0.00/0.03 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 1440 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 180 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 08:58:23 UTC 2026 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime : 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.10/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving 0.10/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.10/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1 0.10/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN. 0.10/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.10/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores 0.10/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.10/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.10/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.10/0.45 % new_bool_3 with pid 2238144 completed with status 0 0.10/0.45 % Result found by new_bool_3 0.10/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN. 0.10/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.10/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores 0.10/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.10/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)) 0.10/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0) 0.10/0.45 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN 0.10/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.10/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores 0.10/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2238147 completed with status 0 0.10/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack 0.10/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN. 0.10/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.10/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores 0.10/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.10/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)) 0.10/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0) 0.10/0.45 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN 0.10/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.10/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores 0.10/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s 0.10/0.45 0.10/0.45 % Proof found! 0.10/0.45 % SZS status Theorem 0.10/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.10/0.45 fof(not, axiom, ![X7, X8]:((~(model(X7,not(X8)))<=>model(X7,X8))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax', not)). 0.10/0.45 fof(contradiction, axiom, ?[X8]:(![X7]:(~(model(X7,X8)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax', contradiction)). 0.10/0.45 fof(thm, axiom, ![X1, X2]:((status(X1,X2,thm)<=>![X3]:((model(X3,X1)=>model(X3,X2))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax', thm)). 0.10/0.45 fof(tautology, axiom, ?[X8]:(![X7]:(model(X7,X8))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax', tautology)). 0.10/0.45 fof(uns, axiom, ![X1, X2]:(((![X4]:(model(X4,not(X2)))&![X3]:(model(X3,X1)))<=>status(X1,X2,uns))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax', uns)). 0.10/0.45 fof(nota_uns_thm, conjecture, nota(uns,thm), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', nota_uns_thm)). 0.10/0.45 fof(nota, axiom, ![X9, X10]:((nota(X9,X10)<=>?[X1, X2]:((~(status(X1,X2,X10))&status(X1,X2,X9))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax', nota)). 0.10/0.45 fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X7, X8]:((~model(X7,not(X8))<=>model(X7,X8))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not])). 0.10/0.45 fof(c_0_8, plain, ?[X8]:(![X7]:(~model(X7,X8))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[contradiction])). 0.10/0.45 fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X19, X20, X21, X22, X23]:(((~status(X19,X20,thm)|(~model(X21,X19)|model(X21,X20)))&((model(esk3_2(X22,X23),X22)|status(X22,X23,thm))&(~model(esk3_2(X22,X23),X23)|status(X22,X23,thm))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm])])])])])])])). 0.10/0.45 fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X54, X55]:(((model(X54,not(X55))|model(X54,X55))&(~model(X54,X55)|~model(X54,not(X55))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])). 0.10/0.45 fof(c_0_11, plain, ![X38]:(~model(X38,esk10_0)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])). 0.10/0.45 cnf(c_0_12, plain, (status(X1,X2,thm)|~model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 0.10/0.45 cnf(c_0_13, plain, (model(X1,not(X2))|model(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])). 0.10/0.45 cnf(c_0_14, plain, (~model(X1,esk10_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 0.10/0.45 cnf(c_0_15, plain, (status(X1,not(X2),thm)|model(esk3_2(X1,not(X2)),X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])). 0.10/0.45 cnf(c_0_16, plain, (model(X3,X2)|~status(X1,X2,thm)|~model(X3,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 0.10/0.45 cnf(c_0_17, plain, (status(X1,not(esk10_0),thm)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])). 0.10/0.45 fof(c_0_18, plain, ![X50]:(model(X50,esk20_0)), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[tautology])])). 0.10/0.45 fof(c_0_19, plain, ![X25, X26, X29, X30, X31, X32]:(((~model(esk4_2(X25,X26),not(X26))|~model(esk5_2(X25,X26),X25)|status(X25,X26,uns))&((model(X31,not(X30))|~status(X29,X30,uns))&(model(X32,X29)|~status(X29,X30,uns))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[uns])])])])])])])). 0.10/0.45 cnf(c_0_20, plain, (model(X1,not(esk10_0))|~model(X1,X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])). 0.10/0.45 cnf(c_0_21, plain, (model(X1,esk20_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])). 