0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.05	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.12/0.37	% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
0.12/0.37	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.37	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.37	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.12/0.37	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.12/0.37	% CPULimit : 1440
0.12/0.37	% WCLimit  : 180
0.12/0.37	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:39:07 UTC 2026
0.12/0.37	% CPUTime  : 
0.12/0.37	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.12/0.42	Running first-order theorem proving
0.12/0.42	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
65.50/10.07	% Version: 3.5.1
65.50/10.07	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
65.50/10.07	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
65.50/10.07	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
65.50/10.07	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
65.50/10.07	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
65.50/10.07	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
65.50/10.07	% sh5l with pid 632918 completed with status 0
65.50/10.07	% Result found by sh5l
65.50/10.07	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
65.50/10.07	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
65.50/10.07	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
65.50/10.07	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
65.50/10.07	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
65.50/10.07	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
65.50/10.07	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
65.50/10.07	% SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
65.50/10.07	% Search class: FGHNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
65.50/10.07	% Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
65.50/10.07	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
65.50/10.07	% SubtermCWHack with pid 632921 completed with status 0
65.50/10.07	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
65.50/10.07	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
65.50/10.07	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
65.50/10.07	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
65.50/10.07	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
65.50/10.07	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
65.50/10.07	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
65.50/10.07	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
65.50/10.07	% SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
65.50/10.07	% Search class: FGHNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
65.50/10.07	% Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
65.50/10.07	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
65.50/10.07	% Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
65.50/10.07	
65.50/10.07	% Proof found!
65.50/10.07	% SZS status Theorem
65.50/10.07	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
65.50/10.07	fof(not, axiom, ![X7, X8]:((~(model(X7,not(X8)))<=>model(X7,X8))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax', not)).
65.50/10.07	fof(nevera, axiom, ![X9, X10]:((![X1, X2]:((~(status(X1,X2,X10))<=status(X1,X2,X9)))<=>nevera(X9,X10))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax', nevera)).
65.50/10.07	fof(csa, axiom, ![X1, X2]:((?[X3]:((model(X3,not(X2))&model(X3,X1)))<=>status(X1,X2,csa))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax', csa)).
65.50/10.07	fof(thm, axiom, ![X1, X2]:((status(X1,X2,thm)<=>![X3]:((model(X3,X1)=>model(X3,X2))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax', thm)).
65.50/10.07	fof(nevera_csa_thm, conjecture, nevera(csa,thm), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', nevera_csa_thm)).
65.50/10.07	fof(c_0_5, plain, ![X7, X8]:((~model(X7,not(X8))<=>model(X7,X8))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not])).
65.50/10.07	fof(c_0_6, plain, ![X9, X10]:((![X1, X2]:((status(X1,X2,X9)=>~status(X1,X2,X10)))<=>nevera(X9,X10))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[nevera])).
65.50/10.07	fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X68, X69]:(((model(X68,not(X69))|model(X68,X69))&(~model(X68,X69)|~model(X68,not(X69))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])).
65.50/10.07	fof(c_0_8, plain, ![X25, X26, X27, X28, X29]:(((~model(X27,not(X26))|~model(X27,X25)|status(X25,X26,csa))&((model(esk4_2(X28,X29),not(X29))|~status(X28,X29,csa))&(model(esk4_2(X28,X29),X28)|~status(X28,X29,csa))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[csa])])])])])])])).
65.50/10.07	fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X19, X20, X21, X22, X23]:(((~status(X19,X20,thm)|(~model(X21,X19)|model(X21,X20)))&((model(esk3_2(X22,X23),X22)|status(X22,X23,thm))&(~model(esk3_2(X22,X23),X23)|status(X22,X23,thm))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm])])])])])])])).
65.50/10.07	fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X11, X12, X15, X16, X17, X18]:((((status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X11)|nevera(X11,X12))&(status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X12)|nevera(X11,X12)))&(~nevera(X15,X16)|(~status(X17,X18,X15)|~status(X17,X18,X16))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])])])).
65.50/10.07	cnf(c_0_11, plain, (~model(X1,X2)|~model(X1,not(X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
65.50/10.07	cnf(c_0_12, plain, (model(esk4_2(X1,X2),not(X2))|~status(X1,X2,csa)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
65.50/10.07	cnf(c_0_13, plain, (model(X3,X2)|~status(X1,X2,thm)|~model(X3,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
65.50/10.07	cnf(c_0_14, plain, (status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)|nevera(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
65.50/10.07	fof(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ~(nevera(csa,thm)), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[nevera_csa_thm])).
