s
142.65/21.26	% System time              : 0.761 s
142.65/21.26	% Total time               : 20.417 s
142.65/21.26	% Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
142.65/21.26	% E exiting
142.65/21.27	EOF