0.10/0.45 fof(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ~(nota(uns,thm)), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[nota_uns_thm])). 0.10/0.45 fof(c_0_23, plain, ![X9, X10]:((nota(X9,X10)<=>?[X1, X2]:((~status(X1,X2,X10)&status(X1,X2,X9))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[nota])). 0.10/0.45 cnf(c_0_24, plain, (status(X1,X2,uns)|~model(esk4_2(X1,X2),not(X2))|~model(esk5_2(X1,X2),X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])). 0.10/0.45 cnf(c_0_25, plain, (model(X1,not(esk10_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21])). 0.10/0.45 fof(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ~nota(uns,thm), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_22])). 0.10/0.45 fof(c_0_27, plain, ![X11, X12, X15, X16, X17, X18]:((((~status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X12)|~nota(X11,X12))&(status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X11)|~nota(X11,X12)))&(status(X17,X18,X16)|~status(X17,X18,X15)|nota(X15,X16)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])])])])])])])). 0.10/0.45 cnf(c_0_28, plain, (status(X1,esk10_0,uns)|~model(esk5_2(X1,esk10_0),X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25])). 0.10/0.45 fof(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, ~nota(uns,thm), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_26])). 0.10/0.45 cnf(c_0_30, plain, (status(X1,X2,X3)|nota(X4,X3)|~status(X1,X2,X4)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])). 0.10/0.45 cnf(c_0_31, plain, (status(esk20_0,esk10_0,uns)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_21])). 0.10/0.45 cnf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, (~nota(uns,thm)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29])). 0.10/0.45 cnf(c_0_33, plain, (nota(uns,X1)|status(esk20_0,esk10_0,X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30, c_0_31])). 0.10/0.45 cnf(c_0_34, negated_conjecture, (status(esk20_0,esk10_0,thm)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32, c_0_33])). 0.10/0.45 cnf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_34]), c_0_21])]), c_0_14]), ['proof']). 0.10/0.45 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.10/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 33 0.10/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 21 0.10/0.45 % Initial clauses : 29 0.10/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.10/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 29 0.10/0.45 % Processed clauses : 101 0.10/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 2 0.10/0.45 % ...subsumed : 26 0.10/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 73 0.10/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.10/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.10/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0 0.10/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 7 0.10/0.45 % Generated clauses : 159 0.10/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 110 0.10/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.10/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.10/0.45 % Paramodulations : 153 0.10/0.45 % Factorizations : 6 0.10/0.45 % NegExts : 0 0.10/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 0 0.10/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0 0.10/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 56 0.10/0.45 % ...of those cached : 26 0.10/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.10/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0 0.10/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.10/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0 0.10/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.10/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.10/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.10/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.10/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.10/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.10/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.10/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.10/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 66 0.10/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 20 0.10/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.10/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 8 0.10/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 38 0.10/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 34 0.10/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 91 0.10/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.10/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 7 0.10/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 76 0.10/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 66 0.10/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 17 0.10/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 41 0.10/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.10/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 14 0.10/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 7 0.10/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0 0.10/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0 0.10/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3387 0.10/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 540 0.10/0.45 0.10/0.45 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.10/0.45 % User time : 0.009 s 0.10/0.45 % System time : 0.001 s 0.10/0.45 % Total time : 0.010 s 0.10/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages 0.10/0.45 0.10/0.45 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.10/0.45 % User time : 0.012 s 0.10/0.45 % System time : 0.006 s 0.10/0.45 % Total time : 0.017 s 0.10/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages 0.10/0.45 % E exiting 0.10/0.45 EOF