0.00/0.02	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.04	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.09/0.36	% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
0.09/0.36	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.09/0.36	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.09/0.36	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.09/0.36	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.09/0.36	% CPULimit : 1440
0.09/0.36	% WCLimit  : 180
0.09/0.36	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:32:10 UTC 2026
0.09/0.36	% CPUTime  : 
0.09/0.36	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.09/0.40	Running first-order theorem proving
0.09/0.40	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.09/0.43	% Version: 3.5.1
0.09/0.43	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.09/0.43	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.09/0.43	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.09/0.43	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.09/0.43	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.09/0.43	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.09/0.43	% new_bool_3 with pid 4048307 completed with status 0
0.09/0.43	% Result found by new_bool_3
0.09/0.43	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.09/0.43	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.09/0.43	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.09/0.43	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.09/0.43	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.09/0.43	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.09/0.43	% Search class: FGHNF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
0.09/0.43	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.09/0.43	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.09/0.43	% SubtermCWHack with pid 4048310 completed with status 0
0.09/0.43	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.09/0.43	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.09/0.43	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.09/0.43	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.09/0.43	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.09/0.43	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.09/0.43	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.09/0.43	% Search class: FGHNF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
0.09/0.43	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.09/0.43	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.09/0.43	% Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.09/0.43	
0.09/0.43	% Proof found!
0.09/0.43	% SZS status Theorem
0.09/0.43	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.09/0.43	fof(nevera, axiom, ![X9, X10]:((![X1, X2]:((~(status(X1,X2,X10))<=status(X1,X2,X9)))<=>nevera(X9,X10))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax', nevera)).
0.09/0.43	fof(not, axiom, ![X7, X8]:((~(model(X7,not(X8)))<=>model(X7,X8))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax', not)).
0.09/0.43	fof(uns, axiom, ![X1, X2]:(((![X4]:(model(X4,not(X2)))&![X3]:(model(X3,X1)))<=>status(X1,X2,uns))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax', uns)).
0.09/0.43	fof(nevera_uns_thm, conjecture, nevera(uns,thm), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', nevera_uns_thm)).
0.09/0.43	fof(thm, axiom, ![X1, X2]:((status(X1,X2,thm)<=>![X3]:((model(X3,X1)=>model(X3,X2))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax', thm)).
0.09/0.43	fof(c_0_5, plain, ![X9, X10]:((![X1, X2]:((status(X1,X2,X9)=>~status(X1,X2,X10)))<=>nevera(X9,X10))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[nevera])).
0.09/0.43	fof(c_0_6, plain, ![X7, X8]:((~model(X7,not(X8))<=>model(X7,X8))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not])).
0.09/0.43	fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X25, X26, X29, X30, X31, X32]:(((~model(esk4_2(X25,X26),not(X26))|~model(esk5_2(X25,X26),X25)|status(X25,X26,uns))&((model(X31,not(X30))|~status(X29,X30,uns))&(model(X32,X29)|~status(X29,X30,uns))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[uns])])])])])])])).
0.09/0.43	fof(c_0_8, plain, ![X11, X12, X15, X16, X17, X18]:((((status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X11)|nevera(X11,X12))&(status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X12)|nevera(X11,X12)))&(~nevera(X15,X16)|(~status(X17,X18,X15)|~status(X17,X18,X16))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])])])).
0.09/0.43	fof(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ~(nevera(uns,thm)), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[nevera_uns_thm])).
0.09/0.43	fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X54, X55]:(((model(X54,not(X55))|model(X54,X55))&(~model(X54,X55)|~model(X54,not(X55))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_11, plain, (model(X1,not(X2))|~status(X3,X2,uns)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_12, plain, (status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)|nevera(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.09/0.43	fof(c_0_13, plain, ![X19, X20, X21, X22, X23]:(((~status(X19,X20,thm)|(~model(X21,X19)|model(X21,X20)))&((model(esk3_2(X22,X23),X22)|status(X22,X23,thm))&(~model(esk3_2(X22,X23),X23)|status(X22,X23,thm))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm])])])])])])])).
0.09/0.43	fof(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ~nevera(uns,thm), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_15, plain, (~model(X1,X2)|~model(X1,not(X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_16, plain, (nevera(uns,X1)|model(X2,not(esk2_2(uns,X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_17, plain, (model(X3,X2)|~status(X1,X2,thm)|~model(X3,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_18, plain, (status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)|nevera(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.09/0.43	fof(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ~nevera(uns,thm), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_20, plain, (nevera(uns,X1)|~model(X2,esk2_2(uns,X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_21, plain, (nevera(X1,thm)|model(X2,esk2_2(X1,thm))|~model(X2,esk1_2(X1,thm))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, (~nevera(uns,thm)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_23, plain, (model(X1,X2)|~status(X2,X3,uns)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_24, plain, (~model(X1,esk1_2(uns,thm))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21]), c_0_22])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_25, plain, (nevera(uns,X1)|model(X2,esk1_2(uns,X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_12])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_26, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25]), c_0_22]), ['proof']).
0.09/0.43	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.09/0.43	% Parsed axioms                        : 33
0.09/0.43	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 21
0.09/0.43	% Initial clauses                      : 29
0.09/0.43	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.09/0.43	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 29
0.09/0.43	% Processed clauses                    : 91
0.09/0.43	% ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.09/0.43	% ...subsumed                          : 25
0.09/0.43	% ...remaining for further processing  : 65
0.09/0.43	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.09/0.43	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.09/0.43	% Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.09/0.43	% Backward-rewritten                   : 7
0.09/0.43	% Generated clauses                    : 120
0.09/0.43	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 106
0.09/0.43	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.09/0.43	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.09/0.43	% Paramodulations                      : 120
0.09/0.43	% Factorizations                       : 0
0.09/0.43	% NegExts                              : 0
0.09/0.43	% Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.09/0.43	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.09/0.43	% Total rewrite steps                  : 19
0.09/0.43	% ...of those cached                   : 2
0.09/0.43	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.09/0.43	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.09/0.43	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.09/0.43	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.09/0.43	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.09/0.43	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.09/0.43	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.09/0.43	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.09/0.43	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.09/0.43	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.09/0.43	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.09/0.43	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.09/0.43	% Current number of processed clauses  : 58
0.09/0.43	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 15
0.09/0.43	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.09/0.43	%    Negative unit clauses             : 9
0.09/0.43	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 34
0.09/0.43	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 42
0.09/0.43	% ...number of literals in the above   : 103
0.09/0.43	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.09/0.43	% Current number of archived clauses   : 7
0.09/0.43	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 48
0.09/0.43	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 46
0.09/0.43	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
0.09/0.43	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26
0.09/0.43	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.09/0.43	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 12
0.09/0.43	% BW rewrite match successes           : 7
0.09/0.43	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.09/0.43	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.09/0.43	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 3134
0.09/0.43	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 545
0.09/0.43	
0.09/0.43	% -------------------------------------------------
0.09/0.43	% User time                : 0.004 s
0.09/0.43	% System time              : 0.005 s
0.09/0.43	% Total time               : 0.008 s
0.09/0.43	% Maximum resident set size: 3680 pages
0.09/0.43	
0.09/0.43	% -------------------------------------------------
0.09/0.43	% User time                : 0.005 s
0.09/0.43	% System time              : 0.010 s
0.09/0.43	% Total time               : 0.015 s
0.09/0.43	% Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
0.09/0.43	% E exiting
0.09/0.43	EOF