65.50/10.07	cnf(c_0_16, plain, (~status(X1,X2,csa)|~model(esk4_2(X1,X2),X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])).
65.50/10.07	cnf(c_0_17, plain, (nevera(X1,thm)|model(X2,esk2_2(X1,thm))|~model(X2,esk1_2(X1,thm))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14])).
65.50/10.07	fof(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ~nevera(csa,thm), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])).
65.50/10.07	cnf(c_0_19, plain, (nevera(X1,thm)|~status(X2,esk2_2(X1,thm),csa)|~model(esk4_2(X2,esk2_2(X1,thm)),esk1_2(X1,thm))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])).
65.50/10.07	cnf(c_0_20, plain, (model(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1)|~status(X1,X2,csa)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
65.50/10.07	fof(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ~nevera(csa,thm), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])).
65.50/10.07	cnf(c_0_22, plain, (nevera(X1,thm)|~status(esk1_2(X1,thm),esk2_2(X1,thm),csa)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20])).
65.50/10.07	cnf(c_0_23, plain, (status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)|nevera(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
65.50/10.07	cnf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, (~nevera(csa,thm)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])).
65.50/10.07	cnf(c_0_25, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23]), c_0_24]), ['proof']).
65.50/10.07	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
65.50/10.07	% Parsed axioms                        : 33
65.50/10.07	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 19
65.50/10.07	% Initial clauses                      : 37
65.50/10.07	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
65.50/10.07	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 37
65.50/10.07	% Processed clauses                    : 52360
65.50/10.07	% ...of these trivial                  : 728
65.50/10.07	% ...subsumed                          : 47243
65.50/10.07	% ...remaining for further processing  : 4389
65.50/10.07	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
65.50/10.07	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
65.50/10.07	% Backward-subsumed                    : 231
65.50/10.07	% Backward-rewritten                   : 87
65.50/10.07	% Generated clauses                    : 701186
65.50/10.07	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 626677
65.50/10.07	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
65.50/10.07	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 162
65.50/10.07	% Paramodulations                      : 701056
65.50/10.07	% Factorizations                       : 130
65.50/10.07	% NegExts                              : 0
65.50/10.07	% Equation resolutions                 : 0
65.50/10.07	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
65.50/10.07	% Total rewrite steps                  : 82935
65.50/10.07	% ...of those cached                   : 82211
65.50/10.07	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
65.50/10.07	%    Propositional check models        : 0
65.50/10.07	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
65.50/10.07	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
65.50/10.07	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
65.50/10.07	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
65.50/10.07	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
65.50/10.07	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
65.50/10.07	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
65.50/10.07	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
65.50/10.07	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
65.50/10.07	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
65.50/10.07	% Current number of processed clauses  : 4071
65.50/10.07	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 512
65.50/10.07	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
65.50/10.07	%    Negative unit clauses             : 131
65.50/10.07	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3428
65.50/10.07	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 572161
65.50/10.07	% ...number of literals in the above   : 2285628
65.50/10.07	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
65.50/10.07	% Current number of archived clauses   : 318
65.50/10.07	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3418645
65.50/10.07	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1872266
65.50/10.07	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 18169
65.50/10.07	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19361
65.50/10.07	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
65.50/10.07	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 9081
65.50/10.07	% BW rewrite match successes           : 41
65.50/10.07	% Condensation attempts                : 0
65.50/10.07	% Condensation successes               : 0
65.50/10.07	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 10807090
65.50/10.07	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 695
65.50/10.07	
65.50/10.07	% -------------------------------------------------
65.50/10.07	% User time                : 8.933 s
65.50/10.07	% System time              : 0.308 s
65.50/10.07	% Total time               : 9.241 s
65.50/10.07	% Maximum resident set size: 3680 pages
65.50/10.07	
65.50/10.07	% -------------------------------------------------
65.50/10.07	% User time                : 8.937 s
65.50/10.07	% System time              : 0.311 s
65.50/10.07	% Total time               : 9.248 s
65.50/10.07	% Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
65.50/10.07	% E exiting
65.50/10.07	EOF